Sarah Baxter, Los Angeles
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes

FORGET the staged smiles of last week’s televised debate between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama at the home of the Oscars in Los Angeles. With two days to go before Super Tuesday, the contest for the Democratic presidential nomination has turned into a deadly struggle between two political titans.
Nearly half the country is up for grabs in one of the most evenly matched encounters of its kind. The crowds drawn by Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton to their rallies are so huge and the atmosphere so electric that it feels as if America is witnessing the final round of the battle for the White House rather than the preliminary skirmish to decide who will carry forward their party’s banner.
Accusations were flying thick and fast this weekend as the latest polls showed Obama rapidly gaining ground. Gallup’s daily national tracking poll put him just three points behind Clinton yesterday, compared with 11 points behind last Sunday. With Clinton still ahead in most of the biggest states voting this week, however, Obama was running out of time to wrest the mantle of history from his rival.
Tony McPeak, a former four-star air force general who is one of Obama’s advisers, took aim at Clinton’s performance in the New Hampshire primary last month, jeering that his candidate did not “go on television and have crying fits. He isn’t discovering his voice at the age of 60”.
The Obama camp apologised, but Clinton’s surrogates were just as quick on the draw. One of her advisers likened Obama supporters who challenged Clinton’s health care plans to “Nazis marching through Skokie, Illinois”. It was her campaign’s turn to say sorry for overreacting.
If the charismatic Obama, 46, was the first to demonstrate that he could fill a sports stadium when Oprah Winfrey, the television entertainer, joined forces with him in South Carolina last year, Clinton showed last week that she could attract thousands of cheering fans to the home of the Aztecs basketball team in San Diego, California.
“Wow,” she beamed. “This is unbelievable.”
Her supporters refused to be deflated by word that Winfrey was heading back on the campaign trail in California today with Obama’s wife, Michelle, 44, and Caroline Kennedy, 50, President John F Kennedy’s daughter.
“Oprah is a celebrity, but so what?” said Stacey Warnburg, 25, a legal secretary. “I know a lot of people like her, but she is not going to sway my opinion.”
In a sign of his growing confidence, Obama said he had promised his young daughters Melia, nine, and Sasha, six, a dog if he becomes president, although they are “not sure” if they want to move to the White House.
On closer inspection, the Aztecs’ stadium was not as full as it looked for Clinton. Half the hall was closed off by a black curtain. On the one side were 5,000 cheering supporters - 80% of whom were women, and 100% of whom were Democrats. The good news for Clinton is that her admirers are the rock-solid party loyalists most likely to vote on Tuesday.
The other, empty side could be said to represent the missing independents, disaffected Republicans and young first-time voters Obama is drawing to his 10,000-strong rallies - twice the size of hers - furthering his claim to be the best-placed candidate to take on John McCain, the Republican favourite, in a general election.
At one of his enormous rallies he declared that “I believe in the marketplace, I believe in capitalism” - words it is hard to imagine Clinton saying, no matter how centrist her politics.
As Democrats prepare to vote for their standard-bearer on Tuesday, they must decide whether to stick by Clinton, who has won their respect and affection but remains one of the most polarising figures in American politics, or “roll the dice”, as Bill Clinton put it, by choosing Obama, the candidate with the most promise, who has yet to prove that he can deliver.
Addressing the crowd, Hillary Clinton said it was thrilling that either she or Obama was going to “make history” as America’s first woman or first African-American president. For a long time, she had thought making history was her unique destiny. It was an admission that Obama might snatch the crown.
The giant state of California, previously a sure-fire win for Clinton, has suddenly become too close to call. It provides 441 of the 4,049 delegates whose job is to anoint the winner at the Democratic National Convention in August, but they could end up being fairly evenly divided after a Rasmussen poll showed her lead shrinking to three points.
In New Jersey, Obama is only six points behind Clinton, the senator for neighbouring New York. He appears to have been helped by the withdrawal of John Edwards, his rival for the votes of white men, from the race. In Connecticut, on the other side of New York, Obama has taken a four-point lead.
Clinton’s advisers can barely conceal their rage and bewilderment at Obama’s presumptuous challenge. They are seething at the way he has framed the race as a contest between the future and the past. “We do not believe that Senator Obama is ready to practice the politics of hope he talks about,” said Mark Penn, her chief strategist, through clenched teeth, after Obama suggested Clinton was a divisive figure. “He’s bringing out his greatest hits of negative attacks.”
Bill Clinton, who served as Hillary’s attack dog and chief race-baiter in South Carolina, where she lost heavily, has been muzzled after reminding voters too much of the downside of a Clinton co-presidency.
“Of course!” she was obliged to reply to the embarrassing question of whether she could control her husband. “If he did give offence, then I take responsibility and I apologise about that,” she said, swallowing her pride.
Yet it is never wise to write off the Clintons, who are at their most tenacious when fighting for their political lives. Robert Dallek, the historian, sees parallels with 1968, a time of disillusionment with the Vietnam War and political engagement by a new generation.
