Magnus Linklater and Dominic Kennedy
Pick up your copy of Joy Division: Closer at WHSmith today
Nato has begun an investigation into British findings that wind farms make overflying planes invisible to radar as military chiefs fear a security threat from the rapid spread of the turbines.
The US has been attending tests by Britain’s Air Warfare Centre after it made the surprise discovery that the energy plants create blind spots in air defences.
Renewable energy campaigners have been stung by a spate of last-minute objections from the Ministry of Defence to proposed new wind farms in northeast England and the Scottish Borders.
Nato’s alarm about this potential Achilles’ heel against airborne terrorists or invaders is disclosed in evidence, seen by The Times, for a planning inquiry.
The MoD is now objecting routinely to all wind farms within line of sight of radar stations, irrespective of distance. There is currently no known technical solution.
Evidence was given by Squadron Leader Chris Breedon, opposing a 48-turbine wind farm at Fallago Rig in the Lammermuir Hills in Scotland. “As a result of MoD trials proving that wind turbines adversely influence the performance of military and civilian radar systems operating within radar line of sight, Nato has become concerned about the rapid increase in the number of wind turbine farm projects under planning or in development in a number of Nato countries,” he said.
Britain is leading an investigation by the Nato Research & Technology Organisation into the impact of wind turbines on radar. The first meeting of a newly created technical group, involving the US, France, Italy, Norway, Belgium, the Netherlands and Greece, took place in London in June. The experts will review all scientific evidence from trials, consult the wind farm industry and civil aviation authorities, decide what new trials are needed and recommend policy changes.
A cloud will hang over the wind farm industry for years as the alliance’s report is not due to be presented to Nato’s sensors and electronic technology panel until 2010. A review will take place the following year.
Britain discovered the blind spots during tests over a Welsh wind farm in 2004. Pentagon experts were invited to observe subsequent trials.
President Bush’s Administration was so anxious initially that it introduced an immediate moratorium on all wind farms in line of sight of its own military radars. Since then the stance has been softened and each new US wind farm is now considered on a case-by-case basis.
There is still no sign of a solution to the British impasse caused by the MoD’s objections to wind farms in line of sight of its radar stations. Although Britain refuses to say how far the line of sight extends, a Pentagon report suggests a 60-mile radius.
The problem is urgent because the stations tend to be on the east coast and the North Sea has been earmarked for a major expansion of offshore wind farms.
Since 9/11, radar policy has been dominated by fears of an airborne terrorist attack launched inside British air space, rather than an invasion from overseas. Air Chief Marshal Sir Jock Stirrup, Chief of the Defence Staff, has given a firm direction that radar surveillance capability must not be degraded.
Despite the MoD’s stance, John Hutton, the Energy Secretary, went ahead with an announcement in December of 7,000 new turbines by 2020.
In a key climate change speech last autumn, the Prime Minister said that he had asked Des Browne, the Defence Secretary, and Mr Hutton “to step up their efforts . . . and test technical solutions to the potential difficulties that wind farms pose to air traffic and defence radar”.
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2006
£14,337
2008
£39,937
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
Competitive package
Npower
Midlands
£
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
1 & 2 Bed apartments
From £249,995
Great Investment, River Views
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
low-cost ownership homes in London
Multi–Centre 9 Nights
From only £925pp
View thousands of properties online with your Vacation Rental People
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Is it a good idea to have firms like Energy Kontor based in East Germany operating wind turbines which can effect the radar protection of the UK. I was told they will be directly operated form East Germany. What happens if the sell the company on to Russia for instance or some other Country
Catherine, cupar, fife
Sounds to me like a consortium of special interests mounting a campaign to devalue wind energy which is currently cost competitive with coal, natural gas, nuclear, and oil.
As for birds -- buildings cause far more deaths of birds than wind farms ever will. Just another smear on an energy resource that will help make the west less dependent on imports.
Robert Marston, Portsmouth,
As an objector to a wind farm sited very close to the east coast we are well aware of the problems with radar. We already have three wind farms which currently cause problems for NATS, and am sure that further applications will follow creating even more difficulties. This area 'Bomber County, has always been the first line in defence and is recognised as a 'special case' - when will this Government realise the extent of the problems caused by turbines, to which there is no solution as present.
Jill Lingard, Louth, England
Wonderful News!!! Pull the existing eyesores down. Solar and nuclear energy is the correct path to follow.
paul freeman, London, UK
It wasn't an accidental discovery, it is a well know phenomina that moving objects are picked up by radar. Wind farms just cover a large area of land and so their affects on radar can make it difficult to see a plane crossing over them. Plenty of research has been done in this area a comprehensive report was written by Gavin Poupart in 2003.
Solutions exist! BAe systems and Selex have been developing systems to filter out the wind turbine signals and QinetiQ have been developing a system of incorperating radar absorbing material into the blades of wind turbines.
These solutions were presented in 2006 and are still being developed.
Annie , NOttingham, UK
So you build a 1 Mega Watt wind farm, if the wind blows at 12 metres per second (gale force 5-6). It becomes a 100 kilo Watt wind farm at a wind speed of 6m/s, and a 10kilowatt wind farm at 3m/s, if it works at all as 3m/s is borderline to get the blades to turn. Useful stuff - wind energy - NOT!
Nigel MacDonald, Camborne, UK
Wow I bet history will vindicate the decision to stop building windfarms due to these radar blackspots.
"Hundreds of millions of people died from runaway climate change" they will say.
"But at least we made sure no hijacked planes would vanish off the radar screen for 30 seconds, which would truly have been a disaster."
Zane Alcorn, Melbourne, Australia
SO there nuclear weapons and aircraft are more important than clean energy to them. This is proof they really don't care about. Who cares about radars. Clean energy is more important and so is our lungs. The mod attacked iraq illegally
Mike, torbay,