Francis Elliott and David Charter in Lisbon
Win Sky+HD for a year and a trip to Barcelona
Gordon Brown has set aside up to three months to ratify the new EU reform treaty after it was agreed by European leaders last night, raising the spectre of the tumultuous parliamentary battles over Maastricht 15 years ago.
The Prime Minister briefed his Cabinet colleagues on Tuesday to expect another protracted tussle on the latest treaty, starting in the new year and continuing well into the spring, The Times has learnt.
He told them that months of detailed examination will dampen Eurosceptics’ opposition while demonstrating that the document is too complex to be decided by referendum.
Ministers also hope to revive voters’ memories of a divided and weak Conservative Party under John Major, obsessed with every detail of the European Union. The 14-month debate over the Treaty of Maastricht, which transferred some powers from Westminster to Brussels, split the Tories.
The reform treaty was agreed by leaders of the 27 EU nations after talks that stretched through their summit dinner.
Mr Brown confounded those expecting a reprise of his previous role as a reluctant European when he arrived in Lisbon yesterday for his first EU summit as Prime Minister. Instead he urged recalcitrant leaders to accept the final version of the EU reform treaty.
Mr Brown scheduled face-to-face meetings in the margins of the summit with both Romano Prodi, his Italian counterpart, and Lech Kaczynski, the Polish President. They were seen as the two biggest stumbling blocks to agreement, with the Italians demanding extra MEPs and the Poles’ insisting on greater voting powers for medium-sized countries. Officials last night confirmed a deal to resolve their concerns.
In his first meeting with Mr Prodi since entering No 10, Mr Brown urged the Italian leader to agree the treaty so that the process of ratification could begin. The Prime Minister also joined in the armtwisting of the Polish President, who threatened as he arrived in the Portuguese capital to delay the treaty if he did not get what he wanted.
Last night, after agreement was reached, Mr Brown insisted the British national interest had been protected. “It is now time for Europe to move on and devote all our attentions to the issues that matter to the people of Europe — economic growth, jobs, climate change and security,” he said.
Speaking before the start of formal talks on the document, Mr Brown effectively destroyed any remaining hopes that it could be put to a referendum, insisting that it did not represent “fundamental change”.
“Let’s now have the debate in the country,” he said. “That will be reflected in a very substantial number of days in the Houses of Parliament and people can judge for themselves whether the British national interest has been protected.”
Although Geoff Hoon, the Chief Whip, has yet to finalise the number of days allocated in the House of Commons, Labour MPs were told this week to expect significantly more than 20. It is understood that legislation will be introduced after Christmas and a target of late March has been set for completing the passage of the Bill ratifying the treaty.
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2006
£14,337
2008
£39,937
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
£
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
1 & 2 Bed apartments
From £249,995
Great Investment, River Views
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
low-cost ownership homes in London
Las Vegas SALE!
£POA
With Ramblers Worldwide Holidays!
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
it looks like you folks in europe have the same trouble with polititians that we do in the US. I would like to press the "POOF" button and get rid of "ALL" of them including the UN and elect all new representatives "Of the people, by the people and for the people". It is time to start over.
Harold Thompson, Owatonna, Mn 55060,
We badly need a referendum on this treaty. The promise was made on the constitution and this treaty is 90% or more the same. It is time we had a referendum on the whole issue of Britain and the EU.
Jeremy Andrews
Dorset
Jeremy Andrews, Wimborne, Dorset
Why have a referendum? When looking at the debat people would have ended up voting For or AGAINST the EU, and not the reform itself. Just like what happened in France and the Netherlands when they voted over the Constitutional Treaty.
Additionally, this reform does not affect the UK to such an extent like for instance the Maasricht treaty did. Instead, it is meant to make the EU system more suited for the new situation it is in; being almost twice as many member states as they were just a couple of years ago. One is only trying to improve a system which was created for 12 to be better suited for the 27 members they are now.
Why so much opposition against improvement?
Benedicte, London,
By all accounts, the EU Reform Treaty is a "cut down" version of the constitution, containing a varying percentage of the constitution depending on who you believe.
If the governments argument against holding a referendum is that the EU Reform Treaty is too complicated for the public to understand, why did they say that they would hold a referendum on the constitution. If the constitution contained everything in the EU Reform Treaty and more, surely it would have been even more difficult to understand.
