Having the system in the USA would be too little to late. We can hit a target earlier, knowing the origin, verses unknown destinations. Possibly, the placement has been selected to compensate for the rotation and curvature of the earth, and proximity to possible threats. Planes don't fly straight.

John K., Lincoln, USA

Russia sold Iran ICBMs this summer. The first delivery is schduled for Dec 2008 with another in Jan of 2009.

tyler, Huntsville,

The world police...on the prowl again.

Kim Jon Ill, St. Petersberg, Russia

pls. don't forget - time before 39 in Poland, 56 in Hungary and 68 in Chehia = Józef Beck ask Hitler for joint (Poland-Germany) strike to Russia, and provide help for Hitler to invade in Chehia, Hungary was the closest ally of Hitler and the atrocities of its troops in Russia exceeded SS troops

puerh , moscow,

Article misses the real reason the shield is being built. Iran doesn't have nukes, they're not going for nukes, and even if they had them.. they dont have the long range missiles to put them on. Russia does have these kinds of weapons though, and I don't blame them for feeling threatened.

Matthew Blaha, Sacramento, USA

Might I remind our Russian friends that it was thier country who joined Hitler in the invasion of Poland in 1939? A fact that seems to have been conveniently forgotten.

Kieron, London,

We need missile defence urgently. I would approve 10 installations in Germany. Defensive systems are never a threat.
Russia opposes this only for internal reasons. We should ignore it. Our security has first priority!

Juergen T., Stuttgart, Germany

Russia don't like american plans 'cause Moscow wants to get back the political control on East Europe

Andriy, Kherson, Ukrain

Prevailing Russian hostility here seems to show that the only sensible course for the West would be a first strike.

Sean, Coventry, UK

If these stations are constructed, Russia should simply send bombers over and destroy them. Just as Israel destroyed a nuclear reactor in Iraq years ago. Europe could do nothing. And the point would be clear.

Chris, Tucson, USA

American goverment want to start new world war?

Denis, Bratsk, Russia

2John Claro

Firstly, It's very stupid to believe that USA can't changed it on aggressive missiles in a short space of time...It will be only the second step, just to defend from Iran....

Secondly, it's just 10 missiles here add interceptor missiles in California, Alaska, Japan, etc...

Pavel S.Tsarevskiy, Moscow, Russia

The anti-missile system consists of 10 interceptor missiles, to deal with rogue states, no more. So HOW does this threaten Russia with its thousands of missiles?

John Claro, Cleggan, Ireland

USA make mistake. And Russia just wants to protect yourself from stupid danger politics.

Under some conditions it can be resulted in attacking Czech and Poland if reconnaissance mistakenly said that USA wants to attack Russia

Anyway it also maybe not mistake but true - structured American plan

Pavel S.Tsarevskiy, Moscow, Russia

2Raymond C. Sanchez

Of course the war against USA would be bad.

But USA already started the process of creating new war

And be sure the war against Russia will be very bad for USA.

Russia remembers mistakes in believing that France or Germany don't attack which resulted in two global war

Pavel S.Tsarevskiy, Moscow, Russia

Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Iraq, Vietnam, Afganistan, Belgrad... American tradition is so carefull about human life and human rights, that Russians dont need to be afraid ;-)
Cheh people are happy, thanks to their leaders they have chance be involved in global nuclear war being one of the primary targets.

Alex, Los Angeles, US

I see that mass media in US, in UK, in EU and in Russian Federation start propoganda for new World War.
I see that amerikan colonisation was started and world war 3 is their last chance to continue it. I'm affraid that civilization will die...
Russia just tries to stop amerika to make a mistake...

Ruslan, Moscow, Russia

It's disgusting to see how East Europe has prostituted itself for Washington, and people's opinion account for nothing with the corrupted and bought "governments" of those buffer-republics.

Just how does it differ from the puppets that were put in place by Soviet Communist Party 1945-1991?

Leo, Gbg, Sweden

there is so lot of noise, from eastern europe, that radars defend them from russians, that is is clear - iran here is not a goal
americans simply want to create a military infrastruture in this region against russia. to make it not too impudent, as first step-it is "peacifull" radar+missiles.

alys, moscow, russia

This is not about attack.

This is about resources in the future. Russia has 1/3 of worlds drinking water. Russia has the most oil, gas, coal, gold and whatever else you can think of. USA may be known for building big things, but make no mistake the biggest THING on this planet is Russia.

Yuriy, Earth, Russian Federation

If 90-95% of russian strategic missiles were destroyed by the first strike, the remaining missiles could be destroyed by the missile defense systems in Europe and USA. Therefore, USA will have a capability to destroy all the russian defense without a sufficient risk of retailatory strike.

Sergey, Toronto, Canada

first of all, how many Europian countries try to invade Russia? Hmm, right from my mind can name Poland, Germany, Britan, France, after 1917 we have som brave Chech guys scavanging and robing around, and they came to Russian land without invitation.

Marina, Moscow, Russia

For some americans who play football instead learning history: Arizona, California, Texas belong to Mexico and were invaded and anexed buy USA, and I even will not start about native americans, easier to kill them all then deal with them later? In Russia still live all types of nationalities -150

Marina, Moscow, Russia

Dear Ivan from Los Angeles, you can visit any Russian territory without fear of the commies. If you find a sign of modern day communism - send me the bill and I will pay for your trip. Bloody KGB, despotic Putin, agressive illiterate Russians dreaming to annex the entire world.... get alive!

Maxim, Troitsk, Russia

Amerika! There are no bad nations-is bad presidents!

Dmitry, Rostov-on-Don, Russia

Thinking about Russian mass media and controlling it by Kreml. I came to a conclusion that Western mass media also doesn't true and may be much more then Russian.

Instead of controlling in the West I can see smart managing public relations by the government.

Awake people.

Pavel S.Tsarevskiy, Moscow, Russia

Alexey: Gotta "love" your version of history. As far as Prague in May '45. US Army was in Pilsen (80km W of Prague) in the morning of May 6 but they waited on the demarkation line because that was the agreement from Yalta. BTW, it was the Vlasov Army was the one which liberated Prague not Red Army.

Richard, Pardubice, Czech Rep.

Problems with AMS:
1) it is only part of a global multi-layer system being developed by the US and including e.g. airborn lasers;
3) Russia is worried that the US may use it to support US first strike - which makes it much easier for the AMS to deal with the remaining Russian missiles.
Etc [500]

Egor, Moscow,

Can you name one Eastern European country that Russia did not annex as part of her territory? I don't know why Russia is going back to its Soviet regime. I salute the Eastern European countries for standing up to its former ruler! Now I can visit them without fear of the commies.

Ivan, Los Angeles,

Nuclear threats, global warming, credit crunch....
We really should have stopped when we were cave men (and women), life was much simpler and no-one cared about how many clubs you had in your cave.

Mike, Birmingham, UK

Terry L. Walker, Ladson, SC / USA – Sorry, they did not publish my answer.
Next, I think we pay too much attention to that game. It is obviously on the one hand the present-day US does not have money to accomplish such expensive project and is just puffing up. On the other hand Russia perceives that and opposes urging Americans forward to start the project ASAP ruining their economy.

Alexey, Moscow,

If Russia wants the US to cancel plans of setting up missile defense, then Russia needs to help the USA in dealing with Iran. But instead, Russia is making Iran a stronger threat and that is why a missile defense may be necessary for Europe's security.

Sam, Clarkston, USA

You guys just don't get the grip, do you? Forcing, with "defensive" system as ironically called, the wounded bear into a corner generates only one outcome in the long run.

One simple question: the world, including US herself, has becoming a safer place or more dangerous one after this???

E. Wong, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

to Gerald Baxter:
not you should mention functionality of brain cells. Modern americans are descendants of bushrangers from Europe who tried to escape punishment for crimes in motherland and killed indians to occupy their territories. Nothing has changed since then. There's nothing to do with genes.

Elya, Moscow, Russia

It's funny... I do remember how we were against the Krasnoyarsk radar which was claimed to be a pure defencive installation by the Russkies. Right, it was in the middle of Siberia. And it was in 1983. We stated very clearly that this was a major threat to US security.

Ian, Praha/Manchester,

Alexy, Moscow--You didn't mention Russian tanks rolling into Czechoslovakia in August 1968 and turning what had been the "Prague Spring" back into a Communist winter. Same people, or their proteges, run Russia today as then.

The Russian anti-missile argument simply has no merit.

