Philip Webster and David Charter in Heiligendamm
We've made some changes
to The Sunday Times

World leaders last night hailed a groundbreaking deal paving the way for a “substantial” reduction in greenhouse gas emissions with a view to halving them by 2050. The compromise agreement fell short of the original aims of Angela Merkel, the German Chancellor, but was more ambitious than many expected.
It was clinched after President Bush was persuaded that his own plan for a climate change conference in the autumn would be part of efforts to reach a global agreement through the UN. Against expectations, he also allowed the 50 per cent target shared by most leading industrial countries to appear in the final G8 communiqué. Some saw Mr Bush’s shift as a parting gift to Tony Blair after their last one-to-one meeting.
Mrs Merkel and Mr Blair called the agreement a “huge success”, emphasising that America was now at the heart of the attempts to reach a worldwide deal to succeed the Kyoto Protocol in 2012. Some campaigners welcomed the compromise as an important advance; others said it was weak and did not go far enough because they omitted the target of limiting temperature increases to 2C (3.6F).
At the summit on the Baltic coast, Mrs Merkel said she was “very, very satisfied” with the pact but acknowledged that the accord was a compromise that fell short of her hopes for a binding deal. “Many countries moved on this issue,” she said. “The very best we could achieve has been achieved.”
The UN called the deal a step towards a broader, worldwide pact by 2009. But Greenpeace said the deal was clearly not enough to prevent dangerous climate change. Mr Bush is still not committed to achieving the 50 per cent cut in emissions on 1990 levels but has agreed to give it “serious consideration”.
A British official said: “There is no reference to any other proposal in the deal, so 50 per cent must be the starting point of the discussion in the autumn.”
The US insisted that its agreement was dependent on China and India, two other major polluters, also signing up to progress in the UN process.
Mr Blair was asked by Mrs Merkel to put the draft agreement to Mr Bush at their breakfast meeting yesterday and he went along with most of it. Officials saw that as clear evidence that Mr Blair’s often criticised close relationship with Mr Bush has yielded positive results. He declared that the deal would have been been unimaginable just a few years ago.
Leaders of the G8 nations agreed that greenhouse gas emissions should stop rising “followed by substantial global emissions reductions”. In setting a global goal they would “consider seriously” the decisions made by EU countries, Canada and Japan to halve emissions by 2050.
Mr Blair said it had been accepted “that we need a new worldwide agreement on climate change” and that at the heart of that should be a substantial reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. He emphasised: “There isn’t going to be an agreement until it’s got America and China in it. There’s now a process to achieve that agreement.”
Asked if he was disappointed that there was no specific commitment to halving emissions, only serious consideration given to that goal, Mr Blair replied: “What does substantial mean? . . . What you have got is a sense that a substantial cut in emissions is of the order of a halving of emissions.”
How the new breed of location based mobile services can find your nearest cashpoint, restaurant or wi-fi hotspot
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
See the best entries in this year's competition
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Overseas contacts and local business information


A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests


2006
£189,500
NW England
2008/08
£169,950
NW England
2007/57
£35,000
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
Circa £82,000 per annum
Birmingham Women's Hospital
Birmingham
To £28k
Barclaycard
Northampton/Liverpool/Teeside
£
Up to £66,000 per annum
Hertfordshire County Council
South East
To £38k
Barclaycard
Northampton/Liverpool
2 Bathrooms, Balcony and Garden
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Dining, Shopping & Riverside Pk
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I suppose that when it is proved beyond doubt that the World heats up and then cools down of its own accord, the wise World leaders will give us all the money back they have taken in 'stealthy green' taxes, like the excessive surcharges on airline flights and will apologise to Africans (again) for maintaining their grip on poverty.
Ian Turner, Aberdeen, UK
It certainly seems like progress, and I fail to see the point of raising global terrorisism, it's a totally separate issue. Unfortunately, all explosive conflicts create lots of nasty gases, but to trying to keep us all fed, watered and homed, also informed, employed and leisured/exercised/entertained, is one huge task.
Gov. can't hope to provide it all, and to try and and seccond guess the effects of what Abraham Derby and others, started 200 years ago, is very tricky.
There's so little over which we have control, and climate has NEVER been one them, but, having just become really aware of the evidence and subsequent problems, we, and our politiical leaders, seem to be trying.
Could you actually do any beeter, cynics? And do you have the experience?
Would we vote for you?
Guy Hudspith, Gosport, England
Mr.Bush,I was wondering what you've done to the innocent Iraqi people?The Iraqi War was compeletely a massacre.Every child has parents.Every parent has babies..Why did you kill them?I believe you will be going mad if someone hurts your children...
Love makes the world go around......
jacky, Cape town,
This is simply a spin exercise... when the global temperature begins to go down through naural causes (the Sun) the world leaders can lay claim to saving the planet. If only Maggie hadn't hated the miners so... Oh, and they can prevent China from dominating the world economy, and Africa from developing beyond mud huts. They must all be very proud.
DannyJ, Midlands,
We'll believe it when we see the results.
If Blair's involved in any way we don't believe anything even if its in writing - remeber his Iraq ''dossier''.
K Urban, London, UK, Blair jetting round the world -trying to save CO2!
One may wonder it was whether the presence of clowns (or rather demonstrators dressed as such) which subconsciously focussed minds on the imperative of an appearance of an agreement at this important summit.
If so, it could be a resounding victory for the notion of persuasion by metaphor, and, perhaps, an interesting (if somewhat cynical) evolution of the body politic.
dr venables preller, Warminster, UK
The climate deal is a good start, but if it turns out that scientiic predictions of a temperature increase of 3-4 degrees by 2050 with a commensurate criticial water shortage to two billion people, the deal will need to be seriously reworked within a few years. People need to realize that using clean energy is going to save our planet but will also save every family several thousand pounds per year. Industry may be holding back but the public has no reason to.
Emma H., Orillia, CAN
The G8 goal of cutting GHG emissions 50% by 2050 means the US would have to cut 80% from today's level. That is obviously unrealistic, and could be too little too late anyway.
Instead, I suggest removing the CO2 from the air after it has been emitted. Nature removes about half of mankind's CO2 emissions, but that is expected to reduce 30% by 2030. I suggest improving nature's ability to remove CO2 with genetic engineering-perhaps seeding a GMO into the oceans.
Biosequestration is a low cost, highly scalable, and technically feasible solution to global warming. Cutting GHG emissions is an expensive and weak mitigation strategy.
-A warming earth means that soon carbon sinks will become carbon emitters big-time, completely erasing any cuts mankind makes to their GHG emissions (for instance, melting methane hydrate).
-Technology to capture and sequester carbon from coal emissions is decades away from widespread use, and will be very expensive to build and run.
Brad Arnold, St Louis Park, USA/MN