Tom Baldwin, Orangeburg, South Carolina
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes

A crisp and sure-footed performance by Hillary Clinton last night appeared to confirm her status as the frontrunner - by a narrow margin - for the Democratic presidential nomination after the first televised debate with her rivals.
She was helped by a format for questioning all eight candidates which allowed little time for dwelling on any issue, including that of Iraq on which she has faced criticism from Democratic activists over her refusal to apologise for voting to authorise the war.
Instead, the tone of last night's debate was polite to the point of being lacklustre, as the top tier candidates - Mrs Clinton, Barack Obama and John Edwards - avoided the risk of direct confrontation with each other.
"I think that what Barack said is right," was Mrs Clinton's only direct reference to her chief opponent last night. A Wall Street Journal poll this week had her still in the lead with 36 per cent support, against the gathering challenge of Mr Obama at 31 per cent and Mr Edwards at 20 per cent.
The most combative of them last night was Mr Edwards, who has renounced his own vote in favour of the war in 2002. "We need a leader who will be open and honest, who will tell the truth when they made a mistake," he said last night.
But he denied this was taking a shot at Mrs Clinton, saying only that she must "search themselves and decide whether they believe they've voted the right way." She responded with her now standard line of accepting responsibility for her vote before switching the subject to the future, saying: "If this President does not get us out of Iraq, when I am president, I will."
Mr Edwards also appeared to take a jab at Mr Obama, suggesting he lacked substance on healthcare policy - a top issue from Democratic voters and one on which "highfalutin language is not enough”.
But Mr Obama offered few of the rhetorical flourishes or flashes of charisma which has earned him so much admiration and - although he did not slip up - was perhaps over-cautious.
But towards the end of the debate he sought to appear presidential by entering into exchanges with Dennis Kucinich and Mike Gravel. These two fringe candidates had already provided most of the flashpoints on a night when they were both clearly desperate to take a rare opportunity for making an impression.
Mr Kucinich accused Mr Obama of "setting the stage for another war" by failing to rule out military action against Iran and questioned his assertion that the Islamic Republic was intent on developing nuclear weapons. Mr Obama stopped his interruptions with an authoritative "let me finish" before reiterating that "we have to take seriously the threat from Iran"
Mr Gravel, who said the top tier candidates' views "frighten me", paid special attention to Mr Obama, asking: "Who are we going to nuke? Tell me Barack, who do you want to nuke." Mr Obama replied: "I'm not planning to nuke anybody right now, Mike, I promise." Back came Mr Gravel, saying: "Good, good, we're safe then. For a while."
Asked about a recent poll showing most Americans have an unfavourable opinion of her and claims that Republicans are keen for her to be the Democratic candidate, Mrs Clinton responded cooly, saying of her right-wing critics: "I take it as a perverse form of flattery, actually, that if they weren't worried, they would not be so vitriolic in their criticism of me."
She earned praise from pundits, a group not necessarily representative of Democratic voters, last night for the clarity of her answer to a question about what she would do if American cities were once more attacked by al-Qaeda. "I think a president must move as swiftly as is prudent to retaliate," said Mrs Clinton.
"I supported President Bush when he went after al-Qaeda and Taleban in Afghanistan. And then he decided to divert attention to Iraq, it was not a decision I would have made, had I been president, because we still haven't bin Laden. So let's focus on those who have attacked us and do everything we can to destroy them."
Mr Obama, who had earlier once again pointed out that he opposed the Iraq war from the outset, answered the same question with a long-winded answer which talked only of "potentially" taking "some action to dismantle" a terrorist network.
After Ms Clinton had spoken, he came for a second stab at this answer, saying: "One thing that I do have to come back on, this issue of terrorism: we do have genuine enemies out there that have to be hunted down, networks have to be dismantled."
The shortest answer of the night came from Joe Biden, a candidate known for his verbosity, who was asked if he had the discipline to lead American on the world stage. “Yes,” he said, in one of the lighter moments of the 90-minute debate.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I was only able to catch some of the debates in the highlights on evening news shows.
First, let me say that I am backing Senator Obama because he inspires me in a way that Senator Clinton does not. I am also concerned that a Clinton candidacy might be enough to install yet another Republican in the White House, since the "base" of Republican voters would unite against her candidacy.
Senator Obama speaks of a vision to unite our currently fractured country, much in the same way that another candidate from Spingfield, Illinois did in 1860.
Lead us home, Senator Obama, lead us home.
Jim Lyons, East Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania
Hillary Clinton came to John Edward's rescue when Edwards was having a problem rationalizing to Moderator Williams his work as counsel to a hedge fund . It's not all that surprising thatSenator Clinton praised such New York-based investment firms as "examples of the nation's entrepreneurial spirit. " Her daughter Chelsea is employed by Avenue Capital Group, a $12 billion hedge fund manager whose founder, incidentally, has contributed to many Democratic Party campaigns. When the campaigns warm up at Hillary's sordid past is highlighted, there will be many Brits who are hoping for a Clinton win who will be very disappointed.
