Sam Knight and agencies
Win VIP tickets

Britain's relations with Iran will move into "a different phase" unless Tehran quickly releases 15 British sailors and Marines taken hostage last week, Tony Blair said today.
The Prime Minister gave the warning while insisting that diplomatic channels remained the preferred route to secure the release of the personnel, who were seized in the disputed Shatt al Arab waterway which divides Iran and Iraq on Friday.
Asked whether there was any news on the eight sailors and seven Marines this morning, Mr Blair told GMTV: "No, there isn’t, but let me just say our first concern is for their welfare and to get them released as quickly as possible.
"What we are trying to do at the moment is to pursue this through the diplomatic channels and make the Iranian government understand these people have to be released and that there is absolutely no justification whatever for holding them. I hope we manage to get them to realise they have to release them. If not, then this will move into a different phase."
The Prime Minister's spokesman later explained that by saying "different phase", Mr Blair meant that Britain might explore alternative means of negotiating with Iran, such as making public the exact co-ordinates of the incident last Friday, which would indicate that it took place in Iraq waters.
Last night relatives of the only woman among those taken hostage, Leading Seaman Faye Turney, spoke of their distress at her capture. Today a photograph of Ms Turney, taken six years ago when she was serving with the Royal Navy in Sierra Leone, was released.
In a statement released by the Ministry of Defence, Ms Turney's family said: "While we understand the media interest in the ongoing incident involving Faye, this remains a very distressing time for us and our family. We are grateful for the support shown to us by all personnel involved and appreciate it, but would request that our privacy is respected."
This evening, a second of the hostages was named as Paul Barton, 21, from the Marshside area of Southport in Merseyside, who it is believed only completed his training with the Royal Marines last year.
Iran stated once again today that the sailors and Marines from HMS Cornwall were safe and well but refused to confirm reports that they had been brought to the capital.
"They are in completely good health. Rest assured that they have been treated with humanitarian and moral behavior," Mohammad Ali Hosseini, a spokesman for the Foreign Ministry, told the Associated Press.
Mr Hosseini said that Ms Turney was being held apart from the others to give her privacy. "Definitely all ethics have been observed," he said.
He added that the personnel were being interrogated as to whether they entered Iranian waters deliberately or not, suggesting a possible way out of the impasse. Until now, Iran has threatened to put the sailors and Marines on trial for spying.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£23,093 - £56,211
The Office for National Statistics
Newport, South Wales
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I'd just like to add a few things to what people have said, the reason that the marines were captured with no resistance is because, they arent allowed to open fire unless ordered to or they are fired upon, this would include the HMS cornwall firing any warning shots as they would be considered hostile actions. Furthermore why would the UK gov be using diplomatic channels if all they wanted was war, for the conspiracy theorists out there, read the above comment, if the UK & US govs really wanted a war i reckon we would have already gone in, and doesnt a crisis concerning a countries nuclear development present a good enough reason to have our troops ready, i would prefer to see this conflict to resolved peacefully but they have captured our soldiers and we dont leave anyone behind, so if they wont release them i think we shouldnt be afraid to resort to military action.
Alex Doyle, Norwich,
this is just pretext to get in to a war tha both blair and bush
wants.. setup incidents on the sea. have gotten the U.S. into two other war korea and vietnam .
if the iranians and iraqi's can not agree on were the border is how can the British navy?
pete staff, seaford, n.y., u.s.a.
the difference between americans and British is this... the British train, think, plan, think, train, plan, train, plan then act mission successful. Yanks... knee jerk...BOMB THEM, SHOCK AND AWE. GO USA. WE RULE....everyone dies..including their allies... Yanks..tut tut.. all the gear and no idea..yawn... ooohh.. we are behind you Britain... well if the 2nd world war is anything they are a long long waaay behind us. Leave this to the professionals or there will be war that the ÚS will regret. We aint behind you usa. Britain needs deliverance from evil....that evil is usa. (im ex-Brit army and ex-gulf war 1 BTW))
John Shonfield, Reading, Berkshire
What is it about spring and Iran taking hostages? the situation now, the one in 2004, Operation Eagle Claw and the London Embassy seige all took place in April/May/June. Anyone know why?
I can't see this crisis blowing up into a war unless both sides are that stupid. The American Captain's comment that his men would have reisisted capture shows just how much the US is itching for a reason to fight Iran (Tonkin Gulf mentioned by Gregg).
No resistance shows integrity and courage of our troops rather than tactical stupidity. Quite why counter-measures to this were not put in place based on the 2004 capture does raise questions about the leadership of the marine commanders in the gulf.
Matt Parrott, Scunthorpe, UK
Yet another Yank with a say......
If they were in Iranian waters, then they are guilty....this must be solved in courts. If they were in Iraq waters, then they are innocent and should be released immediately. If neither of these are possible and Iran refuses to be intelligent on handling this situation, then unfortunately we must prepare for the worst. Are we tired of war and of our soldiers deaths....of course we are....but there is a simple rule in the military, never leave a (wo)man behind. This is not Americas fight, but we will not leave our British friends behind. I understand how the British population feels about their PM as a general whole....but should the British government feel that there is no other recourse then war, I am sure that the American Government will support them with every ounce of military might we have. For those who say we do not have enough troops to support another front....here is a thought.....a double carrier group already in place...hmmm
Mike B, Fort Wayne, IN, US
It is embarassing to read all the comments made by British that advocate for a diplomatic solution to the crisis. In fact, it is downright shameful. They are sattelite photos being circulated that pinpoints the exact location of British vessel/s and guess what, they were in Iraqi waters intercepting an Iraqi-bound vessel. Notwithstanding the fact that the Iranian Navy was intruding into Iraqi territorial waters, but by kidnapping and threatening UK forces in Iraq operating under a UN-sanctioned mission is essentially a declaration of war and an act of international piracy. It is jaw-dropping having to witness what the British people have been reduced to over these past decades due to the extremes of multiculturism, political correctness and a general weakening of the spine, not to mention the brain too! If my daughter/son was one of those kidnapped, and i do have a brother who is serving in Iraq, I would never accept anything less than an immediate and unconditional release OR ELSE!
Harry, Hounslow, UK
As being in the US military, Has anyone heard of ROE? Probably not. Its rules of engagement. Every solider has to follow these rules.. you cannot open fire against other military personnel unless your life is in DANGER. With that said, being captured by another government does not constitute your LIFE IN DANGER. What would happen if someone fired a weapon and killed someone? The lowest ranking guy can set off a war!
