Sarah Baxter, Washington
2 for 1 tickets to Singin' In The Rain, this coming Monday. Book now
IN THE few weeks since Hillary Clinton announced she was running for president, a striking element of her campaign strategy has emerged: criticise her and her team will turn the big guns on you.
Dick Morris, a fierce opponent of Clinton who was her husband’s closest political guru for years, has described criticism of the couple as the “new mortal sin” in American politics.
“Nobody’s allowed to do it,” he observed last week. “Certainly none of their opponents. If they dare to, Hillary sends in one of her boys, who practically accuses them of being unAmerican.”
Chris Matthews, a television talk show host and former presidential speechwriter popular with Democrats, said: “Is this the strategy? You cannot dare criticise us?”
Robert Shrum, the top adviser to Al Gore in the 2000 presidential campaign and John Kerry in 2004, warned Team Clinton that “attack, attack, attack doesn’t always work, as the people in the Charge of the Light Brigade found out”.
Clinton’s spokesman had unleashed a ferocious assault on her main rival, Barack Obama, for failing to disown some stinging remarks by David Geffen, a film mogul who raised $1.3m (£650,000) for him in Hollywood last week.
Geffen tweaked some raw nerves in the Clinton camp by reeling off a list of concerns that are usually only whispered about the “royal” Clintons. He knocked Hillary for being ambitious, polarising and stubborn about the Iraq war, intimated that husband Bill was still a womaniser and suggested that they were both seasoned liars.
Clinton’s camp fought back by demanding that Obama apologise and return the $1.3m. Obama’s spokesman refused, suggesting that the Clintons had been only too eager to have Geffen’s money and reward him with sleepovers in the Lincoln bedroom at the White House when it had suited them.
It was not the first time Clinton’s campaigners had retaliated in such a way. John Edwards, another rival for the Democratic nomination, was savaged by her advisers when he suggested last month that senators and congressmen should refuse to fund the surge of new troops in Iraq. “Silence is betrayal,” he claimed.
Edwards did not name names, but Team Clinton took his remarks personally. Howard Wolfson, who led the attack on Obama last week, railed against Edwards for failing to live up to his “bragging” in 2004 about running a positive campaign.
Fighting dirty while accusing your opponents of diving in the mud has been a hallmark of the Clintons for years, according to Shrum. It happened to Robert Dole, the Republican nominee in 1996, he recalled. “He was constantly accused by the Clinton campaign of being negative while it was relentlessly running a barrage of negative ads.”
Although Hillary Clinton claimed to be above the fray, she also laid into the “politics of personal destruction”, a phrase redolent of the Bill Clinton era. It left opponents scratching their heads: if they could not refer to her vote for the Iraq war, nor mention her husband’s impeachment or private life, was there any criticism they could voice?
Mike McCurry, a White House press secretary in the Bill Clinton era, believes the clash with Obama was “designed to test battle systems” for the 2008 campaign. “She wanted to signal, ‘I’m not going to get slapped around’,” he said. “It’s important for her to establish that because of the fear of Democrats that she will get Swift-boated” — a reference to the Republicans’ brutal demolition of Kerry’s status as a Vietnam veteran.
It was a surprise, however, to see Clinton’s attack dogs unleashed so soon against a Democrat, rather than a Republican. “It’s something people may have raised an eyebrow about,” McCurry acknowledged.
However, one of the Clintons’ most vitriolic opponents during their White House years has suspended hostilities.
There was no bigger hater of the Clintons in the 1990s than Richard Mellon Scaife, a billion-aire publisher known as the “funding father of the right”. He financed the Arkansas Project, which dug up every possible piece of dirt, real and imagined, against the couple. The campaign led, ultimately, to Bill Clinton’s impeachment by the House of Representatives. He was acquitted by the Senate.
Christopher Ruddy, who co-owns the right-wing online newspaper NewsMax, in which Scaife has a stake, announced: “Both of us have had a rethinking.” He went on to claim that Bill Clinton “wasn’t such a bad president”. Hillary, he added, had “moderated and developed a separate image”.
But Ruddy told The Sunday Times that the right had not finished with her yet. Hostility would increase if she became the Democratic nominee. “I believe she will become a big lightning rod when she gets the nomination, so why make a big issue of her now?” he said.
It was confirmation of one of Geffen’s stated fears — that the Republicans would only set about destroying her once she had seen off her rivals.
With almost 21 months left before the presidential election, the prize may go to the candidate with the most stamina for the fight. There were signs last week that Obama was already wearying. A leading commentator in Iowa noted that he seemed tired and off his game on a campaign visit last week.
