Tim Reid in Washington
Star musicians and your favourite Times writers at the Albert Hall

Two years after the Hurricane Katrina disaster triggered a plunge in his approval ratings from which he has never recovered, President Bush returned to New Orleans yesterday, accused of betraying a city that he once promised to rebuild at any cost.
Mr Bush arrived in the city on the anniversary of the disaster – one of the most politically damaging episodes of his presidency – to be greeted by anger and frustration over the slow pace of recovery.
Since the hurricane, economically the worst natural disaster to strike the US, many in New Orleans have felt abandoned by Mr Bush, especially after his promise that “we will do what it takes” to rebuild the city. Katrina and the subsequent flooding, which swamped 80 per cent of New Orleans, killed 1,700 in Louisiana and Mississippi and destroyed an area the size of Britain.
Two years on, more than 43,000 families in Louisiana are still living in trailers. Of the 180,000 applicants for the federal Government’s “Road Home” house rebuilding grants in New Orleans, only just over a fifth have received any money. Violent crime in the city has risen dramatically; the murder rate has doubled. Fewer than half of its schools have reopened. The police headquarters and two police stations continue to operate out of temporary buildings. Tens of thousands of people suffer from depression. Much of the city is a wasteland.
Although Mr Bush has been to New Orleans 15 times since the disaster, this was only his second visit since the anniversary last year. He caused outrage on the Gulf Coast when he did not mention Katrina, or New Orleans, in his State of the Union address in January. With his approval ratings just above 30 per cent, and his domestic agenda effectively dead 17 months before he leaves office, his visit yesterday served as an unwelcome reminder of an episode that delivered an enormous blow to his presidency.
Iraq has been an issue that has slowly taken its toll on Mr Bush’s standing. The debacle after Hurricane Katrina, by contrast, was a made-for-television disaster that for the first time left a majority of Americans doubting his ability to govern.
The failure to prevent the flooding of New Orleans – despite days of warning – and the disastrous performance of Michael Brown, the unqualified Republican appointee who was the emergency management director, convinced many voters that the Bush Administration was marked by incompetence and cronyism. For many, the Katrina shambles explained the growing chaos in Iraq.
In the past two days a string of presidential candidates have visited New Orleans to lambast the response of the Bush Administration. John Edwards, a Democrat, even advocated a “Brownie’s Law” to ensure that political appointees were qualified. At the height of the disaster Mr Bush told Mr Brown, then head of the Federal Emergency Management Agency: “Brownie, you’re doing a heck of a job” – a phrase that has come to haunt him.
Yesterday Mr Bush, before a small audience inside a school in the city’s Lower Ninth Ward – the area most devastated by the breached levees – said: “We understand there are still problems and we are staying engaged. We are trying to work through the bureaucracy in Washington.”
He said that of the $114 billion (£60 billion) that his Administration had committed to the region, $96 billion had been paid out or was available. Mr Bush said that he would request an additional $5 billion that was needed to complete the rebuilding and strengthening of the city’s levees, scheduled to be completed in 2011.
There is some good news – several neighbourhoods are thriving. The city’s population is back to two thirds of its preKatrina level of 450,000.
Don Powell, the head of rebuilding work on the Gulf Coast, said that state and city officials were to blame for much of the delay in repair work. Government auditors say that $1 billion of the first $6 billion in federal money was lost to fraud and waste. Subsequent inquiries have been scathing about the performances of the Louisiana governor, Kathleen Blanco, and Ray Nagin, the Mayor of New Orleans. Mr Nagin has still not provided a clear plan about how he wants New Orleans to be rebuilt.
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