“This campaign is about calculation versus inspiration. Obama is riding the crest of a wave, but is he going to win?” Dallek asked. “I wouldn’t bet on it. The couple of days before Super Tuesday are going to be absolutely crucial. It could be that this race will end up being between Hillary Clinton and John McCain, just as in 1968 it ended up being between Hubert Humphrey and Richard Nixon, two of the oldest faces you can imagine on the political scene.”
Oddly enough, Obama’s greatest weakness may be his least expected. Some Democrats believe he is less likeable than Clinton, whom they have come to know. “Obama is arrogant,” said Duffy Fitzpatrick, 54, who brought her young son to see Clinton in San Diego. “My daughter was on his bandwagon until she really started watching him and decided that he was full of himself.”
It did not help when Obama appeared to snub Clinton in the Senate before President George W Bush’s State of Union Address last Monday. As she shook hands warmly with Senator Edward Kennedy, his highest-profile supporter, Obama turned his back on her.
Maureen Dowd, the witty columnist for The New York Times, believes Obama is in danger of appearing obnoxious. “You can see him get annoyed in real time, whereas Hillary is better at masking her emotions,” she said, observing him at a rally in Phoenix, Arizona.
Early in the campaign, Dowd suggested in an influential article that Michelle, his wife, seemed obsessed with putting him down, drawing attention to his inability to put his socks in the dirty laundry or make his bed – “a comic routine that rests on the presumption that we see him as a god”. Now she wonders whether Michelle knew something the rest of us did not.
“We may have to tell Michelle to get him down from his pedestal and go on about his socks again,” she said.
Obama is not a seductive figure like John F Kennedy, according to Dallek. “Kennedy was a man with a great deal of charm. Obama’s difficulty is that he comes across as an academic, a man who is very serious, even if he clearly can be quite inspirational.”
His greatest gift is to to talk about America’s problems, from the war in Iraq to the economy, in a manner that radiates optimism. “Who are our greatest presidents? George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, John F Kennedy and Ronald Reagan,” said Dallek. “It speaks volumes about people’s desire for hope and inspiration.”
Bit by bit, Obama has been cutting the ground from under Clinton, rolling out big-name endorsements with theatrical timing. The latest scion of a president to join his supporters’ club is Susan Eisenhower, granddaughter of “Ike”, who promised in yesterday’s Washington Post that “this lifelong Republican” would work for his election as “a man who can salve our national wounds and both inspire and pursue genuine bi-partisan cooperation”.
While rumours abound that Obama might snag the endorsement of Al Gore, the former vice-president and Nobel prize-winner, he has already got the better of the Clinton dynasty by winning the blessing of Ted Kennedy, 75, who is storming across California’s Hispanic community in support of Obama.
There were another 10,000 people at a rally last week for Obama in Arizona, where 17% of the population is Hispanic, yet whites and African-Americans dominated the crowd. Yolanda, a young parking attendant directing cars, said shyly that she was backing Clinton.
Inside, Abby Hansen, 45, a credit manager, described herself as a registered Republican. “I’ve had enough of the Clintons. I’ve never liked them.”
Obama, she said, could beat McCain, the senator for her home state, who, she believes, has never done much for Arizona. “I think we need somebody who is a step above. Obama seems very genuine,” she said.
Obama has struck at the heart of Clinton’s power by raising more money than her from a larger base of donors. In January, he received $32m (£16m), an astounding sum, while Clinton’s camp has remained silent about their fundraising totals.
Obama is already beginning to advertise in seven states beyond Super Tuesday where he believes he will have an edge over Clinton because of the strong presence of African-American voters and independents.
But Clinton is also proving that she can run an innovative campaign by staging the first “national town hall” meeting tomorrow evening – a rally linked by satellite to all 22 Super Tuesday states – and broadcasting it on the Hallmark channel, which specialises in films and kitchen-table dramas aimed at women.
The race appears to be so close that it may not be decided until March 4, when Ohio and Texas vote, or even April 22, when Pennsylvania finally has its say. Both camps are already wooing “superdelegates” – the 796 party notables who can vote as they please at the convention – in case neither candidate emerges with a strong lead.
Clinton has Bill and daughter Chelsea working the phones for her, but Bill’s power is diminishing after he failed to persuade Ted Kennedy to remain neutral.
Janet Napolitano, governor of Arizona, said she was dialling as many colleagues as possible on behalf of Obama. “I’m already on the phone talking to other delegates under the radar,” she said. “They tend to ask different questions from the voters about electability. One of the things I tell them is that he does very well among independent voters.”
Speculation is already growing about who Clinton or Obama would choose as vice-president to balance the ticket. Ted Strickland, the popular governor of the all-important swing state of Ohio, is an obvious pick for Clinton, while Evan Bayh, a senator and former governor of Indiana, which was lost to the Republicans in 2004, could be her second choice.
Some dream of a joint ticket with Clinton as president and Obama as vice-president. “I think Hillary and Obama would be the kiss of death for the Republicans,” said Jordan Stockberger, 20, a student at San Diego State University. “It would bring together all their supporters.”
