Barack Obama's campaign is about the future, not only of our children and grandchildren, but of the United States of America and the world. This man is a developing statesman and gifted leader. He is striaght forward and is running to bring us together. However, it is up to us to step up. Remember, "in a democracy we get the government we deserve." We must help save ourselves and our republic. The world is watching and hoping too. Let;s each do our part to elect Barack Obama.

Doug Cunningham, Brockport, New york

Dear Sarah,

I'm an independent thinker and native of Maine now living in The Netherlands. The Dutch overwhelmingly favor Obama's
candidacy for President of the U.S. They see him as a genuine,
honest, gifted person who will breath new life , grace, and balanced perspectives in our tired, nasty system of politics.

As for myself, I simply disagree with Hillary's contrived ridicule of Obama's message of HOPE as a meaningless slogan. On the contrary, his message of HOPE is a challenge to not cynically give up on coming together on some really serious problems before us.

HOPE is recognizing the urgent need to correct some systemic flaws in our social-economic model. This means striving for a more intelligent, civil dialogue; to more constructively argue, compare alternatives, judge, compromise, create new ideas and strengthen old ideas. All this to remove us from the precipice of erodiing financial stability, divisive social stratification, and loss of world respect.

Frank Thomas, The Hague, The Netherlands

It was with the greatest sense of pride and enthusiasm, when as an 18 years old, I supported, campaigned and cast my first vote for Ronald Regan. Since then I have voted Republican in every Presidential election, state wide election and nearly all local elections. I would never have imagined that the day would come when I would be without a Regan Republican for whom to cast my vote. George Bush killed Regan Republicanism.
I agree with the sentiment that Senator Obama is the "black Ronald Regan." I regret that the Republican party, under the leadership of George Bush, has abandoned the principals of Ronald Regan. When Senator Obama is taking the Oath of Office as the President of the United States, he will have been elected with the aid of my vote.

Robert, Cambridge, MA

I agree with the above comment. I'm also in favor of Ron Paul, but since he has no chance, I think Obama is the next best choice. I appreciate the fact that he wants to increase the transparency of the federal government. He seems like the candidate who is most likely to unify the nation rather than further divide it. I'm a bit skeptical about his promise to improve the "fairness" of the federal income tax, but I'm willing to give him my vote and support.

James, Knoxville,

Another college-educated, pro-Constitution Republican for OBAMA. I know many of you are afraid of what is outside the crab bucket, but I assure you, there is a country waiting for you that honors the Constitution, families, and SMART government instead of big government. We'll be here for you even after January 20, 2009, to help you with the transition.

R Tracewell, Findlay, Ohio

It's quite clear with the large conservative votes going to huckabee that the conservatives will cross party lines with a McCain nomination. One must consider the only thing that will unify that wing of the party is a Clinton nomination. Obama has a clear advantage with independents as well as McCain over Hillary. Obama vs. McCain will be an interesting election. Hillary vs. McCain is a sure defeat for the republicans. Can we really afford to let the Bush policies continue? Wake up people! Hillary will not win the general election.

jake, Phoenix , AZ

i'd love to see Ron Paul on the ticket as a republican, but since there's not a chance of that, i'm going to vote for obama. Crazy? maybe, but even though i know he is very liberal, he strikes me as a uniter, and will actually listen to both parties to assess what needs to be done. besides, what president has been able to accomplish his "promises" anyway? the opposing congress and senate see to that.

irisheve, portland,

Ron Paul may be your hero, but he has enough money to not need his pension or government funded college loans. You try shunning a college loan to advance yourself while working minimum wage at a library.

Pat, Atlanta,

I once thought that Obama might be that "shining light" that this country has not seen in nearly a half century. This impression came to me following his speech before the Democratic National Convention in 2004. Wow! I thought, not really knowing much about him, or politics either for that matter, at the time. Another JFK! But, now I am totally convinced by looking at the facts of his record and his political connections that this was a staged production. It was orchestrated to attract the masses who will not look behind the veneer of the man who has become the latest "Super Hero" to save the world. Never fear, "SUPERBAMBI" is here!!!

Likkerish, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA

John of Stevens Point, WI wrote:

"If there was a republican who was principled, and actually practiced fiscal responsibility and tried to get the government out of our personal lives...I would vote for him in a heartbeat."

John, have you not heard of Congressman Ron Paul??? He is the epitome of a principled legislator, having maintained his values to the point of voting alone at times throughout his twenty years in Congress. He voted against the war. He voted against the Patriot Act, when others were voting for it without even reading it.

He is the most fiscally candidate that you will find. And his primary message is that of individual freedom and liberty which requires getting the government out of our personal lives across the board. And, further, he practices what he preaches. He would not allow his children to accept government loans for college. He refuses to take a government pension. And, he returns a portion of his congressional office budget every year.

Alan, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA

Anyone who thinks Barak Obama will herald a significant change in politics-as-usual is buying into the washington shell game. Read the article again. Barama supports aggression, a war crime, in pursuit of US 'national interests'. Why do you still trust the washington elite to define your national interests? Iraq never was a military threat to the united states, yet US destruction of that country has only served to keep its oil offline until the multinationals can pump the sweet oil out at $100+/barrel profit. Invading Afghanistan didn't profit the US but instead restarted the flood of heroin worldwide.
And we are not to worry at the prospect of this spineless juvenile holding his finger over the button of the world's largest nuclear arsenal because he's assured us "I'm not planning to nuke anyone *right now*?"
Democrats, republicans and independents please consider *very carefully* this time what you believe in, and who you are willing to trust.

Benjamin Shapiro, Giessen,

What no one understand here is that Bush has failed miserably. You, as President, are not only held accountable for your intentions, but your ability to execute. What we're seeing is a Senator who is willing to go bi-partisan on issues. People like that.

That is what's wrong with politics today. It's all negative and nothing gets accomplished. We need someone who can unite everyone to just get something done.

And as for Iraq and Dar fur, Dar fur was much more important to get to. If you want to go after Islamic militancy, go to Iran, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Afghanistan....Iraq was the least of the concerns in the Middle East...yet it's where we base the war. Had a lot of oil though...hmnnnn. And Govt, do some history on the Sunni and Shi'ite conflict before you take down a regime with no plans for after. You created chaos and exposed the civil war.

Obama is hope for a new kind of politics. Change is necessary.

Ryan, Madison, Wisconsin

I don't understand why everyone is getting riled-up about this article. If there was a republican who was principled, and actually practiced fiscal responsibility and tried to get the government out of our personal lives (as opposed to the gay marriage amendment proposed by the current administration, for example) I would vote for him in a heartbeat. I sure wouldn't want to reward the GOP after they cherry-picked Bush over a then-more principled John McCain after the 2000 primaries by voting for their candidate again anytime soon. Obama is a charasmatic voice of reason and principle in this campaign, and his detractors can only spout-off catchphrases like "he's a flipflopper like the rest of them demmy-crats". After the calamity of the Bush adminsitration (one of the most divisive in history), a well-spoken, honest, and charasmatic candidate is a breath of fresh air.

John, Stevens Point, WI

Three reasons to support Obama [1] A Democratic president will increase the liklihood of a Republican congress; [2] A new tone for American blacks; [3] His last name is not Clinton or Bush. I'll still vote Republican, but I won't mind if Obama wins.

Maria, Columbia, USA/SC

I'm amazed that some Republicans are suggested that Hillary is a harder general election opponent than Obama. One of the reasons why I think this is guy is going all the way is because he incites so much whistling passed the graveyward by both Hillary's people AND Republicans.

Chris McDonald, New York,

This is the most disingenuous article I have ever read - the idea that a couple of Republicans who say they like Obama, (one didn't even endorse him!) constitutes a movement ? This is a not even veiled attempt to create some momentum for Obama, who still trails even H. Clinton in the polls for the Demo nomination. Perhaps we should check out who the writer of this tripe is supporting for president !!

Rick, Atlanta, GA

Should Fred Thompson stand for the Presidency might not his Law and Order platform win against any other candidate?

john kidd, brisbane, australia

AJ Pecqueur, Clayton, GA: "Just on the Darfur point alone it shows the typical left - liberal slant: only use the military where we have zero national interest. The left, like Obama, hate any military action that we get involved in due to national interests."

I must admit to being curious, AJ. How was destabilising Iraq, virtually handing it over to Iran on a silver platter and generating a debt large enough for your grandkids to still be paying off in the national interest? I can't see it myself.

Dan, Hampton, UK

Hey Dan- Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton.... You're the people who are creating the nightmare. Time for a change. Anyone, liberal or conservative, besides Clinton/Obama in '08, please.

Wayne , HOUSTON, TEXAS

any republican money that comes his way this early is purely to stop hillary. And 'Democrats widely expected to win in 2008', give me a break. Their candidates are so week that this will be only the second time in history that a party will retain power after a two term president. it happened with bussh after regan because the dems were so week

Walt, Ithaca, NY

cute article about nothing...RHINO's have always have hedged thier bet. There isnt an ice cubes chance in hell that Obama could win. Obama is the Paris Hilton of politics - a nobody. On the other hand Colin Powell was a true conservative, although conservative light. If there were an opportunity for an African American president it was Powell. I love it that companies are tossing in millions for Dems based on the front runner status. Good Luck, ah la John Kerry and Al Gore - they all looked great right up to the General Elections.

Keith, Virginia Beach, VA

AJ Pecqueur, Clayton, GA: "Just on the Darfur point alone it shows the typical left - liberal slant: only use the military where we have zero national interest. The left, like Obama, hate any military action that we get involved in due to national interests."

I must admit to being curious, AJ. How was destabilising Iraq, virtually handing it over to Iran on a silver platter and generating a debt large enough for your grandkids to still be paying off in the national interest? I can't see it myself.

Dan, Hampton, UK

Naturally Republicans are restless. The Bush administration blew their chance with lies, bad faith and monstrous incompetence, and the majority of conservatives I know feel betrayed. It will take a generation to fix, and no Reaganesque conciliator can tell them what they want to hear because the reality is so disturbing. Some will cross over, the rest will sit back while Dems try to clean up after them and come back 4 years later and blame Dems for everything again.

Mike, Pittsburgh,

Anyone ever heard of "Reagan Democrats"? Are those people "real" Democrats?

Of the Republicans on this Forum say "yes" then the "Obama Republicans" are also "real" Republicans.

Inna, Sacramento,

If I didn't know that Obama voted the straight liberal Democrate line, I might believe all the hoopla. Just on the Darfur point alone it shows the typical left - liberal slant: only use the military where we have zero national interest. The left, like Obama, hate any military action that we get involved in due to national interests.
Bush's failings should not lead to a national suicide pact to vote in a very very liberal guy, regardless of his campaign slogans, most of which seem to go against his liberal voting record.
Real conservatives never loose sight of their heart held beliefs. I question the true conservative credentials of some of the so called conseratives noted above.

AJ Pecqueur, Clayton, GA

I voted for Bush and I tried to stick with him because I thought he was the best choice. The more I hear what Obama has to say about that I value, the more convinced I am that I will switch parties to make sure I vote in the primary too. He is the thinking mans candidate.

Rick Hendricks, Rochester, NY

Don't like what Hillary or Obama have to say? Wait a few minutes and they'll change their positions. Flip flop AND a southern accent to go with it!

Matt, Fredericksburg, USA/VA

So these former Bush supporters are going to cross over to the Obama camp? They go from Conservative to the most liberal, some think socialist, candidate? Hard to believe. Sounds to me like a conclusion based only on anecdotal evidence.

Richard, LA, California

Dream on, liberals...Obama is a light-weight with NO leadership skills. He couldn't win if EVERYBODY else backed out. History will show that Bush is and was a GREAT leader who refused to listen to polls. Look at Lincoln...hmm. Washington wasn't all that popular in England either, nor with the tories or the hessians. Dems here are fixated on Clinton's legacy, trying to ruin Bush as revenge...simple as that. They are still mad because the WOT started during Bush and not Clinton, so their guy could dig out of his impeachment. Good old Bill, the working girls friend, red nose and all. Can't blame him, if I had to look at Hillary...

charles t. sherwin, pittsboro, nc

I am surprised that Tom Bernstein, Robert Kagan, Matthew Dowd, John Martin, and others would allow disagreements with President Bush's policies to cloud their judgement. It seems strange that they would all be swayed by the mere words of a first term senator with no experience of large scale leadership or demonstration of coalition building. I suspect the motives of these men are based more on self preservation fueled by the change of power in Washington.

Mike Henry, Ft Washington, PA USA

Why is everyone getting so hysterical about this article?

God forbid someone choose to vote against party lines. After the poor performance by all the Republicans last week I can see why some people want to jump the fence?

Or did any of you actually watch the debate? Listening to post analysis doesn't count.

Michael, Los Angeles,

First of all there are PLENTY of Articulate Black men in AMerica. There are regular articulate black people in America. Plus, you seem to know nothing of the black middle class and wealthy in America. They never seem to get on TV. We have countless educators, intellectuals, activists, doctors, lawyers, scientists, philosophers, business people, artists etc. We have 2 black billionaires and several black CEOs of Fortune 500 companies. It is a small mind that only thinks of Obama as some type of anomaly. Sure blacks have some ignorant people and some poor people but so does every race. The difference is you people want to think that the poor and ignorant are the standard for blacks in America.

That said, my choice is a Hillary/ Obama ticket with her giving Edwards a position in her cabinet.

Ronald, Anytown,

Now THAT'S funny! You Brits are always good for a laugh!

Marc, Cleveland, Ohio

With the mess in Iraq and the Republican base unwilling to waver on it, people who are against the war will be more willing to vote Democrats into office. This includes much of the Independent vote. Besides, Guiliani may be pro-war but he's in many ways a liberal in a republican's body - pro-choice, pro-gay rights, etc. Obama is really liberal though and I doubt how many people are actually going to vote/campaign for him. Donating money is one thing but we'll see what actually happens next year.

Katie, Mt. Prospect, IL

So three guys jump to the Obama camp, so what it happens. There were Republicans that voted and worked with Clinton...he even had one as his Secretary of Defense. My gosh I bet even some Democrats voted for President Bush. (Naw, couldn't have happened).

Dennis K, Chicago, USA

While people still hate other people because they are politically left or right, it is nearly impossible to notice that everyone is actually on the same side. All of the candidates love the United States of America for obvious reasons, but they see different ways of making it better and that's where the political divide comes in.
I think we should vote for the most capable and consciencious person running and then run our government in different ways BY STATE with federal funding. If the "red" states want domestic wire tapping, let them have it - it will surely protect them more strongly at the expense of civil liberties. If the "blue" states want universal health care, let them have it - it's sure to be expensive as well. But running the NATION requires a president to love "red" AND "blue" states, not to pick the side with the bigger voting population and neglect the sincere voters from the other side. Obama seems like that kind of person, so he's getting my vote.

Colin, Johnson,

I am a former servicemen and never voted for Bush. Whether Obama gets elected or not one thing is definate, our political leaders need to stop catering to special interest groups and fundraisers and concentrate on the actual people. The families that have familiy members serving and dying in other parts of the world and families that are finding it harder to make ends meet are who they should be concerned with.
It also unsettles me that any canidate is receiving so much money from any company that would just as soon fire those same workers that vote for their donation receiver.

Brendan, Chicago,

Speaking as a Reagan conservative I can clearly say I do not and will not support Obama for President. O is a lib. He is for bigger government, higher taxes and a weaker military. This guy hasn't stated his presidential position on anything except he loves everybody and if he had been in Congress he would have voted not to go to Iraq. So he was willing, based on what we knew at the time, to let Sadam retain WMD and work with terrorists, that is a very strong defense position? In the democrat debate he said his response to a WMD in the US would be to make certain FEMA responded well. Strong defense?