Terry L. Walker, Ladson, SC / USA

Personally I think that the Russians should contribute to the defence of the global community as well. In an attempt to return the favor I think the Russians should implement a missile defense system in such countries as Cuba and Venezuela in order to defend the America's from possible future attack

Vlad Pavkovic, Toronto, Canada

The thing that strikes me as strange is that if this is to stop missles from Iran why position it where they are? The US has its new colony in Serbia. Europe tends to forget these anti missle missiles still wont stop the warhead landing in the EU and contaminating European soil..

Darren, London,

This is not a MISSILE COMPLEX it is an Anti-Missile Complex. The Russians are using this situation to gain more global influence in the world, Why the USA does not understand this beats me. USA cannot put this on Russian soil because it consists of technology not available in Russia

Ron, New York, Almaty, USA, Kazakhstan

Arthur
Simply put Russia is a threat to global stability,basically their government does not want to respect human rights,there is too much coruption and irresponsability at high levels of the govt.And their handling of nuclear technologies is very controversial.

Dave, Exeter, Uk

To specify Russian tanks were in Prague two times. When in May 1945 Germans were shooting Czech rebels there, being very close Americans did not stop the bloodshed but Russian tanks saved Czechs coming in Prague straightly from Berlin.

Alexey, Moscow,

So why doesn't Russia just put up it's own anti missile defense system...then both sides are equal. The Czechs made this decision based on past experience with Russia. China is the real threat. China is spending every cent on new weapon tech. They will soon be taking all the Russian oil they want

Michael, Atlanta, GA, USA

Before instigating a crisis with ballistic missiles, Russians set up defensive SAM (surface-to-air) missile sites in Cuba. The U.S. did not protest. One of those SAMs shot down a U2 recon aircraft, killing the pilot. Cuba still has SAMs.

Daibhidh, LA, USA

Editorial in today's "Wall Street Journal" made this point: The anti-defense missile system being installed in E. Eur is designed to deter a few missiles lobbed from Iran. Russia has thousands of missiles in its arsena, and this anti-missile system is no threat to such a capability.

Terry L. Walker, Ladson, SC / USA

To make ineffective any country's main weapons of attack/defense is tantamount to an act of war. Next the US will want waltz in and take all their bullets in case a gun or two falls into the wrong hands. Sticking a gun to someones head is not the way to go about making the world more secure.

Ross, Southampton, Hampshire

Dear Dave(continued)

Secondly you state that the russians sold the stockpiles of cold war weapons to poor african countries. Now i must admit russians did sell weapons to africa but so did the americans, the british and all other self respected capitalist weapons exporting nations.

Arthur, Edinburgh, Scotland

Mindaugas,

You do not want Russia as a neighbor but you have no choice but need natural resources from the world's largest natural gas and oil producer which is Russia!

I would be careful as a small nation because to rely on NATO for defense would be suicide.

John, Chicago,

P.3 So by this logic what the US says is true is true?? The US has reneged on every promise it gave Russia (from NATO non-expansion to WTO accession), been caught lying just about everything – from WMD to CIA secret camps and are now telling “the truth”? Wake up, people, it is not funny anymore.

richard, moscow, russia

I myself have defensive missiles in a backyard. Does Russia know that? You bet! Nobody likes Russia in the neighbourhood. We don't want another Soviet Union - the worst chaos mixed with force, exiles, censorship, xenophobia, shortages etc.

Mindaugas , Kaunas, Lithuania

It's an adequate answer. People from US just don't understand how any government in this world can do the same as their government does. And you wanted Russia to be silent? to be surrounded with american missiles and to be silent?

Alec, Saint Petersburg,

There is a recent research IRAN'S DELIVERY SYSTEMS CAPABILITIES by Andrei Frolov freely available at http://www.isn.ethz.ch showing that there is no Iran nuclear missile threat in the nearby future. Besides, why Poland and Czechia but not Turkey, Bolgaria or Greece? Because system is against Russia

Pyotr, Montreal, Canada

Reading some of the articles posted by russians in the comments its very easy to see their false beliefs,simply because their state media is controled by a dictatorship.Lets paint a rosy picture,nevermind shady deals done with Iran,nevermind all the cold war weapons sold illegally to Africa.

Dave, Exeter, UK

"Ther (sic) civilized world need only worry about the surplus of uranium in russia and it's (sic) own failing economy and not their false threats."
Since when was Russia's economy failing?
But yes, other than their nuclear arms they are of little threat to Western Europe or the US.

Kieran, St Andrews,

Why doesn't the US simply negotiate a deal with Moscow to put some of the defense missiles within Russia under joint US/Russian control, and the rest in Poland under the same command?

Chris, Philadelphia, PA

If the Russians have a problem with the balance of power, then the shield is absolutely necessary.

rank, Amsterdam, USA

You guys are missing the point here. These missles will not have nuclear warheads to intercept another missle, they will have conventional explosives on missles that are very fast and accurae (hopefully) to hit any missles that Iran, Syria, and/or that any terrorist or terrorist state might launch.

Dave, Conroe, USA

AJ from NY:

You claim the U.S. black budget is as big as Russia's entire military budget but you fail to realize Russia can still destroy the U.S. with her nukes and they do not have to spend 42 cents of every dollar. Also look at what Israel just went through in Lebanon not too long ago!

John, Chicago,

Shouldn't Bush not be worrying about Iraq & Kabul .... rather than fighting the russians?

Will he not over stretch USA like the Roman Empire.

Russia is not the enemy - why make it?

Oh, I forgot about Bin Ladin.

Vishal, London, Uk

The Russians are just talking tough. They know a war with the United States would bad for Russia.

Raymond C. Sanchez, Las Vegas, United States

Does russia really have a military response to anything or do they just threaten it? Ther civilized world need only worry about the surplus of uranium in russia and it's own failing economy and not their false threats.

Chris, Moore, USA

Russia's cornered on all sides. It is only natural that it tries to fight back when being initmidated and undermined.

I'm sure the U.S knows that Russia will not take military action, however they are slowly pushing the country (like Iran) to a wall; with only one outcome.

Gez, Blackpool, UK

Level of stupidity of the US policy toward Russia is astonishing. Instead of allying with Russia against growing Chinese and Islamic threats,US politicians make everything possible to poke Russian bear in the eye. Wait another 40 years and China will do the same to the US what we are doing to Russia

Dan, Denver,

Soviet-US Cuba conflict definitely was an example of 'military response', in particular on deployment of US nuclear missiles in Turkey. However even this precedent was peacefully resolved, and analogous mutual radar monitoring may be the next step to increase Russia-US awareness, trust and security.

Alexey, Novosibirsk, Russia

Linda, so you would have no problem if Canada invited Russia to place some 'defensive' missiles, targeted southwards, from the northern shore of Lake Ontario?

Paul, Coventry,

The U.S. has missile platforms that can be located , at will, anywhere around the sea world that is necessary. We call them Carriers. So what's the problem??

Kenneth B. Smith, P.E., Wilmoington, DE, USA

Larry better clean his ears and also open his eyes .there are plenty of nations worroed about Iran but they will all wring their hands and wait for the U.S. or Israel to do something about it.
Wake up Larry before you have to start talking Iranian

Norm, Port Charlotte, USA

I've got one. Why don't every nation in the world get there head out of their rear end and realize that we all live on the same planet. If everybody would stop expecting the rest of the world to live the same way they do and just mind their own damn business the world would be in better shape.

David, Graham, USA

US has no intention of attacking Russia, and Putin knows it. If it did, missiles outside E. Eur. are more than adequate. US would not respond with nukes if Russia did attack Euro states. Most US folks just would not be willing to have nuc war over Europe. Putin rattling sabers to intimidate Euro

Terry L. Walker, Ladson, SC / USA

If Gorbachev new how proudless would become some former Warsaw Pact and Soviet Union countries, how they learn nothing for themselves and sometimes would allow democracies rip, divide and share them like personal property, he would have been much tougher on disarmament deals with US.

Alexey, Novosibirsk, Russia

Larry says: "Nobody else seems to be worried about Iran and Iraq." Ah Larry, you might clean out your ears. Israel is saying they will move if Europe doesn't, and that will drag in the US. When Hitler said he was going to kill all the Jews, most didn't listen, I think Ahmadinejad got their attn.

Roger, Los Angeles, USA

Missile defense is a tool for a first strike. If US launches a massive first strike at Russian missile sites and destroys them, then Russia will have only a few missiles left to respond, missile defense is to take care of them. The Russians said, they will deploy military technology to counter this.

