Tim Reid in Washington
Win VIP tickets
Democrats yesterday abandoned their demand that a war funding Bill contain a withdrawal date for US troops from Iraq, thereby handing President Bush a victory in his fight with Congress over how to end the conflict.
The decision to back down and give Mr Bush almost $90 billion (£45 billion), which he had requested in February to continue paying for the war, brought only a temporary end to the legislative showdown over Iraq, with Democrats vowing to renew calls for troop withdrawal this summer.
The Democrat capitulation was a reminder that despite their takeover of Congress after the November mid-term elections, which many in the party saw as a popular call to end the war, their slim majorities in the lower house and Senate still leave them powerless to override a presidential veto.
The three-month battle over funding the war has demonstrated that Mr Bush, despite his anaemic approval ratings and the unpopularity of the war, is still able to prosecute it without congressional interference. The Democratic decision was also a reflection of the political dangers of cutting off funds for the war. Although two thirds of Americans oppose the conflict Democrats are still haunted by the experience of Vietnam. The party, which controlled Congress then, cut off funds for that deeply unpopular war but then spent decades being blamed for the defeat.
Democrat leaders worried that a continued refusal to give Mr Bush an Iraq funding Bill that he would sign he vetoed one last month that contained a withdrawal date would be seen as indifference to the troops, a politically untenable stance.
One key to Mr Bush’s victory was that Republicans on the Capitol largely stood united behind the White House.
“Democrats have finally conceded defeat in their effort to include mandatory surrender dates in a funding bill for the troops,” John Boehner, the Republican leader in the House, said. But Democrats believe that, despite their climb-down, the spending battle has laid the ground for a fresh push to end the war later this year. The $120 billion Bill that they will send to Mr Bush tomorrow funds the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan only until September the month that General David Petraeus, the US ground commander, gives his crucial progress report to Congress.
This month a delegation of moderate Republicans went to the White House and told Mr Bush that unless General Petraeus could prove significant progress in the war they would defect. Ray LaHood, one of those Republicans, said yesterday that progress in Iraq must come quickly. “There is very, very thin patience on the part of the American people.”
Mr Bush made some concessions. After initially saying that he would accept no strings in a funding Bill, he agreed to 18 political and legislative “bench-marks” for the Iraqi Government. If they are not met US reconstruction aid could be cut.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£23,093 - £56,211
The Office for National Statistics
Newport, South Wales
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
This has been a sad day for those of us who believed that change was coming in Washington. The Congress should have sent the bill the President vetoed right back again and again. To those Congressmen and Congresswomen who fell for the Republican scare tatics and Karl Rove, shame on you. To those of you that voted against this, thank you.
To Speaker Pelosi and Leader Reid....where is the leadership ?
Jean Staler, st. louis, mo
Many warned in 2002 (including myself as a diplomatic consultant) that nohing would help al Qaeda more than an invasion of Iraq without Security Council support.
Now worldwide damage has been done to America & its allies - nothing will undo that until a new Administration is formed under a President who opposed the war (Obama? Gore?).
He will then face the present problem - what to do about Iraq? As we warned, the US is again in a 'Vietnam' situation - but leaving Vietnam after the Sino-Soviet split did no great damage except to US reputation.
But just leaving Iraq would be a disaster - a victory for Al Qaeda, & danger of chaos for the Middle East . Also an even greater loss of American credibility.
Iraq has just one thing going for it: virtually every country has an interest in its stability. So Democrats should not be trying to force a premature withdrawal but clamouring for GW Bush to launch a worldwide diplomatic campaign for Iraqi stabilty linked to US withdrawal
John Pedler, Sarlat, France
It is disappointing, though not perhaps surprising, that in all the discussion, I have seen no mention of the way in which the U.S. government, Democrats and Republicans alike, have totally ignored, in other words, dismissed as not worthy of comment, the various peace plans put forward by the Iraqis themselves. Most notably, this applies to the recent plan put forward by Al Fadhila, a group of moderate Shiites. The reasons: it would legitimize Iraqi resistance and ensure that Iraqi oil revenues would go to the Iraqi people and not to the U.S. and mullti-national oil corporations favoured by the U.S. administration. Let's face it: the U.S. will never leave Iraq voluntarily, no matter how many hundreds or thousands of American soldiers are killed.