Overseas contacts and local business information

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests


£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
with annexe accommodation and 5.25 acres
£1,100,000
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
So, Tom from Willmington, using your 'logic', people in other cities who suffer thru floods, earthquakes, tornadoes, and other acts of nature should just, what, leave the city they've lived in all their lives and move somewhere else? Where might that be that they don't have some kind of disastrous weather at times ?
Chicago shouldn't have built back after the fire? San Franciso shouldn't build back after an earthquake? New York shouldn't build back after 9/11, all because it WILL happen again?[
Cella, new orleans, la
Di,
Much anger and blame *has* been pointed at Nagin and Blanco, as those who read and watch news coverage will know. The necessary responses to this emergency, however, were far greater than any of the smaller, poorer states in the US could have led, or handled. This was a textbook case of why federal governments matter, and the Bush government did not lead in anything like a competent manner.
David, Columbia, MO
There is no oil in NO, and hence no gain to be made out of military entreprise. For GWB killing innocent people in Iraq is more worth than saving lives in NO. That's the prize for electing a presumably competent president
Goldman, London, UK
David in Sydney Your view of Nagin could not be more wrong. This man is a disaster of epic proprotions. He's George Bush's twin but at the local level. He's incompetent and completely out of his element. Notice in the article where it says he still does not have a plan to rebuild the city after TWO YEARS.
Brian, syracuse, US
Thank you Dave in Washington. Mark in Conway and Bob in Anaheim, should your areas be rebuilt if an earthquake hits? Most of the flooding in Nola happened because of levy failures in the canals that the *Federal* Corp of Army Engineers built and not even to design specification, which they have since admitted. There are just so many facts that the rest of the world does not know about. There is not enough room here to tell you everything. If FEMA was not under the Homeland Security department, that would help the next major disaster, (natural or manmade) aide the victims, one major change that is needed for all of the USA.
Bonnie, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
If David from Sydney were to spend a little time on the ground in New Orleans, he'd get a better feel (literally) for why it was necessary to prevent those hordes of looters from crossing.
Do you think that the massive increase in the murder rate is because of the "gentrification" of New Orleans?
Or perhaps it's because Mayor Nagin's vision of New Orleans staying a "chocolate city" is coming to pass.
Sydney is a good distance from The Big Easy, lucky you.
Hammer, Los Angeles ,
Apparently Mr Nagin doesn't READ! The voters that tried to oust him from his position, were shut down by his web and cellular messages that told any and all prior residents of the New Orleans area that he would Bus them in, they were able to vote online from their location and their votes would be counted.
Now, as far as the residents that were living in the area and stayed or came back home,this was a slap in the face. Many wrote to the local paper that they would not return to the crime and political malfeasance that has continued to grow in New Orleans.If a person is NOT PHYSICALLY residing in a community, supporting that community by paying taxes to it or through an agency to pay the taxes to the community, how were these votes allowed? Absentee votes were the votes Mr.Nagin relied upon. He received them. He won. Now I ask you, How many of those Absentee votes are currently living IN the New Orleans area??? Did they return? Are they going to? What is being done for those who stay?
Alaintha, Hattiesburg, MS
Unless you pay attention to this story day in, day out, which includes talking to people in New Orleans, you really aren't likely to get the facts straight. Case in point: Bob Evans of California. Bob mistakes funds allocated for the entire Gulf Coast with funds spent in one city. His assertion that most Americans "have always recognized New Orleans and Louisiana to be the most corupt...." is just nonsense. To say that contracts let by the Federal government to firms not even located in New Orleans are somehow controlled by the city and state is laughable. Go to New Orleans, Bob. Survey the damage wrought by the failed flood protection. Watch the people trying to rebuild their lives. Better yet, lend a hand. It might give you the humility you are so sadly lacking and the understanding of what has happened and is happening there.
David, Washington, DC
Nagin isn't the problem. Lack of money is the problem. The federal government has not given a single dollar to the City of New Orleans to rebuild the destroyed fire stations, rebuild the destroyed water system, rebuild the destroyed police labs, or rebuild any other critical public infrastructure, despite that this was all destroyed because FEDERAL levees failed (they were NOT overtopped, they collapsed due to design flaws, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has admitted this). The locals are being required to pay the full cost of FEDERAL bungling. Without money, you could have Superman as mayor and the city would still be a shambles.
BT, Lafayette, LA,USA
I can clearly recall those haunting images of (mainly black) New Orleans "refugees" fleeing the rising flood waters only to be met at a bridge by an armed cordon of police and prevented from crossing into a neighbouring county. They will not leave my mind for many years, if ever. The great American nation, beacon of hope and democracy, died that day.
One might ask on what constitutional basis these people were denied entry to a neighbouring county? On whose judicial authority? Further, in the aftermath of the events of Hurricane Katrina, who was disciplined for the behaviours of (so called) "law enforcement" officers towards victims in the days after the flood.
Most importantly, who will ultimately be held accountable and responsible. The American nation blames their President and they are right. As a former President famously declared: "the buck stops here".
David, Sydney, Australia
What the UK and the rest of the world fail to understand is the outrage of most Americans over the corruption that has been the hallmark of New Orleans cleanup. Oh, most Americans have always recognized New Orleans and Louisiana to be the most corrupt City and State in the nation. But what has been done with taxpayersâ $114 BILLION is unprecedented, even by their standards.
Federal Government controls little of that money. Instead, it merely inspects the damage, uses national criteria to estimate the cost of repair and clean up, and authorizes THE CITY AND STATE to spend that amount to have the work performed.
What was found was that previously allocated Federal money for flood control had been squandered in corruption throughout the years, allowing the disaster to happen.
The flood has cost each American $380. For those residents of N.O. to scream demands of âentitlementâ is an outrage, when so many of them simply sit on their derrieres and do nothing for themselves.
Bob Evans, Anaheim, California
same way they voted bush in again for a second term after he alongside Britain attacked Iraq and now pakistan..
thats the same way they voted Nagin in again!!!
laureen, Leeds/UK,
Di - You've got to be kidding. Until he uttered those famous words ("pardon my French but I'm p..."), Washington was content to simply ignore the problem in the hope that it would just somehow go away. This was day 4 of the crisis, I believe. It's just unfathomable.
In my view Nagin was a hero that day. He stood up to an ineffectual President like no politician has before, or since.
David, Sydney, Australia
At what point is the anger going to be pointed at Mayor Nagin or Governor Blanco...it is not entirely a federal problem. The state and city messed up more in my eyes. How could they vote Nagin in again?
Di, lansing, mi
While I am not a Bush fan, nor a real Bush basher- in all fairness- BILLIONS of tax dollars iwent from the US government for YEARS to the levee boards in Louisianna to build, repair and maintain the failed levees. The money was squandered, stolen, and frittered away on who knows what. THAT is the THE REASON the LEVEES FAILED. To this day, the Louisianna governments- locally and at the state level will not change the way they manage the levees. The problems persist and always will because of politics and personalities-- and when another storm hits New Orleans will be wiped away again.
While I do not see how we can continue ot pour money in to a foreign war that is a disaster, I personally don't see why we as US citizens should pay to rebuild a city that is essentially built in a place that is LOWER than not just any river- but the MIGHTY MISSISSIPPI.
markh, conway, ar
New Orleans should not be rebuilt. This *will* happen again in a few years. I am sure some will be interviewed, when it does, and will say "Can you believe this happened again! - What is the government going to do for ME now?" If I built my house under a large rock held up by twigs and it, one day, crushed it - why would I expect the government to bail me out of a dumb decision - I made - to build a house in such an *obviously* dangerous location!
Tom, willmington,
will go down as one of the three worst presidents in American history, maybe the worst. totally incompetent and the cost to America in so many ways is staggering, like New Orleans,human lifes, human life, the environment, world image, respect for the law.
walter palmer, ny, ny