Charles Bremner in Paris
We've made some changes
to The Sunday Times
French anti-terrorist police are hunting a “guerrilla” organisation that is blowing up speed cameras and demanding a ransom from the State.
Police are taking seriously claims from the Nationalist Revolutionary Army Faction (FNAR) that it is responsible for the destruction of six radar installations on roads in the Paris region over the past six months.
The latest attempted attack was on Tuesday on a motorway close to the village of Baillet-en-France, 20 miles north of the capital. The device, consisting of a bundle of explosive and a timer, did not detonate. It was spotted by a road maintenance team and defused after police closed the motorway for five hours.
The FNAR, which also calls itself the National Anti-Radar Front, is reported to be demanding a significant sum of money to halt the attacks, as well as tax cuts and less rigorous enforcement of the law on the roads.
The group sent its demands to the Interior Ministry in October. Worded in the grandiose jargon of 1970s revolutionary groups, it complained about the oppression of “the owner State which robs its citizens”. The police said they did not know if they were dealing with one person or a group, “but either way, this is dangerous stuff”.
Dozens of France’s 1,100 roadside speed cameras have been destroyed or vandalised since they were introduced in 2003 – later than in most neighbouring countries. The devices have contributed to a sharp drop in road deaths, but many drivers still consider their presence “unFrench” and a breach of their civil rights.
Many believe they were created to fill the state coffers with tens of millions of euros in fines a year. Many motorists rejoiced last month when officials reported that speed readings could be exaggerated if the cameras in the steel-encased units were slightly misaligned with the road. The Government said that the report was wrong.
Road safety campaigners deplored the violent attacks on the cameras, which were installed after the former President, Jacques Chirac, decided to get tough on France’s high death toll on the roads. “The speed cameras are more than symbolic,” said Chantal Perrichon, president of the League Against Highway Violence. “Thanks to them, we have saved so many lives.”
Police said that the attacks, which were carried out with primitive homemade explosives connected to a timer and which appear to be linked, represented a threat to passing drivers.
The gang is being compared to a mysterious group that planted bombs on railway tracks in 2003 and demanded a €10 million (£7.2 million) ransom. The authorities made two unsuccessful attempts to pay the ransom, including a delivery by a helicopter that failed to find a rendezvous point designated by the group.
The organisation was never traced and disappeared after announcing in 2004 that it was temporarily suspending its campaign while it improved its methods. Police said that the railway group appeared to be more professional than the speed camera saboteurs, but did not rule out a possible link between the campaigns.
President Sarkozy, who was the Interior Minister at the time of the railway campaign, has ordered police to crack down hard on the vandalism of speed cameras, which each cost thousands of euros to install. Attacks on them are not amusing and are an afront to the authority of the state, he said.
Speed cameras per 1,000 sq km
Ireland 0.3
Germany 0.7
France 2
Italy 7.2
Switzerland 16.1
UK 20.9
Netherlands 37.3
Source: European Speed Camera Database
How the new breed of location based mobile services can find your nearest cashpoint, restaurant or wi-fi hotspot
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
See the best entries in this year's competition
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Overseas contacts and local business information


A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests


2006
£189,500
NW England
2008/08
£169,950
NW England
2007/57
£35,000
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
Circa £82,000 per annum
Birmingham Women's Hospital
Birmingham
To £28k
Barclaycard
Various (outside London)
£
Up to £66,000 per annum
Hertfordshire County Council
South East
To £38k
Barclaycard
Northampton/Liverpool
2 Bathrooms, Balcony and Garden
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Dining, Shopping & Riverside Pk
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
The cause of accidents is not bad road design but bad driving. It is time people started taking responsibility for their actions. That said speed camera are just a means of collecting money
Heather, Derbys, England
Speed cameras placed at known accident blackspots are a good thing (even where the root cause of the accidents is bad road engineering).
Cameras placed anywhere else are simply a source of tax revenue.
P Miles, Stevenage, UK
As an American that has lived at leasts 1/3 of my life in Europe (with 3 years in France, 10 in UK), I have sampled "traffic enforcement" as it exists there. No thank you. I like our way better.
Sure, we Yanks must deal with cops hiding in bushes with laser and radar guns, but at least when you are "done," it is direct and you face your accuser -- you may get off with a warning. That said, I DO like and approve of your stop light cameras, they are unquestionably sensible and I wish we had them.
In Europe, people brake like madmen from much higher speeds, then speed up immediately the Gatso has been passed. Here, there is always the nagging fear that the local yahoo or "Statie" (for State Police) is around the next bend. Net, you drive slower.
If enforcement is/was the primary reason, then it is better addressed by live cops -- who can easily pull in enough fines to fund their miserable existence. But your European way is a tax, pure and simple.
Brett, Boston, USA
The idiots perpetrating this vandalism fail to grasp that their actions will bring yet more stringency on everyone. Next, there will be cameras monitoring the cameras. It is a fact of life that idiotic behaviour brings a societal response. Were it not for idiots who speed we wouldn't have speed cameras in the first place. They have brought on themselves the very things they claim to hate, and they are too stupid to realise it.
David Bond, Wellington, New Zealand
I guess that smiling whilst reading this would count as 'incitement to terrorism' in the UK.
Mike Hart, London, UK
Why give the statistics in terms of cameras per 1,000 sq km since roads are linear constructs? Cameras per 1,000 km makes more sense.
Bill Q, Derby,