Deborah Haynes in Baghdad and Michael Evans, Defence Editor
Take a trip to New York and see the city from the air
Iraqi interpreters hoping to resettle in Britain are being warned that the number accepted will be strictly limited and many will be unable to enter the country before summer 2009. The criteria laid down in the letter sent to former Iraqi employees by the British Government sets out the hurdles to be cleared before they can be considered refugees. They are being offered a financial package or resettlement in Britain, but not both. Kim Howells, the Foreign Office Minister, is to discuss the matter with concerned MPs today.
The Times disclosed yesterday that 200 out of 600 former Iraqi employees had already been rejected, and more than half of the 200 interpreters on the list had been turned away after failing to meet the eligibility criterion of 12 months’ “continuous” service.
David Lidington, a Conservative foreign affairs spokesman, said: “I think the Government is being niggardly. The bottom line is that, if an individual’s life is in danger because he worked for the British Armed Forces in Iraq, there shouldn’t be an arbitrary quota. We owe these people a moral duty.”
A 29-year-old interpreter who has been told that he is eligible for assistance – either financial or an application for resettlement – said: “The Government is trying to make the number of interpreters accepted for asylum as low as possible. It has to take into consideration our suffering. It should reform its position again and make it easier. It should accept all the interpreters and make their asylum procedure take just one or two months. If it is difficult to take all the interpreters to the United Kingdom then it should send them to a third country.”
Two routes to resettlement in Britain have been offered: former Iraqi interpreters can apply to the Home Office’s Gateway scheme for refugees but they have to start the process in a third country; current Iraqi employees can apply for “indefinite leave” in Britain.
The Home Office said that under the Gateway scheme, a quota of 500 Iraqis had been fixed for next year. But that figure includes dependants, listed in the official letter to applicants as spouse or civil partner, children under the age of 18, mother or grandmother who is a widow aged at least 65, father or grandfather who is a widower aged 65 or over, and parents or grandparents travelling together of whom at least one is 65 or over.
Other relatives can also be considered under exceptional circumstances. A spokesman for the Foreign and Commonwealth Office said that he was unaware of any quota for those still serving in Iraq who wanted to apply for “indefinite leave” status.
Britain has announced that it will hand control of security in Basra to the Iraqi authorities on Sunday. Yesterday a triple car bombing left about 40 people dead in the city of al-Amarah in Maysan, another southern province once under British control.
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


Overseas contacts and local business information

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests


£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
Live in One of London's Most Vibrant Areas
From £249,950
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Sir,
Despite all the surprising volumes of good news being reported by the Times, I wonder will they actually make it out alive by 2009?
SC, London, United Kingdom
UK what i have been told u my life is in danger and the rules of resettlement for UK still out of reach please correct rules to consider all of interpreters
N, south iraq, iraq
indeed that is uneasy for interpreters to have some cash money what am saying what the indivitual did with money if his life in risk and cant work in civil area as safe as before ..pls UK do the best or correct the rules so that to be able for workers outter from Iraq...with regards
m, basra, basra
Sadly we should not be surprised this has happened under Labour.
So many promises made to the press and so to the public, only for them to be quietly broken months later.
I cannot remember a government apart from this one that has so blatantly twisted and turned their back on pledges and policies made to the press and public.
It did not sound right before but I now have to agree with the Conservatives that Gordon Brown is truly disrespecting the public and is arrogant in telling us the public one thing and yet deliberately having no intention of following throught with it.
My heart goes out to those interpreters and other people who have helped this country only to be let down by the current Labour government.
Aubrey, London,