The writer of this article might have offered a few reasons why a any conservative would support O. Nothing is stated. True conservatives generally do not feel Bush has been coonservative enough outside of reducing taxes and the war on terror. He has been weak on government spending (espansion of Medicad) & illegal immigration. We do not view McCain as a favored candidate based on Iraq.

Ray Harkins, Hamilton, Bermuda,

Personally, I say the people of the United States are ready for a fresh change in Washington and I hope Obama will be up to the task.

He will have much work to do as "King George" has really screwed the American people over.

It should be an interesting election!

Paul Aughtry, Clearwater, USA / Florida

The folks mentioned and those before them that have jumped to another political party are why the term RINO became popular. They are fleeing to support folks that with RARE exception promote issues that people that support republican positions are strongly opposed to and could never support. While it is certainly within their rights to do so, the media needs to refer to these people accurately, to wit: Republicans in name only.

Jim Roseman, Etna, CA

Yo' Mama Obama!!!

Ross, Charlestown, WV

I have been a Republican since I was old enough to vote. I voted republican in every election I've voted in, with no exceptions. Today's republican party has moved from it's roots of conservativism. True conservativism defers to the individual; preserves individual rights. I will be voting for Obama, if he makes it to the general election (I can't vote in a Democratic primary in my state). I have more than a couple long-time conservative friends who feel the same. And they have friends. This article, while not actually talking about a "larger movement" of Republicans, is actually spot on.

David, Jacksonville, FL

Personally, I think this is a fabricated story. Obama is a far, far leftist and will no way appeal to the typical Rpublican, let alone serious Bush supporters.

Jay Mason, Chicago, US

I've voted for Reagan, Bush, Dole and W (once, and only once), and I now will vote for Obama.

Numerous other attorneys in my office have similar voting records, and are doing likewise, of leaning in that direction. At this point the Republicans couldn't BUY a vote in my conservative firm.

Dennis O'Brien, Springfield, IL / USA

Thank goodness, there is some thought left in the left-soaked, brain-dead country of my birth. After the 2004 elections, I vowed never to vote again (after having NEVER missed since 1972). But maybe there is hope still. We have brain-washed our education system and the media advertises the news they want all to hear. I'll be watching America as we approach 2008. The strategy of the left to divide and conquer and then just smear defensive anger works on most of the "sheeple" in my area. Hope I like what I see, or I will just hope to outlive my retirement.

carrie rich, Hermitage PA, USA

Oh yes, let's extricate ourselves form one hellish civil war so that we may participate in the Sudanese civil war. Are you kidding me?

I'd much prefer we begin minding our own business. Trade as we need; but, stay out of their affairs.

Phil, Saint Louis, USA/MO

Baxter,

Do you even know what a neoconservative is?

And if so, could you point me to the Official NeoCon Group that...
(a) Is endorsing John McCain, or
(b) Considers JFK a hero of the Cold War?

You not of what you speak, and you've turned the term into a catch-all for "People I don't like."

Jeff, Charlottesville, VA

How foolish that the silly republican party who have shunned all forms of diplomacy have a complaint about the Democratic candidates. Why don't you guys just be quiet and let our country get back to the real business of making the USA a superpower instead of a laughing stock. The poor leadership and corrosion of our country is historic and for that the red states must now realize they have always been wrong in what the country needs. And as for Giuliani, we are so happy a "NY democrat" is running as a Republican. Mr. Obama is the future of our nation even if he doesn’t win; the American people are ready for an intellectual and measured president.

Adrian Scriven , Bayonne , New Jersey

This nation is not divided. The MSM wants you to think it is. Obama is not the answer.

Steve, Romulus, MI

I believe the forgotten person in this race is New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson. He by far, is poised to outshine anyone on the Democratic side. Mr. Richardson has executive governing experience, knowledge of international affairs/diplomacy, a familiarity with the energy issue and what is needed to be successful on the national stage.

AG Kaska, West Newton, PA

Add my name to the list of former US Republicans. Obama has the eloquence and intelligence required of a true US President - he has the vision and optimism to pull this fractured nation back together after years of purposeless partisan strife.

It's worth noting that during the Cold War, the US elected a Republican President 28 out of 40 years (1953-1993) and held a Democratic Congress for 38 of those 40 years (1955-1993.) The Dems elected were hardly peaceniks - Kennedy and Johnson were Cold War Warriors, even Carter was shocked into action by the Soviets in Afghanistan in 1979.

It may be time for a reversal at home. It worked well during the last six Clinton Years (1995-2001.) Bill was free to feel the world's pain, to be our friendly Oprah-In-Chief abroad, while the Republicans at home in Congress were reasonably serious about fiscal matters.

Divided government in this country works best - certainly it lends itself to avoid corruption better than any one party rule.

Tony G., Seattle, USA

I can attest to this phenomenon.

My own mother, a conservative church-going lady voted Republican in the last three elections.

This time she is an Obama backer. That should concern Republicans. She says Bush has become arrogant and incompetent now and she wants change. She hates the war.

She introduced Obama's book, "The Audacity of Hope" to her church book club and all the ladies loved it and "felt hopeful for the first time in ages," According to my mom.

She turns 70 years-old in June.

Republicans used to call her their base.

Bob Smith, Davenport, Iowa

Dear Ms. Baxter -

Let's see - Good looking, speaks well, makes vague promises to improve harmony and social programs and has absolutely zero experience -where have we seen this combination before?


I bet you lost your bet on the French elections too.

Lokki, Dallas, U.S.A

The truth is that most people are not truly dedicated to a party even if they are registered to one. Most thoughtful Americans are independent by nature and only register as democrat or republican to be part of the process in the primaries because of the two party system. A good moderate candidate like Obama can take do more good for the country than some dense ideologue because he puts good sense first. People appreciate this.

Todd McCollum, Austin, TX

Who wrote this article, Howard Dean? A Democrat victory in 2008 is by no means assured, and the idea that conservatives are going to vote for Obama is ludicrous. Republicans lost in 2006 because the conservatives sat on their hands and just didn’t go to vote. The loss of votes by Republicans did not translate into votes picked up by Democrats. After 2 years of seeing what Nancy Pelosi and her socialist colleagues really stand for I guarantee the conservatives will not sit it out in 2008.

Jim Mahoney, Allentown, PA, USA

Fred Thompson or Mitt Romney President and Vice president. Americans will not vote a Demo into office if there is even a possibility that we will be at war or the war will continue. The left is like the old French lib Party. You saw what happened to them. Even with 99%of the Press going all out for the Dems most Americans still do not want to commit suicide. At least not yet.

Dallas Jackson, Vacaville, California/USA

The new Diageo Hotline poll shows Obama receiving the best numbers any Democratic Presidential candidate in modern history has ever gotten from Republicans. Among Republican voters, Obama gets a 44% favorable/30% unfavorable rating.

On top of that, among independents he gets a 51% favorable/13% unfavorable rating, a 4-1 ratio, which is better than any major Presidential candidate has done with independents in recorded history.

The Reagan comparison is not only justified by these numbers; it may be an understatement.

It seems more and more people are starting to understand, whether on an intellectual or intuitive level, that an Obama Presidency would not only up our world standing but destroy the visceral basis for anti-Western terrorist recrutiment propaganda. The added level of national security that would result from the utter confusion in jihadist recruitment efforts would on its own dwarf anything any another President would be able to do for our national security.

Shadow, Hamden, CT

Dear TimesOnline Readers;
As an American that isn't affiliated with either the Democrats or Republicans, I assure you that the above article is wishfull thinking at best and blatant propaganda at worst.

All of this hoopla is generated only from the choir interested in a partys primary election, not the voting public as a whole. America isn't jumping out of their seats for Obama or Clinton or anybody else at this point.

All this talk about how powerfull the Internet & Grassroots support is, is simply nonsense. Remember how powerfull the Net Roots thought they were in the Joe Liberman Campaign? Well Joe Liberman won the election and the vocal net blogs all went down in flames.

Net Blogs in the U.S.A. are 0 - 2.

They couldn't defeat Joe Liberan and they couldn't elect Howard Dean.

Jim Foy, West Islip, USA, NY

This is a lot of wishful thinking crap. If Republicans are going to migrate to any Democrat, in itself a highly unlikely turn of events, it would be to Dodd or Biden. If this article is an indication of the kind of reporting not U.S.-citizens are reading, it explains a lot about the misinformations we Americans have to endure.

JE, Washington, DC, USA

The people mentioned in the article are not the rank and file members of the party, rather high powered fence sitters who will endorse the candidate they think will win thereby improving their own standing in terms of political favors.

Obama is a rookie politician who votes the party line....not exactly a free thinker. The best thing he brings to the campaign trail is his youth, his looks and the fact that he is not Hillary or Al Gore!

Obama may mature into a candidate worthy of the Presidency, but I don't think he is there yet.

Paul Morris, Centereach, NY

Does it bother anyone that Obama is warmongering like Bush? It bothers me. More soldiers and more money for an undeclared and therefor unconstitutional wars?

I want my President to follow the Constitution.

Ron Paul 2008

Don Pratt, Des Moines,

Wow, the Times online has found a "trend" in three Repubicans jumping ship. Then moves onto quoting some polls for evidence. Even the Kosmonauts are laughing at this story. Don't you guys know that Hillary is the black Ronald. Thanks for the chuckles. PS Sarah please cut back on the hydro.

Stephen, New York, New York

That is the biggest pile of BUNK I have ever read.Three or four people (who make a living in politics) flip flop, and your title your article REPUBLICANS DEFECT TO OBAMA CAMP.As if all Republicans have suddenly decided to vote for a muslum for president. "NICE TRY THOUGH" .......

Will Bevis, Florence, Al. USA

Some misinformed paranoid maniacs are still trying to claim Obama is a Muslim. The truth is he is a Christian.

Obama had two parents, one was a moderate Muslim student from Kenya ( a nation of mixed religions) and left when he was "two years old".. his mother was from Kansas and a Christian who later remarried, and who later sent Obama to his grandparents in Kansas who were individually Baptist and Methodist, and he himslef was later baptized at the Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago.

Check your facts you miscreants or better yet who do you work for... Fox News, Hillary or Halliburton?

Marc, US expat in Amsterdam, Netherlands

Call me a skeptic. It would be just like the neo-con(artist)s to back Obama to retain power. They back a democrat, whom they feel would not be elected in th general election, only to have a republican elected. The new president would be a "known commodity" to them, like McCain or even Giuliani.

Bob Stephens, Dyer, USA/Indiana

Nothing kills political movements faster than inopportune wars and now the neocon movement is being smothered by a war that is not only inopportune but has become the worst policy disaster fiasco over which any president has presided. I don't know who the Republicans will run in 2008, but you won't hear them saying much about George W. Bush. There will be no more "neocon" candidates for president for a long, long time.

Steve Owens, Indianapolis, IN, USA

This article seems like a elaborate Media Goof-Joke .
Product of a hang over , perhaps?

I note not one point is stated as a fact.

Of course Republicans want Obama to win the Democrat nomination...how obvious can that be?

RUSSELL DIEHL, Irvine, Calf

This is the first time that I've come across the assertion by Obama that he would increase defense spending to 'fight terrorism.'

Obama is no longer the peace candidate. That would be Ron Paul.

Imp, Redmond, WA

If they are supprters Obama then they are not Republicans. We won't be fooled by the sudden appearance of a hackneyed website like "Republicans for Obama" either -- that is one of the oldest political campaign tricks in the book. Get one of your supporters to pretend he represents the other party and that by inference, you are a political moderate that should draw support from members of both parties. Obama's voting record makes him the most liberal member of the Senate.

Bill, Nashua, NH

I have enjoyed some of your recent articles, but I have to agree with others that this one is a little "out of touch". America will never elect someone who is going to try to socialize our country. Obama is a handsome young man with absolutely NO experience in government. Less than 2 years in the Senate does not qualify him to be the leader of this country. Further, he may be "talking the talk", but his record shows that he has no intention of "walking the walk". He is clearly a socilaist in his voting record and views. I cannot imagine that he will suddenly become a conservative.

Pattie Bittles, Scribner, NE

Obama is a glib talker, but when you get down to substance, Obama is just a left wing Democrat who will pursue policies of appeasement and military weakness in foreign affairs. Any defecting Republicans who think otherwise are kidding themselves and doing a disservice to the country. There are not, however, many such defective Republicans and certainly no defecting conservatives.

Phil Byler, Huntington, New York

Well, Obama's got a nice voice. And he smokes, which goes over real well with the Euro and non-hygenic crowd over here. So yeah, I see the repbulicans and everybody else lining up for Barak Hussein Obama. Sure...that's the ticket!

Donald, Riverdale, GA

Barack Hussein Obama President of United States We are really in trouble. This man Commander in Chief Of our Armed Forces? Think again. A man that was brought up as a Muslim. A Person that is not just a liberal, but farther left than a liberal. This man is not qualified to be a President of anything. He hasn't the slightest idea of what this country faces. He could not unite two pieces of steel with a welding torch let alone unite this country.

Mike Lorenzo, Sharon , Pa

Who is Sarah Baxter? Anyone here know her backround? I ask this because many Euro-UK journalists and voters are not as aware of US politics as they think. The so called "defection" is a result of the impending doom of a second Clinton administration. Obama is a typical US liberal Dem. (much like Bill Clinton), who looks and sounds good and who will fool the average dolt. But under the surface, he is completely dependant on "finger to the wind" policies. They will support Obama in hopes he will topple Clinton, Inc., and his vast inexperience will but guarantee a Republican president. It's really that simple, and it's US politics in a nutshell.

Joe Manzo, Peabody, US/MA

Something gets lost as news travels across the pond.

The only Republicans who support Obama are liberals who wouldn't support a typical conservative Republican anyway. Obama is as leftist as Hillary, and there is nothing in his campaign that would unite our country. He would unite a lot of Democrats, but Democrats who run as liberals - as Obama is - always lose.

Mainstream Republicans are hoping for former Senator Fred Thompson to run. He is a mainstream Republican that both conservatives and moderates (the majority of voters) will support.

Jeff J, Atlanta, GA, USA

It does not seem as tho Obama has credential one....

Kenny Bouy, Naples, Fl/USA

You are not a republican if you support Obama. Things like socialized medicine and giant welfare are not Republican ideals.

S, Washington, DC

Yes we really want an 'inexperienced' charlatan as our next President -- to get us through all the 'tough' siuations and problems that we face in the future??!!!--How outrageous is that!!

diane, princeton, New Jersey

Ridiculous on its face. Except for his position on the war Obama is Hillary. There aren’t 5 republicans in America who would support him.

Kevin, Boston, Ma., USA

Barack Obama will be the most important political figure of a generation. He will be our next president and will bring America back to being the country the rest of the world looks up to, not down on.

Hillary stands in the way and Republicans want nothing more than for her to win because they fear that maybe, just maybe Americans have woken from a nightmare that they created called George W Bush and will unite the country again.

Dan, Toledo, OH, USA

Obama just makes everyone feel so good, doesn't he? Unfortunately, what this country/world needs is to fix our foreign policy and he doesn't have any clue how to do this. He just doesn't have the experience we need in our next president.

Buddy, Round Rock, Texas

Hey Nick fron S.D McVeigh was an Atheist. He did not do it in the name of religion.

