Catherine Philp
Win VIP tickets

The explorers who planted the Russian flag beneath the North Pole were given a heroes’ welcome yesterday in defiance of the international condemnation of Moscow’s territorial claims.
Russia released the first pictures of the moment the tricolour was placed on the Arctic shelf at a depth of more than two and a half miles in a mission intended to advance the country’s claims over the region’s vast untapped mineral resources. It announced on Thursday that two of its submarines had successfully reached the bottom of the Arctic Ocean under the pole. But the symbolic planting of a rust-proof titanium Russian flag drew scornful responses from Western nations with Arctic ambitions.
“I’m not sure whether they’ve put a metal flag, a rubber flag or a bed sheet on the ocean floor,” Tom Casey, spokesman for the US State Department, said, affecting uncharacteristic jollity. “Either way, it doesn’t have any legal standing or effect on this claim.”
Earlier, Peter Mackay, the Canadian Foreign Minister, had remarked on television: “Look this isn’t the 15th century. You can’t go around the world and plant flags and say, ‘We’re claiming this’.” Canada and the US are among four other Arctic nations, including Denmark and Norway, that challenge Russia’s claim to the seabed, thought to contain a quarter of the world’s remaining oil reserves.
The Russians launched the mission to produce scientific evidence to advance their claims but the symbolic planting of the flag, intending to mark the territory as theirs, proved a step too far. Sergei Lavrorv, the Russian Foreign Minister, pronounced himself “amazed” at the international reaction, saying: “We’re not throwing flags around. We know what we can prove.”
Russia’s claim to more than one million square kilometres of Artic seabed was turned down in 2001 for lack of evidence to prove that the Lomonosov Ridge, an underwater shelf that runs through the Artic, was an extension of Russia’s own continental shelf. The submarine mission was sent to collect samples from the seabed to make a sound geological case for that claim.
Under the UN Law of the Sea treaty, a country’s claim to the mineral resources of the seabed may extend up to 200 miles beyond the end of its continental shelf, giving Russia, Canada, the US, Norway and Denmark a share each.
Russia’s claim, however, is based on the entire Arctic seabed being part of its own continental shelf. The US, meanwhile, notes that it is not a signatory to the treaty, while experts point to the small print of the document, which prevents a country with a vast underwater shelf from keeping the resources to itself, forcing it to share the revenues with developing nations.
Russia’s media stoically ignored the mockery, applauding the expedition as the first salvo in what one newspaper referred to as “the battle for Arctic oil”. The government daily Rossiiskaya Gazeta went further, hailing the hoped-for rezoning of the Arctic as “the start of a new distribution of the world”. Washington, however, remained unconvinced. Mr Casey told reporters: “I don’t think whether they went and spray-painted a flag of Russia on those particular ridges is going to make one iota of difference.”

Russia looks to Mediterranean
The head of the Russian Navy says that it should restore a permanent presence in the Mediterranean Sea. “The Mediterranean is a strategically important zone for Russia’s Black Sea Fleet”, Admiral Vladimir Masorin said while visiting its base in the Ukrainian city of Sevastopol. (AP)
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£23,093 - £56,211
The Office for National Statistics
Newport, South Wales
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Hmmm, let's see here. Putin's team makes a peaceful expedition to the artic sea floor just off their shores and claims (yet unproven) mineral resources for themselves - and the Powers That Be (PTB) raise holy hell.
Meanwhile Bush's team "makes war in the name of peace", kills hundreds of thousands of (otherwise) innocent by-standers, causes untold environmental and genetic damage (which will carry on for hundreds of years), sacks the very leaders of the puppet regime his daddy's team recruited and trained - and the PTB calmly applaud.
Orwell must be grinning in his grave.
Larry, Middletown, USA/NY
If America had any real balls it would show true courage by leading a national initiative to rid ourselves of the need for foreign oil. Iraq would not be necessary nor would any hypothetical World War III.
It is pretty laughable for my own country to talk about the absurd when our past seven years of unilateral behavior have produced nothing but the absurd in the Middle East. Rule of law? With our current administration? That is a pretty sad joke.
Bigwell Swift, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Will Russian tollbooths one day stud the Northeast Passage?
A. Schelberg, Germany,
OK-so first of all, I have to point out that nobody in Russia claimed that the flag in and of itself constitutes a valid claim to possession. Peter from LA- you are mistaken about Russia's lack of a legal claim- countries CAN claim certain exclusive rights (resource extraction from the sea bed, but not fishing, which remains open to all ) beyond the 200-mile EEZ, provided they can prove that the ocean bed beyond the EEZ is the same as ther continental shelf. That is what this expedition was for.
