Martin Fletcher in Baghdad and Deborah Haynes in Amman
2 for 1 tickets to Singin' In The Rain, this coming Monday. Book now
The Government has accepted privately that interpreters who face persecution and death for helping British troops in Iraq must be given sanctuary in Britain.
Its change of heart follows two weeks in which The Times has highlighted the plight of the interpreters, and expressions of outrage from military leaders, politicians and diplomats at their abandonment.
“There’s an emerging consensus [across Whitehall] that there’s an issue here that has to be dealt with, and it’s difficult to see how a blanket refusal could be a tenable position,” a senior official disclosed yesterday.
Ministers will not take a formal decision until early autumn “but I would be very surprised if that decision is entirely negative . . . There’s a general acceptance that we need to do something and should do something.”
Referring to the Danish and American decisions to grant asylum to their Iraqi employees, the official continued: “Is it a tenable position for the Government to take against the back-drop of what the Americans and Danes are doing to say ‘sorry, we don’t accept there’s an argument here and we’re going to do nothing about it.’? I don’t think so, and I don’t think ministers do either.”
He said that the argument within Whitehall was no longer over the principle of accepting the interpreters, but over “scope and scale” – how many Iraqis to accept – and other practicalities. There are only 91 interpreters, but thousands of other Iraqis have helped the British in various ways and could be targeted as “collaborators”.
The Times revealed two weeks ago that the Government had refused to relax its asylum regulations for the interpreters despite personal appeals from senior army officers in Basra. That prompted Gordon Brown to order an urgent review of a policy that had been the subject of bitter squabbling between the Ministry of Defence, the Home Office and the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. Since then The Times has reported several cases of interpeters and their families being killed, kidnapped, tortured or threatened by Shia militants, who are said to have a hitlist of those who work, or have worked, for the Brit-ish-led coalition in southern Iraq.
The official called those people “unsung heroes” of Britain’s engagement in Iraq. He said that the military, the Foreign Office and other branches of the Government were totally dependent on them in places such as Iraq and Afghanistan, and spoke of an “emerging recognition” across government departments that these people had to be helped.
“There’s a clear moral and opera-tional argument that we must do all we can to recognise the contribution they have made to British interests, and the risks they run by dint of working for us,” he said. “Nobody is seriously disputing that we do have a serious responsibility to these people.”
The debate within Whitehall now centred on which Iraqis should qualify for sanctuary in Britain, he said.
The interpreters and their families would clearly be included, but there are thousands more Iraqis who have helped to build British bases or worked on them in other capacities and would also be regarded as collaborators. Most would would want to bring their dependants to Britain. The Home Office has claimed that 15,000 Iraqis have worked for the British since 2003 and could claim assistance.
“I don’t think even those who have seen the clear, moral argument would suggest it’s feasible to have 15,000 Iraqis set up on Romney Marsh,” the official said.
The Ministry of Defence is said to be concerned that there would be a “rush for the door” by its Iraqi employees. The Home Office is worried about the impact on its asylum policies. It wants to avoid relaxing the rules in a way that would set a precedent – by allowing the Iraqis to apply for asylum from outside Britain, for example. It does not want to open the door to failed Iraqi asylum-seekers in Britain.
Rafiq Tschannen, the chief of the Iraq mission for the International Organisation for Migration (IOM), also told The Timesin an interview that his agency was ready and able to assist Britain with any resettlement programme. “The UK must do something for the people who work for them,” Mr Tschannen said at his offices in Amman, Jordan. “They should take the responsibility and say that if you have risked your life for me then at least I can try to help you.”
Road to sanctuary
August 7 The Times reveals that 91 interpreters have been told they will be left behind. This contrasts with the position of Denmark
August 8 The Prime Minister promises a review of asylum applications lodged by interpreters
August 9 Emerges that an Iraqi translator who travelled to Britain independently was granted asylum
August 12 An interpreter claims that about 60 colleagues have been killed working for the British
August 15 The Times reports the story of two brothers who work as interpreters, one of whom has been killed. The other is in hiding
August 21 A senior diplomatic official tells The Times that the Government accepts it must give sanctuary to Iraqi interpreters
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
Have you ever dreamed of owning your own racehorse or a beautiful painting?
Enjoy comfort, safety, space and great design. Plus enter our great competition
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
Do you have what it takes to be a Times photographer?
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
Find out to make the most of your money with our wealth management guides
Need help with your property? We have an entire how to guide - buying, selling, letting, moving, to help you
We are seeking entries for the inaugural Sunday Times Best Green Companies Awards
Enjoy some wonderful inspiring wildlife moments
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Overseas contacts and local business information

Direct from the farms
2007/07
£57,500
South East England
2007/07
£40,995
South East England
2006/06
£41,995
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
£40-55k+benefits+uncapped commission
Morgan Keating
South East
Up to £30,000
GLE
London
£
c£75,000 + executive benefits
Morgan Keating
London and South
Unpaid with travel expenses
Network Rail
Globrix, the property search engine
Visit Times Online Property for homes for sale or rent
Residential development site with planning permission
£1,500,000
Mortgages, bank accounts & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Dinarobin Hotel Golf & Spa 7 nights
From £1830 per person – saving £530.
