Charles Bremner in Paris and Michael Evans, Defence Editor
Pick up your copy of Love: Forever Changes at WHSmith today

President Sarkozy will boost Nato’s struggling campaign in Afghanistan this week when he fleshes out his promise to dispatch up to 1,000 French troops to relieve pressure on the Americans, Canadians and other allied contingents.
The President’s decision, to be announced at the Nato summit in Bucharest on Wednesday, will add to the 1,500 French forces already in the Afghan zone. It is part of his policy of bringing France closer to the alliance and eventually back into the command structure from which it withdrew in 1966. His shift has heightened fierce opposition from the Left and stirred misgivings in sections of his own Gaullist camp.
“We cannot afford to lose Afghanistan,” Mr Sarkozy said in London last week. “We cannot afford to see the Taleban and al-Qaeda returning to Kabul. Whatever the cost, however difficult the victory, we cannot afford it. We must win.”
French paratroops and a handful of special forces are likely to be deployed alongside Americans in the east rather than the more violent south, where British troops are based. French commanders are said to have resisted the southern deployment as too risky. Hervé Morin, the Defence Minister, said that Mr Sarkozy had yet to take a final decision on numbers and the nature of the French contingent.
“Everything will depend on the outcome of the talks in Bucharest,” he said. “The figure has not yet been fixed.” One of the French conditions is that Nato should devote more resources to rebuilding Afghan society, bringing in judges, teachers, medical workers and civil administrators. Another is that the arrival of French forces should not prompt the departure of other contingents. French intelligence officers have been advising their country’s humanitarian organisations to expect possible attacks on their personnel once France becomes more involved in the Afghan fighting. French forces are currently based mainly near Kabul.
The probable arrival of French troops in the east will release US Marines there for duty in the tougher southern zone. The likely eastern deployment has not quelled anger from the Socialist opposition and doubts in the more Gaullist, or nationalist, sections of Mr Sarkozy’s Union for a Popular Movement.
The Socialists and some military experts say that it is folly to send troops into a campaign that is not working. The National Assembly will take no vote after what is expected to be a bitter debate tomorrow.
Jean-Louis Bianco, a senior Socialist MP, said yesterday that Mr Sarkozy was leading France into a new Vietnam: “The risk is great that we will be drawn into a trap, which is exactly what the Taleban and al-Qaeda want.” Mr Sarkozy’s pro-Atlantic move back towards Nato is also under fire from many quarters. A senior commentator on France Inter, equivalent to BBC Radio 4, said that the President was rushing to the aid of the US, preparing to “shed its blood in the sand without any hope of results”. He added: “France is taking a turn towards integration with the Anglo-Saxon world.”
The President and his supporters say that the time is right to implement a longstanding French desire to link reintegration with Nato to the American acceptance of a European Union defence system. The Americans have lately dropped their reservations over an autonomous European Security and Defence Policy and have begun to talk about it as a necessity. Mr Sarkozy hopes to be able to seal France’s return to full Nato membership after four decades of absence in time for the alliance’s 60th anniversary next year.
While the Nato leaders hope that they can achieve at least a public appearance of unison over Afghanistan, there are many other issues that are likely to expose divisions in the alliance: Kosovo, where minority Serbs are threatening to declare unilateral independence in the north; American missile defence and relations with Russia; the attempt by Ukraine and Georgia to join Nato; and what the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia should be called when it joins.
Albania, Croatia and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia will be invited to join the alliance during the Bucharest summit, which will be held in the former palace of the late Communist leader, President Ceausescu. Greece refuses to allow the Former Yugoslav Republic to call itself Macedonia if it wants to be in Nato. Other options, including the Republic of Macedonia Skopje, are being studied.
The question of Ukraine and Georgia stepping closer to Nato will also invite opposition from President Putin. On his last appearance before the alliance as Russian President, he is expected to trumpet his objections, not just to these two former members of the Soviet empire cosying up to the Western alliance but also to President Bush’s ambitions to locate part of America’s missile defence network inside Poland and the Czech Republic.
It will, of course, be Mr Bush’s last Nato summit, too. When the two men meet, neither is expected to back down on either of these issues.
Troop numbers
Number of Nato troops in Afghanistan by member country:
Belgium 370
Bulgaria 420
Canada 2,500
Czech Republic 135
Denmark 780
Estonia 130
Germany 3,210
Greece 150
Hungary 230
Iceland 10
Italy 2,880
Latvia 100
Lithuania 260
Luxembourg 9
The Netherlands 1,650
Norway 495
Poland 1,100
Portugal 160
Romania 535
Slovakia 70
Slovenia 70
Spain 740
Turkey 675
United Kingdom 7,800
United States 15,000
Plus 16,000 outside Nato jurisdiction
Source: Nato
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2006
£14,337
2008
£39,937
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
c. £90,000 + PRP
Essex County Council
Essex
£
Not Specified
The Bar Standards Board
London
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
1 & 2 Bed apartments
From £249,995
Great Investment, River Views
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
low-cost ownership homes in London
Multi–Centre 9 Nights
From only £925pp
View thousands of properties online with your Vacation Rental People
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Any chance he might hurry up and get on with it!
Obviously not a Rapid Reaction outfit.
Oh, and the 16,000 outside NATO jurisdiction!!!!!!!!!!!!!! No credit for them then, or can you not mention the Arab brethern helping out?
Jim D, Norwich, UK
The list of NATO troops is only a little helpful. I am aware that the US, the UK, Canada and the Netherlands are all fighting in the hostile South but who else has joined them? I seem to recall Estonia were willing to help out, but surely there are others. Some more information would be useful.
And it would boost your image of objectivity if you would mention Canada and the Netherlands whenever you discuss the trouble in Southern Afghanistan in an article rather than solely hailing "American and British" efforts.
Erik, the Hague, Netherlands