Chris Ayres in Los Angeles
2 for 1 tickets to Casablanca, this coming Monday

A Mayfair mining company has caused uproar with plans to extract uranium from the Grand Canyon – prompting one official to ask how Britons would react “if an American company went to drill at Stonehenge”.
The Grand Canyon is not only one of the world’s most famous natural landmarks, attracting five million visitors a year and offering a home to bald eagles, condors, bighorn sheep and exotic fish. It also happens to contain vast reserves of uranium ore – suddenly in huge demand, thanks to renewed interest in nuclear power as part of the search for “green” fuel.
But while demand for uranium has risen, supply has fallen as mines have closed in Canada and West Africa. As a result, the price has soared – and that has sparked a rush to find new deposits.
The Mayfair company VANE Minerals is at the forefront of this scramble, planning to drill at up to 39 spots on seven sites within the Kaibab National Forest, which borders both the north and south rims of the Grand Canyon, in north-central Arizona. A further thousand claims are thought to be pending from other companies – up from just ten in 2003.
National Park officials, Indian tribal leaders and even some scientists are doing everything they can to stop the exploration, going so far as to call a congressional “field hearing” in Flagstaff, Arizona. “The Grand Canyon is something we depend on for visitors, for tourism, it’s one of the wonders of the world, and here we are as the federal Government allowing the distinct possibility of uranium mining,” Raul Grijalva, a congressman for the state, said.
Environmentalists point out that uranium is both a toxic heavy metal and a source of radiation. As a result it could kill local wildlife and poison the water in the Colorado River Aqueduct, which provides drinking water to Los Angeles and much of southern California, Tribal leaders also complain that they have previously been forced to clean up after bankrupt mining concerns, while radiological assessments at one past exporation site – the Orphan Mine – have shown gamma-radiation at more than 450 times the background level after uranium was brought closer to the surface.
Yet with fears rising over global warming, many argue that the dangers of continuing to burn coal for electricity far outweigh the potential dangers of uranium mining. And while solar, tidal and wind technologies show promise, they are nowhere near as reliable.
Kris Hefton, chief operating officer of VANE Minerals, has tried to reassure environmentalists by arguing that his industry is far more safety-conscious than it was. “I’m not talking about the industry of 50 years ago that impacted the Navajo Nation,” he told the congressional hearing. “We ask you to judge our industry on its current performance rather than on past, unrelated events.” The company reportedly believes that the deposits in the Grand Canyon are of a higher grade than elsewhere in the US, because they are in geological formations known as “breccia pipes”. This means the mine could be profitable even if the uranium price falls.
VANE Minerals’ exploration permits were initially approved by the Forest Service, which cited laws created during the Wild West era to allow mining on public land. The permits were granted with minimal conditions, such as bore areas being close to existing roads, but were immediately challenged by environmentalists in the US District Court, where a federal judge issued a temporary restraining order.
In an interview over the weekend with the Los Angeles Times, Taylor McKinnon, a public lands advocate for the Centre for Biological Diversity – one of the parties that sued for the restraining order – raised questions over the safety of the exploration, such as whether floodwater could pass through the bore hole and contaminate the water supply. “We don’t know because there wasn’t an analysis,” he said.
Mr McKinnon added that VANE did not understand the importance of the Grand Canyon to Americans. “What if an American company went to drill at Stonehenge?” he asked.
A full hearing of the case is expected to be held this summer.
Power politics
— Uranium is a very dense radioactive metal, occurring naturally in rocks and seawater, with a melting point of 1132C (2070F)
— It was apparently formed in supernovae about 6.6 billion years ago. Its slow radioactive decay in the Earth’s mantle heats the planet
— After mining, the ore is crushed and treated with acid. This dissolves the uranium, which is then extracted from the solution
— It is used in building yachts and aircraft, in medicine and food preservation, but more often in the production of nuclear power
— Uranium now sells for around $65/lb, up from $9.70 in 2002
Sources: Uranium Information Centre, archives
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love.
Have you ever dreamed of owning your own racehorse or a beautiful painting?
Enjoy comfort, safety, space and great design. Plus enter our great competition
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
Do you have what it takes to be a Times photographer?