akai ringo, Tokyo, Japan
May 1st marked four years since the President, in an impressive display, landed his plane on the deck of the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln and declared that major hostilities have ceased in Iraq - "Mission Accomplished" a sign said in the background. Well, that wasn't quite the case, now. We need to support the troops with the necessary funds, but at the same time, what about the will of the people as expressed in the November elections and in a number of polls since ? The great majority of people want this war drawn to a close and the troops brought home. This war cannot be won militarily, which some still believe. The American people are frustrated with this war that they feel has been mismanaged, along with the realization that they and their representatives were lied into this war. Most recently Secretary of State, Condolezza Rice, has been tip-toeing away from supporting accountability and benchmarks for the Iraqi government and consequences if certain benchmarks are not met in a reasonable amount of time. And now, the President vetoed the war spending bill which included deadlines for bringing the troops home and accountability measures (benchmarks) for the Iraqi government to achieve if they are to continue to have American military and financial support. The President continues to ask the American people for an open-ended commitment of our troops while refusing to set benchmarks for the success of their mission, until now, but with benchmarks that can be waived by him. As is stated by many people in and out of the military and civilians inside and outside the Administration, we are not going to win this war militarily, which apparently the President still harbors hopes of doing. More of our soldiers and more of our billions are going to be wasted because of his obstinacy, trying in essence not to change course. Twenty (20) more months of this Administration is too long to not make the major change of course which the President paid lip service to but will not institute. Recognize the will of the great majority of people, Mr. President !
Thomas Grimms, Orlando, Florida/USA
what a bunch of spineless pathetic losers the dems are. bush is a lame duck president and has no support in the country - only the fact that he HAS to go in 18 months time is keeping him in office. £45 billion pounds to keep a pointless lost war going for another 4 months (enough money to give every person in the US universal healthcare for a year) seems like a bad deal - you will also incur at least 400 more casualties. So basically you're paying £100 million per time to have someone's son returned to them in a box. Way to go team America!
Phil Russell, london, uk
and that's all that matters, right Stan? Who gets the blame. Let's just do all we can to make sure the Republicans look as bad as possible so that our side can win the next election, yippee! Oh, and we're really concerned for the welfare of our brave "children" in the military too. Spare me!
C Heathcote, Brick, USA, NJ
Useless bunch.!!! What about listening to to the majority..ie American public. Has nobody got the balls to take this bunch of neo con fundamentalists on.
M McGregor, Tunbridge Wells, UK
Stan, my friend - either you are not aware that the Iraq parilament is NOW only taking a 2 week recess or..........you are intentionally misleading everyone. I suspect the later. Perhaps you've spent too much time listening to your neighbor Speaker Pelosi.
Larry, ATL, USA
If Democrats find a way to force Bush out of Iraq, they will have given Republicans a wonderful present. When Iraq falls completely apart, as it is very clearly destined to do, the blame would be laid on the heads of Democrats. So politically, the best strategy is to offer firm by not rock hard resistance to the war, so that it remains obvious even to the weakest minded of our citizens (that 33, or is it 27 percent that still give Bush a positive approval rating), which party shoulders the blame.
Unfortunately, Americans will continue to suffer the violent and unnecessary loss of its children at the rate of about 100 per month. Add to that about 500 per month who will lose eyes and limbs and we can only wonder whether the game of politics trumps compassion for these mislead, brave men and women.
By the way, have you heard that the Iraqi parliament plans to take a TWO MONTH SUMMER RECESS?
Stan , San Jose, CA
this just shows the dems have caved in again is there no one who has the guts to stand up and speak for the people???????
c. owens, sebastopol, CA
The dems are a push that was designed to fail. The dems and the GOP are all part of the same business party. All hail the great decider.
Joe in CA, Stockton, CA
Typical of the spineless Democrats. Unfortunately, your article perpetuates the myth that because they can't override a veto they are powerless. The reality is that if they wanted to end the war immediately (or at least bring Bush back to the table), they would just decline to pass any more money period.
They are now willing accomplices in this whole sordid affair. And this is why 42% of Americans - a new high - consider themselves independents.
Jason, San Francisco, CA