Gerard Baker, US Editor of The Times
Win Sky+HD for a year and a trip to Barcelona
To his presumed dismay, and certainly to the US military’s detriment, General David Petraeus has become a polarising figure in Washington.
Democrats are furious at what they regard as a politically inspired whitewash by the commander of US forces in Iraq designed to please his masters in the White House. Today, they used the opportunity of his long-awaited testimony to two House of Representatives committees to attack the General’s broadly upbeat assessment of the progress of the surge and his plea to allow the military to continue the fight at least until next summer.
Though they carefully stopped short of outright hostility towards the solemn man with the four stars on his epaulettes, Democrats lined up to express deep scepticism at Gen Petraeus’ claims of significant progress.
"The administration has sent you here today to convince the members of these two committees and the Congress that victory is at hand. With all due respect, I don't buy it, “ said Tom Lantos, chairman of the House Foreign Affairs committee.
Other war critics went further. Protestors in the House hearing room shouted “war criminals” at the general and Ryan Crocker, the US ambassador to Iraq, who testified with him. Uglier in its way was a characteristically unpleasant attack advertisement in the New York Times taken out by the left-wing antiwar group MoveOn.org. It accused the general of lying about the progress of the war and mocked him as “General Betray Us.”
It is odd that Gen Petraeus should be getting such flak.
It is odd first of all, because it is not what Democrats were saying when they agreed eight months ago to the appointment of the general as commander in Iraq. Back then Democrats lined up to associate themselves with someone routinely praised as a war hero for his earlier contributions to the war in Iraq. He was confirmed by the US Senate without a single dissenting vote. Democrats knew at that point that the general favoured the surge; indeed he was one of the architects of the strategy. Now they don’t like his advocacy of it or his hones assessment to judge his progress.
It’s odd, secondly, because the surge is indeed showing signs of real progress, as Gen Petraeus explained at the hearing. This was no triumphalist performance. He was sober and restrained and expressed great caution about the long-term prospects. But he also laid out in simple, statistical detail how he has kept up his end of the bargain by helping achieve significant improvements in security.
But it’s odd most of all, and indeed dangerously curious, because in the end it is of course right that military leaders should be committed to the military objectives they have been tasked to complete.
Gen Petraeus has a mission to execute. He is in the process of executing it. He is not there to critique the broader strategy nor is he likely to insist to members of congress that his men and women should be free to carry on with a failed mission.
Democrats agreed to the process by which the general himself would report to congress on the progress of the surge. Now they seem to want to discredit that process.
The really dangerous aspect to all of this is that one day Democrats really will be in charge of the US armed forces again. They of all people should be aware of the risks to the democratic process in politicising the military leadership.
The loss of confidence in the independence of the US military leadership in Vietnam was one of the most damaging long-term effects of that war. Politicians on both aides will be the losers if that miserable experience is repeated.
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2006
£14,337
2008
£39,937
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
£
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
1 & 2 Bed apartments
From £249,995
Great Investment, River Views
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
low-cost ownership homes in London
Las Vegas SALE!
£POA
With Ramblers Worldwide Holidays!
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Et tu General Betrae-us?
SC, London, United Kingdom
The dems seem to be in an awful hurry to lose this war...at any cost!
Scott Boswell, London, NA
Ideology and political partisanship defeats reason too often. I'm talking about Democrats in this case who seem to wish to refuse to listen to reason in a feedback process they themselves set up. They are too eager to see the war fail for their own political gain and it will bite them in the behind.
Russell, Leeds,
It is not only the Democrats who are questioning the Pet General's rosy scenario. Senator Lugar, a most distinguished Republican , took C&P to task today, along with Senators Hagel, Coleman and Murkowski.
Rebecca, memphis tenn., USA
Are you people living in a time warp? Are you aware that this war has been going on for almost five years. Petraeus is not a hero, he is part of the problem. The American Generals have been a go along to get along bunch and have been the large part of America's failure. A hero would have challenged four years of failing tactics about four years ago. Weak Generals like Petraeus have cost us 3,700 dead and 27,000 wounded with 12,000 of these maimed. We are still counting. How many more casualties will we have over the next four or five years?
c. perry, Boynton Beach, USA, Florida
This administration and those who still support the invasion of Iraq have stated in their own defense that everyone, Democrats included, believed at the time that Saddam Hussein had wmd's and that regardless of the fact that this was ultimately proven to be largely overstated if not entirely wrong, the invasion clearly appeared justified to all at the time for this reason. Democrats and their kind shared the blame by not being critical enough of the presented facts, so the argument goes.
I have no doubt that both General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker are honorable men just as I have no doubt that Colin Powell is an honorable man. Unfortunately men can be both honorable and wrong.
Although one can argue about the choice of words, I think the skeptics at yesterday's committee hearings should be applauded by both sides of the issue. Had skepticism originally been encouraged rather than shouted down, perhaps America would not find itself in a situation that no one sought.
Nick Vasile, Yardville, NJ
It is ironic when Josef of Cape Elizabeth, Maine USA is critical of politicians dubious of General Petraeus stay the course logic, saying they "...must be experts in the art of war", obviously not knowing of Sun Tzu who wrote the book entitled The Art of War. The fundamental message in that famous text is that you will certainly be defeated in war unless you both know yourself, and your enemy.