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
Find out to make the most of your money with our wealth management guides
Need help with your property? We have an entire how to guide - buying, selling, letting, moving, to help you
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
We are seeking entries for the inaugural Sunday Times Best Green Companies Awards
Enjoy some wonderful inspiring wildlife moments
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Overseas contacts and local business information

Direct from the farms
2007/07
£57,500
South East England
2007/57
£22,950
The Midlands
2006/06
£41,995
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
£40-55k+benefits+uncapped commission
Morgan Keating
South East
£60k plus excellent benefits
Barclaycard
Stockton / Northampton
£
£55,000 - £75,000 plus bonus and benefits
Diligenta
Based in Peterborough
£45,000 - £70,000 plus bonus and benefits
Diligenta
Based in Peterborough
Globrix, the property search engine
Visit Times Online Property for homes for sale or rent
Residential development site with planning permission
£1,500,000
Mortgages, bank accounts & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Dinarobin Hotel Golf & Spa 7 nights
From £1830 per person – saving £530.
Smart prices on ATOL protected holidays
Excellent online info & holiday selection.
Walt Disney World Resort Florida SALE!
From £619 per person!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Environmentalism is a branch religion now... and must be kept out of government. If people would look at the world's problems objectively we'd be able to solve them... but this reaction to a reasonable proposal proves the point that environmentalists are no different from religious radicals
Jon, Albuquerque, USA
Well, having been to Stonehenge, I think a drill rig 30-40 miles away (as is the case at Grand Canyon) would be preferable to the busy freeway and frontage road that goes by Stonhenge.
Also, the photo is from Utah and shows Navajo Formation with underlying Kayenta Formation in the distance.
Bill Thompson, Denver, USA
As the Colorado River sliced its way through thousands of feet of rock to create the Grand Canyon, it also washed hundreds, perhaps thousands, of uranium deposits down through the canyon and to lands below. Mining will remove these deposits as future sources of contamination!
Tom Pool, Golden, Colorado, USA
Uranium and oil are both bad for the world. Why don't we force the nuclear and petroleum companies to allow Hydrogen cars and Hydrogen power plants and get rid of the deadly nuclear power and oil for fuel??? These Corperate Mobters need to be put out of bussiness. There are many suppressed ideas
Jason, Newark, U.S.A.
The mining isn't proposed to be IN the park (though historic U mining occurred there). It is to be in the National Forest lands outside of the National Park. And the photo accompanying the article is from Utah. The Grand Canyon National Park is in Arizona. Facutal reporting would be nice.
George Byers, Oklahoma City,
What if an American company went to drill at Stonehenge?
It's completely irrelevant. I would HOPE that british law would be stringent enough to stop them - being a world heritage site and all.
The americans really shouldn't criticise us because their laws don't work the way they want them to.
pete, york, uk
A century ago, Hopi prophets warned that mining and drilling the Earth would be toxic to humankind. Doomsday scriptural prophecies are vague, while this Hopi prediction was specific about mining and drilling and is in fact coming true. As for nuclear power, it only takes one accident to kill us all
alan gorg, venice, los angeles
The greens cannot have it both ways. If they insist that fossil fuels cannot be burned to save the planet from global warming, then nuclear power is necessary. It's illogical to complain about the environment when uranium ore has to be mined. Would they prefer a monster windfarm instead?
Dwight Vandryver, Scholar Green, Cheshire, UK
The mining operation/cleanup would most likely last 10-15 years -24/7 - blighting the landscape with noisy drilling rigs, thousands of well heads, a central processing plant using up millions of gallons of water, many vehicles per day transporting the uranium. = Radioactivity is forever.
alexis hmielak, ft. collins, USA
The Centre for Biological Diversity is playing games. They find a judge that shares their Environmentist views and have him put an Induction on the drilling. All the drill holes will be filled so that no ground water can transfer to different formations. We need this mineral instead of coal.
David A. Lacy, Blanding, USA
The article headline is misleading. The breccia pipes are outside the boundaries of the Grand Canyon national park does that mean that the national park boundaries have increased.
Andrew, Plymouth, UK
Except that VANE MINERALS (VML.L) would not be drilling in the Grand Canyon but 3 miles outside. They would drill a small hole down and all mining would be underground within that very small shaft - that's what pipe is. After about two years the hole is filled leaving no evidence including radiation
Dave, Birmingham,
NO!
Marc, Antrim,
Look, in the future this will be happening more and more
as the earth's resources start to dwindle.
And dwindle it will. There is just so much then no more.
Humans are eating this planet alive.
Jerry Scroggin, Phoenix, Arizona/USA