Gerard Baker, US Editor
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
For most of the last three years, John McCain has not missed an opportunity to tell anyone who would listen that the war in Iraq was being mismanaged by the Pentagon, that Donald Rumsfeld was doing a terrible job as Defence Secretary, and that the US needed to recommit itself to winning the war with more troops and a new strategy aimed at defeating the insurgency.
But as his campaign for the Republican nomination for the presidency gets seriously under way, he must be ruefully reflecting on that old adage: "Be careful what you wish for."
When President Bush fired Mr Rumsfeld last November after the Republican defeat in the midterm elections, it might have seemed that – at last – the administration was listening to the senator's criticisms.
When he followed that up two months later by announcing a bold new strategy – the "surge" of troops to Baghdad – in a much more serious effort to restore order, it looked like further vindication.
But even as the President seemed to accept the logic of Mr McCain's criticism, he has made it much harder politically for the senator to distance himself from an increasingly unpopular war that could derail his presidential ambitions.
Having Mr Rumsfeld to kick around always offered the senator the most practical and easiest way to attack the war's conduct without directly criticising President Bush, something still considered unseemly even in the now fractious Republican Party.
And as long as Mr Bush and Mr Rumsfeld were continuing their bumbling "stay the course" strategy, Mr McCain could say, with real conviction, that this was not his preferred approach, and that, if the administration was not serious about winning the war, it might be better if the US pulled out completely.
But with Mr Rumsfeld gone and the surge now under way, the US now appears firmly committed to what the Democratic contender John Edwards cleverly christened "the McCain Doctrine".
This spells trouble for Mr McCain if he is to win the presidency next year. If the new strategy does not succeed in quelling the violence, it is hard to see how the senator can win a general election against a Democrat.
Mr McCain is still frustrated by the administration's actions. Those close to him express strong doubts about the administration's new strategy – which they think involves not enough troops, deployed too slowly to Iraq, with confusing signals about how long they will be kept there.
But in public Mr McCain is now the loyal supporter. In political terms he needs to ensure that the blame is attached not to him for his support for the war, but to those who in his view have mismanaged it for the last few years.
That was why – most unusually for a Republican – he voted against the appointment of General George Casey, the US commander in Iraq for the last two years, as the army's chief of staff
And that was why he was unusually vocal on Monday in a speech in South Carolina in his criticism of Mr Rumsfeld, describing him as "one of the worst defence secretaries in history".
Mr McCain's advisers still believe his association with the war will not destroy his prospects in the Republican primary. They continue to argue that no serious Republican will run on an antiwar platform. Instead, they say, Republicans will be looking for real evidence of leadership and competence in national security – something Mr McCain offers in spades
Republican voters will also be looking for something else – a real and effective means to attack resurgent Democrats. Which was why Mr McCain, in addition to his verbal assault on Mr Rumsfeld on Monday, had some contemptuous remarks for Democrats. He described their efforts in Congress at the weekend to pass resolutions condemning the conduct of the war as "a charade and a joke and a publicity stunt".
The more the senator can turn Republicans' anger onto the Democratic Party, the better his chances of winning them over.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
The McCain brand of snarling, hypocritical self-righteousness leaves a worse taste in my mouth than Gore's brand of condescention. Think Bush is an arrogant man? Think Rumsfeld is arrogant? Well, World, just wait until you are forced to swallow a big, healthy, dose of President John McCain. The only thing worse will be his reaction to how "unmanly" your response to his victimization is
Miles, Carson City , Nev
The article totally avoids addressing the ineptitude of the Rumsfeld approach to invading and managing Iraq. McCaine may not be the darling of conservatives but, he has a point. Even Bush's strongest supporters now admitt many errors in Rumsfelds "War on a Shoe String" approach to invading and occupying Iraq.
