Tony Halpin in Moscow
Win VIP tickets

Russia delivered a nuclear snub to the West yesterday by revealing that it had begun to send enriched uranium to Iran.
Fuel for Iran’s first atomic power station at Bushehr began to arrive on Sunday, the state-run Russian nuclear corporation, Atomstroiexport, said. More deliveries would take place over the next two months.
The surprise announcement flew in the face of repeated appeals by the US and the European Union for Moscow to withhold supplies of uranium because of claims that Tehran is secretly building a nuclear bomb.
There are suspicions that the Kremlin was using the delivery as a warning to the West over Kosovan independence. Russia, which backs Serbia’s desire to hold on to the province, wants to send an unmistakable signal that it can create real foreign policy difficulties unless its concerns are heard.
The Foreign Ministry in Moscow gave warning of “an uncontrollable crisis” if Kosovo broke away. It urged the US and the EU to “weigh all the consequences of the unilateral granting of sovereign status to Kosovo . . . and to abstain from hasty decisions that could set a destructive precedent for the whole system of international relations”.
That Russia was still building the Iranian power plant at Bushehr suggested that there was no urgent need to deliver the fuel rods of lightly enriched uranium235 now. Atomstroiexport said that it expected the $1 billion (£500 million) station to begin generating electricity in six months.
Russia said that there was no evidence of an Iranian weapons programme. The US and Israel have repeatedly accused Iran of using Bushehr as a cover to build a bomb. But a report by US intelligence agencies this month concluded that although Iran had had a nuclear weapons programme it had brought it to a close in 2003. President Ahmadinejad insists that it is for purely civilian purposes, but he has also boasted that Iran can enrich uranium on an industrial scale after installing 3,000 centrifuges at an underground bunker in Natanz.
Moscow said that its deliveries were being supervised by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and that it had received written assurances from Tehran that the fuel would not be used for other purposes. It added that all spent uranium would be returned to Russia for reprocessing and storage to prevent any being lost. Moscow said that it had also urged Iran to abandon its enrichment programme, arguing that it was redundant now that Tehran had proof of a secure supply of fuel.
US President George Bush agreed, saying that the deliveries meant “the Iranians do not need to learn how to enrich” uranium. He added: “Iran was a threat to peace, Iran is a threat to peace, and Iran will be a threat to peace if we don’t stop their enrichment facilities.”
Iran confirmed delivery of 80 tonnes of fuel but a senior official insisted that it would not freeze its enrichment programme, adding: “Nothing is related to freezing enrichment.”
Tehran has refused to halt its programme despite two rounds of sanctions imposed by the United Nations for its repeated refusal to cooperate with the IAEA. The US is leading a drive for more sanctions in a third resolution, but this seems unlikely to succeed now that Russia, which holds a veto on the Security Council, has chosen to deliver uranium to Iran.
Bushehr had been due for completion in September but payment disputes prompted Russia to delay construction. President Putin visited Iran in October, the first Kremlin leader to do so since Stalin, and pledged that the project would be completed.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£23,093 - £56,211
The Office for National Statistics
Newport, South Wales
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
With even greater respect to David in Zurich, obviously Stalin was not an Angel, but every soviet solder that fought with the Germans knew, that the allies fought on the side of THEIR own interests and if the Russians were that wacky, today Russia would be a 51st state of America or a trophy cellar for the winners of the WWII.
Stalin asked the allies for opening of the western front since the 1941, but it was opened in 1944, when the Germans were nearly home. If the western front would have been opened in 1941 there would be millions of Europeans lives saved. The Red Army had destroyed 606 of German divisions and the allies at the all other fronts had destroyed 176 divisions. It cost 26m lives of soviet people, with about 70% being civilians, not mentioning the Europeans!!! The allies just callously watched the Nazi mincer working in Europe for three years. About what side are you talking here? Guess, what forced them to join after the Germans were nearly defeated? The USA was on the side of the Angels â is a wrong answer! I foresee you mentioning the American aid supplies to the USSR. I will just repeat myself here - For ALL British and American supplies, 5-10% of all USSRs resources, USSR had generously paid with the evil communist gold. Here again you can not talk about any side.
However, I must admit that out of the two allies the USA was more tolerant to the Russians during the WWII, but again, the USA could not bear the British Empire and at any cost was aiming to bring it to an end. The false fellowship with Russians was one of the USAs play cards against the British Empire.