Mike B, Inverness, Florida

These big polical insiders and business people don't believe in anyone except the potential winner. This is why they donate cash and endorsements; so they get jobs and favors when he gets in. They don't care what Obama stands for. But they certainly know that he is an emplty suit who is a brilliant speaker. And good enough to fool the dumb American public to vote him in as President - just like we were fooled by Jimmy Carter and Slick Willy.

Nick, Creedmore, NY

What a ridiculous pro-Obama article. Most conservatives will never vote for this guy. What a ridiculous conclusion to jump to that republicans are for Obama. Also, the quote with Democrats expected to win in 2008. Could it be any more obvious who this reporter is cheering for? The election is a year and a half away. Obama is a complete fraud who has done nothing signifigant at all in his short time as a senator. If he were not a monority nobody would know his name. What a ridiculously slanted article this is.

Stadler, Detroit, Michigan

"Democrats widely expected to win in 2008," ha ha ha, I do not think so! If that is the case, how come with Bush's approval rating at 37%, Giuliani still leads all Democratic candidates? America is not going to elect a tax raising, weak on national security Democrat.

Adam, New York, NY

And, pray tell, how many Republicans are flocking to the side of Obama? Two? Three? Is the rush of converts causing a traffic control problem, or is the author of this little liberal fantasy on loan from The Onion?

Vituperator, New Orleans, USA

Good riddance, republicans can only get elected nationaly with a truly conservative message. The chamber of commerce types just dont cut it with the regular folks. You know the type of republican that will sell out the folks for an extra buck every time. The drive-by media loves to puff these guys up. Put up a conservative candidate combined with a percieved threat and the American people will run home to daddy every time!

james, wichita, usa

This "Uniter" "Bring the country together" is fine as long as it is driven by strong, wise and experienced leadership. We can expect challenges from within and outside our country that will threaten our safety and values. These threats will not be solved by a candidate who exhibits charming stage presence and mouths off phrases that sound like they came from Miss America finalists.

I'm looking for a candidate who shows experience, gutsy leadership and is a good communicator.

Gene Jurasinski, Gettysburg, PA

I find it "interesting" how a few high profile names constitutes a larger "movement".

joe, atlanta, ga

Hey Drew from Texas.( another tolerant individual) assume you don;t trust all Muslims, because of 911. Do you also feel the same way about Catholics. Remember Timothy Mcvee. Think about that .....

Nick, San Diego, Ca

I actually work with someone who was a top Bush consultant. He is currently volunteering for another Republican campaign but stated that he will quit the campaign if/when Obama wins the Democratic nomination. He said he felt Obama would be good for the country.

gary, austin, TX

Our nation needs healing after the divisive ways of the Bush administration. Hilary is also a divider, while I like her personally, she is not the one for the job.

Obama carries a message of hope for this country, and will come as an eye-opening surprise to many, carrying this country forward into the next decade.

Daren, Fresno, California

While I appreciate that some Republicans may be "defecting" to the Obama camp, I challenge that they were ever Republicans at all. It is almost unthinkable that a Republican, well to the right of center, would move to the extreme left of political ideology to align with an avowed social democrat. On the right we tend to call these people Rino's, Republicans in name only that find it a label of convenience. Every camp, it would appear, has "les agent's provocoteur"...

Gregg, Fremont, Michigan

Conservative David Brooks was also favorably impressed with Obama some weeks ago - writing in the NYTs but I don't have a link, sorry.

david morley, moab, utah

The title and opening sentence of this article commit the fallacy of making a statement in which 'all' is implied but only 'some' is true.

Kevin, London,

Glad to see that the Democratic Party dirty tricks campaigns have been working overtime for this planted story. Clearly the Obama Camp is getting nervous if they start to resort to this type of talking-points blast faxed/emailed/blogged out to the media...besides the aparent laziness, this reporter clearly has cut and paste their way to miss understanding American Politics.

Roger , Washington, DC

Hey all you people who say Obama can;t win. Newslflash today....... Any, thats any Democratic candidate will beat any Republican contender. Poll out today. Bush's popularity is so far down the sewer that he will drag any and all Republicans down with him.

Nick, San Diego, Ca

So John Martin says “Obama has a message of hope for the country.” Who cares, is that why you are supporting Obama, all the presidential canditates have some kind of hope message. Like my Grandpa Gustafson used to say: You can hope in one hand and crap in the other and see which gets filled first.

Joel, Saratoga Springs, UT

I knew that I was at a left-wing site when I read this article.
Sarah is such a good little Liberal with her socialist. agenda. The Socialists didn't win in France. We need to vote them out in the US.

Trish, Aurora, USA

Obama and Clinton both have been too middling and full of doublespeak, they haven't put forward any new ways of thinking, they only seem to vaguely think we should evacuate Iraq while threatening Iran with use of force. The only Democrat candidate that has really straightforward and spoken for himself has been Mike Gravel.

Joseph M. Pence, Champaign, IL

The Muslim community has stated they would take over this country without firing a shot. Putting Obama in the White House they would be succeeding.

J. Reilly, Aberdeen, NC

Republicans that support Obama are doing it for one reason. He can't win, but Hillary might. By putting the weaker candidate out, you increase the chances of the GOP winning in 2008. Despite what the liberals say, this country is not ready for a black president. It won't happen. I don't even believe a woman can win. You'll probably scream racism or sexism, as any Kool-Aid guzzling liberal would, but it's just the truth, face it

Dan, Pittsburgh, PA

I believe almost nothing that comes from the liberal media. Nice try, but we've seen this tactic plenty of times in the past.

Rick, Midland, MI

Now that "The Times" has decided who will be the next U.S. president maybe we should forego the elections and concentrate on something important, like BP's executive mis steps...

Lou, Fort Myers, USA Florida

If it wasnt so early in the year, this would definately be the award winning article under category Liberal Media wishful thinking. Give me a break. This type of reporting belongs in the Enquirer. No wait, even the Enquiirer wouldnt post such a ridiculous article

Ken Hamel, Newton, Ma, USA

I find the quotes of Obama's speech to be hard to reconcile with other things I think I've heard him say. It's a jedi mind trick. He's for expanding the US troops, and starting wars to protect US interests? Doesn't sound like the Obama I've seen on TV.... but is it?

Jeanne Hannigan/ Hilo, HI, Hilo, HI

Sorry - but Obama is an empty suit.

Before he announced his candidacy, I was impressed with him. In his few TV appearances, he sounded intelligent and I was impressed (despite my conservative views).

Once he announced, though, it's been all downhill. He speaks liberal platitudes and talking points.

After six years of a president seemingly unable to articulate his thoughts (I voted for him both times), Obama was a breath of fresh air.

The air has gone stale.

Robert, Kansas City, MO

Another post that could easily be applied to George W Bush.
(Well, if you replace ZERO by NEGATIVE: driving a corporation into
the ground, driving a sports team into the ground, letting 9/11 happen
after telling the messenger "You can go now, you've covered your ass."

"The guy has absolutely ZERO accomplishments on his resume aside from getting elected in a race in which he was essentially unopposed. Remember, ZERO accomplishments. Not one of his supporters can name a single thing he has done. Its only what he 'believes'. People believe in Santa Claus too but the guy doesn't make a credible Presidential candidate."

Silvio, Minneapolis, CA

Only U.S. citizens should be allowed to vote in U.S. elections, to propose otherwise is insane.

Jeffee, Springfield, U.S.A., IL

How to turn a screed from false to true changing a single name:

No one who is a true Republican, a believer in smaller government and more individual responsibility, could possibly support GEORGE W BUSH. He is a big government socialist [DEFICITS!!!]. and believer in the nanny state [for corporations], despite his platitudinous speeches and personal appeal. His performance in the debate [whenever he opens his mouth] show he's definitely not ready for prime time. Lofty, non-specific speeches may sway the addlebrained but will leave us all in the lurch when it's time to govern. It is a sad commentary on American culture to think that such a neophyte could garner so much support based on affability and bone structure.

Silvio, Minneapolis, MN

No conservative would ever vote for socialists like Hillary or Obama. They are not worthy to even be mentioned in the same sentence as Ronald Reagan, or even George W. Bush and John Kennedy.

Paula, Richmond, USA

These people are just looking after themselves; they see the writing on the wall. The Republican Party is going to be trounced in 2008 and these folks don't want to loose there seat at the table!

And sonny,
The reason we don't let Presidents serve more then eight years is because they all get corrupt over time and need to be flushed out!

Bison, Granada Hills, ca

Thw Republicans should not be underestimated. They are after the front runner, being Hilary, and if propping up Obama will set her back, then Republicans will sign up to do it.

Emma, London, Eng.

If these guys were real conservatives they would look at Obama's voting record, not what he says. A candidate will say anything to get elected, as we saw with Bill Clinton.

Mario Goveia, Toledo, Ohio

Ithink Americans should wake up to the fact that the world is changing.Bush and his generals as well as those Americans citizens who voted him again in the second election made a whole lot of mistakes on the war in Iraq.Just look at the mess.Americans should look for someone who is going to fix this mess.Dont look at the colour of the person.Look at his strategies.There is no way America can succeed and survive with its foreign policy.This is not 80's when risks were minimal.

Iam no American citizen.Ilive in Africa-Malawi but I could see chaos with the Iraq war.America could have sealed the Iraq borders when it was invaded.But it chose to ignore all its neighbours,Iran,Syria and the like.Now it is requiring their support,but it is too late.So when choosing candidates look for someone with fore sight so that the mess is cleaned.

Dont choose people who supported the war earlier and are retracting in their actions now.They lack foresightedness.They wont help America.Wake Up Now.

Patricia, Blantyre, Malawi

no way!

And jesse jackson is voting for David Duke.

Get a real life

Tom, chicago, il

Anyone who could vote in favor of partial birth abortion shouldn’t be allowed to even babysit let alone be put in charge of a country!

Besides writing a book and giving a rousing speech full of empty platitudes, exactly what has this man actually done for this country? Seriously..

Judith, Dickinson, ND, USA

Drifting Closer to Disaster: Demoncranks and Republicants

The nation drifts ever closer to disaster and neither the Demoncranks or Republicants have the political wisdom, much less the will to implement critical measures necessary that would make possible the constitutional restoration of our country. Both parties are so bound by special interest groups, the pursuit of personal power and aggrandizement, and proselytes of the idolatry of internationalism that they have become the enemies of all those who love liberty. Nearly all of them have violated their oaths, in one way or another, to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America.

And we have stood by and not only allowed it to happen, but often have encouraged their perfidity. Instead of holding he villains accountable, our only concern has been if their would be a wider space at the feeding trough and more slop to keep us content...

Rest of essay: http://blog.myspace.com/runrigtexas

Richard, Austin, Texas

As an American, I had to laugh when I read this article. I can assure you, very few Republicans are defecting to the Democrat camp and very few Democrats are converting to the Republican camp. Taking a few examples and trying to peg the trend is utter nonsense.

Scott, Houston, Texas, USA

My guess is that if the Dem. candidate is either Hillary or Obama a huge percentage of Democrats will be voting Republican.

Ron L., camarillo,ca., usa

Obama has it right. We should focus on fighting "our enemy" where they are, namely in Pakistan and Afghanistan, rather than playing out a losing hand by refereeing a civil war in Iraq. The "enemy" in Iraq is primarily freedom fighters that just want us, the occupiers, out of their country.

Steve, Oakland, CA

I don't know where the "Democrats are widely expected to win" comes from. All of the polls I've seen have Republicans and Democrats neck and neck. I think a lot of people want to ignore the Republican candidates because of their party affiliation with Bush. People will see that their messages actually resonate well when it comes down to it.

AC, Mesa, AZ

Obama has a nice personality, but is a far left liberal by American standards. To think that he is acceptable to a majority is a media and left wing big lie. Say that he is mainstream long enough, and maybe the uninformed will believe it.

Unfortunately most Americans don't take the time to study the issues enough. My favorites are Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani. They are not as conservative on illegal immigration as I would like, but I think they are loyal to the traditional values of America. They are articulate and attractive candidates. They are more experienced than Obama also. I believe that Mc Cain is too old for the job.

Of the Democrats, I would prefer Hillary, at least she has a lot of second hand experience.

Ronald C Wagner, Decatur, IL

Obama has made huge pushes to clean up corruption and promote campaign finance reform. And he even did this by reaching across the isle and working with McCain. Obama's Awesome!

Tony, Portland, OR

It really does not matter what the elite media have to say about who becomes presient because in the USA each INDIVIDUAL has but ONE vote. This country is not going to elect either a female or a black to be president. PERIOD end of story. Not this time. So whoever the Republicans actually DO nominate will become president.

Leslie, Commerce Township, Michigan

This author is so disingeniuos it hurts. All you have to do is go to opensecrets.org and punch in Bernstein,Tom to see who he gave to. The results, while he did give to Bush, as a friend I am sure, mostly he gives to liberal candidates. Chuck Schumer and NY Liberal Party. Wow I cant wait to look up the rest. BIG defection... NOT

Dave, Pasadena, CA

I live in Orange County and am about as republican as it gets. That said, I am watching Obama with interest. and giving him the benefit of the doubt. I can't get excited about any of the GOP contenders. I like Obamas tone, but am waiting for him to say something that he knows will displease some - his 'sister souljah' moment. So far it has been a lot of bromides and truisms.
I almost think it would be a good idea to have a democrat president for a while - the democrats have had a free ride for 6 years and will find out that, as bad as Bush is, not everything is his fault.

Ian Board, Mission Viejo, California USA

Yes, there are some Republicans who are capable of thinking for themselves. When almost one third of the current covey of candidates discount evolution, I think you can expect many more who will wonder “Where in the world is the Republican Party?”

ED, Jaffrey, NH

In your wildest dreams, I know of no Republican who would vote for Hill or Obama " EVER. "

Nell Stewart, Georgetown, Tx

I'm a republican and I LOVE Barack Obama. He is the best there is and he has given me hope for the future of America. Sarah, Oregon

Sarah, McMinnville, Oregon

I am a U.S. Army Captain and an Iraqi Freedom Veteran. I can tell you that more and more career U.S. military leaders are angry with the Bush administration. Bush had the full support of the military leadership initially. Now he has lost our trust. Of course we will follow and carry out his orders. That doesn't mean our heart has to be in it. This current administration has embarassed our nation even more than the Clintons ever have. I registered as Republican to vote for Bush. I am glad Kerry didn't win, but this administration has embarrassed us. We need to leave Iraq. The president has become so disillusioned with Iraq. We in the Army are also glad Mr. Rumsfeld is gone. We need someone who is a good conservative to turn this country around. Sen. McCain could do it but he won't win the White House because he thinks we can win in Iraq. The Repubs better get a candidate that can get us out of Iraq, or you can be sure they will not win the White House in 08.

Joe, West Palm Beach, USA, FL

Perhaps some people cross party lines during the primaries to help their opposite party select a candidate which will be easy to defeat in the general election.

That is why I am a "democrat" "supporter" of Obama.

D Paul, Tucson, Arizona

Sounds to me like republican dirty tricks. Send enough money to the #2 candidate in the opposition camp that he feels like he could win. That will divide your enemy.

adam russell, san jose, california

Anyone hear of Ron Paul or Mike Gravel i think they should be mentioned more also.

st, hornell, ny

It seems the media always has information on when Republicans go to Democrats, never the other way around. Obama is not a conervative, any conservative supporter would never support Obama.. There are a great number of good Republican presidential
nominees coming up for '08, no need for the liberal media to start the Obama band wagon.
The Western world is going "Conservative, my own country Canada voted for a "Conservative PM" and now France is following , the US will go again for a strong "Conservative person in these troubled times.

