David Charter in Brussels
2 for 1 tickets to Singin' In The Rain, this coming Monday. Book now
Angela Merkel was accused yesterday of planning to smuggle key parts of the failed European constitution into a new slimmed-down treaty after a letter to EU leaders in which she suggested a series of presentational changes was leaked.
The German Chancellor listed 12 discussion points for a new treaty, including a new name for the proposed EU foreign minister, as well as the document itself, to make the idea more palatable to sceptical nations such as the British, Czechs and Dutch.
Tony Blair insisted in interviews yesterday that a new EU treaty would not require the referendum he first promised in 2004 because the revised version would not involve constitutional changes.
However, in her letter, seen by The Times, Mrs Merkel showed that she was determined to make only minimal changes to the EU Constitution rejected by French and Dutch voters in 2005.
She said: “Every effort will have to be made to restrict change to what is absolutely necessary to reach an overall agreement and to ensure ratification by all member states.”
She then posed a dozen key questions, including: “How do you assess the proposal made by some member states to use different terminology without changing the legal substance — for example with regard to the title of the treaty, the denomination of legal acts, and the union’s minister of foreign affairs.”
In the same way, she asks whether to “replace the full text of the Charter of Fundamental Rights by a short cross reference having the same legal value”. As proposed by Mr Blair, the replacement for the Constitution could be presented as a treaty that amends the Nice Treaty of 2001, she said, “with the necessary presentational changes resulting from the return to the classical method of treaty changes”.
Mrs Merkel will use the letter as the basis of one-to-one talks with key EU leaders over the next two weeks, including Mr Blair. She hopes to set out a plan for a new treaty at the EU summit in June.
It would be written by Christmas, leaving a year for the 27 EU nations to ratify it before the next European Parliament elections. Neil O’Brien, director of the eurosceptic Open Europe think-tank, said: “This leak shows that we are going to have the same proposals pushed through under a different name, with a few ‘presentational changes’. It is incredibly cynical but the voters are not stupid and will not be fooled.”
William Hague, the Shadow Foreign Secretary, said: “It is vital that any new treaty that transfers power from Britain to the EU should be subject to a referendum.”
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
Have you ever dreamed of owning your own racehorse or a beautiful painting?
Enjoy comfort, safety, space and great design. Plus enter our great competition
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
Do you have what it takes to be a Times photographer?
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
Find out to make the most of your money with our wealth management guides
Need help with your property? We have an entire how to guide - buying, selling, letting, moving, to help you
We are seeking entries for the inaugural Sunday Times Best Green Companies Awards
Enjoy some wonderful inspiring wildlife moments
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Overseas contacts and local business information

Direct from the farms
2007/07
£57,500
South East England
2007/07
£40,995
South East England
2006/06
£41,995
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
£40-55k+benefits+uncapped commission
Morgan Keating
South East
Up to £30,000
GLE
London
£
c£75,000 + executive benefits
Morgan Keating
London and South
Unpaid with travel expenses
Network Rail
Globrix, the property search engine
Visit Times Online Property for homes for sale or rent
Residential development site with planning permission
£1,500,000
Mortgages, bank accounts & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Dinarobin Hotel Golf & Spa 7 nights
From £1830 per person – saving £530.
Walking & multi-activity holidays in Cauterets. Stylish self-catering apartments.
From 350€ for 7 nights.
SAVE 25% on Sandals Luxury Resorts
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
So Merkel comes clean at last !!!!!!!
We must make our voices heard to continue with the promised referendum.
All Blair wants is to take over as EU President after it has been authorised.
Alan Robson, St Ives, Cambs
This is typical of how the other treaties were implemented. The Maastricht Treaty was rejected by the Danes. That should have killed it, but the Danes where "urged" to vote again and the Treaty was passed in the second ballot. The same happened with the Nice Treaty which was rejected by the Irish, who was then "forced" to vote a second time. (As they didn't vote "the right way" the first time...). Now the Constitution, which has been rejected by two countries, are going to be enforced anyway, irrespective of what the voters want. I just want the Britts to remember that an integral part of the constitution *demands* that the union has only one currency, the Euro. The Sweden and Denmark officially has rejected the Euro (they were the only two countries where a referendum about this currency was held) will not matter. If the constitution is implemented, it will demand that those countries, as well as the UK, scrap their currency and adopt to the Euro.
Lasse, Canberra, Australia
Anyone doubt that the EU is corrupt - read this and consider. Anyone now doubt their destination is the United States of Europe (USE - useless, for democracy).
The assurances from the political class, especially from the Conservative Party over the decades that (1) this was not intended, (2) we will reform the most unacceptable aspects (specifically CAP) and (3) we would take control of the beast, have been shown up for the pretence they always were.
Pity it took me and so many others until the Maastricht Treaty to realise what was afoot.
Andrew Smith, Epping, UK
I think the UK should now say stay or leave. The Dutch & Frenchdidn't reject Europe, they rejected a weaker EU. The EU needs to counter balance a growing Russian * Chinese menace since America can't do it alone.
Tom, Ceglie Messapica, Italia
Pascal-Pierre, you are welcome to your views, but you should remember that you are the one wishing to change the nature of the EU, not those who oppose the constitution. In those circumstances, wanting to issue ultimatums to others is a bit of a cheek.
antifrank, London, UK
What I believe is that the EU needs a real constitution...not a " slimmed" treaty to suit britain's anti-european feelings. I guess Europeans would be much better off if the Brits were out of the Union. Why not ask the Brits what they want...and eventually leave the Union if they fail to say "yes". The French and the Dutch didn't reject Europe...they rejected a treaty that was too lukewarm and not because they wanted to say NO to the EU.
Britain's stance has always been ambiguous....so it's high time for them to say if they want to be a part of it or ...leave it.
Pascal-Pierre, Dinan/france, European Union