Ivan Ivanov, Chicago, US

It seems that lately the children are not getting along that well in the sandbox. Might be time for a time out. (and an education)

Thomas, Fort Pierce, USA

Yeah Dmitry, Leningrad , USSR Where is the USSR? I think that Union of overjoyed souls disappeared along with your potato diet and Russian hatchet wielding meat hackers, The East German Trabant and the Polsky Fiat and how could we ever forget the Lada, Yes indeedy all the symbols of a Superpower.

Peter, Vancouver BC., Canada

When will Bush clean out his ears and listen? Nobody else seems to be worried about Iran and Iraq, but us. We need to stop increasing the deficit by spending money elsewhere and start improving the US and US economy.
Reducing oil starts with Bush staying home and doing his job as US President.

Larry, Redding, USA

I believe if Russia to deploy radars and missiles on some other country territory it will allow US to monitor it. So may be it should be the way to restore parity and not to be accused of 'bulling' by refusing allowance to monitor its inner territory.

Alexey, Novosibirsk, Russia

Wait... Russia want's it's neighbors to be defenseless against their missiles?

Is Russia planning to attack other countries? I am shocked that Putin insists that nations be without defense to Russian missiles.

This only proves that Russia is still a dangerous and agressive country.

Mike, Manchester,

These interceptors are defensive, not offence. What is Russia's problem unless they intend on invading Eastern Europe?

Linda , Rogersville, USA

What good would a missile defense system do north of Iran? A strike by Iran (as unlikely as it is) would go west over northern Africa. This is posturing by the US and Russia responded. I don't blame 'em for being upset the US military is prowling around their backyard.

Mdizz, PDX, USA

The Russians immediately demonstrate why these defensive measures are required.

David Leslie, Perth, Scotland

Russia is just jealous.....and their stubborness(sp?) keeps them from realizing it would benefit them too....I have forgot how to spell.....

blupill, Bethany,U.S.A.,

Richard, because it alters the balance of power if the US can launch missles at Russia with impunity because it is defended with its own shield.

Tony, Islington, London,

After the Austro Hungarian Empire, German Anexation and 40 years of Communism, Czech Independance has been short lived. After a brief post '89 freedom, they have become part of the United States of Europe and an active satelite of Bush's war machine. As well as a target.

Lucas Tatek, Herts., uk

Dmitry, Leningrad, USSR: One of the crucial factors that determines superpower status is a nation's ability to project military forces anywhere on the globe, since all three of the countries you mentioned are unable to do that I suggest you rethink your rather silly statement.

J Roberts, Manchester, UK

Dmitry

I think you need to rethink your list of super powers (Nowadays there are only 3 superpowers in the world: Russia, China, India) China is the only one on your list that has that status along with the USA. Russia has lost that status and India has barely stepped out of the 3rd world.

Chris, Atlanta, USA

Don't you all realize that Russia has their own missles pointed at Europe right now ?? Check it out for yourselves. This is something the left media conveintly forgets to tell you..
The missles have been in western Russia for a few years now, and they aren't just little ones either.

Jack, reno, USA

I don't think that Russia wants to go there. US military technology is still leaps and bounds ahead of Russia.

K Moore, Richmond, VA, USA

Like the U.S never sold weapons to Saddam, the Taliban and yes Iran which has F-14's. Note, the U.S. still buys fuel from Chavez, so U.S. money helps to buy Russian weapons, nice job Americans!

John, Chicago,

im tired of hearing how Russia`s military is superior to the U.S. Russia cant even afford its own military. Our black budget alone is 30 billion dollars, for our top secret black projects.Our real technonlogy is 100 years ahead of its time, unlike the stuff u see now, which is 25 yrs old already...

AJ, staten island NY, U.S.A

This is a time when we, the US and Russia, must work together. There is a beast brewing in Asia. If the US and Russia were to asserts themselves within a friendly framework, global influences would be a positive! The US, must involve ourselves overseas. God help us if Obama wins.

Markus, SDaratoga Springs, NY, USA

If Russia really wanted to hurt the West, all they need to do is to turn the gas supply taps off ....

Darren, Haverfordweest, Pembs

In reality, Russia has got big success in his missile defence system. And the Russia will give to USA and Czech significant challenges.

America never happy like Russia now if Russian missile system will be placed in the Venejuela or say .. Columbia.
system if it was placed in ..say ..Mexic

Dandi, London, UK

Czechs dont want this, it makes them a target. Poles demanded Millions from USA. Czech gov have steamrollered this thru against the wishes of the people, like under Communism! America may not turn out to be your guardian angel after all (still probably preferable to another 40 years of communism!)

Lucas Tatek, Herts., uk

I'd say that this would work out all right if the people in charge of this missile defense system was say, a council, that consisted of basically delegates from each state/nation involved/concerned.

Chris Thayer, Ft. Worth, US

The reason this “defensive” system worries the Russian is because it neutralizes their ICBM threat to the US. The only thing that kept Russia and the US from war all those years was the threat that one would destroy the other in the event of war, now if the US nullifies that threat than the Russians have no “ace up their sleeve”, nothing to hold the US back from committing whatever act of aggression it wishes against any Russian interest.

FEL121, Claymont, USA

So, the Russians are threatening military action in retaliation for the fact that the Czech want to be protected and this somehow makes the Americans bad? Forgive me for not being able to understand how exactly. Anyone remember '68? Russian tanks on Czech soil. Or '56 in Hungary. Or '39 in Poland?

Pavel, London, UK

First of all folks, let's not forget that this technology is still in its infancy and with the current hit/miss ratios, we aren't really providing protection against a superpower (and yes I still consider Russia a superpower despite their military, economic and political woes).

Jack, Commerce, TX, USA

I see many short memories writing here. I remember Russian tanks in the streets of Prague in 1968; bodies of E Germans killed trying to escape E Berlin; Russian missles in Cuba pointing at the USA; the Gulag for dissidents; the Lubyanka prison.. Anyone else remember those ??
Read your history.

vicki, grand rapids, USA

Well, America is making very, very big mistake. Although Ms Rice realise that, there's no way back cos "US is always right". Reason why US decided to place the shield in Eastern Europe is they don't want to jeopardize their Western Europe allies, but it will put an impact on the whole Europe...

Konrad, Sheffield/Warsaw, United Kingdom/Poland

The Russians have always been suspicious of everyone, must be that Vodka diet. That would explain their lack of understanding(few functional brain cells). In any case, their dangerous and need watching. As for military action, bring it on Ivan, its your funeral!

Gerald Baxter, Sanger, Texas, USA

the palestinians in 1970, attacked israel several times, and are a monarchy, ruled by a majority tribe that doesnt have to worry about miniority rights.our intervention in iraq was self ish too, but had altruistic goals. checyna had none of these goals, nor russia going into afghanistan enuff said

jason f, minneaplois, usa

This is an EU problem. If the EU is as powerful as it thinks itself to be, let IT protect it's members. The US is met with vitrol by action or inaction either wa. The EU needs to take care of it's own problems and Russia is their problem. Spend the $$$ on our own military, let the EU handle theirs.

Duch, BallyK, USA

These missiles are very fast and very small;
far too small to carry nukes.
By their very design, they cannot be a threat.
If we can stop the big missiles,
who does that threaten
other than those with those nuke-capable larger missiles ?
Who is the bully here ?

Erik, denver, USA

Reading the boasts of the Russians here about their "military might" tells me we are back to the Cold War days of them being told what the government wants them to hear. Too funny.

Andrew, Cincinnati, USA

The Russians said "military technical means" That to me doesnt mean a military attack, more a case of electronic jamming.

Alan, Chelmsford, UK

Europeans don't learn from history. After the US saved you from 2 World Wars. If it weren't for the US most countries there would be speaking either German or Russian so why don't you just say THANK YOU!! The Czechs didn't accept the Marshall Plan and paid for it with a Russian invasion in 1968.

Stymie, Dallas, Texas, USA

Russia know that the only way to hurt the US is not by direct military conflict but by stirring up trouble globally funding terrorist states thereby taxing US miltarily and financially over a long long time ie: middle east= no solution in my lifetime!! This is Russia's reponse to Cold War.

Leslie, Orlando, USA

A significant portion of the Russian government is composed of hardline KGB - not just Putin. He has set himself up to remain in authority, while hand-picking his groomed successor. The Russian populace has accepted him blindly because oil rescued their economy. Nothing to do with Putin.

Scott, Michigan, USA

In addition to the inadequacies of the missile defense system, I also agree that this is a time when the US should be attempting to forge new relationships with the global community and create win/win situations for the benefit of humankind.

