David Charter in Nice
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
Barack Obama was handed an early foreign policy hot potato yesterday when President Sarkozy proposed a truce in the row over US plans for a missile defence system in Europe.
Taking it upon himself to make the EU’s first intervention in the debate – and getting the backing of Russia, which has threatened to position missiles in Kaliningrad – Mr Sarkozy proposed a summit next year on a new pan-European security system, after a suspension of activity from both Moscow and Washington.
The French President’s latest piece of off-the-cuff diplomacy caught most of the main players by surprise and raised eyebrows for seemingly trying to bounce the next US President into a policy change as well as talks about a security organisation to rival Nato.
Mr Obama has said only that he will review America’s national security priorities, including the Bush Administration’s plans to site ten interceptor missiles in Poland and a radar base in the Czech Republic.
These two countries remain confident that the plan will not be scrapped and were dumbstruck at Mr Sarkozy’s proposals yesterday, which seemed to reward the threats made by President Medvedev of Russia last week.
Speaking after hosting the one-day EU-Russia summit in Nice, Mr Sarkozy proposed that a summit be held next June or July at which Russia, the US and Europe could discuss a long-term security framework.
Although the US has insisted that the missile shield would act as a defence against Iran, Mr Medvedev chose the day of Mr Obama’s election to threaten the deployment in Kaliningrad, the Russian enclave next door to Poland, in a Cold War-style escalation of the row.
Mr Sarkozy, speaking at a joint press conference with Mr Medvedev, said: “I have suggested that in mid2009 we could meet within a framework to lay the foundations of what could possibly be a future pan-European security system. This would bring together the Russians, the Americans and the Europeans.”
Mr Sarkozy said that this could be discussed at a summit of the Organisation of Security and Cooperation in Europe, adding: “Between now and then, please, no more talk of missile deployment or antimissile deployment.”
He added that the proposed missile shield would do nothing to help European security.
The suggestions represent the latest in a string of eye-catching proposals from the hyperactive French President while his country holds the six-month EU presidency.
Many fizzle out as fast as they are made after painful battles with fellow EU leaders, such as his call for political intervention in the running of the European Central Bank, his desire to become the “economic president” of the EU by chairing regular meetings of eurogroup countries and his suggestion of European sovereign wealth funds to take stakes in ailing industries.
Responding to his latest proposal, Mr Medvedev called for all sides in the dispute to avoid “unilateral measures” before a new security framework was agreed.
He also defended the Russian threat to move missiles to Kaliningrad as a counter-measure, calling it “a response to various nations in Europe who, without consulting anyone, agreed to deploy new weapons on their soil”.
Speaking on a visit to Prague, the Polish Foreign Minister said that he and his Czech counterpart hoped that Mr Obama’s Administration would go ahead with the missile defence scheme.
Radek Sikorski said that he and Karel Schwarzenberg understood that Mr Obama “will take a new look” at the plans but he said that they did not expect “any revolution” in thinking on the project.
Showing that Russia and the EU remained divided over Moscow’s behaviour in Georgia, Mr Sarkozy repeated in front of Mr Medvedev that Moscow had not yet met all the conditions set in the peace agreement that he negotiated. Mr Medvedev insisted just a few minutes later that Russia had indeed done all that was asked of it.
The two sides nevertheless agreed to resume talks on a wideranging economic and political agreement covering their relationship after they were frozen in August by the EU in protest at Russia’s “disproportionate reaction” in Georgia.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
The British Army wore Red so That blood would not show during battle.
The French wore Brown for similar reasons.
Reallity Check, Washington State, USA
Please do not trust Russia. You will remember my words. Do not trust Russia. Russia's attitude has never changed and never will. Russia is looking back to reigning Eastern Europe.
jirikoo, Prague, Bohemia
In better times, "protecting" Europe was an extravagance America could afford. Though Europe, and to a lesser extent the UK, were worthless as allies, our "alliance" kept Germany from rearming. Today, however, I think Europe and the UK should fund their own defense. Ditto for Korea. Good luck!
RSP, St. Simons Island, GA, USA
Russia can overwhelm any defensive system. So what does Putin really want? Regional hegemony. This fight is about reasserting control over Eastern Europe. Russia cannot lose, if the west gives in, Russia is bigger, if the west goes ahead, Russia has reason to rearm and redeploy. Putin is smart.
Frank Stein, Coleytown,
I think that the French President is right to some extent. The US has its military missiles all over Eastern Europe. The countries there are poor dependable on many things. In addition you can't just put all you weapons in another country, keep them in yours.
Stevan Datzkel, Berlin, Germany
Sarko finally does something right!
William, Guildford, UK
The French can't seem to get past a policy of appeasement. Rejecting a missile defense system, given the rogue status of the middle East, is an invitation for future terriorist extorsion. A defensive position is not an act of provocation. Protecting ones home land should be paramount.
James Meredith, Brantley, Alabama, USA
A union of the EU, US and CIS seams the way forward no ?
We cannot afford to go back to cold war scenarios, not with emerging powers in China or India.
Alfred Dodds, Dakar, Senegal
I feel sure we have been here before. That's right Reagan and the Pershing missiles. Who was against them-France. Can the Berlin Wall redux be next ?
Desmond Taylor, Houston, USA TX
we are rewarding the russians and showing serious weakness in the face of aggression. It is also showing why a EU force would never work and also why the EU as a whole is always going to struggle. with so many countries all with different foreign and internal policy agendas all pulling against
c. Frize, glasgow,
I agree with Mr.Sarkozy. There should be no US or Russian missile sytems in Europe.
However I don`t see the point of a new EU Force. Instead, we should look at the achievements of NATO and how we can strengthen it. After all NATO brings together more partners.
N.Imamoglu, Essington, UK