Louise Paquette, Tecumseh, Canada, Ontario

Tim from Florida and Chad from Texas are right. You're misreading the trends in the U.S. Please remember that, if Obama manages to claw his way past Mrs. Clinton for the nomination, he will NOT be running against George W. Bush. The conservatives are hungry for a nominee who is more conservative and more articulate than Pres. Bush. When that candidate emerges, that's when the election will get interesting.

Pam, Spotsylvania, Virginia

I'm retired Army, have 5 combat tours under my belt, (3 of which are thanks to G.W.) and voted Republican since I was able to. This election, I'm voting for Barack Obama. Period.

Barack Obama is the only candidate I see whose "mistakes" were made BEFORE he was in public office. He admits to those mistakes, and has the best chance of unscrewing the perception the rest of the world has about our government.

The refreshing thing in my eyes is that he's got my vote because of the man he is, and not because he's black, half black, 1/4 black, whatever... Race doesn't matter to me anyhow. He's a helluva lot smarter than I am, and he has good ideas, principles, and a lot more morals that the others. Who cares if he's a first year senator? I want someone who isn't already corrupted to be the next president.

steve berkshire, Loveland, CO

Those so called defectors are NOT conservatives. If they like Obama and are aware of how he has voted then they really should be called socialists. Like so many they should look at what he has DONE not merely at what he says. Words are often hollow.

ab, new alexandria, pa

I agree with William from El Paso.

One of two 'useful idiots' allow themselves to be used by liberal journalists & socialist politicians, and the resulting propaganda is supposed to convince thousands that an Obama or at least a democrat presidency is inevitable.

Everyone wants to 'vote for a winner', and the press is already working to convince those who will not think for themselves, that Obama or Clinton are predestined to be president.

I also agree with Larry from Cedarburg, and would like to add the following. What has Hillary actually accomplished, other than standing by her political 'meal ticket' through all of his scandals. What legislation has she authored that has made a real difference in the USA?

The only practical experience that Hillary has is in the "politics of personal destruction" to those who stand in her way!

Dave C, Virginia,

Are you guys kidding yourself? Do you really believe that huge numbers of Republicans will vote for Obama?! That may be the dream of Democrats, or other countries who hope that America will vote Democrat in '08 so that America will be defeated internationally on a variety of levels. Let's be honest, Americans are not the only ones who know that the Democrats will lead us to defeat. In all due respect, "I admired Ronald Regan. And my friend, Barack Obama is no Ronald Regan!" Good try though!

Nicolette, San Bernardino, CA, USA

"My 2c worth is that "Informed Republicans" is a contradiction in terms."

M McGregor, Tunbridge Wells, UK

Well, M McGregor, you placed the value on your own opinion, and I agree... 2c. It is ridiculous to think that conservative Republicans would even consider voting for a socialist. Obama is the media darling, so perhaps he will garner all of the media votes, but I doubt that he will be more than a fleeting fancy for bleeding-heart liberals.

Cecil, Eastland, Texas

If they have defected to Obama, then they were never Republicans.

David, Bloomington, IN, USA

Sorry if this sounds like naive Brit-speak but I think that the best Clinton for the job and the best candidate fullstop is Bill. The US should allow more than 2 terms on the basis that it disqualifies (potentially) the best man / woman for the job. I know Bill is better viewed outside the US than within so this view may not be shared by many in the US, but he has a greater grasp of world and domestic politics than many if not all of the candidates currently thinking of standing. It's such an important job, not just for the US but for the world so someone with a "global view" is essential in my opinion. Maybe we should be allowed to vote as well?

sonny, london,

Thanks for your insight into Republican support for Democrats. This is not new to America and may prove to be mere self-interest on the part of campaign contributors who either have business interests in Obama's state or in the purview of committees he sits on. Core conservative and liberal philosophies do not easily change just for elections. In the end, one will not hear Democrats using such phrases as "our beloved country" or "our great nation", much less "God bless America" or the dreaded phrase "on to victory". Therefore, most conservatives such as I will vote for a liberal Republican before we accept a conservative Democrat. Your gracious Queen was very welcome here. May God save her. And, if you have more communicators like the brilliant Christopher Hitchens, send them over - we sorely need the brain power

Tom Budney, Sheb Falls, Wisconsin USA

At last some Republicans may see though the darkness they created.

Rob Noll, Norway, Maine

Please stop attacking this article by calling it mere propaganda and attack the facts it's based on if you want. If you can't, swallow it down, even if it hurts. Barack has made clear his position on many issues, just because you don't know his stance, doesn't mean he doesn't have one. Go to his website. While I'm not sure why Obama would even strive to emulate Reagan, he has said he was fond of "Reaganomics." The world socialist probably shouldn't be directed so quickly at Obama or hillary considering how much Bush increased the size of the gov, except for the EPA of course. It's ashame so many people have the opinion they will never vote for a Democrat/Republican, true ignorance.

John, Chicago, IL

Who cares. Obama will not win the primary anyway. Hillary and company will save the dirt on him until it is close to the primary and he will end up a distant second or third in the running.

Tom Spiegel, East Stroudsburg, Pa.

If he now supports Obama he never was a Republican to begin with.

bob macdougal, St. Augustine, Fl

How would Obama conduct the War on Terror or does he even acknowledge the risk of another 911 if we don't fight the Muslim terrorists? If we don't fight our enemy in Iraq, where do we fight? Eventually he will have to provide some details on how he will deal with this issue. That will be the end of his hopes to be President.

Russ Stabley, Fort Lauderdale, Florida

Its true! My christian conservative father and grandmother from Texas (former Bush supporters) have praised Obama and named him the best candidate for President from both sides! He is the real deal!

Noel , Washington, D.C.

It is difficult to classify Obama as either left or right. His policy positions are reasonable and guided by common sense. In any case, the next President won't be elected by pundits and bigwigs, but by the vast grass roots movement for change from divisive politics that will restore a united and stong nation.

Mark, Arlington, VA

This fact in the article undermines the whole premise of the article:

"According to figures compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics in Washington, Obama and Clinton have vacuumed up more than $750,000 (£375,000) in individual contributions from former Bush donors."

Bush has raised hundred of millions of dollars in the last two election cycles and if these two candidates COMBINED have only been able to raise less than $1 million from former Bush donors, this should be evidence there is no massive defection to these socialists.

However, when you see the names of these people that are defecting and their close association with the President, it allows you to better understand why Bush has not governed as a conservative. Sadly, Mr Bush is not a conservative and neither are many of his close associates.

Doug, Jupiter, FLA USA

Tancredo is the best candidate. It's too bad that most of the American public is too absorbed in their ipods, tv, and American Idol. They are brainwashed by what the media dictates. Hillary?? Obama?? Come on!! The lack of independent thought and the ignorance of our own American citizens is driving our country into the sewer. The politicians have the advantage because the American people don't know their Constitution and they fall for the tactic that we have to help the entire suffering world, at the expense of our country. Focus on Darfur and ignore the parasitic illegal immigrant problem and other destructive problems within our country? That's the way to destroy America. All terrorists need to do is watch. We are destroying ourselves. It's pathetic.

G., Lompoc, USA

the stupidity of people calling for Surrender in Iraq and Redeployment to Darfur/Sudan is beyond belief! If we cannot see bin Laden's work in Iraq..and call it a Civil War..we WILL indeed see it in Darfur/Sudan! The UN Has IGNORED it for years..and if we Surrender In Iraq..the UN should Not then get our Troops involved in Sudan. the call from EVERY Surrendering Soldier should be "Remember Mogadishu"! Surely we will have enough on our hands fending off attacks in Kuwait or wherever we RUN TO..

Lara Barker, So. Boston, Ma

Kagan supports Obama! Hell has frozen over.

Dan, Atlanta,

Biggest bunch of HOGWASH I have ever read... As usual in presidential elections, the people will have TWO choices: bad and worse... The democrats will self-destruct and the republicans will simply fill the vacuum.... The less of the two evils will remain for a third of the disenchanted and disenfranchised electorate to choose.

Jay Heimdal, Mobile, USA / AL

Is this writer merely ignorant about the American political scene, or affirmatively disingenuous? Hard to tell.

James, Los Angeles,

If anyone thinks the Clinton machine will allow Obama to win this primary, you'd better think again.
At best, it will be a Clinton / Obama ticket. That's if Clinton doesn't destroy Obama in order to knock him out of the race...which will probably happen.
Obama is a novelty that will wear off...just like dean.

Mike Hunt, NY, USA/NY

This is pure garbage, No Republican, living or dead, would support Obama. This is pure swill.

William Hofmeister, Moberly, USA/Missouri

I've been in the GOP since I worked for the Ford campagn in 1976 before could vote. I voted for Bush and never voted for a democrat for President. I'm career military.26 years. I've seen our stature plunge around the world, even among friends, seen the disasterous effects of current ops on our force and the lack of thought the administration put into to Iraq. I have lost conficence in Bush and the GOP in congress. Most running for the GOP nomination inspire little confidence. I haven't decided who to support, it is possible that for the first time I might vote Democrat for president. The GOP is no longer the party of Reagan, it's the party of Fundamentlaist Christians and BIG GOVERMENT, it has helped destroy our manufactring base and has betrayed Regan's heritage and needs to fix itself, or it will contnue to lose people like me. That's not treason, that's wisdom. It's not about supporting a winner, it's about what's best for the country. I hope the GOP can recover from Bush.

Steve, Virginia Beach, Virginia

"And unlike many Americans, I do not get my news only from Fox. I actually read Drudge, CNN, the Washington Post, the BBC, Al Jazeera's english site, the Bangkok Post, etc. I then use my intelligence to make well thought out observations regarding world politics."


Wow. What an arrogant assumption to make. So, since people think that a Republican might make a better President than a Democrat, they must be unintelligent and uninformed?

Get off your high horse. You're not as intelligent as you think you are...

Jon, Stow, OH,

Your publication can say what it will. "Republicans defect to Obama", reads the headline. Where do you guys get your info, from the tooth fairy? Because one or two "prominent" Yalie types like Obama, all of a sudden there is a Republican upwelling of support for him? Give me a break. Obama is not qualified to be president. He doesn't have any executive experience of any kind. Two years in the US Senate qualify him to "advise and consent", not to lead. He's never had a real job in the real world. Let him dry off behind his ears before we crown him.

Patrick Curry, Irvine, CA

I feel pity for anyone that could support such canditates as Clinton and Obama. They have no convictions, just stick their finger in the wind.

robert sizemore, morgantown, monongalia, wv

Fiction masquerading as journalism: a disturbing and ominous trend even by today's biased media standards. The premise of this bizarre article have been sufficiently de-bunked by others here, yet what is most troubling is that it made it past the Times' editors in the first place.

Mark, AZ, USA

The media an liberals love Obama,but when real AMerica finds out that he did NOT support avenging Afghanistan but rather wanted troops in Darfur, when they find out that he approves of letting prisoners out early rather than supporting our police, and that he has no intention on coming up with genuine ideas, but rather talking in Hillary terms, they'll see that he is nothing more than a typical liberal that the media(ny, la, london) tries to force on REAL Americans.

J Mill, Chicago,

Democratic Disinformation. Republicans for ... a fill in the blank by the DNC to move all of theses loony liberals to the middle.

Tom Jordan, Valley Stream, New York

That is crazy! A true Repulican would never support Obama. His ideas are totally off. If you ever listen to his speeches, he is for higher taxes, abortion, gun control, and many other things so-called "Republicans" are against. My feeling is a person will emerge soon. As far as now, not one person running has peaked my interest. As a true Republican, I am waiting...We still have a long way to go.

mjones, Alexandria, va

Sarah Baxter seems to forget one huge problem for Barack Hussein Obama- Hillary Clinton. The Clinton political machine will not lose the primary to Obama, which leaves the Democrats stuck between a rock and a hard place. On one hand, Hillary will not lose the primary, but on the other hand, she is not well liked by mainstream America. She is not capable of winning the general election, which means that despite the "Drive by Meida," the Republicans will win in 2008,

XEKE, Cuyahoga Falls, OH

What phenomenal bias and lack of insight from Ms. Baxter.

Listen carefully, madam: the Democrats are not a shoe-in for the White House in 2008. As much as you'd love to influence that decision with weak anecdotal premises such as the Republican "defections" you stated, the values of Barack Obama on social issues are fundamentally antithetical to the will of the majority of Americans. Particularly as regards abortion and affirmative action, the majority of Americans will not fall for this hollow populist.

As others have said previously, half of Mr. Obama's time was spent on an astroturfing book tour that any reasonable individual would now see as an overly ambitious plan to run for President in 2008. Presenting Barack as "fresh" versus the "older, more biased" political contemporaries is in and of itself a false dilemma. He is constantly equivocating on points that other contenders would be hung out to dry for.

In short, your article makes the wrong conclusions, period.

Gerald Townsend, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Its also a very big leap to say Republicans are defecting to Obama. Perhaps they are not Republicans but Democrats who have previously voted for Bush. The Times Online will never understand American politics. Republicans in America dont change the things they believe in every four years. They have guiding principles that they stand by and dont waiver. Obama does not offer many of the guiding principles most Republicans look for its a laugher here in America to read the kind of dribble that comes out of the Times.

Woody H., Purcell, OK, USA

What a foolish premise for an article. Republicans are merely funding the opponent they can beat in 2008.

David, Sarasota, FL USA

It's a set-up to trap the media into thinking that all these people support Obama, but they vote in secret as we ALL do! One citizen, one vote! The American people will decide who the next president of the United States will be, not the OTHER politicians! Personally, I don't trust anyone who "flees the camp" to side with the opposing party. They are back-stabbers in my book and not to be taken that seriously. There will be a backlash, alright, but not the one you want us to believe!

Kathryn Warren, Shreveport, LA

I would have to say that the far-left will "overblow" just about ANYTHING now to see Obama elected. There are absolutely NO avaerage American Repubs going to vote for Obama. There is absolutely no way he gets elected and everyone knows it. He is currently running for Vice President as WE ALL KNOW, Hillary will be the Dem Prez nominee.

southerndemocrat, carmel,indiana, usa

This article must have been written by a closet communist. BO a 'black RR'? That's rich, comparing a guy that was afraid to debate on Fox News to the guy who dealt the death blows to the Iron Curtain.

The foreign press is tabloid. No, you really can't buy machine guns in convenient stores here either.

Dan, ROC, NY

More and more Republicans will come out for Obama or help him behind the scenes. Everyday, he is seen more and more as the best way to derail Hillary. Republicans will beat Obama 50 states to 0 in 2008, if only the Democrats will nominate him.

thomas, Phoenix, Arizona

He's more liberal than Hillary and almost as socialist as Chavez. Any "Republican" that thinks he's the right candidate should carefully consider whether or not they are members of the right party.

Radiant Times, Desert Southwest, USA

Oh Mamma! Obama, oh horse manure! Can a country be run with only a grin?

El Duane Whatley, Dallesport, Washington, USA

I believe that the support for Clinton and Obama from typically republican supporters will shift once Frd Thompson enters the race.