“Aides allowed he had takena late-night flight back from the West Coast,” David Yepsen wrote. “He was flat and his answers meandered at times.”
McCurry said American presidential campaigns were gruel-ling and the question of Obama’s stamina was “the kind of thing people are waiting to learn about him”.
Obama seemed to regret that his aides got involved in a tit-for-tat slanging match with Clinton’s team. “We have to be careful not to slip into playing the game as it customarily is played,” he said.
If Clinton’s team cannot silence any of her opponents, it may well be able to pound them into exhaustion.
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
Have you ever dreamed of owning your own racehorse or a beautiful painting?
Enjoy comfort, safety, space and great design. Plus enter our great competition
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
Do you have what it takes to be a Times photographer?
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
Find out to make the most of your money with our wealth management guides
Need help with your property? We have an entire how to guide - buying, selling, letting, moving, to help you
We are seeking entries for the inaugural Sunday Times Best Green Companies Awards
Enjoy some wonderful inspiring wildlife moments
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Overseas contacts and local business information

Direct from the farms
2007/07
£57,500
South East England
2007/07
£40,995
South East England
2006/06
£41,995
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
£40-55k+benefits+uncapped commission
Morgan Keating
South East
Up to £30,000
GLE
London
£
c£75,000 + executive benefits
Morgan Keating
London and South
Unpaid with travel expenses
Network Rail
Globrix, the property search engine
Visit Times Online Property for homes for sale or rent
Residential development site with planning permission
£1,500,000
Mortgages, bank accounts & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Dinarobin Hotel Golf & Spa 7 nights
From £1830 per person – saving £530.
Walking & multi-activity holidays in Cauterets. Stylish self-catering apartments.
From 350€ for 7 nights.
SAVE 25% on Sandals Luxury Resorts
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Is this really what some Democrats want in the White House? Do you really think this woman will get anything useful done as President? She is old school, entrenched in dirty pool, and will never relinquish her lobbyists and their fat wallets. It's not about helping the American people for her. She feels like American royalty, and thinks she DESERVES that highest office.
And for those of you thinking about voting Republican because "it doesn't really matter," please remember...the supreme court.
Megan, Madison, WI
Do these comments actually represent the intelligence of the voting pool? Can anyone actually tell me something good about the Republican party these days?
J. Glynn, Boston, Massachusetts
If Hillary gets the democratic nomination I will campaign for any republican candidate that gets nominated. WE, The USA, do not need another Clinton in the White House, no matter how much the Europeans like them.
Kellie, Maine, USA
No worse fate could befall our nation than to have this Socialist virago as president.
J. Dean, Chicago, IL. USA
Sir
It should be blatantly obvious to even the most casual observer; Hillary is the modern embodiment of Jezebel. Consider the original Jezebel married to a weak King, Ahab, who had no core values, did all she wished him to do (including stealing the land and wealth of Naboth); installing the God Baal over Israel.
Our Modern Jezebel is married to a former President whose followership is renowned; he followed all polls and professed them as right for America and the world. Americas Middle Class suffered under tax increases. She used her role in order to run the government (under penalty of exposing her husbands philandering); this gave her the impetus to install the false religion of socialism on America.
Robert O. Kedney, Jr, Carlisle, USA
It just seems so political to me what Hillary is doing here. Why was Obama to blame for Geffen's views? Slamming Obama for what Geffen said seems so backwards. Is this what we can expect from Hillary? What would it be like if she was elected? What will happen when the inevitable Republican criticism hits? Talk about our country being a soap opera. I can't stand it anymore. That is why I've ALREADY decided to vote for Obama if given the chance. He's a your fresh face, and his relative "inexperience" is perhaps the best thing about him. He does not have a closet of favors owed. The Clinton's will want (and perhaps deserve) revenge for some of the things that were done to them. But does our country need this? They talk about Obama's "inexperience." Perhaps that is his strength. Likened to how The Beatles had no formal music training, and that allowed them to take a path "trained" musicians were unable to take. They thought outside the lines. Like Barack Obama will I believe.
Bill J, Nashville, TN
It's not surprising. Traditional tactics call for a vigorous attack when you have no plausible defense.
Thomas Hendricks, New York, New York
Clinton has won the nomination. Barring some as yet unforeseen upset, she IS the Democratic Party establishment. Power and money, money, money has replaced democracy in the USA.
Can she become the first female president?
Unless the Republicans pull themselves together and find a real candidate - Rudy, McCain and that Mormon.. are you kidding? - she's probably odds on favourite by default.
But if she wins, I predict a record low turn out and a high vote for some independent 3rd party candidate who is yet to emerge.
