Dean Nelson and Ghulam Hasnain, Lahore
Win VIP tickets
AMERICAN and Nato forces are taking the Afghan war into Pakistan, targeting pro-Taliban militants in a development that has caused friction with senior Pakistani officials.
They claim that the West’s determination to capture Taliban and Al-Qaeda leaders threatens to shatter a controversial peace deal that had bought a breathing space for President Pervez Musharraf’s battered army units in the North Waziristan tribal belt.
The United States believes that Pakistan’s pact with the Taliban has allowed Al-Qaeda to regroup there.
During a visit two weeks ago, Dick Cheney, the US vice-presi-dent, demanded that Musharraf do more to pursue Taliban and Al-Qaeda militants in Pakistan’s border areas, where Osama Bin Laden is believed to be hiding.
American forces are increasingly targeting the terrorist leadership inside Pakistan. Admiral Mike McConnell, the US director of national intelligence, told a congressional hearing: “The intent on our part is to do that more and better . . . hopefully at some point either killing or capturing the senior leadership.”
Last week McConnell appeared to be as good as his word after Nato forces arrested a top Pakistani Taliban leader during a raid from Afghanistan.
A joint force of Nato and Afghan army commandos in two helicopters landed in the Shawal district, which borders Afghanistan’s Paktika province, and seized Hakimullah Mehsud. He was a close aide of Baitullah Mehsud, whose Pakistani Taliban fighters are believed to have sheltered senior Al-Qaeda leaders in North Waziristan.
News of the raid emerged as Nato intensified operations against Taliban forces in Afghanistan to try to foil a planned spring offensive. Observers in Pakistan’s tribal areas report increased activity by Nato spy planes and more helicopter surveillance.
Senior figures in Pakistan’s government condemned American claims of an agreement that allows them to strike from over the border.
Recent Nato strikes have undermined Islamabad’s claims to be a partner in the war against terrorism. There have been incidents in which homes in border villages have been searched and villagers interrogated. Last week a shepherd was seized on the Pakistan side and airlifted to Afghanistan for questioning.
In January, two Pakistani soldiers were killed and two wounded in rocket attacks on their border posts at Shawal in North Waziristan and Angoor Adda in South Waziristan.
The United States is also believed to have been behind an air strike on a religious school in the Bajaur Tribal Agency which killed 80 men and boys in October. Pakistan initially claimed that it had launched the raid to target Taliban militants, but local politicians said the dead were innocent students.
The question of whether Musharraf has given tacit consent for the US strikes into Pakistan territory is highly sensitive. Hayatul-
lah Khan, a journalist who claimed to have discovered proof that America was launching missile raids inside Pakistan, was kidnapped last year and found murdered in North Waziristan.
Last night Lieutenant General Hamid Gul, former director of Pakistan’s intelligence service, said he was preparing to issue a writ in the Supreme Court to stop US raids.
He claimed that senior army figures were embarrassed at what they regarded as a breach of sovereignty, and that continued breaches could result in Musharraf being toppled.
America has been frustrated by the Pakistan army’s weak grip on North Waziristan, which is effectively under Taliban control and is increasingly used as a base for attacks on Nato troops.
Yesterday a Pakistan soldier and three militants were shot dead at a border post there. Militants opened fire when they were challenged as they entered from Afghanistan.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
just like the president of pakistans highly contreversial decision to put under arrest the CJ of pakistan is becoming the most testing part of his presidency, the decision by US forces to invade pakistani sovereignty will entirely backfire as time and time it has been proven that you cannot bully a nation to its knees without it retaliating right back in your face. the US cannot tell itself that it is the ruler of the world just because it is the super power, if only one super power decided to learn from history of previous super powers that force is inevitably you fall, if we in this world have that one power that thinks for everyones interest then i wonder i wonder what world would we be living in?
amir ali, nottingham, uk
to a reply to brian, you talk about the civilised world yet whats civilised about the US's invasion of Iraq the US invasion has led to more deaths than that of the entire tenure of saddam hussain is it ok for the US to call this collateral damage just because its not the Americans that are dying its innocent iraqi civilians, i mean US spokesman come out and say in war we will have casualties well saddam hussain could have turned arround and said the kurdish were fighting a war against him so he decided that he will use excessive force because he is at war with his enemy, but would the world have accepted that as collateral damage? 'I DONT THINK SO'.
amir ali, nottingham, uk
If you consider the possible alternative to what you are saying, you will realize that invading the sovereignty of a nation is a big deal. The United States is the lone superpower and cannot enforce/police its own borders. What if a coalition of countries began invading our country in order to capture/kill someone they were chasing? Although I think this happens all the time anyway, I suggest that Musharraf is just playing his cards to the best of his ability. His goals are not our/NATO's goals. That is the real trick. How do we convince other countries, like Pakistan, that we have common goals or how do we convince ourselves to assimilate some of our their goals into a broader action in order to simultaneously achieve both?
Chris, Granbury, Texas
Its hard to say a country is soverign if it can't police its interior, and cedes areas inside itself to foriegn terrorists and world class criminals like the taliban and al queda. Its a joke for the Pakistani Government to feel so offended when legal nations, long standing members of the UN which itself is a signatory, to so righteously object to the hunting down of occupying terrorsts threatening all our civilizations. Pakistan has nuclear tipped missles yet it cannot police its interior. This is a very unstable situation, and they constantly use the excuse that to bring any true law and order there will topple the moderate government of Musharaff and cede these wepons to extremists who will simply give atomic wepons to the foriegn terrorists. Nothing good or civilized will ever come of the taliban or al queda. This war needs to be brought to completion so that the civilized world can better spend its resources on building and growth.
Brian, Los Angeles, California
Finally, it's about time they started taking the fight to these people.
The agreement was little more than giving in to the tribal leaders demands with little to no benefit in return (bar saving Pakistan having to engage them).
People complain that NATO hasn't found the top tier of AlQaeda yet, perhaps untieing their hands and allowing them to cross into these lawless border regions will give them a fighting chance again.
JD, London,
The question is whether they are really that stupid or they are deliberately trying to destabilize Pakistan. (Which would mean they are even more stupid.)
Ofcourse if the policies implemented until now are any measure I fear it is even worse than that.
Albert Bakker, Veendam, Netherlands
Musharraf must be on borrowed time, one would have thought. He has long walked the tightrope of Pakistani politics but growing anti-American sentiment must surely catch up with him. What follows him could be very interesting indeed, especially as elections are scheduled for this year. A government of militant Islam would hardly stand by and watch NATO cross its borders. And such a government would have the keys to a nuclear armoury.
O bin Laden would be a national hero. AQ Khan is one already.
john b, Portarlington, Australia