Walking & multi-activity holidays in Cauterets. Stylish self-catering apartments.
From 350€ for 7 nights.
SAVE 25% on Sandals Luxury Resorts
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Get the dictionary out and check the difference between translator and interpreter. Do it NOW.
Andrew Milner, Yokohama, Kanagawa
Before we look at well paid Interpreters for one year we should look to soldiers with 20 years service in the British Forces - THE GURKAS - do we not owe them? Mr Brown should look at the big picture- not headline grabbing-when will we learn - 1 in 4 UK births to foreign mothers, prisons full of undeportable foreign nationals, rise in crime, our rivers and canals emptied of fish, rise in TB , etc, etc,etc--is it a wonder the 'Brits' are leaving as fast as they can? sigh
william, Sheffield,
About time commonsense prevailed - especially when this dysfunctional government and its interpretation (forgive the pun) of the Human Rights Act allows the foreign murderer of a British headmaster to remain in the UK and contribute nothing positive to society.
Jennie, Pangbourne, Berks,
This will open the floodgates to tens of thousands of Muslims to come to this country - all claiming fear of persecution and all backed by the immigration lobby in this country. There may be a pro-asylum consensus in the political establishment but what about the views of the British people? It's our country - not yours to just give away. Let these people go to another Arab country where they would fit in. How about Saudi Arabia. It's rich, Arabic-speaking, strongly Muslim and was opposed to Sadaam Hussein.
Mark, London,
Once again our authorities have shot themselves in their collective feet.
Showing the attitude of ' the Raj' taking & not giving , behaving like the world owes us , when in truth it's very much the opposite.
Had Britain accepted it's responsibilty, did the decent thing & quietly given permission to the interpreters, they would not have had this dilema .
We need friends in the Arab world , these people will continue to be pro British if treated fairly.
Stop being so damn condescending & give them their due, WITH GRATITUDE & recognition.
Maggie Millington, Brittany , France
So now anyone employed by the army in any warzone across the world can come to live here.
The people being treated with the most contempt by this government are the British, Thatcher took this society to new lows but compared to Blair and his socialist cronies that was nothing.
Steve, London,
Again this goverment plans to show it has no backbone and will let these people into our country which will eventually prove to be the tip of the iceberg and soon all the relatives will be on the march to the UK. Why dont this gutless goverment just hand our country over to those who see it as their Mecca and be done with it. Maybe be the answer is to emigrate as so manny of us brits are or are planning to do ASAP.
H W Wilson, Essex, Great Britain
So it seems we let people into our country who we know nothing about and have done nothing for Britain.
But it would appear that those people who have put their lives at risk by helping us can't get sanctuary here.
Our countries policies just get worse and worse!
Francis, Birmingham,
'Shukrun' is what I remember from my childhood in Arabic speaking countries-Thankyou-
We learned to respect and speak the pleasantries of a difficult language, I may have forgotten lots of words , but some basic ones still surface, Thankyou is the word we must always remember!! Actions speak louder than words!!
maggie snook, wool wareham, Dorset UK
Why is this Government and its highly paid officials so stupid., its obvoius when this matter became public they would have to do the honourable thing.
N Fee, Workington, Cumbria
Time and time again Britain treats all of those non nationals who help us out in sticky situations ,with absolute ingratitude and contempt.
Our arrogance is legendary. As above , the wonderful Gurkhas
are a prime example, even those who served with the camel corps in the Sudan , and elsewhere. Or even when we abandoned Rhodesia, another example!!!!
In heavens name give these Iraqi translators a safe secure passage to the UK, thank them well ,please.
maggie snook, wool wareham, Dorset UK
The British Government has a long history of treating very poorly people who have helped the United Kingdom overseas. One has only to remember the very shabby treatment of former Gurkha soldiers as an example. Many have fought for the United Kingdom and then not even given the right to reside in the country for which they fought for. What a shame and a disgrace. Members of the French Foreign Legion become French citizens.
Charles Morgan , Madrid , Spain.
But look what it took to get the British Government to back down.
Question: Why was it necessary to be forced into a position of having to 'back down'? Doesn't the British brain recognise that when someone has gone out on a limb for you, you support them to the hilt?
Answer: The empire wasn't built by being nice to people. The empire may be gone; the basic attitude remains. How pathetic!
Dave Reynolds, Selby, UK
How pathetic! as usual UK policy is made by reference to the US (and the Danes). Do we not have the nouse to say what we believe and stand by it?
oldasiahand, Guildford, UK
Whitehall playing a numbers game is a little disingenous. Latest immigration figures show approximately 600,000 Eastern Europeans have relocated to the UK in the last few years, with approximately 400,000 UK residents emigrating. The influx of Eastern Europeans has been generally beneficial, although various racist groups dispute this. As such, 15,000 Iraqi's, who by definition would be pro-British, represents something like 2.5% of the newly arriving immigrants from Eastern Europe. This is not a significant amount. As such the offical who seems to think it is impossible to accomodate 15,000 immigrants should look at his own statistics, which demonstrate we do this many times over every year. Even if every Iraqi who had worked with us were allowed asylum, it would not make a greate deal of difference to the overall picture of migration in the UK. This highlights the vileness of Whitehall officials and Gordon Brown's government trying to abrogate their responsibility.
Peter, London,