Harlan Leyside, Basildon, Essex
Indirectly, Hillary has contributed to the selection process of the next president. Obama has known that an election campaign is a test that also strengthens a candidate. How he handles this affair is a part of his growth. Hillary has also knocked the halo off her rival just before the media do it for us; after all, the media had a reason to oil Obama's crown.
mitch weaver, westchester, ny
Hillary is known for her foul language and vicious temper. She is singleminded about becoming the United States' first woman President. She will stop at nothing to get her prize. Heaven help any that cross her path and thwart her ambition. They may soon wish they'd never been born.
Caroline Kennedy, San Jose, Costa Rica
Hillary Clinton has the experience, the talent and the ambition to be a great president. She will not allow herself to be put down by associates of Senator Obama,, nor by associates of the future Republican nominee. I believe the country will rally behind her just as New Yorkers have done. Senator Obama would make a good vice president and this would give him the necessary experience to run for the presidency in the future.
James, Austin, taxes
It seems to me that hilarious hillary would deny Mr Gefen his freedom of speech... HELLO....Is Mr Gefffen not a citizen then? Does he not have the same rights as that obnoxious film maker Moore? We need a big change! Obama seems to be a good candidate with so far little baggage but a possible lack of experience, although I am not that convinced that 'experience' is more important that the ability to hear all the angles and intelligently make a decision. Finally, and not flippantly, I suggest that Ophra may have more of what it takes to be a President that has to make the buckstopping decisions than most others.
BUT lets make sure the hilarious Hillary does not continue to seek to deny others, who displease and threaten her, their constitutional right to their freedom of speech
Kenneth Mottram, manalapan, NJ/USA
Does hilarious 'Hil really wish to deny Geffen his Freedom of Speech? I hope Geffen hits her hard for trying!
Kenneth Mottram, manalapan, NJ/USA
Does hilarious 'Hil dare to deny Geffen his rights to freedom of speech
Kenneth Mottram, manalapan, NJ/USA
why do we even listen to all this negative rhetoric ? If you give one enough rope, they will find a way to hang themselves....so leave her alone...she will never make it to the finals...in spite of all the funding, back room support and friends in high places....Americans are smarter than she gives them credit for being
peggy c. keating, Pompano Beach, FL
The Clintons going on the attack is news? How so? Hasn't that been their style since 1996?
Matt Harrington, Montreal, Quebec
Hillary's a cynical opportunist of the first oar: the others, apart- perhaps- from Kucinic, aren't too far behind. She won't get the nomination- although she and her team are bound to provide us with much mirth.
Arun Varma, Zürich, Switzerland
Mrs. Clinton is relentless and, in a sense, more formidable than her husband. She has assembled a like-minded team. The only principles she holds are those necessary to get what she desires. She deftly abandons these principles of the moment when beneficial. She should never be underestimated.
Thomas M. Doran, Plymouth, Michigan, USA
And as a moderate independent voter in the USA living in one of the bluest of states (Democratic party leaning) Maryland, Hillary's attack on Obama has reopened the Pandora's box of all the reasons for not voting for her. It is time for a change and voting for her would be like going backwards in time. We've already experienced the Freudian fallout of father and son dynamics, whoa be unto US to bring upon our nation the soap opera Clintonian drama.
dee, silver spring, marylnad-usa
What amazes me is that Hillary, complaining about someone she and Bill invited to bed (even if it was a different bedroom), has managed to get the Western world's media to report this as if Obama's team was equally involved - when all they have really said is that Geffen speaks for Geffen.
I see no pounding from Clinton, only whining.
Ken Belcher, Chicago, USA
Americans must vote for a candidate who does not resort to spin, ruthless negativity, and revisionism. Yes, that describes the candidate now known as Hillary because to use Clinton raises appropriate images of the royal Clintons and a husband who will never disengage himself from Oval office sex and an unimpeachment. She will do whatever it takes to succeed. That is not the leadership American citizens need, nor one the world should respect. Not that the world should respect the current occupant of the office.
Deborah B. Luyster, Jacksonville, Florida USA
Pleeez, the biggest problem Hillary has is self-inflicted ones. She's a ticking time bomb of contradictions and 1990s "nanny-state" non-sense.
In short, no one needs to "mess" with the Hildabeast, she messes herself.
CaptainAmerica, USA,
If one cannot criticise Clinton at this stage, what will she be like as the President? Criticism is part and parcel of a democracy. Take that away and you have either a rubber-stamped ineffective regime that tries to please everyone or your have a dictatorship that pleases no one. Will she be America's new dictator?
Elaine Sihera, Maidenhead, United Kingdom