Jack, Commerce, TX, USA

The "ex-KGB" is in control of Russia. they are selling missles, planes, and god only knows what else to the likes of Iran, Venezuela both countries controled by fanatics who call for the destruction of or attack on anyone in the free world who doesn't agree wtih them. no provocation needed!

vicki, grand rapids, USA

Russia does not have the military capacity at this juncture to conduct a military response and succeed. This is just blustering to feel important on their part. I think they should accept Bush's proposal to share the technology. The true threat to the US and Russia is that from Islam.

Brad, Peoria, USA

We (USA) have no business across the world - other than oil. We should not be there being killed or killing. Violence begets violence. History will not be kind to the United States. For good reason. Our leaders are corrupt, our government is corrupt. Our intentions are only self-fulfilling.

Matthew, USA,

If a stranger from out of town inexplicably puts up barbed wire around my neighbour's house - I would be a tad annoyed to say the least and demand answers and removal.
Especially if that neighbour is an old enemy recently seen flexing its muscles in overseas wars.

Jim, Bishop's Stortford, England

Maxim, A lot of "civilians" were killed in Iraq by some guy name Sadam. Iran is in Iraq. And, a nice group called The Taliban is in Afg.. No wonder everyone is scared.The USA has always given blood for other's wars and all we ask is a piece of ground to bury our dead.(American Cemetary at Normandy)

G Gordon, Atlanta, USA

Indeed. The United States has most of the world worried abut the future. It amazes me how one country's foreign policy can such hardship on a global scale. I've been a friendly neighbor to the USA for 40 years Americans are wonderful people. They, however, are burying their heads in the sand. War.

Brian Ringland, Victoria, Canada

I see that US want deploy this system anyway and may be it aware of Russian possible response. In current climate I believe the second radar in Azerbaijan is god thing to host under Russia and US monitoring and may lead to consensus whereas having been rival plan before Iran's resent war exercises.

Alexey, Novosibirsk, Russia

We've all dreamed of a day when mutual disarmament was a reality, when everyone has settled their differences, are satisfied with their borders, their resources, a day when selling arms becomes unprofitable, ie: never

So perhaps that day will come when the arms themselves are rendered useless.

Charles, Billerica, USA

It should be said that the "Americans" have no say in if or where any missile defense systems go. The process of an elected representative government keeps us far away from any world stage decisions. Also, American's is not Americans, Mr. Masson, and don't blame everyone here for a few persons' idea

Sean Horner, College Station, USA

We Americans are ruled by a military-corporate dictatorship, but we are in denial about it. Our "liberal" media give us pablum and propaganda. It is easy to convince Joe Six-Pack that all evil is from other places. All it takes is more fear mongering and appeal to foolish pride to control us.

Philip Twelves, Tallahassee FL, USA

What does Russia mean by it's military response? Are they going to invade us(Czech Republic) the same way they did in August 1968? Or are they going to poison half of the Czech parliament? :)

Eva, London, UK

Hi, I am Czech. And I do support the radar to be located in our country. I think it's good for us from the security point of view as well as to get out of the Russian influence.

Eva, London, UK

Tom in Chicago, I couldn't agree more. Its time for Europe to put its big boy pants on and take some responsibility for itself.

Dave, Alta Loma, CA, USA

The USA should have learned by now that the Russians are a little paranoid & won't take any guff from anyone. A little more respect needs to be afforded for their old rivals, even if the move to put missiles in the Czech Republic seems perfectly reasonable. The US is making many enemies these days.

Richard, Luton, England

The American's are doing it again. They haven't learned a thing from their involvement in Irag etc. They are arrogant and ignorant and are ready to bring on Nuclear War at a moments notice. Best thing would be for them to pull out of all the trouble spots which they created. America smarten up.

Steve Masson, London, Canada

Just in case you thought Russia was no longer evil they pull this nonsense. There's no excuse for Russia to use military force. This is a defensive system. Russians are simply paranoid. The Czech Republic and the world has reason (recent communist tyranny) to distrust Moscow.

David, Memphis, USA

Roan, what are you talking about?
I think, we all are living in a world which belongs to USA. It is everywhere. Do you know who is in Irag ? who is in Afganistan? Who bombed easten Europe ? and so on. And what have they made in Iraq? - a lot of civilians killed by US millitary. Everyone are scared.

Maxim, Moscow,

Would Russia really rather have us invade Iran in the event of their gaining nuclear weapons? I would think that the rest of the world would prefer this "containment" approach.
Honestly, though, are the Russians really worried about us firing at them? Why on Earth would we ever do that?

Dan, Omaha, NE, USA

Hmmm... Might be we should return our missiles to Cuba? Defensive missiles, of course. To protect... e.g. St. Peterburg from evil Mexicans, whos dream about bombing us! It's not important that mexicans don't have any nukes - one day they can get'em - we must be ready for this case!)))

Sergey, Novosibirsk, Russia

Was it not, the Russian top of the line GPS radar jamming system deployed in Iraq? Taken out so effortlessly with (Get This) US GPS Missiles? Yeah I guess I can see why they are worried. Missile system works. And why were those Russian radar jamming system there again? Are they in Iran too?

Roan, Holland, USA

Russia is right to be concerned about its security.

The fact that many don't like Russian politics is neither here nor there. That's for the Russians to sort out.

All this has much more to do with internal US problems than anything else.

Trouble at home - seek diversion abroad.

Stuart, Fleet, Hants

Russ, Pasco, WA "Unfortunately Russians never think like the rest of the world does. They always assume that they are to be the victims and act accordingly in an offensive posture...They want to feel important in the scheme of things worldwide."
For many people this equally describes the USA. Sorry

Judy, Soton,

Nowadays there are only 3 superpowers in the world:
Russia, China, India. Americans have lost their control in the late ninetees during Klinton times. I think that's just the beginning of the end of the american kingdom in the world.

Dmitry, Leningrad, USSR

The main reason why we consider this system as a threat is as follows:
1)Where 10 interceptors are placed later may be placed 1000.
2) We don't have control over what is stored in those silos. "Defensive" missiles can easily be replaced with offensive.

Ivan, Moscow, Russia

How the hell do defensive radar installations threaten Russia? Also why does our government stand by while Russia issues bellicose statements, one after the other without calling them on it? Looks like the evil empire is up to their old ways.

Richard Atencio, Oceanport, NJ, USA

The road to hell is paved with good intentions. Before you believe that missles in Czech Republic will defend anyone from Iran or N.Korea, take a look at a map and see the distances. And then you say that the US government is smart and Russian is hysteric-for-nothing. Use your own head to think.

Elena, Moscow,

Russia threatens everyody?
Oh, yeah.
It is Russia that bombed Serbia and occupied Iraq, Afganistan.
It is Russia putiing "defensive missiles" in Europe.
It is Russia that has the biggest military budget in the world.
Blame Russia.

Eugene, NNovgorod, Russia

Russia, China, North Korea and Iran vs. US and its coalition of the willing.

Al, New York, USA

There is too much paranoia on all sides. The radar and missile defense does not threaten the Russians who would launch over the north pole to the U.S. But neither is Russia or Iran much of a threat to the U.S. or Europe. Iran is a lot of bluster and has never threatened the U.S. It's all paranoia.

Bruce, Long Beach, California, USA

Base the system on US land, and US ships, and let's just build whatever we want. Here is a novel idea : Europe can look after itself !

Tom, Chicago, USA

wonderful and while youre doing that please take back the 40 000 us military troops and your nuke bombs and bombers in our country , ta

bart, birmingham, warks

Suppose in 70 years' time there is a revolution in the USA.
A new radical form of govt comes to power with a mad
dictator at the helm. He decides to wipe out the Jews and blacks in USA.
Looks like the only country that could stop him getting world domination would not get started.

Mart, Sevenoaks,

First, the U.S. abrogated the 72 ABM treaty quite a few years ago now. Second, the Russians have had ABM sites around Moscow for several decades and I'm sure we're not talking about early 60's technology now. Who knows where else they've got them? Not that I have a problem with that.

Bill R., Clinton Twp, MI. USA

Didn't the Poles intransigence lead Britain to promise to defend them in 1939, after they refused to talk about giving Danzig back to the Germans?

And where did that lead?

North Country, Towson, USA

Hasn't Russia already sold Iran most of the technology it needs (reactors , centrifuges ect ) to build its bomb , what a bunch of comedians .

Ohana, london/osaka, japan

These people, they say what if russia blah blah mexico and canada, thats a joke. do you choose the superpower on your own block or the angry stepchild to watch your back.
We want to fight them there. We want israel not to be nuked.
Who is so stupid to not know that we have assets there?