It is pointless by this time pointing out to such as Josef all the falsehoods under which the war was fabricated, but it is useful to note how little we know of our "enemy" because we define it in terms of abstractions and slogans such as Islamofacism, which is not an enemy that can be known. That is merely an epithet. Our real enemy is chaos but we are spreading chaos most effectively, and its kind of hard to know chaos. The longer the occupation, the greater the shattering of Iraq into smaller and smaller units, the greater the resulting chaos and the worse the ultimate blowback. Great.
Tarquinis, Seattle, USA
These things are always political soapboxes for elected officials. I watched the start of it. Skelton went on and on. I took a shower, checked email, let the dog out, folded some laundry, came back, and that blowhard was still talking making his own political statement. Time which could have been better used listening to the General. As for the protesters. Early on the camera showed the ushers seating two rows of people with "generals lie..children die" shirts on. Now c'mon! Call me stupid....but who let these people in out of all the ones that could have been there? I'll tell ya who. The same ones that made a big show of getting them out! It served the democrats purpose. No..its not odd that the democrats turned on this man after supporting him unaminously...its just democrats!!!
Murph, Madisonville, USA/KY
Mmmm statistics,how about over 60% of the world thinks thinks this was a prefabricated fiasco and should stop now.Of course the report shows improvement otherwise we would see the carnage reported in the news wouldnt we?I may have missed the part of the statistics about the numbers of Iraqi citizens who have been killed or are we still not counting them,after all if you are bringing democracy to people shouldnt they be allowed to know the cost?
JohnP, Newcastle, UK
Terrorists - " They're nowhere, They're everywhere, they're evil, they're from the dark side and can only be stopped by good. They live in caves somewhere on the other side of the world, unkown and come out in the dark thirsty for innocent blood. They may be among us now or maybe under your bed ! ".
-Really, being serious for a minute this is the essence of the story both the british and american government has told without the clever words and public hand gestures. Quite honestly as a society if we as a majority arwe able to belive such stories they we deserve to be manipulated and lied too.
Lewis Day, london, middlesex
The General and the Ambassador have bought the US time. Time to create a consensus on its national security policy. It sits now in a hydra between the wreckage of its pentagon's transformation strategy and its state department's performance dialectics. Within its White House lies a vacuum created by its Acting President and recently departed rasputin who have paralyzed it in ways that only Al Qaeda could dream. Somewhere among the new performers of both parties lies the person who will cut this knot. That person will have the men who won today to be give thanks.
Bill Keller, BASKING RIDGE, New Jersey
The military was politicized when our delusional and incompetent President and his neoconservative puppeteers misled the nation into war under false pretenses against the wrong country and then incompetently conducted that war, and demonized any one who dared question their rationale, motives or strategy for launching war in Iraq.
What the anti-war community is saying about General Patreus and the war in Iraq now is nothing compared to the slime that the administration and its allies said about anyone who dared question them, including respected military professionals who dared offer a different opinion about how to proceed.
I don't doubt General Patreus' integrity or his honesty, but I do doubt his ability to convey accurately to himself, to Congress and to the American people an objective appraisal of the Iraq War and the surge.
Even if he were objective, our incompetent and fantasist President, the self-described "decider", will continue down his road of delusion.
Dan W., Santa Monica, California, USA
It seems that you haven't got the word over there yet. The Petraeus report was written in the white house.
Somebody please tell Jerry Baker.
Publius, Pittsburgh, US
Maybe the British and their attitude was right after all and the Irquis need to be left to their own will and fate. Basra is relativley calm now.
Max, Houston, Texas, US
The sad thing here is that the Democrats are determined that the war must be lost at all costs, and want to deny anything that shows the slightest hint of improvement. I don't much like what Bush has done in Iraq, but where the generals try to do their job, then it's unacceptable for the Democrats to publicly attack and slander them. That's plain pathetic.
Doug, Glasgow,
I.m just wondering how many stars do the politicians have on their shoulders especially the ones attacking Gen Petraeus? obviously they must be experts in the art of war, far better soldier than the General! tragically they are not and they just sound like what they probably are idiots, unfortunately idiots with power. If we do not stop the terrorist over there for sure they will be knocking on doors over here and it would not be to sell cosmetics.
josef, cape elizabeth, maine Usa
Basra seems to be doing fine without the UK in town.
phil Greene, houston, us/Tx
The Democrats unfortunately have a foreign policy agenda other than the interests of their country. This is an expression of their moral and intellectual degeneracy. As you indicate, the risks of politicising the US military cannot be underestimated and, since commentators have recently been drawing parallels between America's perceived decline and that of the Roman Empire, the Democrats would be well-advised to note that there was an extended period between the end of the Roman republic and that decline in which the military dominated political life not, many would say, in the best interests of civilised life. The outrageous and reckless manoeuvring by the Democrats and their blindness to the real foreign threats to the USA and the civilised world which it protects are likely to lead in the same direction.
Derek, Shanghai,
I don't agree with the army's stop loss policy. Our son got home from Iraq Nobember 2006 after one year deployment. He is scheduled to get out of the army January 8th 2008. However, his unit is being redeployed in December of this year. One month before he was to get out. He along with 700 others who were to get out of the army were told they have to go back to Iraq for a year to fifteen months. I support our troops and appreciate all they do, but let's let these men and women get out as scheduled instead of keeping them against their will. Our son has a wife and a two year old daughter which he would like to see grow up and not in pictures or videos.
Susie,
A scared and loving mom
Susie Sowers, Casper, WY