I'm not sure what happened, all I know is that 15 soldiers were taken against their will and I don't believe for a second that they were in Iran's waters. Every one wants to say that the GPS will show they were not in Iran's waters- I believe exactly that -what is to happen if we PROVE they were not in Iran's waters? Then we have means of provocation, so we must ACT, the "think tanks" know this, so the information is not being released to prevent the "citizens of US UK" from declaring an all out war. Trust me "people are smarter than you" are trying to do this peacefully
Army, Korea, Korea
If the British personnel did stray into Iranian waters, which is highly implausible considering heightened tensions with Iran over their uranium enrichment program, then we must resolve this on Iran's terms. However, if this was an aggressive capture by the Iranian government we must make sure that we do not become the aggressors. The Iranian President is spoiling for a war, seeing it as an opportunity to unite much of the Middle East against 'Western' invaders and to spread the forces of the 'West' thinly across a vast area.
However, we should not be afraid of going to war just because of the travesty of the handling of the Iraq war. Nations such as Iran would be without fear or respect for the 'West', if we removed our teeth, and since we are reliant upon the Middle East for oil we cannot impose effective sanctions. If diplomacy does fail then it is likely these British personnel may be tried and executed. A mummery which should not be left unanswered.
Phillip Fernandes, London, England
Some of the comments on here are laughable. E.g:
"Its all a conspiracy between the UK and Iranian governments" - oh, get a grip!
"The US/UK are making lots of money out of Iraq" - really, please, please explain how.
"Its just an excuse for another illegal, unjust war" - screaming illegal and unjust every time you get a chance doesn't make it so.
"the poor innocent Iranian government is just being suckered into providing an excuse for a new war" - if so, what was the previous 2004 kidnapping about? And why did the Iranians blindfold our troops / subject them to mock executions?
"if our troops were in Iranian waters, the Iranians are in the right" - how disgraceful. So, the possibility that a few troops in a couple of open boats in the middle of nowhere might have crossed the border justifies their kidnapping and indefinite detention?
I pray that some of these comments do not represent wider public opinion-if they do this country is finished
Charles, Bath, UK
Faye Turney should be remembered as a representative of our "armed forces" who publicly humiliated the uk on Iranian and therefore world tv because she missed her children.
ron, middlesbrough,
"This left wing liberal wimp needs to shut up go hug some trees or save some spotted owls."
I find it quite disturbing that people who do not want to bash other people's brains in and who care about other people - yes, caring about the environment actually means caring about other people - are so looked down upon.
I suggest you visit the BBC's Have Your Say area, Mr USA, you'll get along famously with that lot.
Starling, Lancaster,
I notice remarks about the size of the Iranian army. There is an ancient proverb saying something along the lines of numbers alone confer no advantage. Our technology is far more advanced and that is generally the deciding factor. Any action against Iran would be from the air. A full invasion would never be contemplated and certainly not after Iraq. However, diplomacy is the way to go. It is nonsense to suggest that the UK has any wish to kill any other nationality. I am sure that the Iranians have every intention to release these servicemen/woman. Clearly they will want to do it on their terms so they can posture or avoid loss of face. Let them, the intelligent world sees Iran for what they really are. Iran, will return them unharmed as they will fear the potential reprisals from the UK and it's allies. Iran much prefers lurking in the shadows and employing cowardly means such as terrorism. More importantly, we must spare a thought for the famillies of these soldiers.
Henry, London,
It is embarassing to read all the comments made by British that advocate for a diplomatic solution to the crisis. In fact, it is downright shameful. They are sattelite photos being circulated that pinpoints the exact location of British vessel/s and guess what, they were in Iraqi waters intercepting an Iraqi-bound vessel. Notwithstanding the fact that the Iranian Navy was intruding into Iraqi territorial waters, but by kidnapping and threatening UK forces in Iraq operating under a UN-sanctioned mission is essentially a declaration of war and an act of international piracy. It is jaw-dropping having to witness what the British people have been reduced to over these past decades due to the extremes of multiculturism, political correctness and a general weakening of the spine, not to mention the brain too! If my daughter/son was one of those kidnapped, and i do have a brother who is serving in Iraq, I would never accept anything less than an immediate and unconditional release OR ELSE!
Harry, Hounslow, UK
It is time to make a show of intelligence and wisdom tempered by reason- not more war. Think of all the innocent women, children and men that have been killed or maimed in Iraq over the course of the war- how many more soldiers on both sides have suffered the same fate and yet most of what we see here is cries for more war. Has there not been enough killing for everyone? Have enough children lost fathers and mothers; sisters and brothers?
Yes, there are bad people in this world, but there is no way that a reasonable person can say "everyone in a particular country or of a particular religion is bad just because they fall into a particular category". We all have friends of different colors, races, religions and creeds, but at home we all get along (pretty much anyhow). Why is it that this feeling and mentality can not seem to get past our respective borders? Think about it.
Phil, Shenzhen, China
Let's face it, the Jihrad is here to stay and is determined to destroy the U.S., Britain, Israel and it's allies. If we keep playing this stupid diplomacy game, eventually the Terrorists, Iran and it's cohorts will get their hands on a nuke and make 9/11 look like we got hit with a pea shooter. We need to align our military with our allies, forge ahead and take this enemy down before it is too late. Wake up all you liberals, your butt is on the line too!!!!.
Pete, Ridge, USA/NY
To the 'british uk,uk' bloke who calls himself British - you are not & never will be! Your just one of many immigrants in my country sponging off us & when we (the Anglo-Saxon British) do something which is an attack on your beliefs you all show your true identies. British, my backside!
British Bulldog, London,
The only way to deal with these people is to use force to show them they can't bully the world. Thats all they understand. They dont care about anybody else but themselves and if we set them back a few years,by military action, then maybe they will understand the worlds position that we must all live in harmoney and not by the rule of a madman. Get ready, the're next and they are the ones who are starting this. Enough is Enough. Lets get it on!
Barry Semon usmc, norristown, pa
Blair is calling for our European partners to tighten the screw upon Iran by restricting their large European imports
Yes pigs will fly before the French and Germans rush to answer that call..
Jack, Newtown, Powys
So after the Irainians put your sailors and marines through a show trial and then detain them under duress for 444 days; will you start frothing at the month at the mad mullas or are you going to find another way to appease them Mr Turney?
Only time will tell.
Fritz Massart, seattle, USA
To all these people that want to go bombing Iran, let us think. When my Mother was a child Germany, Russia & China were super powers...maybe when life moves on, you may find yourself at the end of an enemy gun and I'm sure you will beg for diplomacy.
No-one is the 'Big-Boy' forever...and your kids may pay for your gun-ho attitude...
Lee okugbeni, enfield, middlesex
There exists a solution which will assure a prompt release of the British hostages: (i)British Gov't apologizes to the Islamic Republic of Iran, (ii)British Gov't supports the Islamic Republic of Iran at the UN in its quest to become a nuclear power, (iii)Big Ben gets converted to a minaret. Perhaps more can be done, but these are a good first step. Judging from a number of posts here, many Brits are now ready to support these measures.
