David Charter, Europe Correspondent of The Times
We've made some changes
to The Sunday Times
Controversial plans to make it much easier for NHS patients to demand free treatment in any EU country were shelved this morning amid a behind-the-scenes row over exactly how an open market in public healthcare should work.
The European Commission wants to enable any patient with a doctor's referral to be able to claim treatment in any of the 27 member states, paid for by the patient's home country.
A spokesman said that the proposed directive in cross-border healthcare was delayed because it coincided with another big decision due to be taken today on proposed CO2 limits for car manufacturers. But key details of the "health tourism" plan are still under fierce debate, The Times understands.
At present, rulings from the European Court of Justice allow NHS patients to demand swift treatment or scans abroad providing they are suffering "undue delays" on waiting lists.
One of the arguments is whether a patient needs to be on a long waiting list in order to qualify for treatment abroad, or whether they can simply demand overseas treatment straight away, in direct competition with the NHS. Ministers are concerned that this will lead to an uncontrollable loss of NHS funds abroad but supporters say it is just the kind of compertition the NHS needs to bring about improvements.
Last year, Britain reclaimed £38 million from other EU member states for treatment provided to their residents in this country, but paid out £526 million to other member states for treatment provided abroad.
Another point of contention is whether the patient needs prior authorisation from the NHS funding body, usually an NHS primary care trust, to travel in the first place. The draft proposals, seen by The Times, said that prior authorisation would not be needed for any out-patient treatment, meaning that patients could travel automatically, with a guarantee of reimbursement of all treatment costs.
But in-patient hospital care could be subject to prior approval if a member state made a clear case that a particular service would be undermined by too many patients travelling abroad automatically.
A third point of contention is whether patients could "top up" the NHS cost of their treatment in order to use NHS money as part payment for expensive private care abroad.
The directive is now due to be unveiled in January. But it will take more than a year to thrash out the final details because it has to be discussed by the European Parliament and then by ministers from every country in the EU Council.
The Government has vowed to fight to keep financial control - the right to approve the travel in advance - over all inpatient cases. Dawn Primarolo, the Health Minister, said that the Government would support proposals that did not undermine the principles of the NHS.
She added: "What we cannot allow and will not allow is that a few very wealthy patients choose to go elsewhere and then give the NHS the bill."
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
See the best entries in this year's competition
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Overseas contacts and local business information

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests


2002/02
£59,995
The Midlands
2008/08
£169,950
Scotland
2007/57
£35,000
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
Circa £82,000 per annum
Birmingham Women's Hospital
Birmingham
To £28k
Barclaycard
Various (outside London)
£
Up to £66,000 per annum
Hertfordshire County Council
South East
To £38k
Barclaycard
Northampton/Liverpool
2 Bathrooms, Balcony and Garden
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Apts From £249,950
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
If you've paid your national insurance contributions then there is no good reason that I can see that you shouldn't be able to top up your care, either in the UK or abroad.
To ignore that fact flies in the face of the reality that some people have more money than others. We don't live in a perfect world.
There are some important home truths about this whole debate:
Top ups are another source of much needed additional revenue for the trusts - that's good as it reduces the tax burden on the rest of us.
It does not mean that those without funding won't great treated.
Healthcare provision, like it or not, is about cost not people. We either pay for it, or it doesn't happen. There IS a line in the sand where a treatment, no matter how good it is, is not affordable for all because our society can't afford it. Get used to it - we will all die eventually.
If the wealthy travel abroard to get this care they should be able to *partially* bill the NHS. It's not a holiday.
Steve, Cheltenham,
Dawn Primarolo and all other MPs , Ministers and their families are of course not expected to wait for treatment on the NHS, They get fast tracked and I doubt if they have trouble getting the drugs that N.I.C.E. ( a misnomer if ever there was one) have denied the rest of the country. Its all very well talking about the principles of the NHS but when it comes down to it we are being short changed, whilst our lords and masters yet again rush to the front of the queue.
FEF, Cheltenham, UK
I live in France (one of the most bureaucratic nations) yet the standard of health care is excellent - why? because the money paid into the health budget is spent on patient care and hospital facilities. In UK the money is paid to fat cat administrators or even worse highly overpaid consultants (both medical and business) This is why people go abroad for care. This stupid woman Health Minister states that "we cannot and will not allow that a few wealthy patieints choose to go elsewhere and give NHS the bill" She would rather they went private in the UK so the UK private health sector made all the profit. The private cost of a replacement hip operation in France is 50% of one in UK and the waiting time is only a few weeks compared to several months. I cannot believe that there are more people in UK with hip problems than anywhere else? Perhaps the UK should stop catering for 'holiday patients' who visit family members in the UK for the express purpose of using the NHS.
George, Glasgow, UK
Perhaps if the NHS offered proper healthcare to UK patients this would not be an issue at all.
James, Madrid, Spain
"Dawn Primarolo, the Health Minister, said that the Government would support proposals that did not undermine the principles of the NHS. She added: "What we cannot allow and will not allow is that a few very wealthy patients choose to go elsewhere and then give the NHS the bill." That attitude and comment, from Dawn Primarolo, speaks volumes and is a clear indication of the contempt with which politicians treat the people of this country whilst failing to provide the first-class health service that the tax-payers of this country pay for.
Kenneth Armitage, Suffolk, England
fix the NHS and no body will need to go abroad
saud, riyadh,
UK healthcare is more expensive and far less efficient than most European countries. Look at the recent report on cancer treatments.
Drugs in this country are far more expensive than in Europe.
Allowing people to go abroad will not only save money this way but also allow far earlier treatment which means the patients will be far less ill and much easier to treat.
It will save the NHS money, which is all they care about, and mean faster better treatment for patients, which is what we care about.
Thalia, London,
This is a great pity. The NHS has exercised a near-monopoly on health provision funded by taxes rather than a market-place, which has resulted in a service which is expensive (200,000,000 Americans pay much less for far better service) and producer-orientated. It employs a lot of highly-paid people with massive pension liabilities, sucks in doctors and nurses who are needed to save lives in third world countries to extend lives in ours, and is bureaucratic. It also doesn't work all that well.
No politician would dare dismantle the NHS, but one option to change it is health tourism. If basic surgery is cheaper overseas then let patients go there. There are plenty of rich foreigners queueing up to get made better in the UK and there would be more space for them. Eventually the NHS would start to face up to either sacking workers or changing work practises to safeguard jobs. Either way, patients and taxpayers will benefit.
Dave, slough,
This is just what the NHS needs - a good kick. To hear ministers on TV saying patients must wait in this country even though capacity is available elsewhere suggests they can choose between life and death.
Disgusting.
Richard, Plymouth,