Barry Rogers, Clintonville, US

Your article states "Republicans". Are all Republicans defecting to the Obama camp? I would suggest that headlines like this greatly distort the truth. If I only look at your headline, I would imagine that all Republicans were going over to Obama's side. That is not in fact true. Some Republicans may be moving to the Obama camp, but the majority of Americans want string leadership. Obama is a freshman senator with NO experience. We forget that JFK had been in politics for a long time, 13 years, before becoming president. JFK was also a war hero. There is no comparison between Obama and JFK. As an American, I believe the political machine in this country is a disgrace. We reap what we sow. That's how we got the disgraceful President Clinton.

Tom Clair, Lynchburg, USA / Virginia

Frank,

And Rasmussen has Rudy leading Obama 46% to 43%.

So, which poll is "correct."

That Newsweek poll is the first one I've ever seen that has Obama leading. Seems to me their data might be a bit off...

Jon, Stow, OH,

As a loyal Republican who voted for W in both '00 and '04. I have voted Republican in every election I have ever voted in. '08 is going to be the true test of where I stand.
Obama makes a nice speech and preaches a good message. I bought his book because like many other Americans I am seeking someone, anyone who can restore our pride in our government institutions that have failed us (IE: Iraq, Enron, Katrina, 9/11, the list goes on). Many of are also ashamed of the way the world views us. (that is a whole other story)

Either way. I suppose I am still giving him a look. But the bottom line is that despite his message, his policies are to the left of Clinton's. Coming out against the Partial-Birth Abortion decision really made me skeptical. He wants to forge a consensus but how can you when you stand to the left of even most Dems on issues like this. I don't expect him to come out for tax cuts but where are the policies that make him come across as a moderate?

Justin, Baltimore, MD, USA

Not to say that there aren't any defectors, but just becasue someone donated to Bush doesn't make them a Republican. Plenty of people in this country, as with every country, are fair weather supporters. Even rich people will sway in their support if they think they can gain prominence. Also those who leave Bush for Obama can rightly be challenged on their republican or conservative views. Obama has "0" core issues in common with republicans. he is Pro-Abortion, Pro-Socialized Health Care, Anti-war, Anti-Gun, and Pro-UN. Just something to consider.

Cullin Spellings, Knoxville, TN, US

Sorry but this is absurd. Those few Republicans that would choose Obama are most likely motivated more by the repulsion of having another Clinton administration than the reasons mentioned here. But this whole article reads like a worship piece in the cult of personality. Obama is the cotton candy of these candidates; looks appealing but once bitten into has no substance. If Fred Thompson enters the race I would like to see a debate between Thompson the Republican nominee and Obama the Democratic nominee. It would be like watching a Pit Bull maul a Pekingese.

IOpian, Tecumseh, OK

I see the conservatives are in defensive mode yet again. Is Sen. Obama (D-IL) the democratic version of Ronald Reagan? Who knows? It's too early to tell. What I do see in this article in a number of significant defections. The smart Republican money people know they can't win in 2008 unless the Democrats nominate another Sen. Kerry (D-MA) who just flat out lose the election. The one thing that George Bush has accomplished is that he has been so incompetent that we can elect sensible Democrats for at least two or three more two-year election cycles. Mark my words, after the 2010 congrssional elections, the House will have 250 Democrats, the Senate will have 57 Democrats, and either Sen. Obama or Sen. Clinton (D-NY) will be President of the United States. Then, we can rejoin the rest of the civilized world in recovering from the gross incompetence and flawed logic of American conservatism.

Bob E., Richmond, VA, USA

This article is accurate. I am a Republican that is considering voting for Obama. The article compared Obama's "Optimism" to Reagan and his "appeal". I agree. Both parties in this country have become so monolithic and dogmatic on particular issues. There seems to be no room to reasonably disagree. I think that at this time in history we need someone able to bring the country together. I will not be a single issue voter. I dont think thats the way to bring someone into the Whitehouse. The problems in this country and the world are to complex to think and vote so narrowly. It's to early to say, but at this time it seems Obama has all the right characterisitcs we need in a President.

Bill, Seattle, Washington

Get out of Irque now . Spend the 2 billion dollers on storm damage in the midwest..

B.L.Skinner, Graham, Washington

Get Obama to embrace the "FairTax" plan and you
will see a mass flight of GOP voters move towards
supporting him.

BT, Wichita, Kansas USA

Oh Yes all Republicans are fleeing the party to support a left-wing socialist.

thatwuzme, clifton park, USA/NY

It is amazing how far some people will go to try and make nothing seem like something. If anyone thinks more than a tiny tiny percentage of Bush supporters will switch to Obama they are really dreaming.

jon, ft lauderdale, fl

What a bunch of malarky! Republicans going over to Obama's camp is just nonsense. What it really is, is wishful thinking on the part of the Times!

M. Summer, Monroe, Louisiana, USA

I hear echoes of 1961, should Obama be elected. Khrushchev read JFK as such a lightweight that he felt free to be adventurous in Berlin and Cuba. Conventional wisdom has it that JFK was the hero of the Cuban Missile Crisis, but it can be argued that, as a president elected on charisma rather than substance, he brought it about. How will a lightweight president fare with today's threats?

Rich, Hampden TWP, PA, USA

Wishful mediathink.

R. Schultz, Saint Augustine, Florida

Bush's relationships transcended party lines. The individuals mentioned who gave large sums to the president and eventually to the RNC were more or less independents who Bush brought into the fold. Dowd was a chief Democrat strategist before joining Bush.

Bush had a conservative record as Governor or Texas. Obama has a liberal voting record from his days in the Illinois capitol to his days in DC.

Once the media fascination comes to an end, perhaps we'll see stories more about substance and voting records on the candidate versus weak departures from one party to the other.

Chad, Austin, TX,

You Brits need to send someone else to Washington to cover American politics. Ol' Sarah missed the boat on this piece. I am a die hard republican and I want B. Husein Obama to get the Democrat nomination. I sent his campaign a contribution. Who better can run as a Democrat and guarantee a Republican victory in 2008.

tim shepherd, dunedin, florida

"In his speech, Obama called for an increase in defence spending and an extra 65,000 soldiers and 27,000 marines to “stay on the offense” against terrorism and ensure America had “the strongest, best-equipped military in the world”. He talked about building democracies, stopping weapons of mass destruction and the right to take unilateral action to protect US “vital interests” if necessary, as well as the importance of building alliances."

Obama seems to be a Neocon disguised as a Democrat. Al Gore, hurry up and join the race...

Vierotchka, Geneva, Switzerland

Very similar to the Republican primary in 2000, when union voters crossed party lines in droves to vote for John McCain. Many areas found themselves running out of Republican primary ballots. In the general election, Gore likely captured most of these votes. Obama seems much more likely to defeat the party's annointed candidate than was McCain. Go Barak!

Marlene, Cleveland, USA

This story was written by some ignorant "reporter" who believes that by writing news he or she is creating news. FRED is coming and that is news.

Rob, Brooklyn, NY

Mr Obama brings to mind that old advice to "hire a teen-ager before he (or she) finds out that he doesn't know it all".

Buddy, Henderson, NV, USA

I'm trying to figue out just how much more wrong you can be...

Dave Newton, Pottsville, PA, USA

Somebody's nervous enough to ramp up the destroy Republicans campaign.

D, Minneapolis, MN

The media's ability to lob out an idiotic article such as this is merely another sign that they are confident that Americans have been so dumbed-down that they will believe any trash thrown at them. And the media is right.

From the evil acceptance of partial-birth abortion, to the use of "global warming" to impose a world tax, to the liberal quest for an illegitimate dependency class, to a country where one man loses his job for saying the same thing that another man wins a Grammy for saying - we are through!!!

We live in a transitional time here, with a President who has been an easy vehicle for the media to re-define conservatism. If Bush is the new template for a hard-line conservative, we are finished. And as far as I'm concerned, no one is waiting in the wings on our side that can bring us back to the right.

This country is a blip on the radar screen in history, and we are seeing its demise right before our eyes.

Kevin, columbus, ohio

How dare you compate Obama to Jack Kennedy. Kennedy was a war hero Obama certainly is not. I tell all democrats to read and reread Kennedy's inaugural address. I knew Jack Kennedy, Obama is no Jack Kennedy.

JW McKernan, Carolina Shores, NC

obama is a good democrat, butron paul is a much better bush alternative. anti war, anti tax, anti big government.

rob walsh, chapel hill, nc

Obama IS the best bet for my country right now. But that's only because Condoleeza Rice refused to run. Condi would've been a heck of a President: tough as nails, fair and firm, an intellect to be reckoned with. She could've guided the American ship of state well, protected our interests and garnered huge respect in the international community. Her skills and potential have been limited ONLY by the fact she's Bush's SOS and, therefore, had to tow his executive strategy (even during times she really didn't want to). And I get the impression there were several times she certainly did NOT want to. Given the election, you would've seen a vastly different Condi Rice emerge, vastly to all our benefit.

Now THERE would've been a female Ronald Reagan.

James P, Sacramento, California

Claude from Ft. Lauderdale you should proofread your posts before submitting ...
"crazy minded vicious right wing people"
"rabid right-thinkers"
these seem to pre-empt your need for an explanantion without childish name calling...

1.) 8 quarters with the lowest sustained unemployment in the last decade
2.) Has ushered in an age of increased funding for biofuel
3.) Dethroned a dictator in the middle east

There Claude, did it...you want to try

Mike, Santa Cruz, CA

I find the statement "With the Democrats widely expected to win in 2008," interesting for a British Newspaper.

It is a LONG time until November 2008. Your reporters have much to learn about US elections.

I have watched the developing situation in Scotland since your reporters were in nappies.

I personally support the SNP because I think that it is time to break up the United Kingdom and put your outdated monarchy out, but I do not pretend to understand the nuances or the timing.

Scott, Pittsburgh, PA

Uh...Claude?
Care to clarify your comment?
Are you for or against the use of name-calling in this forum?
Somehow I think you're unable or unwilling to recognize your own hypocrisy.
Let's see if you can write a comment without shooting yourself in the foot.

marcia, reno,

Yes, and some Republicans backed Ralph Nader in 00 and 04. Figure it out.

Mr X, Hilo, Hawaii

A disenchanted Republican supporting the socialist Obama makes about as much sense as the thirsty man in the desert saying, "there's no water here so I'll just drink some of this sand".

Carl , Cumberland, Kentucky

Every campaign has hundreds, if not thousands of switchers. They move all different ways. I can remember those who had supported Nixon in 1968 switching to McGovern in '72 and Reaganites from 1980 switching to Mondale in '84. We all remember how well those campaigns turned out. This is a non-story. With over 100,000,000 voters last time, a few switching to any candidate is inevitable.

Bush got the most votes last time and will lose the most supporters even if the Republican candidate wins easily. Try to report something meaningful.

Kenneth Hahn, Placentia, California

My 2c worth is that "Informed Republicans" is a contradiction in terms.

M McGregor, Tunbridge Wells, UK

Hmmm. Repeat it enough times and it will become true? Like saying 1.3% GDP growth is a "great economy."

Face it, guys. The Republicans have shown themselves to be a hapless lot of incompetents, many of them dishonest and hypocritical. It is as plain as the nose on your face unless your ego is tied up in cheering for them.

Brady Sanders, Mineral Wells, TX

There WILL BE a giant shift but it will be from everyone else's camp to Hillary Clinton. She's perfectly positioned for a win and is the only candidate presently from either side to bring appropriate foreign policy team and credentials to the game. She'll succeed in attacting Joe Biden to her team, either as VP or maybe Sec. Defense.

Bank on it!

jim parker, tampa, florida USA

*YAWN* The media hype machine around this guy is laughable. He's John Kerry v2.0 . Remember when the media told you Kerry and Bush were neck and neck the day before the election. Yep, they sure called that one... Obama is a media created hype.... He'll remain that way until the next flavor of the month surfaces....

Jack Bauer, Nashville, Tennessee

Oh yes, all Republicans are fleeing the party to support a left-wing socialist.

thatwuzme, clifton park, USA/NY

This article is patently absurd. Obama lives further left of center than even Clinton, and there is absolutely no way a true conservative would vote for her, much less someone to her left. Additionally, this fails to report that for all the supposed dissatisfaction with Bush, our new Democratic Congress cannot manage to best even his meager poll numbers. The Dems are clogging our system with junk bills that have no hope of becoming law, failing to promote what small bit of an actual 'agenda' they claim got them back into power. I have more faith in the American people than to buy into this hype. (An optimism characteristic of Conservatives in this country, btw) The American and World media might love to believe that '08 is already decided, but they are completely out of touch with reality in America.

Jenna, Charleston , USA/SC

So you actually believe that Evil Republicans are giving to this guy because they are changing parties. What shallow thinking on your part! This is just part of a well thought out plan to derail Hillary in her bid to win the White House back and get Bill back into the game. Obama is the best thing Republicans have going now and will be the spoiler thus electing a Republican in 2008

Norma, St. Petersburg, Florida

You said it, Red. The hypocrisy of these people who supported the wars in Bosnia and Kosovo (to help Muslims), and want us to go full throttle into Darfur, yet think that we are the bad guys in Iraq, is truly nauseating.

Dave , Atlanta, USA/GA

People who point out Obama's "lack" of experience are seriously mistaken. This is a man that has experience where it matters; with communities, with the poor and with those who believe in a better America. Were Obama to be an expereinced politician he wouldn't have the same appeal as he does now. The fact that he isnt your typical run of the mill Politician is what makes him so appealing. Also he message of unity and of ou oneness, his disadain for pundits splitting up our country into different factions makes me comfortable in saying that this Republican is voting for Obama

Ahmed Danso-Faried, Boston, massachusetts

Where? Look at the polling.
5/2-3/07 G:43 O:50 Newsweek
4/26-30/07 G:39 O:48 Financial Dynamics
4/5-9/07 G:42 O:46 Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg
3/27-28/07 G:43 O:43 FOX News

Notice a trend?

Rob, Princeton, NJ

Obamania is driven both by the anti-Hillary Democrats and those disillusioned with politicians in general. He's articulate and attractive,, but inexperienced, untested and comes with considerable "baggage". Once held under a magnifying glass he may turn out to be a far less appealing specimin. But then so did Bill Clinton...

Clement R. Knorr, Tucson, Arizona,

What Republicans? Name me some "name" Republicans and I will believe this story. The polls have Giuliani beating every Democrat so the Dems win in 2008? Keep whistling past the graveyard.

Greg DeJulio, Wynantskill, United States

All who read this liberal pap need to find the book entitled "new Lies for Old" by Russian defector Anatoliy Golitsyn. You will learn what today's liberal press is trying to do to you. It is called disinformation, and the major media and the socialist NYT is working hard to confuse you.

William, El Paso, TX

Don't get your hopes up; Hillary's machine will destroy Obama with well-time releases of delicate information (or the threat thereof).

Mack, Kirbyville, Texas

It is a very big leap from running nothing more than the office of a senator to becoming the chief executive officer of the United States. We do not allow first year medical students to conduct brain surgery, no matter how competant they may be.

Larry Rehbaum, Cedarburg, WI

No one who is a true Republican, a believer in smaller government and more individual responsibility, could possibly support Obama. He is a big government socialist. and believer in the nanny state, despite his platitudinous speeches and personal appeal. His performance in the debate show he's definitely not ready for prime time. Lofty, non-specific speeches may sway the addlebrained but will leave us all in the lurch when it's time to govern. It is a sad commentary on American culture to think that such a neophyte could garner so much support based on affability and bone structure.

Ed, Chicago,

More Quaran flushing media polls for ya. This Obama person is the same 'uniter' who hijacked his biggest Myspace supporter's site and took over the controls (this way his goons can control every every message that's posted). Obama supporters, the yesmen line forms here. Maybe he is a bit green, but he seems to have learned a few tricks from Bill and Hill.

