Tim Reid of The Times in Las Vegas
Star musicians and your favourite Times writers at the Albert Hall

Commentary: Gerard Baker | Bill Clinton claims vote-rigging | McCain wins South Carolina
Hillary Clinton has won the Nevada caucuses, powering past Barack Obama in a race marred by allegations of dirty tricks and leaving her challenger badly needing victory in South Carolina next week.
Mrs Clinton's victory came with overwhelming support from older voters, women and the Silver State's Hispanic population, with the economy the dominant issue, compared to support for Mr Obama among young people and the state's black community.
Mitt Romney won Nevada's Republican caucus, but it terms of his party's overall race, it will have little impact. Most of his rivals ignored Nevada to focus on today's contest in South Carolina. Mr Romney was the only Republican to campaign in Nevada this week.
The victory marks a second win for Mrs Clinton after her triumph in New Hampshire last week. It leaves Mr Obama, who won the first contest in Iowa on January 3, under increasing pressure to win the South Carolina primary next Saturday, where half the Democratic electorate is African American.
Mrs Clinton won 51 per cent of the vote, with Mr Obama at 45 per cent and the former North Carolina Senator John Edwards placing a distant third on 4 per cent. Mr Edwards vowed to carry on, but after losses in Iowa, New Hampshire and Nevada his campaign is now on life-support.
"I guess this is how the West was won," Mrs Clinton declared, joined on stage at a victory rally with her husband Bill and daughter Chelsea.
The former First Lady, referring to a bruising Nevada, said: "We will all be united in November," she said, as the crowd chanted "H-R-C! H-R-C!"
The demographics of Mrs Clinton's win in Nevada – with support from women, Hispanics, people over 45 and voters with financial concerns – is reflected nationally. Her aides believe such backing could decisively tip the nomination battle in her favour on February 5, "Super Tuesday", when 22 states vote, including the delegate-rich prizes on California, and New York, the state she represents in the Senate.
The Obama campaign tried to undermine Mrs Clinton's victory. It claimed that under the complicated mathematics of the caucus system it had actually been awarded more Nevada delegates than Mrs Clinton - because it won more rural areas - despite her overall six-point win.
“We ran an honest, uplifting campaign in Nevada that focused on the real problems Americans are facing, a campaign that appealed to people’s hopes instead of their fears. That’s the campaign we’ll take to South Carolina and across America in the weeks to come, and that’s how we will truly bring about the change this country is hungry for.”
A senior aide to Mr Obama claimed dirty tricks, saying: “We currently have reports of over 200 separate incidents of trouble at caucus sites.”
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


Overseas contacts and local business information

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests


£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
with annexe accommodation and 5.25 acres
£1,100,000
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Obama won 13 delegates and Mrs Clointon 12, not clear how the 8 superdelegates will go.
Sam Rasrikit, New York, USA
Most states have direct vote PRIMARIES at the usual voting precincts which are fairly constant from election to election. These are the same places the general elections are held. States with CAUCUSES are usually held in fewer locations & voters must travel to them. In some states voters must sign up seperately from their normal voting registration to vote in them. The basic requirements for voting are the same, be of legal age, residence & register. (Sadly, a few states still prohibit convicted felons from voting in ANY election.) In recent years caucuses have become more like primaries; voting takes place in more locations so more party members are able to vote. In all but a few states, voters must be registered listing a particular party to vote in a primary. A couple states have OPEN primaries wherein any registered voter can choose between any one parties' candidates. In the GENERAL election party is irrelevant . Ballots list all party candidates.
Darla Jean Christopher, Macclenny, Florida
Let's see- if Obama won more delegates, did Mrs. Clinton really win? Darn tricky caucuses...
Mike Manning, Knoxville, Tennessee
go to cnn.com's election center. There you will find an explanation of how each of our parties selects delegates for the national convention.
Chris, Texas,
Hi Jeannie,
AFAIK (as a European who's lived in the US for a long time), exactly how the primaries/caucuses are organised is decided by the parties at a state level. For instance, in Washington State, Republicans primary but Dems do both primary and caucus & apportion delegates between the results of the two. In many states, you have to be registered as a democrat or republican to vote in the primary and can only vote within those parameters (again, in Washington state, at one point, you didn't have to be registered with a party to vote in primaries but a court case changed that recently). I don't know if delegates are apportioned according to percentage of votes won in a primary or on a winner-takes-all basis; I think it's the former, but again, this might be on a state-by-state basis. Hope this helps!
B, Seattle, WA, USA
2 pages on who is 1st & 2nd in the Democrat race.
In the Republican race, Ron Paul came in 2nd but there isn 't a single sentence on that.
Phil, Philadelphia, PA USA
Can I make a plea on behalf of other fascinated observers of the primaries (outside the US)? Explain how the 'electorate' for primaries in the various states is composed, and explain whether the result of the primary in each state compels the delegates of that state to nominate the winner of the primary as presidential candidate?
How do you obtain a vote in a primary? Can one indvidual have a Democratic and a Republican and an Independent vote? If there has been an article explaining this stuff in detail, just point me to it - but I have a suspicion that your entertaining commentators are assuming that their readers on the east side of the pond have as much background knowledge as they do. I don't think that these readers do have that background.
jeannie, Perugia, Italy