Chris, lawrence, usa

Our military nuclear fleet is controlling the World ocean waters on a volunteer basis already, undoubtfully Russian military forces are 10 times bigger and stronger that Yankees.There is no need anymore to consult evry step or move with Codoliza Rize. What are Americans talking about?!

Grigoriy, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation

This is paranoia on all sides. Russian missliles would be launched over the north pole also could easily overwhelm the system. Iran is not threatening the U.S. nor Europe. It's just a lot of bluster. Iran has no missles nor nukes. If she did, why would she launch on Europe or the U.S? We're paranoid

Bruce, Long Beach, Cal., U.S.A.

The US did NOT ignore russian 'suggestions' for cooperation. Russia demanded that they be allowed full time on site presence and technical monitoring. Russia further would not agree to reciprical cooperation allowing outsiders to see their systems. Typical Russian bully tactics.

Kristina Jensen, Copenhagen, Denmark

I seem to remember the USA throwing a hissy fit about this sort of thing happening in Cuba in the 1960's when the boot was on the other foot . Did no-one in the current US Administration get the equivalent of a GCSE in History at school? Warmongers.

Tony Faulkner, London, UK

At a time when we need Russia as an ally, we are needlessly poking them with a stick, then offering some lame excuse that a missile shield is necessary to protect Eastern Europe from Iran's nonexistent nukes.

MG, Melbourne, USA

This article hardly brings all arguments why Russia decides to not let go US defence Czech-Poland issues. The main unmentioned are: 1) US ignored Russian suggestions on cooperation on this activity; 2) Russia reasonably believe US to conduct research on strategic offensive weapons.

Alexey, Novosibirsk, Russia

"The Bear" is stirring from hibernation... !!

The Bear must be hungry.

Dakota, Lake Stevens, WA, USA

Russia is much stronger, and we are much weaker than the Reagan years.

Ignoring, or downplaying this threat from Putin is done at our own peril.

I believe that Russia means to reclaim their lost glory after the dissolution of the USSR and they are looking for a fight.

truthseeker, Grand Junction, CO,

Can't you whiny liberals see the depths of your hippocracy? It seems like the US is verbally threatened by Russia and/or Iran on daily basis, yet you Benedicts think we are the warmongers, we are the ones spoiling for a fight. Don't forget that WE are the good guys.

freyballz, San Francisco, USA

Gosh, they didn't say a thing when their border-to-border neighbor (communist china) began actually Shooting off nuclear capable missiles LAST YEAR.

And what about their (trhe russians and chinese) RADARS AND MISSILES ?

Charles, Ypres, France

RE: Fred, Bloomington, USA

Because Russia is more powerful than the US.
Russia is quite willing to live unprotected by the technological advances the U.S. has made, because Russian military gear is 10 years ahead of the US.

Neal, Auckland,

Yeah, maybe they'll send their flagship nuclear sub to... Er, well maybe they'll send their tanks rolling through East Germany... Fact is, the Russians aren't going to take time out from fleecing their poor to attack anyone. Their military is in shambles, and their former nukes now power my house.

Anthony Stark, Liberty City , USA

Par 1 plan for radar is simply part of the whole idea to site missiles on the doorstep of Russia. Is the same ok to do on the isle of Cuba? Or would that be a threat?

Andy, Ramsgate, UK

The left distorts things to suit their own twisted view. These are ground to air "defensive" missiles designed to strike incoming "offensive" missiles. They are kinetic energy projectiles built for speed & impact with no offensive use. Russian ICBMs aimed at the US would not even fly over Chech.

Eric, Pittsburgh, USA

I have one question, why are we making countries around the world hate us more than they already do. We in the US have a history of getting involved were we do not belong. Let the rest of the world take care of itself. We in this country have bigger probems then rouge countries.

Jeff, Macomb,

Will someone please explain just how interceptors in Europe protect US interests? If the Euros aren't afraid of Iran, why bother protecting their territory?

Base the system on US land, and US ships, and let's just build whatever we want. Here is a novel idea : Europe can look after itself !

Tom, Chicago, USA

Unfortunately the Russians never think like the rest of the world does. They always assume that they are to be the victims and act accordingly in a offensive posture. Does Putin have a soul? Yes, on his shoes, but not within himself. They want to feel important in the scheme of things worldwide.

Russ, Pasco WA., USA

All these idiots posting about, gee how would US feel if there were missiles in Mexico? Why would Russia put them there? to protect South America from USA? We are protecting ourselves from Iranian missiles into US bases. Russia would use missiles offensively against US not defensively.

victor, Pittsburg,

Would America be happy with a Russian missile defence system if it was placed in ..say ..Mexico?

kevin, London,

Russia has had latent desires to re-incarnate the old Soviet style and power of its former communist super power status which fell apart at the seams when Ronald Reagan went forward with the Star Wars program - an impossible feat for the Soviets to compete with.

Shearwater, Hillsdale. Mi.,

Obama would cower in front the Ruskies, who are more dangerous now than they were during the Cold War. If he is elected, he will lie down to them, and anyone else who barks...148 days in Senate will not be enough to confront ex-KGB members.

A..T., La Mirada , U.S.

Let's see...Russia is running mock bombing runs in the North Sea and the Baltic Straights. They are once again marching and displaying their military might in Red Square.The US is going to provide a defensive shield for Europe. Humm...I keep forgetting it's all George Bush's fault.

Jess, Pembroke Pines, USA

Many of the comments I am reading on this post and others seem to start with the assumption that the United States has the world's best interests at heart. Perhaps we should stand objectively and independent of main stream media and propaganda and consider the true intentions of such actions.

Eraser, chicago, US

Russia is alredy fighting proxy war against US. What else can they do? Bush knows this and is taking means necessary to protect your a$$es. Russia is flexing muscles now due to its oil money. Thanks to the DEMOJERKS who prohibit the US from using its natural resources to bring down energy costs.

victor, Pittsburg,

If Moscow is worried about undermining the balance of european security and thinks this is a hostile move by the U.S. then what are they doing selling arms, uranium and even a missile defense shield to Iran?

Brandon, Seattle, USA

What I want to know is, why as Americans do we have to stick our noses into European politics and keep countries at odds by playing war games on their turf? We've got our own country to look after and I think the Europeans are big and strong enough to mind their own affairs. USA out of Europe!

Raphael, Los Angeles, USA

This missile defence system is for Iran and the safety of Europe,it cant stop Russia's Arsenal(which is about 1/10th of what it was durring the cold war),dont get me wrong,russia has nukes,a lot of them,but do you know the cost of their upkeep,think about it,they went bankrupt for a reason.

Joseph, stafford, United States

One more nail in GWB's legacy. Putin (aptly pronounced "Poo-tin") is the same guy into whose eyes Bush looked and saw a good soul. What naviete'!.
(http://genelalor.com/)

GENE LALOR, RIVERHEAD, usa

My sympathies are with us the average American for our distasteful government. We've obviously learned nothing from WWI or WWII.

Tiffany, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

Russia while threatening military invasion in response to missie defences for Czechoslovakia has very formidable air defences of its own which we better start worrying about.

Gamaliel, Highland Park, USA

Russia is looking for excuses to invade Eastern Europe and reiincorporate it into the Russian empire. We must strengthen the countries of Eastern Europe to deter Russia.

Tony, San Francisco, USA

Missile defence system have no mind of its own. So all assurances that "it are not meant to be used against Russia" are rightly ignored by Russian government who make abscissions based on" what it can be possibly used for". US is wrong to place dangerous objects in Europe with lack of support.

Alexey, Novosibirsk, Russia

The Russians dont have the ability to do anything significant in the military shere. Only Economically and that to the former Warsaw Pact nations. They are a Nation in decline- sadly so.
They need to worry about the encroachment of China into Siberia.

Soldado Americano, Lansing, KS, US

How would America feel if Canada accepted a Russian military presence on it's soil?

Friends are friends. Neighbours are forever.

Aidan, Toronto, Canada

If my neighbor let someone put a canon in his yard and it is aimed at my house I would also try and do something about it. Yes I am an American but I like to see things clearly and I feel the Russians have a case here.

Phillip, Los Angeles, USA

Legal arguments are used in courtrooms when a thief has been caught with stolen goods, "Possession is 9/10ths of the law".

The history of the world is about who has the biggest gun then also makes the laws that retain possession of stolen goods.

In war money is no object.

www.just3ants.com

Gary S. Gevisser, Del Mar, USA

Russia demanded a "diplomatic solution" with regard to Iraq and most recently with regards to Iran and its nuclear program. Yet they go straight to military threats over a missile defense system. How hypocritical!

