You need Flash Player 8 or higher to view video content with the ROO Flash Player.
Click here to download and install it.
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
The breakthrough on Capitol Hill that delivered a tentative deal on the $700 billion rescue plan for the US economy came just after midnight, following hours of tense negotiations, shouting matches, phone calls to President Bush, and even an emergency delivery of pizza and burgers.
The verbal deal, which was posted online in written form last night and will head to the House of Representatives for a vote as early as today, came after one of the most intense and extraordinary sessions of legislative wrangling in modern times. Hank Paulson, the exhausted US Treasury Secretary, finally persuaded the Republican and Democratic leaderships to agree to a compromise hours before the Asian markets opened.
Although many conservative Republicans remain opposed to the deal, both sides now hope that there is enough cross-party support — in both the House and the Senate — for Mr Bush to sign into law within a matter of days the greatest government financial intervention since the Great Depression of the 1930s.
Early this morning, it appeared that enough of the Republicans were falling in line behind the rescue package to make its passage more assured.
After compromises from the White House, Democrats and Republicans, the deal will effectively give Mr Paulson $350 billion immediately to start buying toxic mortgage-related assets, while the second $350 billion will have to be approved by Congress. It includes limits on pay and severance packages for executives, strict oversight of the spending, profits for taxpayers should the plan work, and powers for the government to renegotiate mortgages for struggling homeowners.
One factor believed to have clinched the deal was a proposal by Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House, that if the plan was not profitable within five years, then the Wall Street institution bailed out will have to begin reimbursing taxpayers.
“The party is over,” she said later. “The era of golden parachutes for high-flying Wall Street operators is over. No longer will the US taxpayer bail out the recklessness of Wall Street."
After a rebellion by House conservatives stymied hopes of a deal on Thursday, Mr Paulson resurrected the talks at 3pm on Saturday in the second-floor Capitol Hill office of Mrs Pelosi, just off the Rotunda. By the time a deal had been struck nine hours later, the Treasury Secretary’s original three-page plan — delivered to Congress 10 days ago — had swelled to more than 100 pages.
From 3pm to 5.30pm, Mr Paulson met members of both parties around the huge table in Mrs Pelosi’s conference room, under a portrait of President Abraham Lincoln.
Also present at the table were party and legislative leaders, including Mrs Pelosi, Roy Blunt, representing House Republicans, Judd Greg, the New Hampshire senator and senior Republican on the Budget Committee, and an array of other Democrats, including Barney Frank, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee. At one point Max Baucus, the Democratic chairman of the Senate Committee on Finance, shouted at the Treasury Secretary about the curbs on executive pay.
Mr Paulson became so vexed by the fact that Democrats outnumbered Republicans by nine to two that he rang Mr Reid to demand that some leave. Mr Reid refused.
Later, the group split up and decamped to three separate rooms, with Mr Paulson setting up a quasi-command centre in the chambers of John Boehner, the Republican House Minority leader, sitting on a sofa surrounded by aides in chairs.
In nearby corridors, bemused and startled tourists stared as cameramen barged each other aside to get footage of the politicians huddling outside the negotiations. In a sign that the negotiations were entering a critical stage, early in the evening an aide to Mrs Pelosi demanded the surrender of BlackBerrys by all her staff — they were placed in a bin — so that no details of the plan would leak out.
Meanwhile, phone calls were repeatedly being made, including ones between Mrs Pelosi and Mr Bush, to and from Mr Paulson and John McCain and Barack Obama, and between the two candidates and senior members of their respective parties.
There were even calls placed to Warren Buffett, the hugely respected investor, who had cautioned that a failure to reach a deal would trigger “the biggest financial meltdown in American history”.
Mr Bush, who gave warning last week of financial catastrophe if a deal was not reached, tried to convince Americans in his weekly radio address that the plan was not simply a bailout of Wall Street.
“The rescue effort that we’re negotiating is not aimed at Wall Street — it’s aimed at your street,” he said.
