Tim Reid in Washington
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
President Bush yesterday rejected calls from Britain and the European Union to take a tougher approach on global warming when he renewed his opposition to binding cuts in greenhouse gas emissions.
Speaking at his own climate-change conference in Washington, which European diplomats dismissed as a cynical attempt by the White House to derail UN efforts on a new global-warming accord, Mr Bush called on polluters to cut emissions, but only through voluntary steps.
Before Mr Bush spoke, John Ashton, the special representative on climate change for David Miliband, the Foreign Secretary, expressed Britain’s growing dismay at Washington’s refusal to sign on to mandatory caps on greenhouse gas emissions.
He told The Times that the UN’s effort to forge a new global agreement to succeed the Kyoto Protocol on global warming — which must be done by 2012 — had entered a critical phase. “We cannot do this without binding caps,” Mr Ashton said. “A voluntary approach to greenhouse gases is about as credible as a voluntary approach to speed limits.”
The US is the world’s biggest polluter and European delegates at yesterday’s meeting said that without “real leadership” from the White House in setting binding caps significant progress on tackling global warming will be difficult to achieve.
Connie Hedegaard, the Danish Environment Minister, said: “We need the support of the US, China, India and the other industrialising countries. They will not do anything unless the US is moving.”
The two-day Washington conference was attended by more than 20 of the biggest polluters, including Britain, the EU, China, India and Russia. Mr Bush called on them to come together to set a goal for reducing greenhouse-gas emissions, but, he added, “while keeping our economies growing”.
Mr Bush, who made no attempt to ratify the Kyoto treaty, believes that binding caps will harm the US economy. He said: “Each nation must decide for itself the right mix of tools and technology to achieve results that are measurable and environmentally effective.”
European officials say that the focus of their efforts to change US policy are now on persuading individual US states to follow the lead of California and to look beyond the Bush Administration.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Another shining example of Bush and his Administration's corrupt and self-centered approach to the rest of the world - its embarassing to be an American these days. Roll on 2008!
PA Phoenix
Phil Allsopp, Phoenix, AZ
"Each nation must decide for itself..." - I hope this is not a decision that reflects the general American public, I find it much easier to feel contempt towards the Bush administration than the majority of US citizens.
Jack, Huddersfield, England
When are these blithering idiots going to pay attention and read their own report from the UNIPCC. This states that temp will rise by an average 4.7F by 2100. An average means some hotter, some cooler. Siberia by 9F, Africa by 5F. Does any think we are going to die from this increase? Land heats up for than sea. Night temps would increase the most.. This means that we would wear less clothes in the evening. Statistics for 2003. Heat deaths in Europe 35,000. On the average 200,000 die of heat related deaths. However Europe lost 1.5 MILLION to cold!! Seven times as many as heat. A little heat would SAVE lives. For Britain a 3.6F increase would mean 2,000 more heat deaths, but TWENTY THOUSAND FEWER COLD DEATHS. This assumes we do not know how to keep cool or warm. Heat is more concentrated in Cities-urban heat islands. Cutting CO2 will do nothing except kill more people because they do not have a/c. Wake up read the report. More to come.
Desmond Taylor, Houston, Usa Tx
When Hillary Clinton becomes president of the United States in January, 2009, the industrialized countries of the world will have a responsible U.S. partner in reducing the negative effects of global climate change...if we survive the remaining 15 months of the Bush administration.
Sunny, Tuscaloosa, USA/AL
Fine, Jamie Trotter, Denver, then build a huge bell jar over the U.S. and suffocate in your own dirt but don't blow it into earth's shared atmosphere. Shared resource - shared responsibility and not a sovereign decision.
Matt, Wuerzburg, Germany
The United States of America is its own soverign nation, not a subject of the United Nations. When the president of the USA feels a decision to follow a global warming reduction concept -that in no way violates human rights - is harmful to the USA economy ,which would affect the global economy, then why should sanctions be imposed for that wise decision? I agree that measures should be taken to reduce global warming. This in now way compares, however, to the violation of human rights and the buildup of nuclear weapons by human rights violators.
Jamie Trotter, Denver, Colorado
Now, why should partying on the Titanic come to mind?
Daro, Lymington, Hants, U.K.
It could be time to treat the U.S. like any other country that refuses to follow the guidelines that are ment to protect the world and its people.We impose sanctions againts countrys that try to develop weapons .Is what the U.S. is doing to the enviroment any different ?
John Roberts, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida/U.S.A.
Bush is the winner of this year's King Canute award
http://www.peacesource.net/king_canute_award
His denials will cost the li\ves pf millions of people.
But he has the answer to global warming: nuke Iran start WWIII and nuclear Winter will take care of everything.
Barrie Machin, Perth, AUSTRALIA
Here's an idea. If everyone on the planet held their breath for two minutes how much C02 would not be exhaled into the atmosphere. I've got to try and get Bush on the phone.
Bruce L. Northwood, Washington, D.C., USA
I hope George can hold his ground against the flat earthers in the environmental industrial complex.
warren, calgary, alberta
Roll on Jan 2009. I wonder if the world will survive until then?
gk, Calgary, Canada