Simeon, Milan,
To Scott, Durham, NC, USA
"Old "Squirrel Head" Putin": Please don't get me started on your monkey-face, total-looser president Bush. At least Russia and Putin have enough brains to use UN to justify the claim in the Arctic. US did not even ratify the UN Naval treaty and always treats UN with utter contempt. So your Arctic boat has sailed without you and all you can is go around and questioning Putin's intellect. Well buddy, start with your "red-neck" Bush first!
Oleg, Toronto, Canada
To Scott, Durham, NC, USA
It's OK to express your views, whether friendly or hostile, but it's arrogant and impolite to call Putin 'names', just as it would be in relation to any other president including Yours. Are you sure you can distinguish between logic and your personal attitude? To me, the weaker the arguments, the stronger the words. This is very true.
Daniel, Moscow, Russia
phixod, delft, Netherlands said:
"Makr your headlines right....its not the world which condemned but only countries around the Artic did. Max to max, the western world will condemn but thats not all world"
Yeah, but it's pretty much most of it.
Doug, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
The North Pole has always been Danish.
Carsten, Odense, Denmark
Now Putin is just sounding plain silly. Certainly this is not a claim anyone is going to recognize, but the possibiliby that Russia may try to defend it militarily has serious implications and consequences.
Old "Squirrel Head" Putin wants to return Russia to the glorious days of the cold war where a sortie of Backfire bombers and movements of the Soviet naval fleet caused the West to sit up and take notice. It hardly happens anymore.
Putin obviously recognized the weakness of the former Soviet Union was economic and that it had cost them the Cold War. I guess he's adamant that the next war will not be lost by a lack of cash and reliance upon a pitiful economic system. Capitalism and oil will guarantee a level playing field while an authoritarian government will replace the communist model. This then is a much improved FSU, and it sounds more like an emergence from bankruptcy as a stronger entity, not a capitulation. We had better get hold of the rest of their nuclear material!
Scott, Durham, NC, USA
Over the past several days the Russian Arctic expedition has been covered extensively by every major news agency and newspaper in the world. The Times alone published at least half-a-dozen articles on the subject. So these lame attempts on the part of the US and Canadian officials to ridicule Russia just confirm that they are unprepared and nervous. What makes them nervous is not that Russia made a territorial claim, but the fact that Russia can back its claim up using not just science but, once again, its military power. And it all boils down not to science or UN diplomacy, but to subs, planes, and missiles. Not quite back at the Soviet level yet, but Russia has plenty of those.
Veniamin Nikolayev, Philadelphia, US
Scientific research in Arctic Russia is going to prove it's claims, fully corresponds to international law, and pretty much following legal process required by a designated committee of United Nations starting from 2003.
The flag marked place on Earth human never reached before.
What United States and it's colonial allies done is Iraq is a crime against humanity, an act of aggression and colonial fascism. Russia is calling every side to obey an international law and whatever UN will decide we will live up to, and probably it is irrelevant at that point to what is said on congressional hearings in Washington.
I think it will be more productive if Western Countries and Russia join efforts to create energy-effective electrical vehicles, safe nuclear energy plants and we stop destroying our planet by digging and burning oil, finally.
Dmitry Mironov, Moscow,
As for Peter from the USA of course he would not object if it was US company trying to do the same. I think western strategy to controle everything on the Earth is the straight road to the third World War. I think all the events proove that the World is going there. And there will be nobody whom we can tell the tales about democracy and rule of law.
Temuujin, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
Makr your headlines right....its not the world which condemned but only countries around the Artic did. Max to max, the western world will condemn but thats not all world
phixod, delft, Netherlands
Russia already owns the largest continental shelf in the world within it's 200 mille EEZ. This area is full of oil and gas and virtually unexplored. Thus Russia has no moral or legal right to claim any more area for itself. Its just being absurdly greedy and trying to lock up the world's resoures for extortion purposes. The Arctic Abyssal area beyond 200 nm is nothing to do with Russia's continental shelf whatsoever. the ridges in the abyssal are remnants of spreading volcanic seafloor ridges and distinct geological features, not continental shelfs. The oil and gas of the arctic was claimed over a year ago by United Oil and Gas Consortium Management Corp., a Nevada company. See www.unoilgas.com . This company's claim is the sole cause for all the massive activity in the arctic today. The largest oil and gas sedimentary basin is safely beyond the reach of any spurious Russian claim anyway, so the last laugh will be on them.
Peter Sterling, Los Angeles, California USA