John, Atlanta,

this is a senario to create problem in europe and the midle east, of course with the help from our allies:the russians and the iranians we will stay A SUPERPOWER for the next 10 years,,do you remember kosovo?good luck

george raei, boston, usa

Yes Russia has only innocent intentions. Hey, let's give a totally stable country like Iran a nuclear reactor, and while we're at it let's sign a major arms deal with Venezuela to acquire Russian Fighter Jets and produce Kalashnikov assault rifles so they can eventually bully their neighbors.

Don, Cleveland, USA

President Reagan said that he would share this technology with the world (including Russia) once we developed it. Is this a viable option today, or not?

Dr. Robert J. McMonagle, Aston, USA

The Russians,having lost the Cold War are, emotionally, in the same situation as the Germans after their defeat in WWI - they feel humiliated and are planning war to obliterate that sense of humiliation. The goal is to convince the Russians to let the past go and join the West peacefully.

SMITH, Kent,

Ted B from N.J. is exactly right. This is about Russia's lost pride of not being a superpower anymore. They're saber-rattling to gain a perception of relevance again now that they have petro dollars. They know the shield is harmless to them and only designed to intercept a rogue state's 1 shot.

Rob L, NY, NY, USA

What is missing from the article and many of the comments, is something said earlier by the russian's. In order to intercept an Iranian missile, there is a very good chance the polish intercepting missile will over fly russian territory and could trigger an alert and response from russia

James, Vancouver, Canada

Russian foreign policy is traditionally driven by paranoia and belligerence, a policy that has netted them exactly nothing in nearly 800 years. Russia's rejection of a system that would ultimately be to their benefit, is typical of their dead-end logic.

Mark, AZ, USA

Russia has got a new stream of cash (oil) and is flapping its wings attempting to reestablish itself as an international superpower. They will push the boundaries and test our will as long as they can. Its all a game and no real military action will ever occur, there is just too much at stake here.

Arian, Denver, USA

Seems to me the only goal of setting up the missile defense, which has been proven to work only part of the time at an enormous expense, is to aggravate Russia and China, and possibly provoke them. More neo-conservative tactics in place of actual planning, debate, and diplomacy.

Timmy, LA, USA

Russia and America are friends. So what if both sides use this opportunity to upgrade some gear? A strong Russia and a strong America are good for global stability. The threats of tomorrow will come from different places.

Andrew, Paris, FR

Matt from Rochester, NY:

Know your history kid. What kind of weaponry/missles were in Cuba and on their way to Cuba during the Naval Blockade of the Missile Crisis. Were they strictly defensive weaponry?

No.

Andy D., Rochester, NY,

This whole world would be a better place if we stopped trying to "defend" each other and worried about building our own countries from the inside out, not trying to build other people's countries in our own image and "protect" them with our own missiles. It's a policy fraught with disaster for all.

Raphael, Los Angeles, USA

Right or wrong, at least one thing's consistent: The divide between public opinion and government policy is just as sharp in the Czech Republic as it is in the U.S.

Matt, Carroll, United States

If Russia is so concerned then why don't they simply stand by the USA against Iran. Then Iran would back down - they would no longer have Russia to build the Nuclear reactor. And then the USA could not use Iran as an excuse for the shield. Russia has an easy way to end it but chooses not to.

stevek, phila, usa

"The Ruskies made me hide under my desk in elementary school in 1953. I was ready to fight then, and am still ready now! Step up, Putin! I think you guys are all talk and no action."
Roger, Burlington, USA

...when the lunatics run the asylum...
What can we expect?

Raphael, Los Angeles, USA

Merv,

Difference between US and EU is that we are a country, therefore no... you can not negotiate with a state without federal approval. We on the other hand can negotiate with France, Britain, or anyone else in the EU.

jason, dallas, tx, usa

Alexey ,
These are defensive missles, not nukes, the US and Soviets
both have enough nukes to rid the world either one doesn't need any closer. We could do it from here. Your PM says Russia already has the technology to defeat these, so why are you so worried. Youe gov doen't lie.

Jon, Dallas, U.S.A.

Vladimir Putin is a genius. He has gotten Russia out of debt and the currency is strong. Meanwhile back in Bush Country, the economy is collapsing under the weight of foreign wars and corruption. They have the only other nuke arsenal on the planet to match ours. I would not laugh them off.

Cee, Minneapolis, USA

The anti-missile system is designed to stop the odd missile from a rogue state such as Iran. What does Russia have to fear? The anti-missile system cannot undermine the credibility of the Russian deterrant which consists of thousands of missiles/warheads.

Nick Bowman, Tampa (ex-Liverpool), Florida (ex-England)

1st, a Russian nuclear strike to the US would go over the north pole not Europe, so the radar is no threat to Russia.
2nd, the Russians have enough ICBMS to overwhelm the missle system, so it is no threat to Russa.
This is about Russian pride/prestige vs. our safety against a rogue nuclear state.

Mandy, Miami, USA

We are being hypocritical. Remember Cuba?
Now that Russia's military has excess oil money (opposite from our problem) they are in a position to do something. Our military is stretched to the breaking point - we can't even get Osama. Russia is growing from oil like Communist China is from slave labor

dave, Wolverine Lake , USA

For now, this missile defense system is not going to be able to knock out the size of the Russian arsenal, unless it has so deteriorated a few launch vehicles. If at some point in the future the technology advances to making ballistic missile delivery obsolete, no one should have a problem with that

Harry, Hong Kong, China

The proposed U.S. missile defense system in Central Europe would not fire any explosive projectiles, only an unarmed interceptor. Kind of like shooting a bullet with a bullet. The velocity and impact would take out the inbound missile.

Tom, Texas, USA

Ronald Reagan would be proud of Bush and Condi Rice.

RSU, Crestview, FL, USA

Is defence the European way to spell defense?

Dave, Charlevoix, USA

That one's in the history books. The US Navy has the power, and the will, to stop any offensive or defensive weapon headed for North or South America and deemed a threat. That's a political and military reality.

Dan Fite, Pelham, USA

What would the US do if Russia put defensive missles in Cuba/Mexico/Canada? Laugh and say "boy that was silly b/c the US would never launch a 1st strike. Moreover we have more weapons then they have interceptors so it would be doomed to fail". Its about Russia looking tough, not real concerns.

Mandy, Miami, USA

The American government should have tried much harder to foster good relations with the Russian government after the end of the Cold War. It makes me wonder if they even wanted to seize this golden opportunity that would benefit all of humanity. Pray for a new group of wise leaders who desire peace.

Paul, Cincinnati, USA

Building a missile shield is a waste of resources, because anyone who would attack the US with nukes (at this time) would do so by smuggling weapons in piece by piece, or hiding them on cargo ships. After detonation, the owners of such weapons would be very difficult to identify.

Glenn, Severn, Md., USA

why don't the Russians build some roads? The place is a mess.

Julian, Ben Avon, USA

What is Russia afraid of? The United States is less of a threat to Russia than Russia is to every nation in Europe. If Russia is so benign (when have they been such?), they have nothing to fear from a missile defense system. Their response is indicative of their sinister intentions, no doubt.

John, Warwick, RI, USA

That just shows how "independent" countries like Czech Republic are. The large majority of the nation is against the radar but the government signed an agreement.

Pc, Moscow,

Putin is a modern day tyrant and he must be contained.

R Schulz, VERNON, nj

If Iran backs down maybe we wouldn't have to put a missile shield to protect Iraq and Israel.

Chaz, Euless, Tx. U.S.A.

<< Let's have another arms race so the Russians can go bankrupt again!!!

Chris, dallas,>>

Um Chris? I think you better check again WHO is going bankrupt. HINT:It's not Russia

Jason, Phoenix, USA

In this respect the Americans are suicidal.
Why provoke a conflict with Russia over a stupid, not-needed missile system?
The Americans need to refer to A.C.Valdez's 1929 vision and A.A.Allens 1954 vision...and fortify their own country.

G.Gibson, Sydney, Australia

dont believe everything you see or hear it is part of propaganda..by the united-russian the create problem in europe,,like kosovo era..wich is lasted 10 years..
iran in the midle east.and the defence system in europe will keep us A SUPERPOWER for the next 10 years,,

george raei, boston, usa

Nonsense. The shield couldn't stop a Russian onslaught. It isn't designed to. It is meant to knock down only a very, very small handful. Besides, Russian nukes would most like be launched into orbit over the North Pole if they wanted to hit us, not directly west of them. Use your minds, Folks.

