Tim Reid in Washington
Pick up classic Hitchcock thrillers all this week, only in The Times
Tensions may be rising between Britain and Russia, but the Bush Administration appears determined to avoid conflict with the Kremlin.
Despite extraordinarily antagonistic comments by President Putin of Russia, Washington has refused to get too involved in the diplomatic stand-off over the death of Alexander Litvinenko.
Even in May, when Mr Putin compared the policies of President Bush to those of Nazi Germany, the White House refused to rise. Rather than alienate Russia, the Administration seems intent on a thaw in relations.
Just days after Mr Putin compared American foreign policy to that of the Third Reich, Mr Bush hosted the Russian leader at the “lobster summit” at the Bush family compound in Kennebunkport, Maine.
Even then, Mr Putin rebuffed the hospitality by pulling out of a key Nato arms control treaty last weekend, in protest at Mr Bush’s plan for a missile defence shield in Central Europe. Mr Bush has said nothing.
Despite Mr Putin’s aggressive posturing, Washington does not view it as the prelude to a new Cold War — nor does it want to start one. Russia’s energy supplies are vital to US interests and the White House is keen to maintain reasonable relations.
In the run-up to the Iraq war, when France, Germany and Russia opposed the planned invasion at the UN, the instructions from the White House that shaped the post-invasion US foreign policy were: “Punish France, forgive Russia and ignore Germany.”
Bret Stephens, a columnist for The Wall Street Journal, wrote yesterday: “Talk to actual Russians and you’ll find that one of their chief gripes with this Administration has been its over-the-top overtures to Mr Putin. This isn’t a study in appeasement — quite. But it stands in stark contrast to the British Government’s decision to expel four Russian diplomats.”
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


Overseas contacts and local business information

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests


Our Credit Clinic has free help and advice
2007
£47,700
2007
£41,899
2008
£41,445
Great car insurance deals online
£25,510 – 32,000
Transport for London
London
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£90,000 + PRP
Essex County Council
Essex
100K
Confidential
London
5% below developer pre-launch price!
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Great Investment, River Views
By Funway – Thailand
from £589pp
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
What the hell is a family "compound"? It seems to be something that only the Bushes and the Kennedys have. In any case, it isn't a word in the (British) English language, so why use it? Please translate instead.
Alan, London,
Not to worry, British bretheren. We're a bit tied down now in Iraq and Afghanistan, but we're following this business and you seem to be handling it better than we could do in any event. Were push to come to shove, moreover, you know we'd be with you. But it won't. And as soon as the islamists begin killing Russians you can be certain the latter will be seeking your expertise and assistance.
Alexander Hamilton, NYC, US
So what does Putin have that the US needs? Oh yes, they're a major oil producer and the US may have to pull out of Iraq and surrender control of the gulf if the casualties rise much further.
What's it all about, Georgie?
KR, Stockport,
This happened over the Falklands as well, where the Whitehouse do not want to get invoved in Britains problems. Yet they come whinging for back up when they want something backing at the united nations or there's a need for show of strength in the midst of oil nations.
Lets hope the British goverment of the day now heed this show of 'friendship' and start standing down in present wars, and standing aside in all future American requests. It has not affected other european countries unduly.
Dean Holloway, Solihull, uk
Clealry there is no special relationship, Bush says jump the british goverment says how high sir and for how long. Bush is on planet cuckoo land with the missle defence shield, it will undoubtedly suffer from 'mission creep' due to 'realities on the ground' and have missles pointed at russia and all kinds of high tech listening devices before long. Lets not forget the Cuban missle crisis, what powerful nation would allow an (ex) enemy to have a missle base on its borders. Only self serving narrow minded politician would want a missle shields in their country because if there every is a need for it they will become the primary target. And all an agressor nation needs to do is to fire multiple missles as the missles shield could not cope many multiple targets, so its a waste of time having a missle shields. Looks like we are back to the MAD (mutualy assured destruction) times of the 80's - Thank you Bush for making the lives of my children a lot darker.
Phillip Harris, London,
The British are much more on the 'front line' of Russian relations than the US, as Europeans we are more exposed. The US can afford to take the long view, and wisely, it does. The same thing happened in 1940 with Nazi Germany! If Blair had been in No.10 and not Brown, Bush might have weighed in. Brown has lost the warmth in the relationship and is no diplomat. But Putin is clearly in the wrong and Brown is sending only a gentle message to Russia - a much stronger one to the rest of the world. Putin miscalculated. The question at this point is, will he be clever enough to extricate himself now or will he drag Russia beyond the point of no return.
Robert Gillespie, London, England
Britain should stop being so hypocritical about the extradition of Lugovoi from Russia - we cannot refuse to extradite Berezovsky and then be surprised that the Russians do not extradite Lugavoi. And we cannot say that the reason that we do not extradite Berezovsky is because the Russian judiciary is not independent of the government and then ask the Russian government to break its own laws and extradite Lugavoi.
CHarles butler, Perm, Russia
Just another case of Bush - who looked into Putin's soul and liked what he saw - being incapable of facing reality.
oldasiahand, Guildford, UK
Ah, the special relationship?
SC, London, United Kingdom
I'd comment on this story but I'm afraid if I did, I'd end up dead in an alleyway or irradiated.
[name redacted], Kansas City, Kansas
Hat's off to the US where Boris Berezovsky's status is persona non gratis . No amount of money can buy him the much coveted visa into the US he has sought so relentlessly. Nor has his money been able to buy him the influence he has been able to buy in the UK.
On the issue of Boris Berezovsky, US Russia relations is shaped by the more reasoned approach of maintaining a moral highground.
Brian K. Doan, Burlington, US
Typical, we help them in Iraq, Afganistan and the "War on Terror" and they run away like school kids from a playground fight just as the teachers come.
Peter, Portsmouth,