Charles , Houston, USA

The divide in America is at least as much about economics as the war in Iraq. Our economy has a depth of strength never achieved before due to the free market approach guided by Milton Friedman and embraced by the Republicans. The divide is due to the fact that our ignorant masses have been successfully demagogued with envy. They don't care that they are more prosperouse than ever, only that others have more than they do. Obama is not a free market guy, he is a free stuff guy. Our RINO's (Republican In Name Only) may shift left with the wind, but to say that republicans in general are shifting shows a misunderstanding of the 30 year debate between the American left and right.

Dave Traynor, St Petersburg, Florida

What an elitist crock this article is. From top to bottom, wishful liberal pap!

david, marietta, ga

Living in Texas was once a good thing for young republicans especially during the Reagan era. George W and Rick Perry has broken our hearts and our will to believe in the Party. Conservatives do still live in Texas, but there might not be enough of them to make a difference. to am left with only two possible candidates. But Obama is a Democrat and he is one of my two hopefulls. The other has not assured us conservatives that he can make it past the liberals in the RNC. That leaves us only Barrack Obama as a candidate for a hopeful conservative.

CharlesJr, Katy, Texas

If this article was any more misleading it would be the traditional long walk off a short pier. First, Obama is an ultra left wing Democrat and the only "Republicans" that would say they are supporting him are ones that are either doing it for social status or because they don't like the fact that Pres Bush is supporting the war against the Islamists. Obama never said he would stay on offense against the Islamist, all of his votes have been supportive of policies that surrender to the Islamists. And his economic policy is RAISE TAXES. Rudy G will be the next president and thank goodness for that.

rick geiger, rochester, USA/NY

You have got to be kidding. " black Reagan". He supports abortion on demand including partial birth, supports extensive gun control, and is against parental notification for minors in the case of abortion, he has done nothing in Il to help wounded vets as he promised he would. To busy running for president. By the way I live in IL within 4 miles of the vetrerans hospital on the Great Lakes Naval Base and know what the vets say there.If you ant a true uniter thatt is honest and open. Fred Thompson is coming. Wait and see. He is smart enough not to get in a dog fight till the mutts have been culled out.Right now the whole Republican bunch are mutts. Obama is p[opular because no one is really looking into his home stse to see wht he hasn't done. I am sorry but he is carring the black because he is black and anyone that is honest will admit to it. In my opinoin that is stupid thinking. Wake up people.Obama will not unite the conservative Americans to him.

George, Gurnee, IL

This is not journalism. Surely this was copied from a move-on blog somewhere. I can not imagine that many would think of Obama as good for the military or tough re: defense. Comparing him to Kennedy and Reagan at the same time... nice try.

John LYnch, Mooresville, NC, USA

Obama is one of my two senators, the other being Dick Durbin. Both are left-wing Chicago politicians who vote in lock-step on most issues. Obama is the better orator, but neither of them represents my conservative libertarian views on much of anything. Both of them favor a massive federal government that trumps state, local and individual rights.

If you like Bush's federal control of your local schools, then you'll be very comfortable with Obama's style. If you favor a growing federal government with more and more initiatives designed to control every part of your life , Obama will not disappoint you.

But if you believe that most issues should be handled at the state and local levels, then I suggest that you keep looking.

Owl Creek Observer, Savoy, IL

It is amusing to hear these jokers whine about the war in Iraq, claiming it is a civil war, but then turn around with their other face, and demand that we expend more American lives involving ourselves in the true civil war in Darfur. Sorry, but once we get out of Iraq, as far as most people here are concerned, world, take care of yourselves for a change, instead of looking for the U.S. to come and haul your sorry backsides out of the fire, just like we had to do with much of Europe in WWII.

Red, Cheyenne, U.S.A. / Wyoming

I'd rather cut my wrists than vote for Barry Hussein Obama. Who are you liberal dunces trying to fool? Other stupid liberals?

Paul, NY, NY

Obama supports partial-birth abortion. That's sick.

Joe, Poughkeepsie, NY

Divide and conquer? We see it...as a Democratic strategy! (Just ask James Carville...) Mr. Frazier, you are again demonstrating the Socialist/Democratic strategy of blaming the other side for what they are doing themselves. So don't throw that garbage at us. It is disengenuous.

simont, houston,

"With the Democrats... expected to win..." says the article. Expected to win by whom??? Certainly not me and the Republican candidates. We do not expect Bill's Hill or Barry, as he liked to be called, Obama to win.

Thos Wagner, Morton , Pa USA

I tend to agree with the "divide and conquer" approach; indeed I'm quite skeptical about the sudden support from Republicans to Barack Obama. Hopefully though, if this is their real intention, Democrat voters won't be fooled.

Moema Rosa, Helsinki, Finland

I agree that personal charisma will be the deciding factor in the election. That is the only thing the American voter has cared about since Reagan's election in 1980. The politics of the candidate matter little as long as there is a certain star power about the favored one, and this year that star is Obama.

MJ Froelich, Fontana, CA

NICE TRY

A 90% liberal voting record is far from Ronald Reagan.

Matt, Vero Beach, USA/Florida

I find it amusing that these Republicans who worked so hard to re-elect Bush in 2004 are now 'disillusioned' with him. They are self-serving opportunists who want to be on the winning side in the next election.

Chris, Tulsa, OK, USA

Yes, Let's Support Obama a Man that' in his first year as Senator was on a one year book tour & now in his second has been running
for the highest office in our country. Obama the man that hasen't done anything for our country. I'm sorry, he's has voted for higher taxes, & partial birth aboration & is one of the most Liberal Senators in the Senate. ( what an GREAT man ) and he can
give a good speech. Yea, he's going to unite us? give me a break.
Yea I'll vote for him.

James Smole, beach park , Illinois

The author has this one wrong inferring that Obama just may be the next President. Despite a few Republicans "jumping ship" and, despite Mr. Bush having served up the 2008 Presidential election on a silver platter to the Democrats, the Demos will find a way to lose. In November 2008, the Demos will snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. Scary thought: President Hilla or baby Obama; V.P ...?... Speaker of the House--- San Fran Nan. No thanks. Besides, it is much too early. The media have yet to sharpen their knives and *REALLY* dig into these people.

Dave, Stafford, Va., USA

Whether this article is factually acurate, the fact still remains that Obama is making waves in US politics and Republicans and some democrats alike are very frightened. The best they can come up with is his lack of experience. This man has more experience than the vast majority in Washington - experience with the American people. I personally don't care about a politicians experience in politics, I want experience with communities, with society, with business and with the world. Politics in Washington and in London is a snake pit, I would want the man who has not been bitten to lead me through it.

V, London,

Obama is "the Tiger Woods of American Politics" and will become the next president in 2008...He is the most talented candidate and will be good for America...It's not an accident that folks like Oprah and Warren Buffett are supporting Obama.

Scott, Chicago, IL

For the republicans who "admire" Obama, yet will never vote for him, you're irrelevant. He WILL capture the independent vote. Stop thinking you're going to make a difference, because you won't.

mike, carpinteria, california

Republicans are no longer required to do things in the back rooms of American politics....they now support the enemy to effectively weaken the Democrats by dividing their vote into smaller blocs...once accomplished the GOP can again take the lead...the good ole "divide and conquer" approach, odd the democrats/American voters can't see it...

James R Frazier, Huntington, WV

Every day this election for President of the United States resembles a High School popularity contest for Prom Queen.

JK Wayne, HAMILTON, Ohio

Obama is intelligent, thinks for himself and is not owned by any shadowy interests, is not a religious maniac, is aware that there are countries other than the USA and does not love violence.

It is, therefore, impossible he should ever be President.

julian, norwich, uk

SOMEONE SAID: I challenge these rabid "right-thinkers" to name one positive success achieved by W and his crowd. Let's see if they can do it without mentioning either Bill or Hillary Clinton. Let's see if they can do it without saying someone else should have done it for them. And let's see if they do it in a way that makes sense, without childish name-calling. How about: rebounding America after 9/11....apprehending many wanted terrorists from previous attacks on the US and its interests...low unemployment rate, housing boom, tax breaks, booming economy....besides many others, the W crowd kept that flaming fool Al Gore out of the White House.....

Paul, NY, NY

This column is total wishful thinking. So Sarah Baxter found a few principle-less guys who float from a Semi-Conservative Republican to a Liberal Democrat. . .do these guys even consider the positions of the candidates they support? Another great example of how if the media screams something loud enough and long enough, it MUST come true.

Ryan, Hudson, OH, USA

The people named in this article were never really Republicans in the Reagan-Thatcher sense; they were Bush followers who were let down by the guy. They thought he was what they see in Obama - a guy who can unify and not get dragged down in the muck. I could fill volumes with what I don't like about Hillary, and while Obama is a decent person, he continues to speak in unspecific platititudes.

If Fred Thompson gets in this race, it will get a lot more interesting.

Rhonda, Houston, Texas, USA

Hernandez, don't call Europe a seedbed for terrorism when the war in Iraq creates new terrorists every day. A war your country started that Europe didn't want. A war that you have completely failed to justify to the rest of the world. A war that was supposedly 'over' when Dubya threw on a flight jacket and thought he was shooting a sequel to Top Gun.

I live in Austin, and I agree this article is a little bit misleading. It does imply that Obama/Democrats have momentum I don't think they have at the moment. You talk about a 'liberal agenda' but it's just a term Republican spin doctors have made up. The Democrats' problem is they have no agenda at all.

John Harney, Austin, Texas

So Obama is against the Iraq war but wants action on Darfur. He also plans to have around 100K soldiers constantly on war against terrorism. Firstly this war against a proverb is misleading. Secondly, having so many troops fighting against a rag tag bunch of extremists, give them more credit than they deserve.

In any case, Obama does not stand a cat in hell's chance of being elected, no matter what the people say, because of his ethnic background. What is so special about him anyway ? Does he offer some great policies or is it the fact that he is an African American that is giving him press coverage ?

It just shows that America has been able to break free from its past and is still a racially divided nation.

R. Reagan, NY,

I am an American who has been living in England for the past two years. I humbly admit I have a limited understanding of the politics here. I am trying to make sense of this week's local elections and what is happening in Scotland.

The author of this article shows that she knows as little about US politics as I do about the UK. There are too many wrong assumptions it this article to list. But the biggest error is the assumption that a Democrat will win the White House next year. I wish it were true but it is far, far from being assured.

James Lachowsky, Swindon, Wiltshire

Barack Obama is nothing more than a mere fabrication of the press. This man will never be elected as president. I find it amusing that the press has pushed Barack and Hillary to the front like they are the only candidates that can win. What a joke. This article is nothing but rubbish. It goes to show you that the stupid masses can be led to believe anything by the leftist press.

Robert Sminkey, Summerville, USA/SC

I aam really glad Democrats are showing a lead - here in Britain I think that support for anytype of Republicanism/American neoconservatism is at an all time low. I haven't met a single non-Americansince after 9/11 - although come to think about it none before them and I come from South England where the majority vote for Conservatives in General Elections tho' would probably be Centerists or Left of Center in Am,erica. There is a lot of respectt for the Clinton duo and Obama. Anything to end the American neocon' nightmare .

Jim, Oxford, Britain

Drew - as one who has traveled the world extensively over the last 6 years and has lived in the developing world for the last 3, I can personally attest to the loss of respect for the United States during this administration, not only among those in the first world, but the third world as well. And unlike many Americans, I do not get my news only from Fox. I actually read Drudge, CNN, the Washington Post, the BBC, Al Jazeera's english site, the Bangkok Post, etc. I then use my intelligence to make well thought out observations regarding world politics. I challenge you to do some soul searching and really discover the one who is being spoon fed biased information and whose ability to think for themself is being controlled. Advocating those that do not agree with you as the enemy worthy of imprisonment shows your lack of understanding of American ideals. If you listen, you can learn from your opposition.

A Scott, Omaha, NE

"Obama the new Ronald Reagan? Well, let me tell you something: I knew Ronald Reagan. He was a friend of mine. And Obama, you're no Ronald Reagan."

A twist to Ronald Reagan's speech at the 1992 GOP convention, for those who don't know.

When either Hillary or Obama have to face Mitt Romney in the general election, Romney will run away with it.

Ed, London,

Obama can "unite" the country? I keep hearing this and I keep wondering what that is supposed to mean. The Soviet Union was "united". Cuba is "united" and North Korea is "united". Heck, Hugo Chavez seems to be "uniting" Venezuela.

What does being "united" really mean and why is it a good thing? Obama comes along and makes some speeches and suddenly he's a uniter? And when you get past his eloquent speaking manner, most of what he has to say is void of any real substance. We need to "work with our allies" and "stop the partisan bickering", et al. -- is supposedly some form of wisdom and leadership?

Terry Adams, Cumming, Ga.

Oh, wow. Other countries say Americans are mislead by the news they receive. Give me a break!

Any Republican that would completely jump ship for a Democrat, simply because they no longer believe in Bush, isn't a true Republican to begin with. Period.

Obama is no Reagan, and his being dubbed (by whom???) the “black Ronald Reagan”, is NOT something he is widely thought of as here.

Informed Republicans are too smart to fall for a man with little experience.

Jes, Austin, Texas, USA

What a bizarre article, even by trendy media standards. JFK a neocon? Republicans for Obama? Democrats "widely expected to win in 2008?"...all news to Republicans. The most troubling aspect of the story is that the delusional is being passed off as reality. If people actualy believe these things, they're in for a shock.

Mark, AZ, USA

It's a shame that personal charisma will most likely be the deciding factor in the next presidential election. There is no doubt Obama is by far the most impressive figure in this vein. Too bad its the same liberal agenda that has failed us before and continues to stifle Europe(high taxes-high unemployment-seedbeds for terrorism). It is also the same naive Chamberlainistic foreign policy bent that led us into WWII and prolonged the Cold War. Foolishness spoken with
bravado in an appealing style is still foolishness.

JP Hernandez, Houston, USA/Texas

The media must actually believe they are becoming omnipotent. "In order to make something true, all we have to do is write it!" I am heavily involved in Republican politics in Texas, and I attend frequent national events.....rest assured, Republicans are NOT going to be voting for Barack Obama. Does the person writing this article actually realize how absurd and outragious this claim is? Sorry for the old cliche, but what ever happened to good, old fashioned news, weather and sports? Instead of the media telling us the results of elections, we now have people to tell us how elections will turn out, why, and who will be voting for whom. Was the author of this piece attempting to imply that Obama is so wonderful that even awful Republicans can't fight his appeal? Sunds like typical wishful-thinking from he lefty media if you ask me.....

Eric, Blanco, Texas

Too bad Republicans don't respect moronic British Journalists or we might be able to capaitalise on it. This qualifies as one of the top ten dumbest articles I've read in the last ten years. Hat tip to Drudge for sharing, I've read it twice now in amazement. Ms. Baxter needs to find some new subject matter to report because this is absolutely pathetic. We can't put forward a candidate that's worth a dime, but we think republicans are gonna abadon their values???? for who???? Obama get real

Brian, gaithersburg, MD, USA

There is a famous saying among statisticians, and indeed among scientists of all sorts: "The plural of anecdote is NOT data."

Shall I find a handful of democrats that support Bush as a means to 'prove' that "Democrats defect to the Bush camp"? Should this appear as in a major publication as 'analysis'?