Just after 8pm, pizzas were delivered to the Paulson team in Mr Boehner’s office. Democratic staffers ordered burgers from Five Guys, while a platter from the sandwich shop Cosi arrived at Mrs Pelosi’s suite of rooms.
“This is Saturday night,” said Mr Conrad to reporters at one point. “You have the Secretary of the Treasury. You have congressional leaders. And there’s a reason we are here — because there’s a great feeling of responsibility to get a package as quickly as we can while doing it as well as we can.”
By 11pm, all had gathered again in Mrs Pelosi’s office to finalise the deal. They emerged in front of the cameras with Mr Paulson at 12.30am to announce that they had a tentative agreement. “We’ve made great progress, but we have to commit it to paper before we can formally agree,” Mrs Pelosi said.
Mr Paulson, bags under his eyes, said: “We’ve been working on this a long time. We’ve still got more to do to finalise it, but I think we’re there.”
Down to details
Size Mr Paulson had wanted $700 billion in one go. But the draft legislation proposes instalments and means that he will have to ask for more when needed. He will get $250 billion initially, another $100 billion after writing a progress report to Congress, with a final $350 billion available later
The taxpayer Rebel Republicans want Wall Street to pay for more of the bailout. The draft Bill includes an insurance scheme, which would force troubled banks to pay a premium to the US Treasury in return for Washington guaranteeing their assets.
However, included in the Bill is a critical new measure designed to protect the taxpayer: If the $700 billion is not paid back to the taxpayer through the sale of toxic assets or through the value of the Government's stakes in the banks within five years, the financial institutions that benefited from the bailout must pay the shortfall back
Oversight The draft Bill will include measures to set up an oversight board, made up of lawmakers from both parties. Any transactions by the fund would have to be made public
Executive pay Democrats have got their way on capping executive pay. The Bill will tax executives more heavily if they receive multimillion-dollar severance packages. Washington will also remove some tax breaks for banks if they benefit in a particular way from the bailout, making it more expensive to give executives salaries of more than $500,000 a year. Washington also gets the right to claw back money from executives retrospectively
Housing Some Democrats wanted to force lenders to cut interest rates to help struggling borrowers. It is believed that this has been replaced with an extended tax holiday for those who cannot make their repayments and a clause allowing the Treasury to change the terms of mortgages
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Just saw BBC news at ten where it said the bill had been rejected... might want to remove/re-write this article.
Allen Mayer, London,
How Ironic! In his book "Virtues", by Bob Bennett, is a story of when Abe Lincoln wouldn't give his own brother-in-law a loan until he started paying back some of the loans he already had. Abe was smart. And there is Paulson sitting right under Abe's portrait.
Dave, Tecumseh, MI,
I understood that $400 billion of the $700 billion is the cash already committed by the US government.
Ron , Surrey, UK
The voters of America who are "fighting" for the plan to be dropped are like turkeys lobbying madly to bring Christmas forward 3 months. They have absolutely no idea what they are doing.
victor , Hamilton,
The world faces economic collapse and the bail out plan is held up because Mr Paulson wants to protect Wall Street executives' pay. This shows the real purpose of his plan. Congress should have insisted that the executives responsible for the crisis be fired immediately and replaced.
peterfieldman, paris, france
Relax, chillout everyone. In case you missed it, this crisis is a result of 377 people in the London office of A.I.G. If you want to read the full disclosure and mud-slinging or (how it's all their fault) checkout the New York Times...
Phil , Atlanta, USA
you know the tax payers paid for those Pizzas and Burgers too..I think that ticks me off more than the 'buy-out'
Benoni, Pittsburgh, USA
With the US already in unbelievable debt ($70 trillion?), bogged down in two overseas 'wars', and involved in a programme of World expansionism, HOW is this money going to be repaid, at interest, to the Fed (which, of course, is a PRIVATE bank)? Why only 3 comments from the US on this?
william, hereford, UK
We can kiss $700bn of taxpayers money good-bye! Gone...like autumn leaves before the wind.
Garth Strong, Houston, USA
"Agreed"!? Not yet blokes. It ain't over 'til it's over. Some of us are still fighting it.
