Take a trip to New York and see the city from the air
The Times was the only British newspaper to speak to Vladimir Putin inside his country retreat. He told Bronwen Maddox that he is willing to aim missiles at Europe
On the return of a global arms race:
“It is obvious that if part of the strategic nuclear potential of the US is located in Europe and will be threatening us, we will have to respond."
”We cannot be responsible for our reciprocal steps because it is not us who are initiating an arms race in Europe.”
“This system of missile defence on one side and the absence of this system on the other . . . increases the possibility of unleashing a nuclear conflict.”
"Of course, we are returning to that time [when Russian missiles were aimed at Europe]."
On US suggestion that Iranian and North Korean missiles necessitated the defence system:
“There are no such missiles – Iran does not have missiles with the range”.
“[The defence system would be] installed for the protection from something that does not exist. Is it not sort of funny? It would be funny if it were not so sad.”
“[The US’s real motive is] to avoid further closeness of Russia and Europe”.
On Russian military activity:
“We will need to establish such systems which would be able to penetrate the [US] missile defence systems. . . What kind of means will be used to hit the targets that our military believe are potential threats – ballistic missiles, or cruise missiles, or some kind of new weapons system?"
“We have brought all our heavy weapons beyond the Urals and reduced our military forces by 300,000. But what do we have in return? We see that Eastern Europe is being filled with new equipment, two positions in Bulgaria and Romania, as well as radar in the Czech Republic, and missile systems in Poland. What is happening? Unilateral disarmament of Russia is happening.”
On the case of poisoned Russian dissident Alexander Litvinenko:
"[If heads of British law enforcement agencies] did not know that the constitution prohibits the extradition of Russian citizens to foreign states then their competence is questionable. . .[it is]. . .only a political, public relations step.”
“No matter from what angle we look at this problem, it’s all stupid, stupid nonsense.”
“I will not see any single positive component. It’s complete nonsense.”
On British Prime Ministers present and future:
He praised the “cordial reception” that Tony Blair had given him, and called Gordon Brown, “a high-class specialist”.
On being a democrat:
“I am not President of the Russian Federation to bring our country to the brink of catastrophe, on the contrary.”
“Of course, I am a pure and absolute democrat.”
“But you know what the problem is – not a problem, a real tragedy – that I am alone. There are no such pure democrats in the world. Since Mahatma Gandhi, there has been no one.”
On supplying energy to Eastern Europe:
“For 15 years we have been subsidising the former Soviet Republic with cheap energy. What is the logic?”
On civil liberties:
“Let us not be hypocritical on human rights and democratic freedoms.”
“Let us look what is happening in North America. It is horrible – torture, the homeless, Guantanamo, detention without normal court proceedings.”
“[In Europe] we can see violence against demonstrators, the use of gas to disperse rallies.”
“If people want to express disagreement, they should have that right. But they should not impede people going to work, normal urban life – then the Government must take measures to restore order.”
On the exploration licence which had been granted to Shell:
“Did you see the initial agreement? It was a colonial agreement that had nothing in the interests of the Russian Federation. A real zero.”
“If our partners [Shell] had honoured their commitments then we would have had no chance of remedying the situation but it was their fault that they violated our environmental legislation.”
On BP’s venture in Russia, which is awaiting £10 billion licence decision:
“They have not met their commitments. They knew about the possible difficulties and they decided to buy the licence anyway.”
On what he will do after stepping down as Russian President in March:
“I know that I will be working. But where, I cannot say.”
“I have not reached my retirement age and it would be silly to sit at home without doing anything.”
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


Overseas contacts and local business information

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests


£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
Live in One of London's Most Vibrant Areas
From £249,950
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
The real reason for missile defense is to prevent a retaliatory nuclear attack from Russia when US attacks it in about 12-15 years in order to get its oil and natural gas. I say this time frame because US will need time to rebuild its army from its Iraq fiasco. US is already demonizing Russia....using such lies as...Putin is oppressing democracy and free press...what a bunch of nonsense. Look at what US has done before in invaded Iraq....Saddam is evil, he is oppressing his own people, he has WMDs, he will attack US so US should attack him first. People should know what to expect from the most militaristic, aggressive and dangerous nation on the face of the earth (US of course).
Svetlana, New York, NY, US
Ha, Putin and Gandhi! Ha ha ha ha. God, I love him.
Bob, london,
Accordong to geographers Russia is a big country.
Jimbo Jones, Dublin , Ireland
America should legally be stopped from its further military expansion and EU should take full control over all decisions of military presence on its territory Russians are the only one who acts logically in this situation
Lawrence, London,
Iran and North Korea are in advanced negotiations for Tehrans purchase of Taepo-dong-2 ballistic missiles; whose estimate range is 3,500-4,000 km. Delivery was promised for late July or early August. According to http://www.debka.com/headline.php?hid=4275. Both the US and Russia are aware of this. Interestingly Putin did not deny that N. Korea had such missiles, only that Iran does not - at least not for a few more months.
Putin placing himself on the same moral level as Ghandi, now that is a most extreme example of the practice of moral equivalence!
Lloyd Klein, Ottawa, Canada
[The USs real motive is] to avoid further closeness of Russia and Europe.
We're keeping Europe from being closer to you, so you're aiming a gun at Europe's head? This is starting to sound like a bad soap opera. . .
Michael, Pueblo, CO. USA
USA should not be allowed by EU to install weapons near Russian borders. Putin is right when he said this is unfair. Poland and Czech have no right to decide themselves possible threat aimed to all Europe. Or else, they should leave EU, and become part of the United States...
USA should install their "facilities" outside Europe. Saudi Arabia, or Turkey for example. The security of USA is no reason to damage better relationship between EU and Russia. The best way to develop and increase democracy in Former Soviet Union won't be achieved by rockets or nukes, but by trade and economic ties.
Maxim, Marseille, France
This redeployment of US American troops and missile systems into Eastern Europe cannot by any stretch of the imagination be interpreted as a friendly peaceful act. No wonder the Russians are becoming nervous. I really cannot see how American army bases in Romania are going to discourage rougue states such as Iran or North Korea.
This act is a political provocation and will damage Russo-European Union relations. I cannot understand anyway why American troops must be stationed in Europe at all. It has been tolerated for so long because the Americans keep footing the bill and the Europeans can invest more money in other things such as infrastructure and business development.
O'Looney, Bucharest,
Those sunglasses are to die for.
Keith Murray, Brighton, Great Britain