C Jones, LA, USA

The Russians, not the Americans, are making ridiculous overtures to war in ths case. If you READ the article, it says that the interceptor missile defense system was endorsed by a vote of NATO in April of 2007. Attacking NATO would be suicidal on the part of the Russians.

A.P. Taylor, Buffalo, United States

If Russia was not dishonest they would not see this as a suspicious move. Poland has a right to protection. It's just like the Communists leaders to think they get to determine who is safe and who is not. Nobody is safe with Russia's government. No matter what anyone says.

April, La Quinta, California, USA

If the Poland deal falls through, we always have the Aegis SM-3 interceptors based on ships, the Boeing Airborne Laser, the THAAD high-altitude SAM, the MIM-104 Patriot and MEADS SAMs (deployed throughout Europe) to defend the Continent and our East Coast. I love redundancy!

Matt, Chicago, IL, USA

Cold War historians are clear on this issue. The leaders of the Soviet Union first decided they could not compete militarily with the U.S. after Reagan refused to stop our anti-ballistic missile program. We won the Cold War shortly after. History proved strength, not appeasement, is the right path.

Greg, Columbia, MD, USA

Anyone who believes that Russia simply couldn't overwhelm this puny system is dillusional, they know it too. It's not about worrying about being attacked, it's about previous lost pride and newfound influence due to demand of their natural resources. They're protesting to prove they're relevant.

Ted B, NJ, USA

Both Russian and Iranian Missiles would travel north, over the pole to reach the U.S. Defensive missiles in Czech Republic (South-West of Russian missile fields) couldn't catch Russians birds, but could prevent Iranian missiles from reaching orbital altitude.

Rob, Riverside, California

If it isn't targeted at Russia and instead meant to protect from Iran (which I presume would retaliate after we bomb them) then why didn't we accept Putin's plan? I think the Bush team had a wargasm after Iraq and liked it so much they have to start a war with whomever to keep the feeling going.

Heather, spokane,

This system would be a pathetic first strike system. We have better missile systems for that at sea. If we go to war with Russia, it would be nuclear. AS HAS BEEN STATED, this is a defense system for future Middle Eastern hostilities. Russia's missiles are to numerous. Use a little logic.

Alan, Broken Arrow, USA

One has to agree that America is one her way out as a world power. Then, by golly, all will be well as Obama ushers in his "Change" and America becomes just another third world nation.
Who will protect Europe, or basic liberty then? We are on cusp of a brave new world indeed. A world all will regret

Ray, Kingsland, Georgia, USA

The missiles from the Cuban crisis were offensive, mid-range nuclear missles. These are defensive, short-range and non nuke.

Russian would attack the U.S. by way of the Arctic, so this wouldn't limit Russia's retaliation against the U.S. These sites are in the flight path from M. East.

Rob, Milwaukee, USA

1.20.09- Russians, hold out till then... Obama will ditch this stupid idea of a missile defense... If Iran wanted to nuke a country, they would slip it through with terrorists.... DUH

Christopher Weymont, SPARKS GLENCOE,

The US has already proved that 1. The GMD system works. 2. The system is not for missiles fired as close as Russia is. Look at the number of missiles to be emplaced. 10? 20? Is Russia saying it will only have 10 missile to "retaliate" with? & didn't they say their "super" missile can't be stopped?

Dave, Alaska,

Funny thing is Obama officially supports a tough stance on IRAN
and hasn't ruled out using military options.

I guess the Republican motto is
WWIII in Europe? We Can Arrange That.
Great for the US economy and there worthless currency, also a bonus of killing the Euro and tearing the EU apart.

Tony, Sydney, Australia

1. The Cuban Missile crisis was due to the Soviets parking OFFENSIVE nuclear missiles in Cuba. Sorry Sergey, but you are wrong. The MDS is defensive in nature. It could never deflect a massive attack from the Russians, but would definitely stop a 5-10 missile shot from the Nazis in Iran.

Dr. Jason Tanner, San Antonio,

Stupid George W Bush is determined to start WW3..... what would Americans do if Rusia was to install a 'defensive missile system' in Cuba?

David, Madrid, Spain

In this case, Russia is right. The US and the USSR signed an ABM Treaty 1972 for the purpose of preventing either side from being lulled into a false sense of security. We should focus our attention on getting rid of nuclear weapons and, in the mean time, preserve the reason not to use them.

Philip, New York, USA

Defensive missles on the US border analogy doesn't work. The US didn't spend the better part of 50 years imprisoning the people of Canada and Mexico like Russia did to the eastern block. Keep your guard up and you won 't get hit.

John, Ridgway, Colorado, US

Russia afraids of first strike of US nuclear arsenal. After that rest of their rocket forces can be intercepted by missile defence, system now have more than 10 interceptors and in the future number can be unlimited.

Ivan, Prague,

The defensive anti-missile missiles are not nuclear-tipped. They would amount to a very poor offensive system. The Russians are upset because they might lose the power to threaten their little neighbors with their own, Russian, nuclear weapons. Leftists like those in Greenpeace haven't a clue.

Joe Schmoe, Palo Alto, US

The analogy to missile defense in Mexico and Canada is a farce. No one remembers that Russia dominated Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Georgia, Belarus, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, et al. The U.S. stood up to the USSR - and will continue to do so. Good on us.

John Adams, Boston, USA

The Russian perception of its sphere of influence extends much farther than the world is comfortable with. Unfortunately, the same can be said for the United States. My hope is that a strong EU will emerge more quickly, and be able to field a military strong enough to put Eastern Europe at ease.

Craig, Bethesda, MD, USA

I don't get how a missile defense system in Poland (the north) is supposed to protect Europe from a missile attack from Iran (in the south). I think a better place for that would be in Italy or Greece. Or even better, let's allow the europeans to make their own system.

Steven, Absecon, USA

Russia has clearly stated its intentions. Sounds like time for a pre-emptive strike.

Rich, Marysville, U.S.A

I didn't like Bill Clinton, but I didn't sit around mulling over his mistakes. He was elected by our processes, so I supported (not agreed with) his decisions. He was doing what he thought was best for our country, but he was human. Bush is doing the same. I've never understood political hatred.

jason, dallas, tx, usa

"If the Russians put, "defensive missiles," on the Mexican and Canadian borders, the U.S. would rightly see that as an endangerment, and a hostile move."

- And f those countries were interested in negotiating to do that, everyone would say that it must be warranted because of the U.S.

Bill W, NY, USA

Russia is not in a position to make threats quite yet. Their economy and military are stronger than past decades, yes, but they are still on shaky, state-controlled ground. The U.S. needs to find a better diplomatic strategy in general anyway, though, with regard to Iran.

Jacob Smith, Phoenix, United States

The Russians should respond exactly as the US has on the ABM issue and deploy their own ABM systems on their own soil and those of friendly nations. Defensive missile systems only threaten those they would thwart.

Norm, Phoenix, USA

The Russians apparently do not want to leave themselves
vulnerable in any way and the impression is they do not currently wholly identify with the Western bloc. Therefore it might be better to suggest placing missile shields in nations further from the former communist states, eg, Italy.

Joan Moira Peters, Whangarei UK Citizen , temp o/seas in New Zealand

We only plan on placing 10 interceptor missles Europe. Russia has hundreds of nukes aimed at Europe so why are they crying? I forgot Russia has the final say in Europe. Let's have another arms race so the Russians can go bankrupt again!!!

Chris, dallas,

What do the Russians have to fear? If Russia has no intentions of using any ICBM's what difference does it make whether the U.S. puts in any kind of defense system? Again, this is another case of Czar Vladimir flexing the Russian bear's muscles. The USSR is making a comeback. Duck and cover!

Paul, West Virginia, USA

The emerging soviet power is of deep concern. Many liberties that the Russian people enjoyed have now been "scaled back" since Putin has stepped down. Communist influence is back again in Russia. The USA is keeping this emerging influence "contained," as history has an ugly way of repeating itself.

Mark, Cleveland, USA

Fred Bloomington, USA -- "The U.S.S.R. is dead...why does Russia feel it can still control Eastern Europe?"

Because it can, and it does

Stuart, Chelmsford, UK

Russia at least makes sense. Putin always made sense to me. I'm trying to think of anything the USA has done in 10 years, domestically or internationally, that made sense. I just cant think of anything. Obama doesn't make sense. Neither does McCain. It's a baffling country. And I'm from here.

erik, new york city, USA

The Russians will always be an enemy of the US and the cold war has never really ended. They are bitter that their previously owned USSR territory is pro-US, and their economic trading partner Iran is being targeted by the US with this defense system. Cannot be trusted.