There are already quite a few on record. Quite a few journalists and pundits no less. Not to say that Obama is not worthy of support or that Bush does not deserve whatever defectors he has inspired - merely that the whole premise of this story is, quite simply, daft.

David, Seattle, Washington

This is not all goinf to matter - Obama has no real experience and talks a lot and Hillary is hated as much as she is supported.

We need a middle of the road candidate that has governing experience, management of a budget, tough decision making, etc...

This is why Mayors and Governors make the best presidents historically - check your history.

A middle candidate that can unite, socially moderate, fiscally conservative, tough on crime, good with budgets and turning a ship around.

It would be nice if the Democrats could field someone like this but after the joke brother candidates (Gore and Kerry) why do the Dem's keep fielding people that cannot win?

Just say Rudy and get it over with already.

robert Perr, new york, new york

Oh a "republican headquarters worker" wants to share:

No one that works for the Republican National Comittee would ever refer to it as such. Furthermore, claming you are a Republican does not make you one. It offers nothing to the veracity of your arguments so long as you clearly never supported the idealogy of the Republican party to begin with. You're not fooling anyone.

On another note, wake up: greed and corruption is a bipartisan plague.

Obama supporters: More power to you. Seriously, I welcome an obama candidacy . The very thought of him with the nomination is one that comforts me

Brian, gaithersburg, MD, USA

The Democrats are widely expected to win? Maybe, but every Democrat is trailing in head to head polls with Republicans.

Paul, Amherst, MA, USA

I'm amazed that the only people having this discussion seem to be americans here on this website, do you guys not trust your own media?

akram, London,

It always amazes me when people say "Rabid right wingers" and then challenge the conservative voters to respond without name calling. Most of the US gets their "news" from commentators exposing their ideology not reporters. As someone who has been in Afghanistan and Iraq for the last 3 years I can tell you what you see on TV News for the most part is a joke. I have met many so called journalists and almost to a person they look for a story to support their agenda. Most in Baghdad, where I am right now, never leave the comfort of their hotel and run to report every insurgent action as a great defeat of the coalition. How many stories have you heard of Sulimaniya where capitalism and business are thriving? I speak with common Iraqis daily and also those in government. An overwhelming majority are grateful for the coalition and want them to stay and cannot understand why the western media reports nothing but bad news.

RB, Baghdad,

I am a Republican Headquarters worker who read Obamas books and was very impressed as he can actually think out a problem unlike all the Republican candidates. Plus, he is against the war while all the Republicans are pro-Iraq war so the only way to stop the war is to vote Democrat. I hate to vote for abortionists but will to end the war, Republican greed and corruption in contracts and legislative practices and the Republican hatred of Mexicans who put them in office. Republicans remind me of a chicken whose head has been chopped off yet still runs crazily in every direction until he finally falls dead. Republicans have gone bonkers and need to be stopped.

Jack Walsh, Fort Lauderdale, Florida USA

I've voted for Republican candidates in every election I can remember. This current Republican party has betrayed my vote, and I can't abide by that. I'll be voting for Obama, unless, of course, Hillary is the Democratic candidate. In that case, I'll hold my nose and vote Republican again.

JOhn C, Rupert, ID

This is absolutely absurd. If they valued their ideals, and voted on their ideals, then they're not simply going to throw them away and suddenly support a candidate who values the complete and total opposite. If they're willing to do that, frankly, I don't want them. It simply means that they're uneducated and totally ignorant of the differences between parties in this political system. I don't believe that to be the case, in fact, I think this article is completely fabricated to push whatever Obamania agenda the author has. He's the least qualified of all the candidates, and his charisma can only get him so far.... and if you're a Republican that simply "tired" of Bush, there's no way you're walking away from your ideals with candidates like Romney going for the nomination (who happens to be my greatest fear). Watching him on Leno and in that debate, he was impressive... Romney, not Obama, has a much better chance of stealing votes from OUR side.

K. Jameson, Washington, DC, USA

Loss of respect for our country by whom? Germany? France? I think we are getting plenty of respect, not from the rich elitist countries but more from not so developed countries. People from African countries , countries from Eastern Europe, Japan, Australia, Britain. The bottom line is if we had just gone into Afghanistan right now democrats would be screaming about how evil Bush sent us to war (no doubt in my mind whatsoever that if it wasn't Iraq it would certainly be Afghanistan, does anyone honestly disagree with that?). Imagine if FDR had to put up with this kind of BS. Of course he just threw his opponents in prison because he recognized the damage to the war effort caused by false claims. Imagine after D Day, when we lost entire Battalions of soldiers, what statements would be made by the negative types. Continue to listen to politically motivated news organizations and continue their control over your ability to think for yourself.

Drew, Fort Smith,

I find most of these comments interesting. Many self-identified Republicans refuse to consider any other candidate other than the one running under the Republican ticket. I do not purport to know the motivations of those mentioned in this article, however is it so hard to believe that an AMERICAN can look at the field of candidates and support the one that has the greatest vision for AMERICA? Blind partisanship (perfected by the dittohead masters) is what is ruining this country. I personally support Obama because he has a global perspective and is the one candidate in this field that I feel can unite this country once again and restore international respect for the US. It may be decades before the extent of damage to the world politik and America's standing within it is fully realized as a result of our current administration. I do take solace in the fact that I do not see a single viable candidate (REP or DEM) as dangerous as our current administration.

A Scott, Omaha, NE

They sure aren't Conservatives who'll vote for Obama, and it's absurd that liberals would elect a muslim or "muslim raised" man, before a women to the White house. It's always in your face or shoved down your throat with this dem party!

Tei, Pascagoula, MS

Don't confuse "praise for" with "support." I know several people who praise Obama, but would never vote for him. This is the same logic as saying that approval ratings equal support. That's baloney. When a pollster asks me if I approve of the way Bush is doing is job, my answer is "no," so I contribute to his low approval ratings. But I have no regret voting for him and I still support him. I don't approve of Bush's overall performance, but that does not mean I'm ready to vote for a Democrat. I support many of Bush's policies and would rather vote for someone who could carry out those policies effectively than for someone who would change those policies.

I had a conversation with someone yesterday (he is a Democrat) and we both agreed that we admire many things about Obama. But we also agreed that neither of us could ever vote for him.

Admire? Praise? Yes. Vote for? Never.

Steve, Frisco, TX

Those on the right that are disallusioned with GW are not about to go looking on the left for someone to vote for. That's just stupid. Any problems we may have with the current administration certainly isn't because we don't think they liberal enough. George has shown himself to be too liberal in too many ways. That is the problem. We're not looking for more of it.

Jeff, Kabul, Afghanistan

George W. has accomplished a lot!
Like the great economy
let's not forget that we have not been attached on US soil in 5 1/2 years.

I agree that Obama and Hilary etc... have their good points too, but the biggest threat facing America is international issues like terrorists who hate America and everything America stands for. And neither of these candidates has military experience. We really need a strong leader who can stand up to international pressure and get the job done.

I don't believe 'appeasment' will work with what we are up against.

Another issue that I have as a value voter, I can't vote for anyone who disregards the sanctity of life and would push an agenda that kills millions of innocent unborn children each year for convenience or for harvesting.

There is so much progress being made with Adult stem cells, but because it isn't as lucrative for companies to patent and make $ they are going after embryo research which private investors wont spent a dime on.

Elle, Minneapolis, MN

What uninformed balderdash. Conservative Republicans do Not "defect" to Any Democrat under Any circumstances. The conservative Republican base hungers for a tru conservative, which Bush is assuredly Not---whatever he is, I have no idea anymore. If Fred Thompson runs, talks conservative, stays conservative, kicks butt, takes names and numbers, then you will learn the true meaning of "defect," when you see how defective the Democrat Party truly is, and how a conservative platform Always wins in America, whenever its truly tried, which it has not been, since Regan.

Jeff Friedberg, Albuquerque, NM

The only thing I like about Obama is that he can win. Period. Hillary can't, she's got more baggage than a Samsonite store. And you can take this to the bank-- if Hillary Clinton got a letter signed by God Himself, telling her that she couldn't win-- she'd run anyway.

Henriette Wayne, Daly City, USA

This is purely political posturing. Lots of weak republicans feel that the next President is going to be a democrat so they are trying to get on the Obama band wagon. That's ok, atleast now we'll know who they are when Fred thompson wins the election in 08'.

Kyle, Denton, TX

can someone please direct john from stow, ohio to the recent newsweek poll that shows obama beating rudy? but then when has the truth ever been relevant to a conservative's opinion...

paul, san diego, ca

I am a libertarian Republican from California. I voted for Reagon, Bush, and Dole. While, I don't agree with the Republican platform on abortion there is no way I will ever vote for likes of Billery or Obama. In my opinion a vote for either of them is a vote for the Socialist Republican of the United States of America!

BOBBY BURK, Chowchilla, USA

Jon...
Newsweek has Obama ahead of Rudy 50% to 43%.

Just like the campaign slogan says...Obama for AMERICA.

Not just those that voted for him.

Frank, Edison, NJ

The thought that Republicans and Conservatives will support Obama needs no discussion. It's an inherently laughable idea.

Chris McDaniel, Baton Rouge , LA

Sounds like maybe as many as five (or is it six) "Republicans" may or may not support (vote for?) Obama in 2008 which your (obviously liberal) correspondent has gleefully conceded to the Democrats. This is what we used to refer to as a thumb-sucker, when an editor desperately needs to fill a hole. It is also known as a bed-wetter, when said corespondent (a woman) simply can't control her biased political bladder. Why don't you limeys clean up your own Empire before coming over here and telling us what's wrong with ours.

sarsfield, Patchogue, New York

WOW ! ! !

There are a lot of crazy-minded vicious right wing people out there with a lot to say but most of it nonsensical with apparent ignorance or denial of reality about how bad things are in the way things are going in the US and the loss of respect for our country in the world as a whole as a result of being governed by the Republicans for the last 6 years.

I challenge these rabid "right-thinkers" to name one positive success achieved by W and his crowd. Let's see if they can do it without mentioning either Bill or Hillary Clinton. Let's see if they can do it without saying someone else should have done it for them. And let's see if they do it in a way that makes sense, without childish name-calling.

Claude, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA

Im and "Ex-Bushie" as well from east Texas and have given my support to Obama. Thats the horse to
bet on. The smartest guy in the room.

James Witten, Nacogdoches , U.S. Texas

Yeah, Republicans are swinging over to Obama in droves! LOL. Remember Bush isn't running in 2008. To say someone is switching parties in 2008 because they are disenchanted with Bush is wishful thinking on the part of Democrats. They may be more likely to vote for a moderate Republican, not vote or become an Independent but to go off the deep end and vote for a leftist is absurd reasoning. Any Republican who does so is not a Republican but an opportunist.

RLR, LaVerne, CA

No, seriously... there really are Republicans who will vote for Obama. They're called Democrats.

Mack, Houston, TX, USA

If Republicans are contributing to Obama, it's only because they think he's easier to beat in the General election than Hillary. So every dollar to Obama is one step closer a Republican gets to the White House again.

Flint, Scottsdale, Az

I think we should all vote in the democratic primary for Obama, then just vote Republican like we always do. And don't forget, Bush is not running again. The writer acts like he is running; I guess he cannot stop the hating. Obama does not come close to Reagan's league, what a myth these writers build for you to believe. Just too many half-truths and un-truths.

Anne, Plano, USA/Texas

"Uniting" Americans is a liberal, socialistic, politically correct term for giving up the conservative fight and bowing to liberals. Anyone who thinks that 300 million Americans are going to agree on everything is an idiot, and anyone who thinks there is one man or woman who can get all Americans (or Brits, or Germans, or Spaniards) to agree on everything is an idiot. I don't want to unite with liberals. I want to defeat liberals. That's why Americans have the freedom to argue and disagree, with arguments settled at the ballot box.

C. McDaniel, Baton Rouge , la

George Bush was never a real conservative and certainly has never been a Republican in regard to fiscal restraint. Obama is giving speeches. He has no track record. It all sounds good but where will the money come from? He has many plans all of which will required new taxes (sorry, the liberals refer to taxes as contributions) from the same group the liberals always use as their bait. If he was really going to offer hope and present a vision, he should outline the cost of his proposals and who pays. We shall merely see another President who will write more blank checks.
The reason the Republican Party is failing is because there is not an announced candidate who stands for the principles that have served the party well over the past 25 years. If the party does not reverse course quickly, of course Obama will get elected to one term. Why not. There is no real difference between either party at this time.

MCraig, Munster, In

I have almost always voted Republican in the past but over the last few months I have really been impressed with Obama and his outlook on politics.

If Barak Obama is the Democratic candidate for the 2008 election I will vote for him. Unless he does something stupid before then to make me think otherwise. If he is not a choice in the election I will definitely vote for the Republican who is.

I can't stand Hillary Clinton and I don't really feel like moving to Canada to get away from her. It's not so much that she's a Democrat as it is that I feel she'd lead this country to its doom.

Marcus, Toledo, OH

I am one of those Republicans considering Obama. He is the only candidate who, amazingly enough, doesn't think we should launch into an unnecessary and risky war with Iran. It's a shame he's the only candidate (Republican or Democrat) who doesn't swear by an Israel-first policy and a religion of pre-emptive war.

I will continue to vote GOP for congress, for domestic policy. But our foreign policy is unrecognizable to me. These last few years- this is not the America I know. I'm not embarassed about my country like so many sell-out liberals. But we better get serious about reshaping our foreign policy into something sensible, or we are about to begin a long, steady decline. We must remember, we are a Republic, not an Empire.

chris taylor, mt. kisco, ny

I am not a Democrat but seriously doubt that Obama has either the clout or experience to get the nomination away from Hillary. My prediction is that a deal will be cut to bring him in as Vice President giving him experience and exposure for the future. A Clinton/Obama ticket will look unbeatable to the Democrats. I also believe that both have material in their deep backgrounds which will destroy their ticket. Now, all the Republicans have to do is get their act together. With their current mindset, getting it together is doubtful at best. Forget McCain he is too radical and his personality is minus zero. Gulliani is too liberal and his ego far exceeds his ability. Romney has some potential if there are no unknown disasters in his background and he can find a decent V-President partner. Frankly, none of the top candidates have what is needed to get America back on track. Surprise, surprise, looks like the voters loose again.

Patrick Rodgers, Irvine, CA

Obama has yet to offer any specifics. But his Senate Voting record is 100% in line with Hillary.
As far as switching sides? Rudy Guiliani leads ANY DEM in New Jersey and Pennslyvania . States that went for Gore and Kerry . Looks like lots of Dems going to the GOP for Rudy. To counter Dems would need to win Alabama, Georgia and Mississippi. Yeah Right

Dennis, New Jersey , USA

Yes, what the US needs now is a President who will unite the country behind the Democrat Party Marxist values of redistribution of wealth. Forget free health care, EVERYTHING should be free. All we have to do is nationalize all the greedy capitalist corporations and purge the upper and middle classes. They did it successfully in Russia and China, why not here. If anyone can do it Osama can!

Richard , Woodbridge, USA NJ

In the primaries many of us lend support to primary candidates in the opposing party who have no hope of winning the election. In 2004 I voted for Al Sharpton in the primaries and a straight Republican ticket in the presidential election.

In the sixties in Texas my husband and friends went door to door campaigning for a Democrat primary candidate knowing that he would never win the election. It worked very well, he won the primary and lost the election.

Sandy, Clarksville, MO

"With the Democrats widely expected to win in 2008..."


Where in the world is THIS coming from? Every poll I've seen has Rudy, the Republican front-runner by double digits, beating Obama or Hillary.