Victor, New York, USA
Hey Joshua Denis, Miami Beach,, FL-USA,
Why would we blame the Americans for this? You lied about WMD, you lied about why you wanted to go into IRAQ, you had no plan of what you would do once you got thier, you are responsible for 1 million Iraq deaths. O and you have also been kidnapping Iranian soldiers without any justification and I have not heard of them being given access to thier diplomats.
I guess I have no idea why in the world that anyone would think this entire mess is your doing.
Joseph Kellie, Edinburgh, Scotland
It really seems to me that the Iranians are looking for leverage against the UK/US and a way to ensure negotiations as opposed to bombings of their nuclear facilities. This is a wonderful diversion. This is much ado about nothing, Iran would never harm these Marines/Navy personnel. I must admit though I am continually disappointed by the attitude and comically nerotic British citizens who still think in terms of the Gov't vs. the people. Britain is a strong, rich nation and I very much enjoy your people but you need to stand up for yourselves and stop being pacified by the "european" idealism. Britain still has a lot to lose to the blending of cultures. Diversity doesn't always mean good things when it means losing your identity.
R Cady, Merrimack, NH, USA
Peace, Patience, and Diplomacy.
Gary, corner brook, Newfoundland
Donowan Stone does not speak for all of the US. This left wing liberal wimp needs to shut up go hug some trees or save some spotted owls.
Mr. USA, San Francisco, CA, USA
Ok, Im sorry, but this maybe another incident like in the 80's. Except for one thing; Brittish SAS Forces were the best then and are the best now. I would not agree with a "shock and awe" campaign, but I would like to see the SAS kick rear and take names. Them boys are bad a$$ and can do the job.
Donald Draper, Emoria, United states
In an earlier comment it was stated that the US/Britain have some 400,00 troops in the region and that Iran has
7 meg. What you must realize is that the only troops we really need our the ones that control the weapons that are so far advanced that Iran or anyone else for that matter would have NO defense for. So keep on pushin.
JR , Defiance, OH,
Tiago - Rick Peters is American in case you didnt notice, he doesnt care about the NHS.
Paul, Camarthen (and several others) - Maggie wasnt dealing with a middle eastern state wrt the falklands, with respect, the argentinians are a totally different breed of person with a different mind set to the iranians...I'm not sure she would have been as bullish if she were in the situation Blair is in now (except i dont think she would have sent british troops to iraq anyway!)
Gwilym Rhys Jones - LMAO - probably the most correct statement on the board...then again, John Major....
Mark, Warrington, UK
British marines taken hostage without shooting a single shot? Marines?
When did Jacque Chirac and the French take over the once glorious British military? This is just another of many examples of the "femininization" of the European mindset.
Let's see how long it takes the euro-sissies to blame this also on George W. Bush and the Americans.
Joshua Denis, Miami Beach,, FL-USA
Nobody here in the US, aside fromour President (in all likelihood) wants war with Iran, regardless of the circumstances- even if they built nukes. And we're already too overstretched to win in both Iraq and Afghanistan at the same time, without a draft- and although we probably have over a million potential draftees, there's about zero percent for that courseof action. On the other hand, we can't leave our only 100% reliable ally in the world -the UK- on its own if Blair does ask for American help. Tough situation.
Donovvan Stone, Baltimore, USA, Maryland
this soft approach by Blair will only result in a win-win for the Iranians even though they have ignored and broke all international laws.
The British need to stand up for themselves in this situation by taking whatever punitive military action on the despot Iranian regime to send them a clear message.
dick, baltimore, md
i agree with Tevor. It is a challange to common man and we must say yes to diplomacy and no to war.
a.k.srivastav, Delhi, India
Diplomacy WILL work, its not easy though
(http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/leading_article/article1577370.ece)
Mark, Warrington, UK
I think we should conduct a shock and awe bombing campaign of strategic Iranian sites. If we can set them back several years economically and militarily, including the destruction of their nuclear facilites, this will send a clear message to them that appeasement is not our method of handing this crisis. There would need to be, of course, great care taken to miminise collateral damage that is, the loss of civilian lives.
Nick, London, UK
I can't believe we are being so spineless about this. Even the British forces in the region alone have the capability to deal with this. We should simply sink one Iranian navy boat every day until the hostages are returned. It will be an easy choice then for the Iranians - return the hostages or lose their navy. They do not have the sophistication to protect their ships from our attacks or to retaliate against our ships (provided we remember to fire on them this time when they approach).
john hall, Hyderabad, India
I have to agree with a comment made by an earlier poster: "Fool me once, shame on YOU. Fool me twice, shame on ME". I can see through your vails Blair / Bush and I'm so glad I'm awake. Sorry to dissapoint you Blair, but this one gets my vote for a DIPLOMATIC resolution. You'll have to come-up with a more convincing False Flag Opperation than this one to get me frothing at the mouth like a blood-thirsty drone calling for the bombardment of yet more innocent men, women and children. Perhaps another Gulf of Tonkin scandal is in order? No doubt we'll soon see something along those lines that'll help justify your invasion of Iran...hhmmm...let's wait and see.
Gregg Turney, Derby, England
"Our" combined UK/US troops, by conservative estimates, have killed around 400,000 Iraqies in total. There has been enough bloodshed already. I want my government to DIFFUSE this situation diplomatically not stoke the fire with threats of yet another invasion.
What we have to realize is that this is a sophisticated operation designed to maniplate public opinion. I would not be at all surprised if Iran military are in cahoots with British military to "orchestrate" this pantomime. The general public in EVERY country needs to be alert. We are being duped and persuaded into war with eachother and a handful of elites from each country are profiting from OUR BLOOD. It's not *British* people against *Iranian* people. It's regular British/Iranian people against the British/Irainian Puppet Masters who really don't give a crap about us. We are just a means to an end in their eyes and that end is MONEY. Oil, Arms sales and "reconstruction contracts" are making a few people EXTREMELY wealthy.
Tevor Dante, London, England
The Iranian government is trying to cover up there nuclear program and decided this will draw the steam off that subject for the time being the Iranian government is making a big mistake it is gaining foes instead of allies I belive it is all a lie on there behalf if they were in there waters prove it don't act it release them or there will be hell to pay!!!
The Cowboy, Weyers Cave , U.S. Virginia
Both the ones that say just talk and the ones that say kick down the door are going to extremes. The UK should try diplomacy to the last but be firm and willing to use force if all else fails.
Remember those young sailors and marines are doing their duty for your country. Honor them and pray for their safe return.
Ruben, San Juan, PR / USA
We are with you Great Britain! I know its a mess over there but you must know the U.S. are a good people and meant well with this war. The people over there need to be taught how to be cilvilized with brute force evidently. God bless the sailors and marines.