Guy Cabral, Honolulu,
Dan Truitt, Thessaloniki, Greece
I cant disagree with you about defeating the islamic fascist people who are killing many innocent people everywhere. But, we still have til Nov 08 to decided who to vote for. I am in no hurry to decide, although I usually will favor a democratic party I have voted republican, but Thank God I did not vote vore the current regime !! He said our constitution was just a god damned piece of paper !! That is a lie,, our constitution is written on our hearts in this country !! If you had a 9/11 in your country and your government claimed 17 hijackers were Saudi Arabian, would you go to Iraq ?? I think not.
How will America honor this current president, as is our tradition, with what has been done in our birth name ? Not to mention those that have citizenship that werent born here !!
Kathy, Smithville, Tenn.
McCain is not "flip-flopping" on Rumsfeld. He has been harshly critical of the failed Defense Secretary--and justifiably so--for years.
Gus, Marietta, USA - GA
McCain is an honorable and courageous man, and would be an excellent choice for president. He knows firsthand how horrible war is, and yet understands something we in the west will not honestly face: Islamic fascism must be faced down and defeated, and defeated soundly. Muslims must be given the chance to be educated and integrated into the 21st century. It is not an easy or pretty task, and he is one of the few up to it.
Dan Truitt, Thessaloniki, Greece
McCain has been very consistent with his views on the war. I believe in a lot of ways he and Rumsfeld are cut from the same cloth. Neither individual should be taken lightly.
If one believes that the main advice for troop limitations has always come from the military, then Bush and Rumsfeld have done what should have been done to this point in time. Remember Vietnam-the civilian leadership knew best; as a result 55,000 US military were killed and the US media won.
Keep an eye on Congressman Duncan Hunter. He could be the dark horse in 2008 election.
gtaz, Indianapolis, USA/IN
How amusing to watch the Republican presidential candidates shimmy and waffle and flip-flop(or should I say flim-flam?) tyring to find their "base". The MSM has completely bought in to this ridiculous notion of "bases".
When will they grow up and make the candidates clarify their CONVICTIONS and stand behind them win or lose?
Craig Millett, Kalaheo, USA/Hawaii
I am certainly no GOP insider out here in the heartland, but MANY Republicans are not fooled by McCain, Sen. Hagel has MUCH more gravitas in their view....the war is not gonna look good smeared all over McCains' face. Neither is the blood of 3,100 young Americans NOT born to the purple like McCain THINKS he was.
Hub Galliker, Warren, Michigan
McCain is continuing to be consistent on this issue. I disagree with many of his comments but he can not be faulted for inconsistency here. Marjorie of Pembroke is obviously a Democrat as they wouldn't be able to understand consistency if they were able to read it in Webster's Dictionary.
Wright, Colorado Springs, USA/CO.
give McCain a break. there is nothing in this article that points to him being a 'flip-flopper.' The media and liberals who love(d) McCain turned a blind eye to the fact that he has had a pretty solid conservative record over his tenure in the Senate. You just chose to ignore it in 2000 because he was a fresh face that stuck it to the GOP on a few key issues (global waming, campaign finance, amongst a few others).
McCain does not want a repeat of 2000. I can't blame him. He has to run further to the right then he did in 2000. It's his only chance. I am somewhat dissapointed that he isn't sticking to his guns more but thats only out of neccesity. I don't doubt that the same Maverick is still there.
Just wait for the General Election, he will move back towards the center.
Let's remember: he has been the numero 1 guy on global warming for years, an issue that will prob. be at the forefront of the upcoming election. An unpopular position that has caused him disdain amongst conservatives.
Justin, Baltimore, Maryland
John McCain will not be the nominee of our Republican Party. He has to much baggage going back to 2000. The surrender party and the clueless left will have to worry about Rudi.
HARLIN J HENDRICKS, Tulsa , USA OK
It saddens me that NO ONE--Republican or Democrat--can offer a rational solution to the Iraq War and its shadow, the War on Terror.
Hamas, bin Laden, the Iranian nutcakes (no, not yellow cakes), and their ilk are not reasonable people with whom civilized people can negotiate.
So, just what is the civilized world to do in order to survive. Hillary, Barak, John E, Rudy, John Mc, Mitt...none of them have put forth any concept that will ensure our survival and success.