I believe that governments across Europe should start consulting their electorates before ratifying these treaties. Polls have shown that this is what the people want, it's about time that the politicians started listening.
Martin, Winchester, Hampshire
Just because you hope your Parliamentary colleagues will get bored with discussing the detail, Brown, don't even think that the electorate will. We shall get that referendum that was promised, with or without your presence in the Prime Minister's post.
Roz Venner, St Neots, England
Mr. Brown's refusal of a referendum reinforces the view that politicians are creatures of expediency. They make promises but when carrying out those promises becomes incovenient they swiftly find reasons to backtrack.
A. Bravey, Coleshill, Warks.,
The Irish now have the weight of all the people of Europe on their shoulders, only they can speak for us now...
Adrian, Aldershot, England
The fact that the maastricht treaty should never have been ratified without a referendum, is not a mitigating factor in Browns favour, indeed quite it's quite the opposite, beign in the EEC was one a choice made by the people, but being annexed by the EU-state was not, Lady Thatcher hoodwinked the nation, we are NOT letting Brown do the same.
By ignoring the electorate, Brown is signing his own, and NuLabours political death warrant along with the treaty, his arrogance in the face of the obvious wishes of the public for a referendum, will not as he hopes be forgotten come the next election.
Les, Southport, England.
As well as being a tool of demagogues and dictators the referendum is also the bete noir of patronizing and matronly leaders like Margaret Thatcher. Last time I looked, Switzerland and Ireland whose constitutions mandate referendums, were not hot beds of dictatorship or demagoguery. A referendum causes work for politicians to get out there and sell their case. Like all overpaid and lazy people, representatives who'd prefer a cosy debate and a one off vote in the House to a marathon on the hustings will eschew referendums. Like all rational, hard working people who recognize the flaws in representative democracy, pro referendum MPs acknowledge that they are necessary because voters don't trust them to faithfully represent their wishes once they get into the Westminster club.
Pitt the very much older, Hong Kong,
You say that the Government will claim that the Reform Treaty is too complex to be put to a referendum and that it does not represent fundamental change and therefore does not need a referendum for ratification.
The former is just illogical since it simply is not more complex that the Constitution for which a referendumm was promised.
The latter may be a matter of opinion, but the Government will have to show that the changes included are significantly less fundamental than those contained in the constitution. Mere assertion will not do.
Stephen Bull, fontes, france
Quote from above; "the document is too complex to be decided by referendum." What an arrogant comment and how dismissive of the people of this country. Brown obviously feels that we are not any more capable of making a choice on the referendum than we are on voting in a General Election! Will he ever have the courage of exposing his policies to the judgement of the people he purports to represent?
Mike S, Nottingham,
Whilst Brown desperately scratches around for his legacy England burns
Jonathan, Auckland, New Zealand
To:Francis Elliott and David Charter in Lisbon
'"Gordon Brown has set aside up to three months to ratify the new EU reform treaty, raising the spectre of the tumultuous parliamentary battles over Maastricht 15 years ago."
there was only one battle at Maastricht and that was 20 Years ago;remember the legendary and famous speach of Lady Baroness Margaret Thatcher!
e_widiner, Shanghai , China
By the time Mr Brown realises his mistake he will no longer be in power but future governments will be restricted. The reality here is that we do not live in a democracy we are rules by less than 1% of the political class who believe we are not intelligent enough to formulate a correct decision. We constantly hear that non democratic regimes around the world are evil and need to change but as far as I can tell there is no difference between China and the UK, both are controlled by a minority irrespective of the wishes of the majority but at least in China it is honest and clear where in the UK it is done by stealth, spin and dishonesty.
With this constitution (independent analysis agrees the treaty is identical) we will lose even more say.
Before we slide any further please restore Britain to a true democratic country.
Joe, Edinburgh, Scotland
Then Parliament must do its duty and reject the consti-treaty.
One cannot imagine the British people swallowing this.
Brown is finished if he doesn't call a referendum.
Jim, Milwaukee, USA
I don't think it will be possible for Brown to recover from this in the minds of the British people. His anti-democratic desires are being laid bare for the world to see.
Graham, Manchester, UK