Joey, Tennessee, U.S.A.
A number of Iranian officials were kidnapped by British and American forces just weeks ago. And now Iran has kidnapped British sailors. It's a tit for tat.
Alex, London, UK
my view is remenber ! USS PEBLO WHAT TO DO ?
PAUL, balto, md.
I dont understand, if the brits were in Iraq waters,like they say they were,when iran gunboats came out of their waters into Iraq waters,and as this gunboats were coming at them......would that not be seen as being attack...the brits are at a state of war right!....the thing i dont understand is why did they not open fire?
timothy cowan, toronto, canada
In November 1979 Iranians led by their present day leader raided our US embassy in Tehran "an act of war" and held hostage many of it's staff and workers. This went on for well over a year during the Democrat - Liberal President Jimmy Carter era of government. When Ronald Reagan Republican -Conservative was elected the hostages were let go on Reagan's Inauguration day January 20th, 1981. They feared what Reagan would do to them but not Carter.
Is there a moral there someplace ?
Whatever you Brits decide the USA will be with you.
Moon Dog, Long Island, USA / NY
ehsan davoodi should prove they were in Iranian waters, they were not as GPS will show
Allan, Liverpool, UK
In my opinion this kidnapping incident is an act of war by the Iranians. This is in addition to the acts of aggression Iran has made to "warn" countries of the consequences of any action. The Iranian government is becoming increasingly fascist, there is significant suggestion of terrorist training and promotion of anti-semitic activities. Unfortunately there were flawed reports that led to the Iraq mission of removing a brutal oppressive dictator. There is no way another war can be started without much greater reason. A UN resolution should always be granted before taking military action. International support is vital solution. Iran's nuclear ambitions are clear, any peaceful nuclear research should be regulated by international means, by the IAEA like every other country. The Iran problem is not going to dissappear. In fact, the Iraq problem is unlikely to be sorted without action relating to Iran. Now, we can do this the easy way, or the hard way, which is it to be Mr. Ahmadinejad?
Lionel Tiger, Birmingham, UK
Oh, I know, the Irantians snatch 15 brave soldiers who offer no resistence and its Bush's and Blair's fault.
Yet another illogical conspiracy spun by the appeasing left.
IronMike, SteelSpine, USA
Why not just tell Iran that the British did not intend to breach any boundary, but if they have done so, Britain would undertake never to do it again, would help Iran mark the channel to prevent any future confusion, and would be prepared to apologize if any offence was given. Next, Britain might ask if there are any other reasonable steps remaining (none, I would think) it might take to remove Iran's concerns so that the sailors could be returned. If we carefully read the words Iran's leader has said over and over again, I think Iran is mostly thoughtful and peace-loving. What possible legitimate reason is there for Britain and Iran to be at odds anyhow?
Em Hawthorne, London, UK
i think that your say (americans and britan) in this case proves again and again that you don't believe in negotiation or talking to the other who's different from you , you want to attack ,hit , destroy .you believe just in power and strongthe. you must firstly ask how this curious marins had been captured and then request to be released, what will be your attitude if the troops of an enemy enter your country illegally and confessed of doing that by intention. you must learn to say the right even if against you and will hurt you.
waliallah labouzi, guelmim, morocco
I'm not sure sure what people propose by a show of strength? Will the Americans also join in?
The British army has around 110, 000 troops, with some in Iraq and Afghanistan and all over . Iran has close to 7 million men under arms. it has 3 times the population of Iraq and is geographically much larger country than Iraq.
The US struggled to find troops for its surge in Baghdad, so where are you going to find troops to invade Iran?
If you want to go in all guns blazing again, be prepared for failure.
Akram, London,
I have noticed on the many comments made in the past couple of days is that (particularly the American comments) is that the phrases Left-wing and Liberal and bandied around as if they are dirty words.
I myself view being liberal as tolerant, intelligent and adaptable.
I think that sometimes Right-wing conservatives come across as incredibly reactionary, narrow minded and depressingly sceptical.
Wanting to try and find a solution other that battering the door down is not weak, it is the intelligent option before putting other people's lifes at risk. Perhaps it is indicative of the culture of shoot-first, ask questions later.
You can use force and strength, but you combine this with a moral acceptance if you tried diplomacy and they wouldn't listen.
Neil Pickles, Wirral, UK (based in California at moment)
The Islamic world appears very silent on the matter. Is that because our western media report little of their views? Or is it that the Islamic world is truly silent on the matter?
Russell, Cambridge,
As always, it's the USA's fault. Churchill must be doing flips in his grave. What has happend to the british people and their guts. The Iranians said they would capture " Blue eyed, blond servicemen " and guess what they did. I think if it was US troops, they would not have went as easily and the Naval Attack Group on their doorstep would have loudly knocked. I have been to Iran. They are a very modern and beautiful people. There are two sets of lives being lived there. The Iranian people want a democratic, peaceful society like the rest of the civilized world. If the world continues to isolate and squeeze them, there population will revolt. This is why they are resorting to such desperate measures as kidnapping your men and women. I also know we as americans don't believe our military is strecthed or weak. In fact we count on our adversaries to believe this, right up to the point where they are hiding in ratholes. The world needs to stand together and show we won't be bullied.
Steve, The Great, United States of America
Shaffiq Mahmood... if this is an engineered crises, why don't the Iranians just defuse the crises by releasing the Brits?
Unless... they are in on the secret secret hush hush sssshhh conspiracy too?
How silly. I have a friend of a friend of a friend who says you don't know anything.
Martin, Oxford,
We'll line the Iraq/Iran border with loudspeakers and play recordings of Blair's speeches 24/7. The Iranians will soon capitulate, release the hostages & come out with their hands up begging for mercy.
gwilym rhys-jones, costa del sol, spain
Reaction to Madking from Nashua:
I dont' know if the French are good at fighting, but they had the brilliant idea not to put a single foot in the huge iraki mess where you are in right now. Good luck and hope you will manage to get out.
Stay cool.
Charly, Paris, France
Iran needs to be taught a lesson. Here's hoping Blair and co get the troops ready as soon as possible, and devote enough resources this time so we avoid another Iraq
Henrietta Forbes Hamilton, London,
Exactly, Stefan Stackhouse.
There are precious pieces of the puzzle missing. If Iran had been in Iraq water, surely somebody would have mentioned that by now? Why was the HMS Cornwall "helpless"? Because it was in Iraq waters and didn't want to enter Iranian waters, perhaps?
The lack of detail seems to show that somebody is being economical with the truth.
Starling, Lancaster,
"I have a friend of a friend in British Army Intell. They were told weeks to get readty to go in " Shaffiq Mahmood
Sure you do, Shaffiq.