Jon, Stow, OH,

Obama may very well be a nice man that can make a good speech. He has no experience in management. It would be like a student becoming principle of a school. He talks a good talk, but more is needed than talk. As for Matthew Dowd, he was always a democrat. He is just reverting to norm.
I think Mitt Romney not only has the experience as a leader, but also, he is heads above the pack! He can bring the country together. He did wonders for the Olympics and has governed the most liberal state in the Union. His character is above reproach. Be you a Republican or a Democrat, you should give this man a close look!

Linda Steinhauser, Rogersville, Alabama, USA

This whole notion that Republicans who are disappointed with President Bush would support a hard leftist like Obama in 2008, is ridiculous, and sounds more like the wishful thinking of the newspaper's editor.

After all, if these Republicans are truly Republicans, they wouldn't jump to the Democrat party.
If they're truly Republicans, they will find a Republican candidate to support.

Hector D'aquino, Miami, FL

It's not surprising to see the big donors jump ship to the party likely to the White House in 2008. I think Hillary and Obama (possibly Edwards too) will beat any Republican currently in the race (for the record, I don't think Fred Thompson can beat them either, but he'd likely beat the entire GOP field).

Obama's "lack of experience" (since when is 9 or 10 years in public office considered a lack of experience?) will likely appeal to many because it is proof positive that he's not a Washington politician. His personality and charisma are perfectly aligned with his message, which seems to be perfectly aligned with the times. I hope he becomes our next President because I believe he is honest and capable and because I believe he can bring our country back together in a way that's sorely missing today.

Adam, Mesa, AZ, USA

As a Canadian, I just hope the 8-year national nightmare that the US has been experiencing under Bush and Cheney will be reversed under the next Democratic whitehouse.

Joe Blogh, Southwest, Ontario

nice try. but Obama is a Socialist. His only chance of winning a presidency is moving to Canada or Europe!

PHoop, Fairfax,

Obama may very well be a nice man that can make a good speech. He has no experience in management. It would be like a student becoming principle of a school. He talks a good talk, but more is needed than talk. As for Matthew Dowd, he was always a democrat. He is just reverting to norm.
I think Mitt Romney not only has the experience as a leader, but also, he is heads above the pack! He can bring the country together. He did wonders for the Olympics and has governed the most liberal state in the Union. His character is above reproach. Be you a Republican or a Democrat, you should give this man a close look!

Linda Steinhauser, Rogersville, Alabama, USA

So far I see no significant defections except by those who need to hedge their bets and have influence no matter who wins.

What is true is that no single republican canidate has excited the base.

tim, henryville, pa

Those from the red states who state that we're not ready for Obama (I note with interest their use of his middle name, as though that's going to frighten us) speak only for themselves.

Sam, San Diego, USA

The moderates have a deep desire to "unite" America. I do not think that can be done. The US is the most divided it has been since the American Civil War. The far Left is so bitter, so driving by hatreds, that is manifested in their constant pushing of issues. The Right over reacts to the Left's constant new issues. And the middle just sits it out. Neither side can really get a grip (over 55% of the voters).

The US is in the process of going to a five party system. Eventually the democrats will split, this election is showing the divisions within their party. The GOP has its divisions but most of that are the moderates who uncomfortable with the extremism of the far Left.

What would heal the US would be a religious revival. But the US has not had one in nearly 60 years.

Greg, West Lafayette, IN/US

In the USA, business interests often "hedge their bets" by supporting strong contenders OF BOTH MAJOR PARTIES, especially in close elections. The 2008 presidential election is shaping up to be a horserace. If Obama continues to show strength, he will continue to raise cash from some traditionally Republican supporters. If he were to become elected, these supporters want to be able to say to Obama "we were EARLY supporters and helped you get elected. You can now help us with our interests". Also, supporting a black person for political office here is quite in vogue among the cocktail party set that these "swells" hang out with. They feel it shows how inclusive they are.
BUT THE BOTTOM LINE IS: In the voting booth, over 90% of traditional GOP voters would NEVER vote for a politician with the strict liberal voting record that Obama has.

R. Skinner, Shreveport, USA/LA

That anyone of these CFR/Project for a New American Century types will throw his support behind Obama tells me even more clearly that both U.S.A. mainstream parties are ruled by the one-world government types...the very same types who brought the E.U. to fruition. (Hey...didn't that start out as a "trade agreement"?)

It no longer matters in this nation which "side" you vote for - either way an American can count on increased regulation, more military, more war, more collectivism/socialism, and less liberty and individuality. I imagine the U.K. style two-way talking security cameras will be next in the U.S....all to keep us safe on the "war on terror", of course.

Bill Meyer, Jacksonville, U.S.A./Oregon

Hi, Iam not an American, however have followed US foreign policies for severeal decades. So, I have come to the conclusion that the USofA are the worst enymies of democracy . It is all about US interests around the globe. On the other hand, I love the ordinary American people. Never had a bad experience.
Well, I hope that they will not vote for Obama or Hillary because both of them are too closeley tied to Jewish money. but most of all what I find extremely disturbing in the US, is that you can only run for President if you have money behind you. Unfortunately, the past and current people do not care wether or not it is Jewish money or not. The US needs a President who cares about the US. Look at President Putin and what he has done overal for Russia. I am already very sorry now, that President Putin is not up for re-election. Mr. Putin is a very very smart statesman, who worked for his own people only.

Hans, Vancouver, BC

Finally a voice of real optimism (and not just the Bush PR kind) mixed with common sense, and the will to stand up for individuals. It is a travesty that the US, the richest nation in the world, lets people go without health care.

Ryan Kent, Pam Beach, FL, USA

Okay now if anyone actually believes a true Republican would consider switching over to Obama... that's just plain stupid thinking. His values, core beliefs and what he stands for is so far away from any Republican that is to include a Moderate Republican ... nice try Drive By!!

MilesK, Murrieta, California

A Texas donor and Dowd's problems with depression certainly don't indicate Republicans defecting to the camp of the most liberal Senator in Congress. Democrats only won a majority in Congress by running Republican clones in a few key states and Obama is not a Republican clone.

Stuart, Chicago, USA

These particular Republicans have the weight and the finances to support Hillary's opponent in the primary by defecting long enough to nominate Obama. Many Republicans can aim for more than not supporting her but also actually countering her at the lever.

Rita, Amarillo,

Amen John from DC!!!

Leigh, Memphis, TN

Give me a break. These are country club Republicans who have no principles or political philosophy. All they want to do is hitch a ride with a rising star. Obama is good looking, charismatic, and a great speaker. He is also a pseudo-socialist who believes in big government, higher taxes, and wealth redistribution.

JFK was pro-growth, for lower taxes, and a hawk on national defense. JFK said "ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country."

Obama and the current Democratic party are supported by people who constantly ask what their country can do for them. Another program, another entitlement, another handout.

Tom K, St. Louis, USA

I have serious questions about anyone who claims to have supported Bush and now supports Obama. The only explanation would be ignorance of what one or both of them stand for, or a total lack of personal convictions.

Jack, New Orleans, LA

This would be funny if it wasn't being used to convince people who don't know much about the actual workings of American politics that Obama is a serious candidate.

The guy has absolutely ZERO accomplishments on his resume aside from getting elected in a race in which he was essentially unopposed. Remember, ZERO accomplishments. Not one of his supporters can name a single thing he has done. Its only what he 'believes'. People believe in Santa Claus too but the guy doesn't make a credible Presidential candidate.

Actual conservatives are not going to touch Obama with a ten foot pool. Obama is a closet socialist. Nobody in the US media or anywhere else has actually spent any time listening to what he wants to do on any issue which is before Congress or the American people. The guy talks in platitudes like a motivational speaker. All sizzle, no steak.

bruce, las vegas, NV, USA

I am a conservative and disilusioned with Bush. Not because of the war itself - Sadam Hussein needed ousted. But becase of the way he introduced it as well as carried it out.

On the other hand, the war shows the hipocrisy of both parties. The liers from the right, claim the needed stability in the oil marketes as a reason for war. How about alternative energy? The liers from the left, claim the war is imoral - how about alternative energy that will preempt the excuse for war.

I am not happy with Obama. He stands against so many things I cherish: life, small government, etc.. I will never vote for him while I hope in my lifetime I will vote for a black candidate.

Florin, Atlanta, USA / GA

Obama's sincerity is amassing. He also comes across as very honest and humble which appears to endear him to the electorate. And seems like a blend of JFK and former President Clinton. The politics of Obama also inspire hope and vision for a brighter future for the new generation. Illinois Senator Obama is on the ascendency, and has an unstoppable momentum that may be difficult to derail. He seemed very determined and focused on his goal to become the first black leader of the free world and next president of United States.

Chukwudi, Queens, New York

Obama won't be the Democratic nominee-take it to the bank. It's Hilary's hands down. Once Democratic voters realize how much of an ingenue Obama is, and Hilary goes on the attack (and she will) they will swarm back to Hilary. Then the Republicans will win the Presidency, Anyone of the three-McCain, Guliani, or Romney should be able to beat her. Obama's positions on almost every important issue (read Israel, the War on Terror, the Iraq war) are completely the opposite of Republican ideology. So cross-over voting from Republicans to Obama aren't going to happen.

Paula Higgins, Marietta, Georgia

I can tell you this Obama has done more for Veterans then any Republican. He has helped homeless veterans. Every returning trooper who has PTSD that call his office get the help they need. He has stood tall in the fight for Brain Injury. Most Veterans are Republican. Think about that. Oh By The Way I am a Veteran. Not voting for the first time Republican.

Mike Jluszek, Westmont IL, USA IL

I'm sure once they see Obama's tax plan, they will quikcly become disillusioned. A socialist is a socialist, no matter how appealing the packaging.

Joyce, Redondo Beach, CA

It's far too early to make any predictions. Senator Obama has yet to be tested by the Clinton machine and its venom. He's in for a real surprise by the end of the year as the first primary elections approach. His lack of experience is a major, major shortcoming that his rhetoric cannot replace. Americans are desperate need a healer at this point, and Senator Obama fits that bill. But America also needs strong, experienced, and competent leadership, and that's where he may very well prove vulnerable. Time will tell. One thing for sure: President Bush won't be missed when he leaves office. It's a shame that Mr. Blair can't take Bush with him as he leaves office. Bush has about a 29% approval rating right now, and I'm surprised it's that high.

David, Brandon, Florida, USA

Republicans defect to the Obama camp....
Ahahahahahaahahaha!

Yes, that is it, those on the right want someone to the far far left.

Mike, Miami, FL

This is the opinion of a Democrat. Obama can't win the presidency. This country will not elect a person with the name Barak Hussein Obama....it is not going to happen. We aren't that far along, yet. If he is the Democratic candidate, the Republicans win. No ifs, ands, or buts about it. If he is the candidate for the Democrats, the election is handed to the Republicans. That is reason enough for them to back him at this point. It won't be the same in the general election.

Kevin , Norcross, GA

um, no john. neo con as a name means nothing in terms of context. context? like kennedy viewing foriegn policy as a first strike US mandate? see cuba, most of south america, try a little vietnam with some hot sauce on top (although iraq started with war and hopes to lead to advisors while vietnam was the opposite).

as far as league, league what? like, league of...nations? nah. Obama thinks a little the same way as ron ray-guns? yeah, he's about as optimistic as re-gunz ever was. frankly, being optimistic is ok. so what?

nik, seattle, wa

This is nothing but a puff piece and a backhand attack at the President. What Republican would jump ship to go to Obama, come on you must be kidding me.

marco l, Lake Forest, il

Barack Obama is an empty suit whose greatest success to date is creating disruption in Hillary Clinton's campaign. At least that part is amusing. The "black Ronald Reagan" - oh please, he's a lightweight senator with a highly socialist agenda. This guy would be a bigger disaster than Jimmy Carter and that's saying a lot.

Joanne, New York, NY

While Kagan voiced his approval of Obama's stance on being more open to an interventionist foreign policy much like Reagan and JFK, he also had the following to say at the end of his Washington Post op/ed:

Of course, it's just a speech. At the Democrats' debate on Thursday, when asked how he would respond to another terrorist attack on the United States, Obama at first did not say a word about military action. So maybe his speech only reflects what he and his advisers think Americans want to hear. But that is revealing, too. When it comes to America's role in the world, apparently they don't think there's much of an argument.

It's one thing to praise someone to praise a candidate for their stances on foreign policy but quite another to offer an endorsement of the bid.

Randolph, McIntyre, GA

The folks that are "defecting' to Obama may do themselves and the nation a huge favor if they think real hard and study well on this. While the conservation nation is disappointed with Bush on several issues, the ones that are bailing to vote democrat are then not conservative and will only go farther to the left. Republicans defecting to the left are not doing themselves any favors and this just doesn't make sense.

Al_Idaho, Hayden, USA/ID

Total propaganda, if you think republicans would vote for any more socialism than we already have... Wake up people!

Greg GS, San Pedro, CA

John of Washington DC is being far too literal. The fact is, Obama's speech that Kagan endorses was far more ambitious from a neo-con perspective than anything Bush said prior to 9/11. Because the Iraq war is unpopular, there was a carve-out on Iraq to appease the "netroots," but the signal Obama was sending was: I am not an isolationist. I am not a realpolitiker. I will not be governed by polls.

That is a cross-over message for a lot of independents who voted for Bush in 2004. The question is, will it alienate the left wing Dems who are increasingly worried about whether Obama is "one of us."

Stan Kyle Cartman, South Park , CO, USA

I'd sooner vote for Hillary, and I'm a Republican. Obama is a socialist. He's the polar opposite of Reagan, and an enemy of the individual.

He stinks.

Morgan, Salem, OR

I think he has that Jimmy Carter sort of appeal. Mr Obama, no matter his enthusiasm or message, will if elected still be surrounded by democrats.

rcb, indianapolis, IN

Rubbish. Obama has laid out very few actual policy positions, and no one believes him to be a Democratic Reagan. He is a credible candiate, but the article is overly sensationalized.

Mike, Knoxville, TN

This makes a lot of sense to me, and reflects what I see around me. I left the UK in 1989 and now live in Santa Cruz, California. It's my impression, from visits to the UK over the last few years, that people there don't realise how divided the US is, and how much it has come to affect people - even former Bush supporters. It's not too much to say that he has damaged the Union more than any president since the Civil War. America has a habit of changing its national mood rapidly and radically; my feeling is Obama is going to be the beneficiary of this next election. It's not inconceivable he could win with a landslide and have the opportunity to completely rebuild America's internal and international character for the next twenty years.

Chris Yonge
Santa Cruz, CA

Chris Yonge, Santa Cruz, CA, USA

I'm one of the small donors that contributed to Obama's campaign. I think alot of the interest in him is that he comes off as a genuine person, for a politician. I respect his early opposition to the war and his call for national unity. He also stresses in his stump speeches that he's trying to build a movement, that his power as president to do things will come from the bottom to the top, as people come together around the things we can agree on. Its still early, and the field may look very different come election time, but I for one hope that we elect Barack Obama as our next president, we need him.

FLorrain., port aransas Texas, United States

Um, no. First of all, no one calls Obama the "black Ronald Reagan." He's not in President Reagan's league. Second of all, JFK was not a "neo-con hero" since the term did not then exist and, in any case, JFK's policies were unrelated to the current context in which the term is applied. Third, elite donors switch around all the time, often for the purpose of buying future influence. Fourth, none of the Democrats have significant cross-party appeal and they don't need it anyway.

John, Washington, DC,