W. H. Smith, Palm Desert, California
Mrs. Clinton's reply to the question as to what she would do in the event a U.S. city were the target of a nuclear attack -"I think a president must act as swiftly as is prudent to retaliate" doesn't seem very assuring to me. Surely, it would be extremely difficult, perhaps impossible, to immediately identify the source of an anonymous (i.e. ship container) nuclear explosion. Instant retaliation, however, would have to be made to deter immediate (al Qaeda-style) follow-on explosions. Who would Mrs. Clinton immediately retaliate against? How swiftly would she retaliate to prevent follow-ons?
Ian Begg, Corte Madera, California, U.S.A.
forget them, president gore, al please run
david trewick, surrey,
And the antichrist takes the lead.... What excitement (yawn...)! Not.
If these politicians are the best America has to offer, then the whole World is in a lot of trouble!
Thomas, Atlanta, GA, USA
I think that Hillary would bring to the presidency something which has been sorely lacking. A womans perspective. She is intelligent, cool and has the experience that Barrack is lacking. Mr. Obama would make an excellent vice presidential candidate and I think the pair could steam roll over the lackluster group of candidates the Republicans have to offer. My only fear is that of pandering to the religious right leaders to siphon off some of their votes from the Republican candidates. I personally don't want a centrist leaning candidate. I want a clear choice for President, not the watered down version from right or left. I want to know where the candidates truly stand on all the issues and then to make my choice from fully honest representations of what they stand for. I think that Hillary is our best shot at making and keeping America a Democratic Republic, free from the grasp of religious zealots who would like to make the USA a Christian Theocracy. Go Hillary!
Duane, Lees Summit, Missouri
Unfortunately, I missed the debate which took place at a state I love because it was in SC. where I attended and graduated from University - University of South Carolina.
Even though, from a foreigner point of view, I´ve always "supported" Republicans for different reasons (i.e. stronger moral values, etc.).
However, after their (Republican) disaster in Irak, their denial on global warming, etc., I hope that the next US. President which plays a vital part in most of the world (including the other first world countries or G -7 for instance) would be a Democrat - The best one!
We need that the US. Government signs the Kyoto Protocol, leave Irak; etc.
And to Mr. Taylor in the UK. Terrorism is mainly aimed at the US. or you have forgotten about 9/11?
Andy , Guayaquil , Ecuador
Why does everyone keep on insisting that Hillary Clinton is not electable? If there is one thing making her unelectable, it is the repeated mantra that she is not! Why can't we all shut up and let the voters make the choice?
mary, chicago, illinois
Just a little something about American presidential elections: nobody wants to "run" for vice-president. It is considered the end of a political career in most circles, barring a catastrophe. Its a hidden, lackluster position, "second-place" in the sweepstakes. Its not a runner-up prize.
Obama, if he is serious about this election, and I believe he is, is running to win. And that's the presidency itself, nothing less.
Personally, I'd like to see what he could do. We need some serious change in American leadership. I'd like to test the newcomer and see what he's made of. We'll let Hillary be HIS vice-president.
James P, Sacramento, California
Madame President!
JoeCHI, Chicago, IL
In response to Mr. Hull of the UK who asks why Americans think terrorism is all aimed at us: it's because, sadly, we Americans usually believe that *everything* is about us. It's an unfortunate elitist attitude that many of us are only recently realizing. Sadly, that very attitude has also shaped the socio-economic policies that helped foster the environment in which the US *is* a target -- a sort of self-fulfilling prophecy.
David Fuller, Indianapolis, IN, USA
Senator Obama has once more proved he could lead the great country of the United States, with his wisdom , class and character which definitely over shadowed the other canditates ability in yesterday's presidential debate.
Senator Obama and Senator Clinton will make a great team for leading our country.
Hanna, rockville, Maryland
The Democrats must select someone who can actually win the general election! While Hillary has a strong core of supporters inside the party, she is strongly disliked by a large majority of voters across both parties. She can win the nomination but not the election. We have to select our best "electable" nominee! The focus should be the get a democrat in the White House, not just to get a Clinton back in the White House!
Bob, Iowa city, , Iowa
Hillary is a shoe in to win the election
Paul Martin, Brisbane, Queensland Australia
I think George William Taylor, you have missed the point! The candidates are being asked what they would do to protect America.
Here's hoping Hillary will win and we'll see the Clintons back in the Whitehouse!
SJD, London, UK
My vote goes to Hilary and Obama as her vice. I love the Clitons.
Sam Danso, Kinshasa, Dem. Republic of Congo
why is it that Americans think terrorism is all aimed at them
its a world wide problem that needs a world wide solution
maybe a global force like our SAS or the french foreign legion to gather information and bring down these organisations together not just as one country but as a team effort by all countries at risk, all terrorism has to be
funded ,stop the money you stop the terrorism I am sure in
this great techno age that's not a hard job to do. I have lived
in the UK for 52 years and never felt threatened or frightened.
george william taylor, hull, uk
The US needs a strong leader, who can think clearly on the US roles in world and who can find solutions to the internal problems of health care, deficits and rising crimes. Though Hillary Clinton is one of the most intelligent leaders, it is doubtful that she can win the US Presidential elections. Democrats ought to leave their confused thinking to win the race.
Regards,
Krishna R. Kumar, Udupi, India