David Charter in Brussels
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition
Angela Merkel was accused yesterday of planning to smuggle key parts of the failed European constitution into a new slimmed-down treaty after a letter to EU leaders in which she suggested a series of presentational changes was leaked.
The German Chancellor listed 12 discussion points for a new treaty, including a new name for the proposed EU foreign minister, as well as the document itself, to make the idea more palatable to sceptical nations such as the British, Czechs and Dutch.
Tony Blair insisted in interviews yesterday that a new EU treaty would not require the referendum he first promised in 2004 because the revised version would not involve constitutional changes.
However, in her letter, seen by The Times, Mrs Merkel showed that she was determined to make only minimal changes to the EU Constitution rejected by French and Dutch voters in 2005.
She said: “Every effort will have to be made to restrict change to what is absolutely necessary to reach an overall agreement and to ensure ratification by all member states.”
She then posed a dozen key questions, including: “How do you assess the proposal made by some member states to use different terminology without changing the legal substance — for example with regard to the title of the treaty, the denomination of legal acts, and the union’s minister of foreign affairs.”
In the same way, she asks whether to “replace the full text of the Charter of Fundamental Rights by a short cross reference having the same legal value”. As proposed by Mr Blair, the replacement for the Constitution could be presented as a treaty that amends the Nice Treaty of 2001, she said, “with the necessary presentational changes resulting from the return to the classical method of treaty changes”.
Mrs Merkel will use the letter as the basis of one-to-one talks with key EU leaders over the next two weeks, including Mr Blair. She hopes to set out a plan for a new treaty at the EU summit in June.
It would be written by Christmas, leaving a year for the 27 EU nations to ratify it before the next European Parliament elections. Neil O’Brien, director of the eurosceptic Open Europe think-tank, said: “This leak shows that we are going to have the same proposals pushed through under a different name, with a few ‘presentational changes’. It is incredibly cynical but the voters are not stupid and will not be fooled.”
William Hague, the Shadow Foreign Secretary, said: “It is vital that any new treaty that transfers power from Britain to the EU should be subject to a referendum.”
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the collective power of smart thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Flip MinoHD Camcorder
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
42,945
2008
71,450
Car Insurance
Not Specified
MI6
UK-based
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Save up to £1,000 per couple with Elite Vacations at the five-star Constance Lemuria Resort
and do the British Isles this Summer.
Save up to 60% with Oxford Hotels and Inns
Try our inspiring luxury holidays to the Indian Subcontinent and South East Asia.
Great offers available
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
So Merkel comes clean at last !!!!!!!
We must make our voices heard to continue with the promised referendum.
All Blair wants is to take over as EU President after it has been authorised.
Alan Robson, St Ives, Cambs
This is typical of how the other treaties were implemented. The Maastricht Treaty was rejected by the Danes. That should have killed it, but the Danes where "urged" to vote again and the Treaty was passed in the second ballot. The same happened with the Nice Treaty which was rejected by the Irish, who was then "forced" to vote a second time. (As they didn't vote "the right way" the first time...). Now the Constitution, which has been rejected by two countries, are going to be enforced anyway, irrespective of what the voters want. I just want the Britts to remember that an integral part of the constitution *demands* that the union has only one currency, the Euro. The Sweden and Denmark officially has rejected the Euro (they were the only two countries where a referendum about this currency was held) will not matter. If the constitution is implemented, it will demand that those countries, as well as the UK, scrap their currency and adopt to the Euro.
Lasse, Canberra, Australia
Anyone doubt that the EU is corrupt - read this and consider. Anyone now doubt their destination is the United States of Europe (USE - useless, for democracy).
The assurances from the political class, especially from the Conservative Party over the decades that (1) this was not intended, (2) we will reform the most unacceptable aspects (specifically CAP) and (3) we would take control of the beast, have been shown up for the pretence they always were.
Pity it took me and so many others until the Maastricht Treaty to realise what was afoot.
Andrew Smith, Epping, UK
I think the UK should now say stay or leave. The Dutch & Frenchdidn't reject Europe, they rejected a weaker EU. The EU needs to counter balance a growing Russian * Chinese menace since America can't do it alone.
Tom, Ceglie Messapica, Italia
Pascal-Pierre, you are welcome to your views, but you should remember that you are the one wishing to change the nature of the EU, not those who oppose the constitution. In those circumstances, wanting to issue ultimatums to others is a bit of a cheek.
antifrank, London, UK
What I believe is that the EU needs a real constitution...not a " slimmed" treaty to suit britain's anti-european feelings. I guess Europeans would be much better off if the Brits were out of the Union. Why not ask the Brits what they want...and eventually leave the Union if they fail to say "yes". The French and the Dutch didn't reject Europe...they rejected a treaty that was too lukewarm and not because they wanted to say NO to the EU.
Britain's stance has always been ambiguous....so it's high time for them to say if they want to be a part of it or ...leave it.
Pascal-Pierre, Dinan/france, European Union