Sam Knight and agencies
Pick up your copy of Joy Division: Closer at WHSmith today
Russia cast doubt today on Iran's claims that it is now producing enriched uranium on "an industrial scale", saying that it had seen no evidence of a recent breakthrough in the Iranian nuclear programme.
Reacting to claims made yesterday by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Iranian President, and the country's nuclear technicians, the Russian Foreign Ministry joined France and Australia in expressing scepticism about Tehran's capabilities.
“We are not aware of any technological breakthroughs in the Iranian nuclear programme recently which would change the nature of work on enrichment being carried out in the country,” the Russian Foreign Ministry said in a statement.
The Foreign Minister, Sergei Lavrov, then said that he was awaiting a response from the International Atomic Energy Agency before believing that Iran had taken a significant step in its nuclear programme. Two IAEA inspectors arrived in Tehran today on a scheduled visit and their report is expected to shed light on how much progress Iran has made.
“We haven’t got a confirmation yet that they have actually begun uranium enrichment at the new cascades," said Mr Lavrov.
The note of cautious disbelief was struck on the second day of condemnations levelled at Tehran, which has openly defied the UN's demand that it stop enriching uranium and yesterday raised the rhetorical stakes by claiming to be about to inject uranium gas into 3,000 centrifuges at its main enrichment plant at Natanz.
Atomic experts say that 3,000 centrifuges running continuously would produce enough enriched material for a nuclear bomb within a year, although Iran has so far only managed to run 164 experimental centrifuges successfully, often with just 20 per cent turning at one time. Diplomats reported last week that Iran had installed 1,000 centrifuges but had not yet injected them with gas.
Russia, which joined the UN Security Council's second resolution demanding the suspension of Iran's nuclear programme in February, is considered a key player in attempts to bring about a negotiated solution to the confrontation. Moscow has assisted Tehran with the building of its first nuclear power plant at Bushehr, although that project has been delayed by Iran's failure to keep up with payments for Russian parts.
Despite the doubts — the Australian Foreign Minister, Alexander Downer, said today he was not sure if the Iranian statement "is true or not" — the EU said this afternoon that it regarded Tehran's announcement, made with great fanfare yesterday, with concern. The UN has demanded that Iran stops enriching uranium as a precondition for talks.
"The presidency of the European Union views Iran’s announcement that it wants to enrich uranium on an industrial scale with great concern,” said the German Foreign Ministry on behalf of the bloc today.
“The presidency of the European Union renews its urgent call that Iran meet the demands of the international community so that a return to the negotiating table and a solution to the conflict over the Iranian nuclear programme is possible.”
Iran meanwhile, flushed with what it regards as the successful conclusion to its seizure of 15 British military personnel in the Gulf last week, continued to talk up the advance in its nuclear programme, saying it was time for the world to recognise the "new realities" of its atomic project.
“Our situation before enriching uranium was different. It changed at the stage of pilot, and then at the industrial stage, which we have obtained," Mohammad Saeedi, the deputy head of Iran’s Atomic Energy Organisation, told the ISNA news agency. "We have a superior position."
“We have passed the stage of setting conditions for talks," he said. "We believe that other parties should move forward based on new realities.”
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2006
£14,337
2008
£39,937
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
Competitive package
Npower
Midlands
£
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
1 & 2 Bed apartments
From £249,995
Great Investment, River Views
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
low-cost ownership homes in London
Multi–Centre 9 Nights
From only £925pp
View thousands of properties online with your Vacation Rental People
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Iran would best be served by using its own oil revenue to develop alternative and globe-safe energy sources. Energy is currently the global economy, and the Iranians, with their vast oil reserves, are in an excellent position to fund and direct research and development of energy alternatives, and likely have both sides of the world market covered. It would probably be much easier to conquer the world in this manner than by some all-destroying force. I thought that the U.S. could have been that leader in new energy technology, but we have spent all of our capital (and more) on a futile attempt of maintaining a grip on the old energy.
keith l. homan, kihei, hawaii
It is astonishing to behold how Iran is desperate for a severe punishment, really gagging for it.
Perhaps Mr. A & Co. thinks that they will go out of a bombardment with only limited military damage, but an enhanced reputation in the Middle East; in some way they remember me of the argentinian generals 25 years ago.
I think we should give them what they are looking for: strong, clear and bleeding hard. This way, as in Argentina, it will not help, but rather damage the government.
Anyway, if I was him I would start digging.
Roberto, London,
Generally I am opposed to armed conflict except as a last resort. At this point I believe Mr. Mohammad Saeedi may be correct in believing that "other parties should move forward based on new realities". The only difference is that the reality is not new. Tehran has continuously lied to the world about their intentions and defied the world community in it's request for Iran to cease production of enriched uranium. Their situation before was simply that the fundamentalist fanaticism was essentially contained by their own border. Now they seem to be on the brink of being able to deliver their message abroad. It seems fairly obvious that they are simply thumbing their noses at our sanctions and act like the school yard bully that keeps calling us out. Maybe we should oblige!
Norm Bradshaw, Petrolia, Ontario, Canada
Iran is indeed puffed-up over its little coup of the last two weeks. I said once before in this newspaper, and I'll say it again, the recent seizure of the British sailors and marines will not be the last of its kind. Its going to happen again, and I think sooner than later. They may be Americans, they may be British -- or both. Given the events that just transpired, how do we answer Iran the next time? Do we play the same hand and hope Ahmadinejad doesn't turn to the dark side, or do we press the issue a bit more firmly? One thing is for sure; we need to purge the Natanz facility of its nuclear potential, or both Britain and the U.S. will be facing a much worse crisis in the near future. The time is upon us to act decisively. God be with both our nations and our common purposes.
James P, Sacramento, California USA
Iran needs to grow up and cease the juvenile behavior. Should their nuclear cause be just, there is no reason to not cooperate as expected from all civilized nations. The international stage is no place for denial, secrecy or deceipt.
Scott R., Toronto, Ontario