Michael Smith and Sarah Baxter
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition
The United States is planning to take control of all military operations in Afghanistan next year with an Iraq-style troop surge after becoming frustrated at Nato’s failure to defeat the Taliban.
Plans are being drawn up to send as many as 15,000 extra troops to Afghanistan with a single US general always in command, as in Iraq, defence sources said.
The Pentagon is also pushing for a permanent “unified command” in the south of the country that would sideline the Dutch and the Canadians.
At present, control of the south is rotated between the British, Dutch and Canadians, the three countries that provide the bulk of the troops.
From October next year, when the UK will take over from the Dutch, command of the south is expected to alternate between the British and the Americans.
Although final decisions cannot be made until the new US administration takes over in January, plans are being drawn up to send two to three US combat brigades – a total of between 8,000 and 12,000 men, the sources said.
Lawrence Korb, a defence expert at the Centre for American Progress, a Democratic think tank in Washington, said: “There is no doubt that the US wants to change the command structure as things have deteriorated in Afghanistan.”
Both Barack Obama, the Democrat presidential candidate, and John McCain, his Republican opponent, have spoken of using “two to three [combat] brigades for the surge, amounting to 8,000-12,000 troops”, Korb said. “There will be a US general and the forces will be under US command.”
The surge will also see US and other coalition special forces, which operate separately from the Nato command, absorbed into a single US command for the whole of Afghanistan.
A report written by Barry McCaffrey, a retired US general, that is highly critical of the command structure in Afghanistan is circulating at senior levels within the Pentagon. “There is no unity of command in Afghanistan,” it says.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the collective power of smart thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Flip MinoHD Camcorder
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
42,945
2008
71,450
Car Insurance
Not Specified
MI6
UK-based
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Save up to £1,000 per couple with Elite Vacations at the five-star Constance Lemuria Resort
and do the British Isles this Summer.
Save up to 60% with Oxford Hotels and Inns
Try our inspiring luxury holidays to the Indian Subcontinent and South East Asia.
Great offers available
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Jeff, Pensacola
The Bush regime was forecasting oil prices of $20 pb post Iraq. Just another example of how they got it wrong.
On 9-12 Paul Wolfowitz and Donald Rumseld chaired an intelegence meeting on how they could link 9-11 to Saddam, even though there was no link.
Joss, Bedford, UK
Re Philip Dennany
Ummm...you have proof, I assume? Would it be the abnormally low prices we are pying for oil? No, wait...that's not right...we're still paying $3.75 FOR A GALLON OF GAS. Wake up and find a new reasonto protest, because no one buys this one anymore.
Jeff, Pensacola, USA
Ron in Victoria and DR in Montreal sure don't speak for me. From the safety of their spoiled, comfortable, easy lives in the most pampered country on the globe, they are so quick to deny aid to those who are fighting a repressive ideology, like my grandfather helped Europe in WW I. Shame!
slgam, Windsor, Canada
With the way the United States runs things, I would expect other countries to pull out rather than subject their people to our leadership!
Robert Egan, Santa Maria, United States
If the truth was allowed, the Bush regime would never been able to invade Afghanistan or Iraq. Both invasions were planned prior to the treason of Sept 11, 2001. The Taliban rejected US Oil's plans for the pipeline to cross Afghanistan. The Iraq invasion was now known to be for it's oil.
Philip J Dennany, Indianapolis, IN
Canada out of Afghanistan NOW! We have already lost nearly 100 of our finest citizens in this war for American empire. If Harper is so willing to ingratiate himself with American politicians, may I suggest he enlist.
In the American army.
Ron, Victoria, Canada
The Liberals told us.....the war in Iraq is lost, we must get
out quick. Now they are beginning to say the same thing
about Afghanistan. Should we really listen to them?
Herman, Torquay, UK
We are not "partners" with a war criminal regime that invaded Iraq with mendacious cover stories, resulting in over 1 million dead, 1.5 million refugees.
And Afghanistan is a blight for Canada. "Peacekeeping"--this is so cynical it makes one want to throw up. The shame of it.
DR--Montreal
DR-Montreal, Montreal,
John from London...'anti-American' means nothing in and of itself. The context will decide whether its just or not. I for one make no apologies for our part in the underground railroad, for example...Do you? Nor, similarly, will I apologize for daring to hold an opinion or agenda not to your demands
1812, Calgary, Alberta
Sorry John, but psuedo-words like antiAmerican are intellectually shallow if not outright inane. The American military has earned a reputation of wreckleness among innumerable sources unconnected to one another. The only common denominator being those forces. Have more respect
for your troops lives.
Liam, Dublin, Ireland
October? How about September. Let the Americans have their righteous wars.
Gun-Free Speech Zone, Lower Mainland,
We Canadians are confusing, aren't we? FYI to the rest of the world, only 8 more years until Canada and the USA celebrate their bi-centennial of their continuing friendship, peace, and discord. Neighbours? Nah, unified squabbling siblings - 200 years without needing UN Peacekeeper intervention. Other examples are ..., Um? Switzerland and ...., Um?
Noel Keir, Langley, BC, Canada
That's not being Canadian or supporting the mission, Steve. That's being anti-American with a shoot-first-and-ask-later attitude.
The partnerships we have with our friends to the south - whether in rebuilding or in war - are extensive. What other partnership in the world today even compares?
John, London, Canada
The British, Dutch and Canadians should pull their troops out in October and leave Afghanistan to the Americans.
Chris , Victoria,
This is putting out a fire with gasoline. And everyone really know this, but we persevere because of powerful but unrealistic political rhetoric.
The Pashtun do not want us to dominate their world, have never and will never bow to NATO or to the US. Pakistan knows this full well if we do not.
tarquinis, Seattle, USA
being Canadian and supporting the mission I dread the day that Americans come in. So far in Kandahar the Canadian have been engaged in rebuilding as well as fighting ther Taliban. But if the Americans come in with their shoot first and ask questions alter I want our troops out.
Steve, St. Catharines, Canada
human rights for civilians, think about it.
giovanni, Berlin, Germany
RE Ian Payne. You are so out of date and touch with todays powerful military. C19th british soldiers had to rely on mules and sherpas for food,ammo and letters from home. C20th russian soldiers were so underpaid and underfed and underequipped even Georgia wouldve beat them! C21st? We are winning.
Rob, Belfast, NI
Some people tell us a 'troop surge' in Afghanistan will never work.
Probably the same people that told us it would never work in Iraq.
John, Leicester, England
C19th - British troop surges failed in Afghanistan under the cataclysmic decsions made by PM Gladstone !!!!
C20th - Soviet troops surges failed during the cataclysmic invasion by the USSR which saw thousands of young Russian troops die unnecessarily !!!!
C21st - US & UK invasion = THE SAME !!!
ian payne, walsall,