M. Fernandez, San Francisco,
Let's make an underwater nuclear test along the iranian coast. They will be back the next day.
Charles, London, UK
"US want nothing but war with Iran. and you "blond blue eyes" are nothing but thirsty bloody war-mongers"
Imarat, New Yor, USA
Imarat, your statement makes it sound like you are separate from the US and its people yet.....
Tom, Santa Monica, USA
while the Iranian government action is deplorable, I guess it is comments made by people like Jeremy, NY, USA, who make the situation worse. Iran is not muslims and there are several muslims, I being one of them who don't like what the Iranian government is doing, including nuclear enrichment. So to say muslims don't treat anyone with humility, is strong and serves nobody's interests. Let's pray that Iran will see sence and release these men and woman who were just out serving their country the only way they know best.
Musa Hassan, Nairobi, Kenya
Thousands of Palaistians in Israeli jails no word about them!!!
Thousands of Iraqis in jails by coalition forces.
Hundreds of thousands dead in Iraq, not a lot being said about them.
But suddenly 15 lives are more important, where is your justice now?
The west really does speak with a fork tongue
James, London, UK
What is Blair going to do? - Prancing around with a balloon on a stick? I sincerely hope the Blair are not still being led by the nose by Bush to enter into another illegal war. "Fooled me once shame on you, fooled me twice shame on me" .......
Frederick, Healdsburg, CA , US
The whole thing is dragging on far too long,why have our troops in harms way when we have the technology to take Iran apart piece by piece from a thousand miles away.....We have been doing this for a thousand years,i can't see us stopping this week.......so its us and them time again.
Shane, lancs, England
The woman is being held separately? Why would this be a benefit to her? Wouldn't she be better off in the company of her colleagues?
Malcolm, Bragg Creek, Canada
I suggest Iran should send these men and the cuddly overfed mum to rendition sessions for sake of all the Iraqi meeks who died in their hands for mere Limie greed.
Ron , New Mex, US
This is kidnapping for political ransom. They did it once before, with the US, and it worked.
Don Quixote, Groningen, Netherlands
usa was shooted iranian air plane in iranian sea in Persian Gulf before.(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_Air_Flight_655)
They (USA and UK) think the world is their home.
The sailors were in ALVAND in iran land.
Blair should say that. He can`t say they were gone in iran lands
ehsan davoodi, Tehran, Iran
With respect and regret, and from a distance, I believe your government has just recently cut back your fleet and the RAF again. What sort of force do you suppose you could exert?
A blockade, yes, but I would be interested in hearing specific proposals based on your much reduced order of battle. Thatcher had a robust military capability to use in the Falklands, but how are you set today?
What you have is really really good, very efficient and brave, but you might want to have your news media do a serious analysis of your power projection capabilities and your options.
Might you wish to reconsider your military budget cuts?
John Brand, Baltimore, USA
What is this 'Mother' doing out there ? Surely She should be looking after her child ? - Our perhaps she should have the papoose strapped to her back ??
Equality - what does that mean ? ....
ken holdaway, East London, South Africa
Imagine how different Iran might be if Jimmy Carter had shown some spine in 1979. Looks like someone's getting set up for a sucker punch. Look out - this one is going to get ugly!
The Great Dane, Copenhagen, Denmark
PM Blair is on the right track. He is confident of a positive outcome and not proceeding irrationally. That is what to expect from a world class leader.
JOHN BRUSSTAR, Slidell, LA
The UK needs to resolve this with a show of force - either via enhanced diplomatic or military means. The marines will have to be freed immediately - without much further delay. Failing to respond swiflty will only lead to the wrong conclusions across the muslim world.
John, London,
Prime Minister, this is a dire situation that should not have been allowed to drag on for 5 days. Immediate and decisive military action should be taken to free these sailors and demonstrate that the United Kingdom will not stand for any similar acts of agression in the future. Take meaningful action now!
Paul, Bogota, Colombia
Can we deal with any phase other than diplomacy ? Without America ? No.. is the simple answer. This is not the Falklands(although in those days we had some sort of manpower), Iran are toying with Tony Blair because they know he answers to George Bush. Had these soldiers and sailors been American we would not be discussing diplomacy right now we'd be reporting on strikes on strategic targets. No messing. This is not the first time we've suffered this embarrasment under the the American security umbrella. It makes me wonder how old Maggie Thatcher would have dealt with this .....Firmly and without hestitation !!!!
paul, carmarthen, wales
In response to Tony Faulkner: Just to be clear, your comments with regards to this situation:
"Blair and Bush want another killing war and are happy to lie their way into it, as they did into the war in Iraq. We are simply being softened up so that public opinion is as divided and ineffective as it was stopping them from the war in Iraq."
So Bush and Blair had these soldier intentionally abducted for their own diabolical purposes? Or perhaps the Iranian government is working with them to start another war? It's simply not possible that the Iranian royal guard and leadership are at fault for this specific turn in this drama? Let's be realistic: most of the people in the world are tired of wars and just want peace. The US and Britain were war-hungry when they went into Iraq, but they've had their fill. Wake up and realize that not all the world's problems stem from Bush and Blair, and that other governments are now taking their shots at creating violence and suffering.
John, New York, New York, USA
The time has arrived for the western nations and their allies to put their foot down with Iran.! Allowing Iran to continue to get away with their recklessness will only serve to give them freedom to act against the free world which will result in death and destruction like the world has not seen since the second world war caused by our passiveness toward Adolph Hitler. Unless you lived through that war as I did, you have no knowledge of what our inactions against tyrants can cause.
Richard Lennie, san patricio, mexico
It is the duty of the foreign office to work out the diplomatic lines to ensure the safe return of the Marines and Sailors. It is definitely a harrowing task for the families and the beloved ones. May God shower His blessings and ensure that this situation ends in an amicable manner.
J Ganesh , tampines ,
If Iran is able to get what it wants (i.e. prisoner swaps or sanction reductions) by taking this action it will validate the kidnappings and more importantly it will pave the way for more. The UK cannot let that happen or it will be Munich 1938 all over again. Appeasement only makes the aggressor more aggressive my friends. Did anybody learn anything from World War II?
Bob, Columbia, South Carolina
The Iranian will probably release the captured personnel very soon, threateninig Iran is not going to work. It looks to me some people live in coco land "send SAS" in etc, I wouldn't be suprised if Maines are not SAS or SBS. From what I have seen in the chanel4 news etc the Iraqi military confirmed they were in Iranian water and the Iranian like to know what was the purpose of their visit, If they weren't why didn't HMS cornwall do anything. We should not forget that Bush/ Blair are probably trying to provoke iran into another illegal war. What they have to realise Iran is not Iraq , When sadam attacked Iran he was backed by all Arab countries except LIbya and Syria and all the Western countries and still lost. If america attack Iran it will get stuck in a hole it will not be able to get out. As for UK we are just american pawns ,blair will just do what the US/Israeli masters tell him. Best way is through negotiation and the the best thing for our troops is to come back home.
terry, c, uk
If troops in undisputed international or iraq waters a serious protest through diplomatic / UN is in order, if not a serious apology is appropriate, again through diplomatic channels. PLEASE PLEASE don't let Blair near this.