Tim, Exton, USA

Defensive missiles can not be used offensively because of it's technology and limited range. It's built for speed and not for the transporting of 20 or 100 megaton nuclear weapons.

Bobby, Milton, Canada

The US does not think it can "control the world".
But it does think it can help protect free peoples from those that would attack them with missiles. Terrible thing I know. Just terrible, defense technology. Why does Russia care if free peoples defend themselves? Get over it.

Jack Burton, Boston, USA

You would have hoped, after the Cold War, that the world would learn that finding a bigger stick for protection only means the bully goes and finds an even bigger stick to beat you with

Stuart, Chelmsford, UK

Well if Barack Obama has his way, Europe won't have any missile defense system in place and will let Iran finish its nuclear weapons program, endangering the entire continent.
A defenseless Europe? Yes We Can.

Matt, Atlanta, Ga, USA

Missile defense system is not defensive, but offensive weapon. Missile defense system will never stop first strike from Russia, but it will be able to stop retaliatory strike after US destroys most of Russian nuclear weapons. Russia is worried and rightly so.

Sergey, Redmond, WA,

The U.S. is in the final throes of its superiority complex and the deluded Yale cheerleader Bush is desperately trying to build his legacy. The bill for all these follies will come due soon, and the American poor and lower middle class will be in soup lines.

gary Belcher, Kettle Falls, United States

Just try to imagine American reaction, if Russia would locate missiles (defensive, of course) somewhere in Latin America. But you don't need to imagine - remember Cuba missiles crisis.

Sergey, Moscow, Russia

History tends to repeat itself and if anyone really thinks Russia is not longer a Military Aggressor - you are now seeing it. Russia is NOT a friend of the West nor the EU. They never really have been.

Chuck Davis, Franklinville, US

And why does US think it can control the world?

Elina, Great Britain

elina, lewes, Great Britain

That's the point of Russia's objection. If it has no viable defense against agression, then it is entirely vulnerable to future invasion. Simplistic, but pointed. Russia's being governed by ex-KGB officials is a separate issue. Just a historical look.

Darryll, El Paso, USA

To me it is obvious why Russia is upset about this program. Setting up a "missile defense shield" this close to Russian soil takes away Russia's ability to retaliate in the event of an act of American aggression, which would be a reasonable fear for them especially given how we went into Iraq.

Jeff, Merced, USA

Some people are not quite right about Missile Defense being purely defensive. It could, theoretically (and only theoretically) be used as a shield from which to sit behind and launch attacks (neutralizing an opponent's retaliatory response). But Russia could defeat this shield easily in any event.

Kyle, Monroe, NY

The U.S. should stop hitting the nose of the Russian bear. This missile defense is a fraud. It's a fraud because Europe shows no apparent fear of a missile attack from the Middle East. It's a fraud because we have a Meditarreanean fleet that can act to detect missile lanches. This is a bad move.

mike, Yuma, Arizona, USA

This is a prelude to war. there were no WMD in Iraq and installing ABM's in Eastern Europe is not defensive.

bryan, santa Monica, United States

there is a difference between a radar and a missile the last time I checked.

Ted, Houston, USA

The Russian growl is worse than there bite. They threatened retaliation in the 80's when Reagan put updated missles in Western Europe. Yawn.

Thomas, St. Louis, United States

The U.S.S.R. is dead...why does Russia feel it can still control Eastern Europe?

If they are so confident that Iran has only peaceful intentions, then let them live unprotected by the technological advances the U.S. has made.

Fred, Bloomington, USA

Apparently the Russians, unlike the Democrats in Congress, are convinced the sytem works. Let's hope we never find out.

Charlie, Harrisburg, USA

Once again, the Bush's administration failed.... this time to measure Russian intentions accurately when he looked into Putin's "soul" 7 yrs. ago.

Add this miscalculation to the long list of Bush Administration disasters. And why are U.S. taxpayers paying off those countries to protect THEM?

Tom, Springfield, USA

Well, one would hope that Russia is going to help Cuba now with a similar agreement. Just think of all the rogue nations in Central America that are threatening Russia and the rest of the world that is still free of US domination.

Dave, San Pedro, CA, USA

Why are we "defending Europe" anyway? Maybe we should withdraw from Germany; I think the war ended some time ago...

bob, Metairie, USA

A threat from Iran...???

Whatever happened to Saddam's alleged WMD?

Did the sand dunes eat them all up?

What will be the next excuse for this belligerent and gross error of judgement plus titanic waste of money and resources...???

I know a "suspected" attack on Europe from the Daleks....LoL

Victor, Moscow,

A missile defense system cannot be threatening if it is never fired upon.

Ryan, Hudson, OH, USA

The U.S. Defence missile system is nothing more than the name implies. It is for Defence only, so why would any country object to their neighbor putting this system in place unless they forsee a situation where they would want to attack their neighbor? I say lets share the technology with Russia.

Scott, San Diego, CA

The russians have always been difficult to trust, anyone who thought they were our friends were just being naive. They are power hungry and dangerous. Europe should be scred, the Soviets have re-appeared over the last few years, pretty scary.

jojo, Elgin , USA

I would rather dither over HOW the US uses its big stick, then find out, we don't HAVE a big stick to "negotiate" with.

Jon, USA,

The Russians are bluffing. What are they going to do? Build a nuclear power plant for Iran? They're already doing that. Maybe they will sell fighters to Venezuela. They're already doing that. The Russians don't cooperate with the US to any substantial degree, anyway. Why listen to them?

Mark, Brookline, Massachusetts, USA

Epicenter by Joel Rosenberg...that's all I have to say.

shannon, Spokane, USA

Is the Czech Republic representing the will of the European Community? Are independant military alliances with foreign governments by member States permissable under EU law? Would the US federal gov't allow Sacramento, CA to form a military agreement with China? Who is really running Brussels???

merv, atlanta, GA, USA

Russia is behaving abominably. Let's hope the chattering classes and the left of the media place the opprobrium where it belongs: Russia, and not with its the usual whipping-boy, the US. The US and NATO are not at fault here. The problem here is an anti-democratic regime - Russia - sabre rattling.

Nick, Rotherham, UK

Building this system is a great way to discover the intentions and attitudes of other naions. Those who object definately need to be treated with caution.

At least I got a chucke from that part about Greenpeace. Kind of ironic that they're protesting a system that could make ICBM's obsolete.

Nick, St. Paul, United States

The governments which force their people to have US radars (Czechs) to have US-ruled NATO membership (Ukraine) and not so hardly in favour missiles placement (Poland) are to be called democratic. It is the US which was bombed not them so the US people should deal with their threats on their own.

Alexey, Novosibirsk, Russia

Attack! Attack! Attack!

Do we recall what happened when the USSR moved missiles onto Cuba-- or almost did? The US and USSR were *this close* to nuking it out.

Now the US is the one acting assininely. What goes around comes around, I guess.

Matt, Rochester NY, USA

Yes, right, if Russia has enough power to ensure its nuclear security and Europe and US hardly will make the deal on some without causing a lot of problems - the Russia is the one to blame!

Alexey, Novosibirsk, Russia

The Ruskies made me hide under my desk in elementary school in 1953. I was ready to fight then, and am still ready now! Step up, Putin! I think you guys are all talk and no action.

Roger, Burlington, USA

Land-based ABM in Europe plus ABM-capable Aegis frigates in the Baltic Sea and Arctic means Russia no longer has a retaliatory strike capability. We'll have to "launch on warning". This is a disaster waiting to happen, if only to please the USA with their compellance (world domination) doctrine.

Anatoly, Moscow, Russia

With a growing middle class and economic might stemming from runaway oil and commodity prices, Russia, predictably, is now able to flex its military muscle in addition to its economic muscle. What's needed is a longer term, foresighted policy for dealing with this challenge, KGB or no KGB

abhaig, arlington, usa

Why must we keep poking them in the eye? We beat up on and dismantled their oldest ally (under false circumstances) and are surrounding them with missiles. Of course they are going to react; because they feel powerless.

Glenn, Capistrano, CA , USA

If the Russians put, "defensive missiles," on the Mexican and Canadian borders, the U.S. would rightly see that as an endangerment, and a hostile move.

That is because a defensive system can be used as an offensive first strike system as well.

The U.S. is playing a very dangerous game.

WW III?

Bill, Slidell, LA

The Russian bear once again showing its true face. With the KGB running its state, history is doomed to repeat itself. My sympathies to the average Russian for their distasteful government.

Bill, New Moscow, CCCP