The USA is always on the side of its OWN interests! That is understandable, but call things as they are named.
Svetlana, London, UK
With the greatest respect to Svetlana in London, even the most rabid anti American would have to concede that between 1941 and 1945 at least, the USA was on the side of the Angels.
David Masu, Zürich,
Ah those wacky Russians. thos totalitarian regimes
just love to stick together. Bruce Northwood, Washington, USA
Ah those almighty Americans!!! That butchery regime just loves to impose its mentoring all around the world with the sweets called weapons, e.g. Vietnam, Yugoslavia, American Indians, Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran is due. Such a just gendarme! Veeeery democratic!
My God some people make such inane and blank comments - speaking of richard from Sydney. Just give some adequate arguments to support your view if you have one and prove Oleg is wrong, otherwise, just keep your head in the sand and keep your mouth shut.
Svetlana, London, UK
My God some people are incredibly ignorant and naive!
(speaking of oleg from Tonronto)
Get your head out of the sand and open your eyes up.
Richard, Sydney, Australia
Why would that be poetic justice?
Just because the US can't get along with Iran, it doesn't mean that other countries can't.
Countries like Russia and China choose to trade with Iran. They choose to have good realtions, to work towards common goals and to work together.
The US model of isolation, pressure and invasion, simply doesn't work with Iran.
What americans and others don't seem to realise is that the propoganda pushed in the press against Iran isn't universal.
just to pre-empt a few arguments
1) Iran is watched by the IAEA
2) The nuclear fuel is inspected and sealed by the IAEA
3) The IAEA says there is no evidence of nuclear weapons
4) The NIE says that iran doesn't have a nuclear programme
5) Iran isn't suicidal
6) Iran didn't say that Israel should be destroyed. It was a call for political dissolution e.g. soviet union
7) Russia and China are happy to trade with Iran on a mutually beneficial level
So boo hoo war mongers and neo cons. Russia has given a clear signal.
MXR, crewe,
Ah those wacky Russians. thos totalitarian regimes
just love to stick together.
Bruce Northwood, Washington, D.C. , USA
"What poetic justice it would be if it Iran were to form closer ties with Chechnya.
David Masu, Zürich,"
Lets apply some logic here:
1. Russia is the only country that helps Iran with nuclear program
2. Russia is the only country that helps Iran with defensive weapons: AAA, SAMs
3. Russia and China are the countries that are trying to shield Iran from direct assault from US
4. Chechnya is getting re-built now.The war was over for almoust two years, since FSB sent Basayev to hell.
So what exactly Iran will achive by forming closer ties to Chechnya, if it hasn't achived it in last 15 years? And why Iran would do this? To piss off it's only ally in the region? Just because someone with Albanian name in Zurich wants it? And what "poetic justice" would it serve? Let me guess, here: more Russians would be killed? So what is the likehood of this happening?
Here is my answer: NONE. Persians are smart people, unlike some politicians in the West that are eager to start a new war.
Oleg, Toronto, Canada
Why does the US think that they and their friends are the only nations who should be able to generate electricity by nuclear power or even have nuclear weapons?
If nuclear weapons are so dangerous in the wrong hands shouldnât we get rid of them all?
Why didn't the US or EU engage with Iran to build their nuclear power stations and thereby have the ability to keep an eye on things?
Oil is used to manufacture a whole load of products from plastics to fertilizers. Isn't it silly to burn this finite resource when you can generate electricity from non-fossil fuels?
Despite the dangers of nuclear power, isn't a greater danger climate change caused by burning fossil fuels?
Saddam Hussein boasted of weapons he did not have. Might the Iranians be using (or permitting) the same bluff?
Why hasn't the IAEA issued a statement supporting or denying the Russian statements of fuel supervision?
Why do US citizens still support warmongers Bush/Cheney?
Answers on a £10 note to:-
R Bingham, Lauzun, France
We all know Bushehr is set to be the next Chernobyl. It's part of Moscow's plan for domination of Eurasia.
Adam, Sheffield,
Well, I think it is a pretty safe bet that Vlad's fishing invitation to Maine is cancelled for next summer....
Robert Miller, Halifax, NS, Canada
What poetic justice it would be if it Iran were to form closer ties with Chechnya.
David Masu, Zürich,