John, Camberley, UK
Shows the respect Iran have for the stregnth in our military leadership. Its time Britain stop the softly softly approach and take action with Iran. Stop messing with Iraq, there will never be peace there unless the people want it.
Ross Melville, Glasgow, UK
Blockade all Iranian ports until the sailors/marines are released.
Of course, if your 'allies' [France, Germany] in the EU could give up trading with Iran [the only thing keeping their economy afloat] for an hour or two, that would help as well. [But, don't hold your breath].
Army Captain, San Francisco,
If the Iranians want war, then declare war. Invasion and bombing is unnecessary. Blockade their ports, shut down their outgoing oil pipelines and cut off their incoming cash.
This should have been the response in 1979, and if we don't take action we will be hostage again and again. Its time for the price of oil to rise to a level consistent with the fact that we (the US and Europe) risk the lives of our soldiers to protect our access.
The blockade should stay in place until the sailors and marines are released and the nuclear program terminated.
D Cohen, Baltimore, MD USA
Apparently the sailors/marines boarded the vessel to extract a compromised MI6 agent, but someone had tipped the IRGC. With the defection of Iran's Deputy Defense Minister to the US in Turkey a few weeks back, its safe to say the Iranians are willing to risk an international incident to stem another intelligence leak. Hence the capture of your sailors (as well as the agent). They will most likely want to trade your sailors for their IRGC men captured by the US a few months back. Although, if these negotiations go poorly for Iran, the your sailors could very well be tried for espionage.
Chris, Atlanta, USA
Had the Briish patrol chosen to resist, I suspect the Iranians would have backed off rather than attack, because they knew that the USA could have had jet fighers overhead in less than 20 minutes. Had they pressed their attack, their ships would all have been sunk, and they knew that.
This is hindsight now, but I do not understand why the patrol did not have standing orders to resist. That was the question immediately raised by American commanders on the ground in Iraq. This appears to be a command failure of considerable magnitude.
Richard, Boise, Idaho/USA
The answer is certainly not to show power and follow the yanks in their tracks by repeating another Afghanistan. What is it with people who have the "hey-ho we're from the USA so you BRITS should follow our lead....lets bomb the Bas*****"!! ..the typical kind of republican idiocracy that gets us no where. If we had Iranian planes flying over our heads with ships patroling close to our waters would you be happy or feel secure? We have to understand that although the leader in Iran is bitter (and you would be too if the big bullies stopped you from playing with party poppers) - there are also thousands of civilians who would become victim of the 'hey-ho' kind of attitudes which, if us Brits have forgotten, managed to kill a number of OUR TROUPS in the Iragi war - the only difference being - our troups were killed by bullets from the people who say 'Power and strength is best'. ..
justin, BKK, Thailand
...First they came for the Jews... The world stood by when Israeli soldiers were kidnapped from Israeli territory, now when Brits are involved there is real outrage in London. When will they learn?
Zack Melzer, Louisville, KY USA
Dear Mr. Sharrocks from Paris, correction: it would be suicide to attempt any type of FRENCH military action. So I tell you what: you just leave the killin' to the REAL pros, like you've had to for the last two world wars. We all know you'd all rather be Bosce, or Red, or under Sharia Law, anything but FIGHT! You have about as much to say on military action as bin Laden does bacon. Au Revoir, Les Infant!
TheMadKing, Nashua, NH USA
Didn't the US occupying force recently take a number of Iranian military staff into custody whilst in disputed territory? It seems that two can play at this game!
Whilst I feel sympathy for the British individuals taken into captivity, I feel that the responsibility lies with the US and UK governments in sending our troops into danger with no real mandate, not the unsurprisingly nervous Iranians for acting in their own national interest.
Alex McGregor, Plymouth, UK
I am very suspect about this whole episode. Is this the reason that Tony Blair will use to go to war with Iran now? Were the sailors their on purpose to start this whole episode of in the first place. I just do not believe that this is happening when the UK with the US is trying to stop Iran from its nuclear enrichment programme.
What I am very worried about is, is the catalyst that pushes the UK to war with the whole of the middle east.
God help us all.
Assie , London,
The political correct in today's society have taken national honor and pride to new lows. The people who rode the peace train in the 70s are now in higher positions of power, making ever more difficult for good, common people to stand their ground and defend themselves and their countries. It's a sad day when peace and the status quo mean more to people than does good. I say, do what's right, UK. The USA is right beside you to support with whatever you need. Iran needs a good thumping.
Satchel, New York, US
Re 'clive stephen sharrocks, Paris, france' 1st comment: Giving up so soon France?
Woody, Chas., US / S. Carolina
"A different phase" states Blair.
What he means is he wil issue Iran with an ASBO.
phinias gribble, Sheffield,
Uh, Patrick, just about every newspaper and TV station on the planet has mentioned that one of the 15 is female. This bit of trivia is just that, in any case.
Iran is winning thanks to the lack of backbone displayed by Tony Blair. The Mullahs now know that they can go proceed "full speed ahead" with nuclear weapons development. They know that even bigger appeasers will soon lead Britain and the U.S.
Gerry Shuller, Los Angeles,
i think the soldiers should just rot in an iran jail, why cant the british just admit it when they wrong... i think iran should open a place like guantanamo bay throught the british soldiers in there in orange outfits, tied up n let them rot! about time the british knew how it felt. i am british but KEEP IT UP IRAN dont let UK and the AMERICANS tell you what to do, your human and got rights!
brithish, uk, uk
I can only assume that the Navy had GPS locations of their patrol boats and this info should be released to the public domain as quickly as possible. If the GPS shows they were in Iraqi waters then we should 'crank up the volume' of our requirements and take 'whatever furtther action is deemed to be appropriate'.
Paul Watkins, Colchester, UK
This United States citizen is with you and any action you must take to secure your military personnel. I hope the Bush camp agrees. Do it fast and do it decisively.
Matthew, NY,
Stop every bit of Iranian export coming out of the country. Isolate it's harbors, Donot allow any border crossing. That'll get their attention. Ya just gotta get them to the table, They'll just do the North Korea thing unless they're losing money everyday. That will probably spike oil prices, but, I believe it to be worth it. The Allies have to show up here in this.
