Tom Baldwin in Washington
Win Sky+HD for a year and a trip to Barcelona
The assassination may have profound consequences both for the tattered foreign policy of President Bush and for those in the race to succeed him.
Mr Bush made a short and sombre statement at his ranch in Texas, condemning “this cowardly act by murderous extremists who are trying to undermine Pakistan’s democracy”.
Officials cut short their holidays to assess the impact on Pakistan, a pivotal ally in the fight against al-Qaeda. An intelligence report in July gave warning that its border region with Afghanistan had become a safe haven for terrorists.
Last week the US Congress imposed new conditions on military aid, requiring Pakistan to make “concerted efforts” to tackle the problem.
The Administration had invested much of its remaining diplomatic capital in attempting to broker reconciliation between Ms Bhutto and President Musharraf. Condoleezza Rice, the Secretary of State, persuaded Ms Bhutto to end her eight-year exile in October, while US officials put intense pressure on President Musharraf to resign as army chief and lift a state of emergency earlier this month.
Hopes that President Musharraf would offer a genuine power-sharing deal had begun to fade before yesterday. Sources said the White House would be watching to see if he goes ahead with the elections on January 8.
Yesterday, the White House insisted that any decisions about whether planned elections that Ms Bhutto’s party was expected to win on January 8 should go ahead were a matter for Pakistan’s government, but sources suggested that Mr Bush and his advisers would be watching closely to see if Mr Musharraf used the killing to justify a postponement.
There was also speculation, which the White House did little to dispel, that FBI officers could offer assistance in discovering who was behind the assassination. A spokesman for Mr Bush said yesterday that there were questions about why an investigation into a previous assassination attempt against Ms Bhutto had yielded so little information.
Hillary Clinton said that she was “profoundly saddened and outraged”. The Democrat presidential candidate added: “Her death is a terrible reminder of the work that remains to bring peace, stability and hope to regions of the globe too often paralysed by fear, hatred and violence.”
Her chief rival for the Democratic nomination, Barack Obama, said: “We will be steadfast in our desire to end the types of terrorist attacks that have blighted not just Pakistan but the rest of the world.”
The assassination, coming only a week before the Iowa caucuses, may switch voters’ attention away from domestic concerns, such as the economy or immigration, which had begun to dominate the debate.
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2006
£14,337
2008
£39,937
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
£
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
1 & 2 Bed apartments
From £249,995
Great Investment, River Views
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
low-cost ownership homes in London
Las Vegas SALE!
£POA
With Ramblers Worldwide Holidays!
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
this is great.
americans can watch yet another iraq invasion on tv over dinner after the new president steps up, only this time it will be in pakistan.
the only reason US foriegn policy becomes so important in pakistans case is because its got nuclear weapons, unlike the other countries the US government has decided to aid or invade or blow up. so i guess here its aiding? unless the next pakistan elections produce a pro-taleban prime minister. there go the country's intellectuals, the poets, artists, students and all progressive people struggling to shrug off the extremist plague. they can become collateral, and it'll be okay because the world will only see the violent fundamentalists on tv. cause it looks less barbaric to do away with barbarians when civilised voters are watching. do we believe everything the media shows? of course. thats what the multibillion dollar industrys for.
in any case welcome troops, experience a new exotic country, meet the people and kill them.
Sana, Karachi, Pakistan
Article's headline, "Race to Replace Bush as President" is nonsense. Bush is not on the 2008 ballot. U.S. Constitution (amended since the days of FDR) limits President to two four-year terms. To cousin "SC" of London, I can't say which is worse; being unable to find (West) Pakistan on a map, or not knowing the U.S. Constitution whilest offering political commentary nonetheless.
Ralph Thayer, New London, Connecticut - USA
it is a fact we have ALWAYS butted into the worlds business.
pretending to be good parents.. the overseers. we choose charity and military actions usually by our corporate investments
and in fact usa corporations found cheap labor and infused politically and socially immature countries with lots of monetary power in many places around the world
kinda like giving a teenager a trust fund...in some cases a 5 year old.
instead of dealing with our transport needs here we made a few in the middle east very very wealthy. now look.
because the corps and a few wanted the profits.. and the elite is never so worried about the extraneous costs ( Fine print:CASUALTIES OF CORPORATE PROFIT)
expect more of the same.
and we and the others who have done this too ARE responsible.
but will the profiteers ever fully own up and take full responsibility?
in this NEW YEAR 2008?
MACDOODLE, BERKELEY, CA
Sir,
I doubt that many of our cousins would have been able to place Pakistan on the map.
SC, London, United Kingdom
I think the US primaries which start in only a few days will show that the people in the US will elect a leader who has the experience to deal effectively with foreign policy. Polls are already showing the shift away from Obama and Huckabee to Clinton, McCain, and Giuliani.
Jenny, Austin, TX/USA
Ah, yes...another opportunity for the average lobotomized TV zombie American to be distracted from issues of domestic substance. Sigh.
I think that the average American IS in fact much more concerned about domestic issues than what happens 'over there' (consider our long history of isolationism), but the various political and media machines will nonetheless grind hell out of this story as a way of manupulating whatever political advantage they think that they can.
Demosthenes, Cottage Grove, Oregon
The General Election is almost a year away - anything can happen in that time and even if the electorate would be concerned today, it is unlikely that they would be by next November, unless of course a) some major tragedy occurs in the continental United States which can be directly attributed to some foreign force or b) a major conflagration erupts elsewhere which requires America's involvement. In previous world wars, the United States has been slow to act, but perhaps not next time. But in any case, the events of the last 24 hours are unlikely to switch voters' immediate concerns. Ask again next October.
David Cunard, Los Angeles, United States
"Tattered foreign policy." *sigh*
Maybe we ought to go back to being isolationists so we don't tatter it some more.
gb, Austin, USA
You overestimate American's interest in foreign policy. The 2008 election will be primarily on domestic issues.
Scott, Rochester, USA/Mn
I hope so but I think most of the people in the USofA are brain dead as far as world foreign policy goes. They just don't get it and I think the media in this country (USA) do not realize the significance of this event.
Livin' In The USA
Tom Grattan, Mendocino, CA,. USA