Tom Baldwin in Washington
Win VIP tickets
Pentagon officials were plotting their next move yesterday and weighing up the possibility of an appeal after military judges dismissed war crimes charges against two Guantanamo detainees.
The decision has once again thrown into turmoil Washington’s efforts to put terror suspects on trial in military courts. In five years there has been only one conviction — that of an Australian whose plea bargain allowed him to serve a much-reduced sentence in his own country.
Since being established in 2002, the prison camp at the US naval base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, where about 380 detainees are held without legal rights, has inflicted huge damage on America’s reputation and become a symbol for the anti-war movement.
Britain is among the US allies which have demanded its closure, and its continued existence is known to divide even senior figures within the Bush Administration.
Commander Jeffrey Gordon, a spokesman for the Pentagon, said: “We’re reviewing the judges’ rulings and will be making a determination soon about where we go from here.”
Tony Fratto, a White House spokesman, said that the collapse of the cases against Omar Khadr and Salim Ahmed Hamdan did not mean that the military courts system was wrong. “We don’t agree with the judges’ ruling,” he said, adding that the Pentagon had asked for time to decide whether to appeal the decision.
Charges against Mr Khadr, who was 15 at the time of his capture and is accused of killing an American soldier in Afghanistan, and Mr Hamdan, who is charged with being Osama bin Laden’s driver, were dismissed because they were classified by Guantanamo tribunals as “enemy combatants”. Legislation written last year allows only “unlawful enemy combatants” to be tried in the military commissions. This law was rushed through Congress after the US Supreme Court ruled that the previous system introduced by the Bush Administration was unconstitutional.
“The fundamental problem is that the law was not carefully written,” Madeline Morris, a Duke University law professor, said. “It was rushed through in a flurry of political pressure from the White House — and it is quite riddled with internal contradictions and anomalies.”
Commander Gordon said that the entire Guantanamo system dealt with people who act as “unlawful enemy combatants”, operating outside any internationally recognised military, without the uniforms or insignia that would make them party to the Geneva Conventions. “It is our belief that the concept was implicit that all the Guantanamo detainees who were designated as ‘enemy combatants’ were in fact unlawful.”
He said that options now included seeking a reclassification of the Guantanamo Bay detainees in separate “combatant status review tribunals” or appealing the judges’ decision that their courts had no jurisdiction over whether the suspects were unlawful.
Marine Colonel Dwight Sullivan, chief of military defence attorneys at Guantanamo Bay, said that the rulings could spell the end of the war-crimes trial system. “It is not just a technicality; it’s the latest demonstration that this newest system just does not work. It is a system of justice that does not comport with American values,” he said.
The dismissals of their cases do not spell freedom for Mr Khadr or Mr Hamdan. But Mr Hamdan’s military attorney, Lieutenant-Commander Charles Swift, said that his client is relieved by the ruling. “He hopes he gets a fair trial and, like the rest of us, is patiently waiting for it.”
Arlen Specter, the Republican Senator, is among senior figures on Capitol Hill calling for the law to be re-evaluated. “The sense I have is that there’s an unease, an uncomfortable sense about the whole Guantanamo milieu,” he told The New York Times. “There’s just a sense of too many shortcuts in the whole process.”
Jerrold Nadler, a Democratic Congressman, said that he planned to hold hearings on the Military Commissions Act, which he said was “riddled with problems and created a process that operates outside the rule of law”.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£23,093 - £56,211
The Office for National Statistics
Newport, South Wales
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Sir,
At least the US judiciary has a semblance of independence. Imagine if this had taken place in a completely totalitarian state e.g. China.
SC, London, United Kingdom
I've been reading the US news online today, and neither CNN nor the Washington Post have articles about this subject. I'm wondering why.
It's interesting comparing what the British papers think is newsworthy about the US and what the US newspapers think is worthy.
J. Rhinehart, Spartanburg, SC, USA
It always happens that when legislation is rushed, its flawed and fails to stand up to inspection when put through a court. Both Bush & Blair are guilty of rushing anti-terror measures through the system which they believed wrongly gave them moral legitimacy but also curtailed the rights of suspects not even put through a court. Whether its Guantanamo in the US or control orders in the UK, neither have been shown to prevent terrorism or meet the due process of law of a democratic country. Bush and presumably Brown must take a long re-think of what they are trying to achieve on anti-terrorist legislation. Short of making their countries a dictatorship and setting up concentration camps, they need to invest far more in the security agencies to gain real evidence which regular courts can use. Terrorism is not a special crime and although more difficult than other crimes, should still be addressed through the normal court process and not quasi military courts accountable to no one.
Mike, Alicante, Spain
Are we to understand that the cases were thrown out because the indictment did'nt describe the enemy combatants as 'unlawful'?
This sounds a bit thin as a technicality.
'Lawful enemy combatants' is an obvious oxymoron that vexes common sense. But I suppose lawyers see it otherwise.
john gregory Flinn, Bealencourt , France
With this latest twist in the saga of the Guantanamo House of Horrors, the Bush adnministration has finally earned its seat in the Axis of Evil Club. Bashir and Kim were looking for somebody to take Saddam's place, and now , by golly, they have George.
Kishore , Galena IL, USA
Shows how incompetent our US friends are. Eventually they may get it right. But how long will these "enemy combatants" remain in "prison" before they are brought before a real judge in a proper Court.
Michael , Sydney, Australia
I am sure Mr Bush will refrain from criticising other countries for glaring human rights abuses while he continues to imprison (and possibly torture) those at Guantanemo Bay without trial or due process. Or am I?
Phil, Hong Kong,