Hannah Strange
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition

US government scientists have warned of a rising death toll from heat waves, wildfires, disease and smog caused by global warming, in a study the White House repeatedly tried to bury to avoid regulating greenhouse emissions.
In a 149-page analysis released last night, experts for the first time laid out the grave risks that climate change poses to human health, and to the supplies of food, water and energy on which populations depend.
“Risk to human health, society and the environment increases with increases in both the rate and magnitude of climate change,” scientists at the Environmental Protection Agency said. In a more absolute pronouncement on the science of climate change than the White House has so far been prepared to accept, they said that global warming was “unequivocal,” and that humans were to blame.
The document warns that extreme weather events, such as hurricanes, and diseases carried by ticks and other organisms could kill more people as temperatures rise. Intensifying heat waves will result in increased mortality, particularly amongst the young and old, while flooding could impact water quality.
Allergies could become more severe because climate change could produce more pollen, it says, while worsening smog will increase the risk of respiratory illness, asthma and even premature death, it says. However at the same time, global warming could mean fewer illnesses and deaths due to cold.
Food supplies are likely to diminish as crops fail, while water is expected to become more scarce as a result of greater evaporation and reduced snowpack, leading to increased competition for resources.
The scientists also raised the nightmare prospect of repeats of the catastrophe suffered by New Orleans during Hurricane Katrina. Not only is the United States set to experience increasingly severe and frequent hurricanes, rising sea levels mean coastal communities face worsening flooding in the event of storms.
"This is a long-awaited EPA analysis that has been kept under wraps by the White House,” Vickie Patton, deputy general counsel of the Environmental Defense Fund, said. “This document inescapably, unmistakably shows that global warming pollution not only threatens human health and welfare, but it is adversely impacting human health and welfare today.
“What this document demonstrates is that the imperative for action is now.”
The Bush administration has long worked to discourage a connection between climate change and public health. Acknowledging such a link would compel it to regulate greenhouse gases, a move the President has resisted throughout his tenure in office.
The analysis was produced as part of a response to a 2007 Supreme Court ruling that under the Clean Air Act, the EPA must regulate greenhouse gases unless it could provide a scientific reason not to do so. The ruling came after number of states and environmental groups brought a landmark case against the EPA for refusing to restrict exhaust gases from cars.
But EPA chief Stephen Johnson, a cabinet level member of the Administration who has frequently courted controversy with his apparent refusal to act on the findings of his scientists, signalled last night that he would not bow to the court’s demands.
After the White House on Friday dismissed the scientists’ findings, insisting that the 1970 law was the wrong tool to control global warming pollution, Mr Johnson fell in line, saying greenhouse gases should be considered as a separate issue by Congress.
He declined to take immediate steps, instead declaring a 120-day period for public comment on a nearly 1,000-page response to the Supreme Court ruling. Any action during the Bush administration is therefore unlikely.
It is not the first time that the administration, including Mr Johnson, has set itself against EPA scientists.
In December, the White House refused to open an e-mail from the EPA that included findings similar to those released yesterday on the links between climate change and public health.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Ummm Why would scientist from the EPA, NASA or NOAA need grant money? They work for very large organizations with hefty budgets! They get paid regardless of their findings!
John, Columbus, USA
Global Warming ate my homework!
boo hoo
b, Cardiff , Wales
The US form of government will eventually fail, because it did not listen to its scientists. Politicians in the US and elsewhere continue to take the denial road to problem solution. Only idiots would reject scientific facts and advise from their scientists.
Jim Wills, Brisbane, Australia
In order to "Have Your Say", you should know what you are talking about. Global climate change has always been called that by scientists not because there is no temperature change but instead due to the fact that temperature change is NOT the only aspect of climate. Look it up.
James, New Brunswick, US
Jerry, maybe when your children start suffering some of these terrible disease then maybe you can curtail your polluting ways. But by then it will be too late, we all know scientist need grants but we can already see rise in all these mentioned disease not only in the US but around the world.
Naleen Lal, Northern California,
What does Hurricane Katrina have to do with climate change?
It was just a normal hurricane. The levies were inadequate and residents should have been evacuated. Human error and stupidity caused the catastrophe. Not the hurricane.
Alex Majthenyi, Scarsdale, USA
I want the President to get a "second opinion". Hopefully, the 120 day public comment period will accomplish this.
If mankind has made the planet "sick", especially if the "cure" is so economically devistating to humans, a second opinion is in order.
Jeff, Columbus, USA
Based on the ' science ' that the EPA uses I will predict a new deadly health scourge. Carrots. I believe everyone who ate a carrot in the Middle Ages died. Proof indeed of how deadly these seemingly innocent veggies really are. Data is not in for 20th Century, but initial results look bad.
Desmond Taylor, Houston, USA TX
Scientists looking to scare up some gov't grant money. The fact that "Global Warming" has morphed into "Climate Change" (since it has not warmed up in the last ten years) says it all. The emperor has no clothes on.
Jerry, seattle, us