We should ask George (not "W" for heaven's sake!), but General Patton is no longer with us. He would know what to do. If Rumsfeld does go down as "the worst" SecDef, it may be due to the fact that key military decisions were made on a political basis, just like Viet Nam.
Bruce, Thousand Oaks, CA - USS
One of McCain's distinguishing virtues is honesty. But to call Rumsfeld "one of the worst defense secretaries in history" is preposterous. It is a transparent pandering to antiwar sentiment, and deeply dishonest. McCain is misreading the tealeaves if he thinks such outrageous attacks will earn the trust of conservatives.
Jay, Lakewood, Ohio, USA
McCain has destroyed his own credibility in his ongoing effort to just curry favor with Republican elements who neither like nor trust him. And after 8 years of Bush the American people could well be branded masochists for handing the presidency to yet another Republican hawk-- or even just another Republican. So farewll, Johnnie, we hardly knew ye. But we knew enough to turn you down.
Valerie Sanford, Los Angeles, Calif., USA
I'm a Giuliani supporter, and I don't like that McCain is so tough on Rumsfeld (I mean, Rumsfeld made mistakes, but who's fought a war like this before?); however, McCain seems to be positioned well for 08. After all, he called for more troops from the beginning; so, even if things don't turn around, he still looks vindicated (since the surge is much smaller than what he called for), unlike the Democrats, who look vinidicated... AND defeatist. And, of course, if the surge works, McCain looks vindicated again.
tofo, new york, NY
Well Marge, McCain simply wishes to win the war.
The flip-flopping is left to the democrats who overwhelmingly voted to attack Iraq, and now tether their political hopes and aspirations to additional US coffins, and a loss caused from resources they will withhold. History doesn't speak of victories won by politicians refusing re-enforcements .
gjd, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Not since Bob Dole have we see a Republican hopeful that is so willing to be anything and/or everything to the minorities that make up the Republican Party. They may be a "majority" of the party but definitely a minority among the general American population.
Linda, Santa Fe, USA
McCain has never flipped on Iraq - in fact, he was the first and only cat aside from Dr Rice, to term Iraq a "...generational commitment..."
McCain has always wanted a bigger military footprint in Iraq, he was disturbed that America didn't take up Israel and Jordan's offer to transport the 4th Inf division through their turf in time to take part in the invasion, and he has longed suspected the murderous mullahs' in Iran of being neck deep in hankey pankey in Iraq.
McCain certaily flips on other things - but be fair - NOT Iraq.
courtney, chattanooga, TN, USA
As a Republican and a veteran, I am deeply disappointed in both Senator McCain and the GOP. In my estimation, the Party has failed to exercise an ability to competently lead from the Executive Branch and question and provide proper oversight in the Legislative Branch. It will be very difficult for me to support any Republican this time around. Such is the Bush legacy.
CLG, Whittier, California
I would contend that Rumsfeld in #2. Robert McNamara did far more damage to America and Americans than Rumsfeld has. McNamara even admitted, years before the war ended, that it was a no win situation, yet he continued to supply troops.
DJ Martin, Topeka, KS
McCain has trapped himself into the same Stay the Course Strategy used by the Whitehouse. How sad to see a once much admired hero selll his soul for political ambition. Why not choose to be an honorable elder statement with the good of his country at heart.
Ann M Narr, Middleboro, MA
Sen. McCain built up an image of statesmanship and bipartisan compromise. Now Candidate McCain feels it necessary to demolish his winning image.
El Alacran, Lubbock, Texas, USA
McCain is the biggest "flip-flopper" and hypocrite among the Republican hopefuls. He is giving presidential contender, Mitt Romney, a run for his money when it comes to flip-flopping. Hence, should he be renamed "Senator McContradiction"?
Marjorie, Pembroke Pines, USA - Florida
McCain has picked the wrong side of the Iraq war debate. He's guilty by association and as this war heads towards the inevitable defeat he too will be a loser.
F.S.SUMMERS, N.Y.,