Bob Hall, New York, United States
If this bailout goes through, the people of America will revolt, get the tar and feathers ready.
Arthur Guy, Gloucester, England
They order pizza and burgers on Capitol Hill, and there are tourists wandering around while they are trying to save the economy...Amazing! What kind of madhouse is it?
S.McDonald, cambridge,
Russell, Monaco - the plan aims to stop the situation you describe - rather than banks selling the assets at a steep loss they sell them to the govt for close to face value (hence the anger) - the govt then holds them to maturity or such a time that they can sell them in an orderly market.
Huw Sayer, London, England
And who dares say that this all started with deregulation of banking industry in the '90s. Social activism, ACORN, Obama, pushed for granting of mortgages to people on welfare who were totally unqualified normally, but political correctness demanded they own houses. Thanks to Obama for this mess.
Emma, Cannondale, Connecticut, USA
The American people deserve better than this! What a shame such a great country should resort to bailouts.
Perhaps the Bush administration should answer for the billions spent on war-making when hundreds of thousands of Americans don't even have access to healthcare!
jmar, Thessaloniki, Greece
I believe there were two options:
1.Honest and depressing
2.Corrupt and alarming
With option 2 the US govt. will soon stiff their creditors rather than pay their bills. Deflation will give way to inflation and the dollar-based money system will perish.
Dick Cheney's moving to Dubai, hmm. Scared?
NDG, Tokyo, Japan
If you are a non OECD reserve bank governor you are going to turn your pile of greenbacks into something the Fed can't print or the Congress cannot legislate. Gold, oil, gas, coal, the base metals and the the bulk commodites like iron ore. Spread the risk from the contagion.
Alberto Jorge, Perth, Australia
There is a failure of trust in the government and the media when it comes to reporting this story . And it comes of no surprise that many American voters will be angry if this bill becomes law. And will use there votes wisely this year when the election is being run.
Clive, Dartford, Kent
I wasn't sure about Paulson before, but his choice of pizza in preference to burgers or sandwiches has earned him my respect.
The question Americans should now be asking themselves is this: Did he go for Pepperoni, Ham & Mushroom or a Hawaiian? Surely not Tuna...
Luke, Bernede, France
Not sure what the big deal is... this amount of money is a drop in the ocean to the US government. It can simply cut spending on its overseas and military programmes.
T, UK,
It is time everybody to avoid the greenback. Probably China and Japan are going to become the biggest losers because of both their huge currency reserves to convert into greedbacks or nearly nothing and in addition the USAs commodity market would collapse anyhow not to have real money to buy export goods.
Alexey, Moscow,
Regretably this is only just starting with worse to come!What happens when the banks start to sell the toxic assets?They will be selling at a large discount hence a large loss.Therefore further balance sheet writedowns,weakened capital bases and the problems with start all over again.
Russell, Monaco,
Congress will be purchasing assets on the cheap pennies on the dollar that they can flip when the markets get better, sweet deal and should give the US taxpayers a good return on investment.
Paul Bahre, Granby, CT, USA
A major cause of the crisis was money paid as salary and bonuses to executives that should have been retained as reserves for handling risk.
See the article "Behind Biggest Insurers Crisis, a Blind Eye to a Web of Risk" in the New York Times.
Keith S, Winnipeg, Canada
The American press isn't reporting this as a "done deal" yet. It goes to a vote on Monday. The only thing that' s been approved is the text of the bill to be presented before a vote on Capitol Hill.
Emma, Atlanta,
America is a sorry excuse for a country that continues to consider itself a world "superpower". It is officially bankrupt. It is prudent for them to clean up their own backyard than continue to tell the rest of the world what to do.
Tony, Singapore,
* Please give us the link to the full official announcement*
Will it be voted through?
Will it be enough?
Is it workable?
Will it come into force soon enough?
Given a lot of the toxic assets are held outside the US, can it work there too?
N Reed, Truro, UK
So now the money's there. All we don't know is who gets how much for what.
ken scott, stanford, US