Charles Bremner, of The Times, in Paris
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes

Continental Airlines, the American carrier, must stand trial on manslaughter charges over its alleged role in the crash of the Air France Concorde thatkilled 113 people in 2000, a French prosecutor has decided.
A similar charge should also be brought against a French engineer involved in the development of the supersonic jet, the former head of France's civil aviation authority and two Continental Airlines staff, he said.
Judges are to decide within six weeks whether to endorse the request from the prosecutor at Pointoise, the county town that covers Charles de Gaulle airport.
An inquiry in 2004 found that the Concorde ran over a strip of aluminium as it sped towards take-off on a chartered flight to New York on July 25, 2000. The strip, which was identified as a tail component of a Continental Airlines jet, shredded one of the Concorde's tyres, sending chunks of reinforced rubber through a fuel tank and setting the aircraft ablaze. It crashed on to a hotel at the town of Gonesse as its pilots were struggling to land it at nearby Le Bourget airport.
John Taylor, a Continental mechanic who allegedly fitted the non-standard strip, Stanley Ford, a Continental maintenance official, and the airline itself should stand trial for involuntarily causing death and injuries, said the prosecutor.
Also cited for trial were Henri Perrier, 77, the director of the first Concorde programme and Claude Frantzen, 69, a former director of technical services at the DGAC, the French civil aviation authority. They are alleged to have known that the Concorde's wing, which contained fuel tanks, was fragile and vulnerable to damage from the outside.
The prosecutors dropped charges against Jacques Herubel, Concorde's former chief engineer.
Continental has pledged to fight the charges. A successful prosecution would be likely to result in millions of pounds in damages against the airline.
Only 20 of the Anglo-French airliners were built. They entered service in 1976 and were finally grounded two years after the crash that ended their unblemished safety record.
It is routine French practice to bring charges of “causing unintentional death” against managers and others with responsibility in a chain of events leading to fatal accidents. Prison sentences are very rare but heavy fines can be imposed.
A court is due to give verdicts tomorrow after the long-delayed trial of an air traffic controller and five former officials from Airbus, Air France and the DGAC over a 1992 airline disaster in eastern France that killed 87 people. The prosecution argued that they were responsible for a navigational error that led the plane to hit the Mont Saint-Odile as it was approaching Strasbourg.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Since 1982, tyres were doubled in strength to prevent blowouts, and for 18 years, there was never a single blowout, EVER. The only "inherant design flaw" is the failure to account for 43cm Continental sized pieces of titanium.
In comparison, the rogue thrust reverser fell off after only 16 days!
Will, Auckland, NZ
Why did the tyre under Inflation system not indicate a puncture, on the flight data recording graphs.? Why did the maintanance records show that pieces of the overhauled undercarriage were missing. ? Why did the aircraft leave exact tyre impressions on the tarmac.? To many questions still open to..
J Harvey, Dundee , Scotland
It's interesting that the America first finger pointers want to call the Concorde design "flawed from the start". You're talking about a plane that had one major accident in its entire flight history.
Last I checked, parts falling off engine thrust reversers are pretty unacceptable.
Kanishka Ray, Pittsburgh, PA
It would appear the design of the aircraft was flawed from the start. While the installation of unapproved parts by Continental isn't acceptable the thought that the jet was designed not to handle a blowout is totally unbelieveable. Tire failures is a fact of life. It is all about cutting costs.
Bruce, Arlington, USA
Both, my father & I were involved with the Concode development with British Airways. It was probably one of greatest steps in Aviation and an exceptional aircraft with a 100% safety record until the crash in France. Just because the USA couldn't compete, they killed commercial Supersonic flight
TERENCE HARRIS, MARSHCHAPEL, UNITED KINGDOM
Our American friends are quick to blame the French as usual. I wonder if they would be shouting as loudly if the roles were reversed. The fact is that the Continental ground crew were fitting non-standard parts to passenger jets just to make their lives easier and without thought for anyone's safety
Jim, Houston, USA
Have all our American correspondents forgotten about the 747 that exploded in mid air with no outside interference or is US isolationism still in full flight. I note one correspondent is from Seattle. Who was chareged with the known fault in the jumbo fuel tank design?
Stan Crane, Warrington,
Let's see, the French have a choice of accepting the blame themselves (as they should do) or blame an American company. Gee, I wonder what the result of these "trials" will be.
Matt, Columbia, MD, USA
This accedent could have happend to any aircraft so it cannot be Air France that gets blamed. Obviously if continental's maintenance wasn't up to scratch then action must be taken although the airport company at paris should take some of the blame too.
John, Leeds, UK
Of course it has to be the fault of others besides Air France and the people in charge of the airport. If this plane was so dangerous, why did the French ever allow it to fly? What a typical and sad attempt by French government and it's associated corporate interests to hide from the blame.
Societe General, anyone?
John Harrington, Seattle, USA
Did Anyone mention that it was required to inspect the runway before every Concorde departure which was not done by the airport authority. The concorde was a flawed design from day one. Blowing tires in the past has also ruptered the fuel tanks, this time they wern't so lucky. That aircraft should have never been given a airworthy certificate. Air France and the French government should be responsible only. Many tires blow everyday on other types of aircrafts and don't rupture fuel tanks. No one in France wants to see the real reason and fault it happend.
Josh, jersey,