Mike Hinkes, Medford, Oregon USA
The next phase?, more troops being seized?, there'll be nothing left to fight with soon!. The Blair and Bush tea party is starting to become somewhat boring!. Iran has a 'very political' agenda and are capable of making a very real problem for both the UK and the USA, Iran are certainly ready for the next phase, and if Bush and Blair really believe that Iran has WMD program, guess what, they're correct this time, they're just far too late to deal with it!
Iran have taken the offensive and have shown that they are just as ready to deal with the repercussions!......Wake up World!
John, Birmingham, UK
No one actually knows where this incident took place, so talk about "going in there" is premature. There are also alot of people making assumptions about what is going on eg interagtions, there will be no rescue mission from the UK or the US because no one knows where they are. The only course of action is a diplomatic one, any other will lead to war. But hey I am sure if war in Iran breaks out Rick Peters from Logansport and C smith of Glasgow will be the first over the top.
Anthony, London,
God does not like war.... . God is love. God is not with USA and UK.
God will get revenge about it at the final day. God will ask you about your aproval of the war.
Jesus died without fights , He loves people, you love money, not the people.
Andres, MAd, spain
I agree with comments from TheMadKing, the Ayatollah said last week that they would start this action of kidnapping and illegal activities, yet there are those that wish to blame America and Bush for everything. When will you other countries and left wing weak liberals realize you are dealing with a dictator that is a madman. This is the same mad dictator that states the holocaust was a myth and that Isreal should be "wiped off the map". I know there are those of you that say America is warmongering, but I ask, have we ever claimed a country should be "wiped off the map"? Forgive us for wishing to protect our own and and wanting to defend ourselves. If diplomacy doesnt work in the days that the British lay out, I feel force is the only next option. Again I said the only "next" option. I pray for those troops and hope they get home safe and soon.
Chris, Tampa, USA
T. Faulkner. What utterley perverse logic. The Iranians kidnap British sailors in Iraqi waters (the boat which they were searching when this happened is still at anchor in Iraqi waters) and suddenly its a case of Blair/Bush softening us up for another war. If anybody seems to be desperate for a shooting war its the Iranian Imperialists in Tehran.
Stephen Jones, Chester, Britain
Tony Faulkner of Uxbridge, why don't you move to Iran and live there for awhile so you can have a clearer understanding of how the Iranian government behaves versus your own. Your willingness to blame your own country for this situation is naive in the extreme. If you have any understanding of what a theocracy is, and how this particular one operates, and still believe that your government (and the US) is to blame, then you should enjoy life in the Islamic Republic. If you were to post the same opinion about your government, but Iran was your country instead of Britain, it's very likely you would disappear afterward, if you were allowed to post it at all. Whether you believe it or not, we (the US and Britain) are the good guys, your belief otherwise is simplistic, uninformed, naive, and treasonous.
Ian Turner, Austin, Texas USA
I know that a lot of people will disagree with me but I see this action by Iran as just another attempt to gain international attention. The county of Iran has committed crimes against international law for years and little or nothing has been done about it. Now they seize every little oppurtunity to harass the western civilization because they know they will not be penalized for their actions. It is clear to me that Iran is trying to provoke the west into a conflict of some sort. I believe no one wants confrontation with Iran but if their behavior does not change eventually it will be unavoidable. It's amazing to me why all countries can not work together to solve their problems instead of taking actions against one another that will only end up in , most cases, unnecessary violence and bloodshed. May we all day live in freedom and prosperity.
Daniel, Bowling Green, Kentucky
I have a friend of a friend in British Army Intell. They were told weeks to get readty to go in - well before this engineered crisis Bliar is now taking about.
Another war for Blair to sign off with.
Shaffiq Mahmood, Halifax, West Yorkshire
Does anyone believe an asault and victory over Iran will be as straightforward as the agression against Iraq, weakened by endless wars and years of sanctions?. Maybe there is a rude awakening to come. What about our captive forces?. Human shields, perhaps?. These will be ruthless foes to grapple with.
Piggy Kruger, bridgwater, UK
"Its time to take a show of strength" -Rick Peters, Logansport
Ha ha. Your "strength" didnt do you any good in Vietnam or Iraq. What makes you think its going to do any good in Iran?
Pete, Cov,
Since the Iranian Embassy takeover under Pres Carter, we have bowed down to tthe world in an attempt no to insult or embarrass anyone. It is time we stood up for ourselves as Americans and let other countries know you "don't mess with our citizens." Yes, I understand diplomacy, but it has been used against us as a weakness since the Vietnam war. If we go in somewhere, our troops have to be allowed to win. Until we do that, we will always be negotiating at a loss.
Michael O'Brien, houston, texas
Muslims do not follow standard Western humanitarian treatment of those they kidnapp or capture. The demand for an immediate meeting with those held is tantamount. The recent war between Israel and Hezbollah was sparked by the killing of 8 Israeli soldiers and the kidnapping of 2 more on non-Lebanese land. To this date, despite UN Resolutions making their freedom a part of the ceasefire, no word is heard about their fate. The Red Cross are denied access. Same for an Israeli ,Mr. Shalit, kidnapped and held by Hamas in Palestinian areas. Even items such as reading glasses are denied by these terrorists. Is Iran - a legitimate state- very far behind these terrorists methods? The next few days will tell one way or the other. My prays go out to these fine British people.
Jeremy, NY, USA
We cannot 'talk quietly and carry a big stick'. We no longer have a big stick. The moral about all this is : Don't mess with with more militarily powerful countries than yourself; unless of course you have an equally powerful partner who is prepared to fight your battles for you.
P. Batten, Christchurch, UK
Questions:
1) If the British sailors were in Iraqi waters, would this not then imply that the Iranians must have violated Iraqi waters to capture the Brits? Why has nothing been said about this? Why have no formal protests been issued by either the UK or Iraqi governments? What should we thus conclude from the absence of such a counterclaim?
2) Was the HMS Cornwall not within radar range to detect the Iraqi boats converging on the British sailors? Was no radio warning given to them? Was the HMS Cornwall unable to fire warning shots over the bows of the Iranian boats? If not, why was it too far away to provide protective cover for its personnel? And if it were not too far away, why was such protective cover provided?
Stefan Stackhouse, Black Mountain, NC/USA
Does Tony Faulkener REALLY belive what he has written?
Trevor Edwards, London, UK
Hey Rick Peters, you so wish your country is still as strong as you think. You should start to look around, try to sort out tre crisis your country is in before going out there for reasons that are put in your mind throught the media who is interested in nothing but help wealthy people become richer. Stop killing innocent people, stop beliving in what the media say, get your goverment to stop making wars, stop killing your own people, help veterans of war and not forgetting the disgraceful nhs.
Tiago, London,
Tony Faulkner's suggestion that this whole thing is just another softening-up preparatory to an invasion of Iran really shows blinding ignorance of the reality of the Iranian regime or its history. The US and UK did not prompt the Iranian revolution, or the Iran-Iraq war, or the ongoing sweep of human rights abuses in Iran, or the non-democratic system of government there, or Iranin interference in Lebanon through Hizbullah, or their interference in the PA through Hamas, or the constitutional commitment to the global spread of the revolution, or the vast nuclear programme, or the activities of the Revolutionary Guards and their Qods Force, or the scary anti-Semitism of the regime, or the calls for the destruction of Israel, or, for that matter, the whole line of radical Islam from the early 20th century on. Iran is a rogue state (I've lived there, I speak fluent Farsi, I love Persian culture) and rogue states have to be resisted and taught to obey international law.
Denis MacEoin, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
The matter seems very obvious to me. The British and their ally, US are trying to Provoke the Iranian government to make a stupid move in front of the world's eyes. Do you people honestly think Iranians are that stupid to go to Iraqi waters and arrest 15 sailors? I believe that those sailors were captured in Iranian waters and they entered intentionally. Now England is trying to convince the world that Iranians captured the sailors to get a winning card!
Pouria, Ipoh, Malaysia
Unfortuinatly the American's and British can not facilitate another war, with the on going struggles in Afganganistan and Iraq, we would not be able to sustain long term operations let alone defensive ones. Against a country which could easily send thousands of advisors, weapons and money over a poris Iraq boarder to foster an already established insurgency. Diplomacy is the only way. Peace Kills!
Gaston Leval, Montreal, Canada
a show of strength? youve watched too many action films m8. people do get hurt and kiled and siutuations get worse over time. vietnam is still costing america billions each year. this is all a good waste of tax payers money. i can think of better things to do than going off to war. iraqs soveriegn rights as a country has been violated. as have several countries. lets stop kidding oursleves that were the good guys and that anyone not in our interests are bad guys. they are many shades of grey in war. i think its best we extract our boys diplomatically and peacefully, reconsider our role in interantional relations and put as much pressure and money in pursuing peaceful solutions to conflict as we do warmongering and selling arms. the world would undeniably be a better place.
sean deni, london,
believe Iran will show how to prosecute the sailor whether US Guantanamo-style, US secret jail style (remember Ab Dujail horrible investigation), or Saddam-style prosecution. Unfortunately, if Iran is more civilized than US, they will not do those styles. So US seems more civilized by now even with 500 thousands killing caused.
Nathan, BL,
Hmmmmm deja' vu.....reminds me of poor little Israeli soldiers caught in Lebanese border just last year. Another provocation by Judeo-Christian power. There is no doubt in my mind that British soldiers have deliberately stepped into Iranian territories. Israel, UK, US want nothing but war with Iran. and you "blond blue eyes" are nothing but thirsty bloody war-mongers .
Imarat, New Yor, USA
I think there is room for resolving this dispute through diplomatic means. It's a pity that Mr Blair statement seems to be a veiled threat and a bullying tactic which will only serve to make Iran refuse to cooperate.
Naledzani, Johanneburg, South Africa
Sounds like a lot of tough talk from folks that aren't in the millitary...if you are so anxious to fight another useless war...go sign yourself and your kids up for the military.
Chris, Raleigh, NC, US
"Mr Blair meant that Britain might explore alternative means of negotiating with Iran, such as making public the exact co-ordinates of the incident last Friday, which would indicate that it took place in Iraq waters."
Excuse me, but isn't this the obvious move that should have been made in the first hour of their capture?
The fundamental issue has not been addressed: were we, or were we not in their waters? If we weren't, take it to the UN. If we were, we should face the consequences.
Laura Roberts, London, UK
It would be suicide to attempt any type of military action . A show of strength would be to negociate the situation , not put thousands of lives at risk . Isn't there enough killing already ? Perhaps this would be a good time to alter foreign policy ?
clive stephen sharrocks, Paris, france
Whatever happened to protecting British lives and interests? Then again, whatever happenened to Leadership (remember Maggie and the Falklands!) I seem to recall that Iraq was invaded because of what Saddam Hussein might do. Iran has done, will Mr Blair?
Paul, Bedford,
Mr. Faulkner, since it is your belief that the PM and Bush are lying (presumably about the location the sailors/marines were captured) then what is your resolution to this conflict? Let them die of old age in an Iranian jail?
Brian, Syracuse, USA
I find it facinating that this was the only place I have seen or read that let's us know there was a woman sailor among the captured. My Heart goes out to all the famlies of these Sailors and Marines. Thank you Briton for your support and God Bless all involved.
Patrick, Fort Worth, USA/Texas
If the Brits take the position that the most important thing is the safe return of the fifteen sailors and marines, then they will have fallen into a trap and the Iranians will have already won. The most important thing is to show that there are serious consequences to the Iranian actions, and that Brittain will not be dissuaded from exercising its legitimate foreign policies.
Theodore C Joerding, St. Louis, USA
A fleetload of US planes etc zooming around on Iran"s borders, simulating warfare. Very disturbing no doubt. Are they hoping to provoke a response, and are our people to be used as human shields?
Piggy Kruger, bridgwater, UK
Diplocamy is not the answer. Time for the full weight of the British military to be used against Iran. If my family was kidnapped I would have no hesitation in doing anything necessary to get them released. Why the Government doesn't have anything like the same regard for it's citizens, especially those who risk life and limb for Queen and Country I do not know. It seems unless there is oil at stake this Government has only hollow words.
C Smith, Glasgow,
I've been to a number of UK news sites, and I can't BELIEVE the number of both Brits and Americans willing to blame this incident on Bush and Blair. The Iranian RG SAID they would do this last week! "Blue-eyed officers and blonds," I believe the correct term was. This was a calculated hijacking of UK military personnel doing their jobs under UN mandate in Iraqi waters. Just like the soldier snatches by Hezbollah and Hamas, sans response. And where is the outrage over all the violations of international law here? No contact with British officials. Unsupervised interrogations. Threats of show trials. All I can say is, blame who you want, but every day that goes by without response is just proof to the rest of the world just how weak the British empire has become. I sure hope it doesn't last 444 days like it did with OUR weak president.
TheMadKing, Nashua, NH USA
"Who needs a crystal ball when we have a history book?" Churchill's famous statement.
Blair and Bush want another killing war and are happy to lie their way into it, as they did into the war in Iraq. We are simply being softened up so that public opinion is as divided and ineffective as it was stopping them from the war in Iraq.
Tony Faulkner, Uxbridge, UK
I say give them 5 days notice . Then go in and get them and let them know that when The Brits and us come in we will destroy everything in our path on our way...
Its time to take a show of strength .
Rick Peters, Logansport,