In last week’s televised debate in Los Angeles – or love-in, as the pundits called it – Obama said that Clinton would be on anybody’s vice-presidential short-list. Clinton laughed appreciatively, but she is still hoping to “make history” without him. Additional reporting: Sara Hashash
The biggest day in the parties' nomination race
What is Super Tuesday?
This Tuesday, voters in 24 of the 50 states select delegates for the two
parties' national conventions, where their presidential candidates will be
officially chosen. Some 2,075 delegates from a total of 4,049 will be chosen
by the Democrats and 1,081 delegates from a total of 2,380 will be chosen by
the Republicans.
What is its significance?
It is the most important indicator of public opinion before the
presidential election itself in November. Big states such as California will
have their say. A decisive victory can win the nomination for a candidate.
President George W Bush and Al Gore both won majorities on Super Tuesday in
2000 and then gained their parties' nominations. In 1992, Bill Clinton
mounted a comeback on Super Tuesday and went on to serve eight years in the
White House.
What are the rules?
They vary by state and between the parties. Most big states select their
delegates in primary elections while many rural states use the caucus system
of party meetings. Primaries will be held on Tuesday in 15 states, caucuses
in the rest.
What makes Super Tuesday different?
Up to now the candidates have been engaged in 'retail' politics, where they
can meet voters in diners or front rooms. They are now engaged in
'wholesale' politics where party organisation, advertising and soundbites
come to the fore.
Isn't this a crazy way to choose a president?
On the contrary. It may be expensive and lengthy (Obama and Clinton raised
more than $100m last year) but the candidates have to prove they have
staying power, grit and the intellectual capacity to debate and campaign
endlessly. It allows voters an opportunity to watch future leaders under
pressure.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
My daughter and I saw Obama about 6 months ago and he was awesome, warm, and inspiring. I know longer get that original feeling-to me he comes off as being full of himself and I feel it probably is due to his instant celebrity, the high power people he is now directly surrounded with, and his inexperience in this highest power political arena (Hillary has been in this arena for years, knows how to handle it, and is comfortable in it). Also, I feel Michele appears to be arrogant and she confirmed it this past week with her "I'll think about it" attitude when asked if she would support Hillary if she ended up being the democratic nominee for president.
Personalities aside- experience, solutions for many of my concerns, and the feeling the she truly cares, are just some of the many reasons I support Hillary for President!
Duffy Fitzpatrick, Murrieta, CA
Sarah,
It is unfortunate you didn't get the quote straight regarding my daughter leaving Barack's bandwagon. My daughter & I saw Barack about 6 months ago and thought he was completely awesome and inspirational. Now I don't get that feeling from him and I feel he has become full of himself due to his instant celebrity, the high power people he obviously is surrounded with, and his inexperience with this new and huge arena (a place Hillary has been for years and is very accustomed to and relaxed in). When I spoke of arrogance-as you know I was speaking of Michele Obama, and she confirmed my feelings in this regard the last week by herI'll think about it" attitude when asked if she would support Hillary if she ended up being the democratic nominee for president.
Duffy Fitzpatrick, Murrieta, CA
"the contest for the Democratic presidential nomination has turned into a deadly struggle between two political titans" Oh, come one now. What our solders are facing in Iraq and Afghanistan is deadly. Can't we just get some decent reporters who write honestly instead of creating bigger than life stuff. Leave that to the fictional writers. Let's get someone up there to write about real issues and observations instead making a TV show. Mabe this writer is trying to get on as a scab writer since the writers are on strike in Hollywood.
Rick Avant, San Antonio, Texas
Washington, D.C. (February 1, 2008) -- Republican Jewish Coalition
Executive Director Matt Brooks responded today to the recent
comments
made by Sen. Barack Obama in an interview with Paris Match
(January
31, 2008).
As reported by Reuters, Sen. Obama said in
this interview: "Once I am elected, I want to organize a summit in
the Muslim world with all the heads of state, to have an honest
discussion about ways to bridge the gap that grows between
Muslims and
the West... I want to ask them to join our fight against
terrorism.
We must also listen to their concerns."
"We are deeply troubled by Senator Obama's desire to
'hold a summit in the Muslim world, with all heads of state' --
many of
whom have yet to renounce terrorism or refrain from anti-Semitic
incitement," said Brooks. "Nowhere in the Paris Match
article does Senator Obama affirm Israel's right to
exist. Nor does he condemn the repeated terrorist strikes
against Israel --
the only stable democracy in the region."
"Further in his interview, Senator Obama said he wanted
to listen to the 'concerns' of these nations. For many, their
biggest concern is Israel's
existence. It's worrisome that Senator Obama wants to 'listen' to
those calling for Israel's
destruction. It's also worrisome that he didn't use this
interview
to call on Muslims to stop teaching hateful anti-Semitic and
anti-Israel
propaganda in their schools and textbooks."
"By asking Muslim nations, some of whom actively train
and fund Hezbollah and Hamas, to 'join our fight against
terrorism,'
Senator Obama once again demonstrates his shaky foreign policy
judgment
and raises questions about his commitment to Israel's security.
For
all those who care about Israel,
Senator Obama's Muslim nations summit is a cause for alarm and
concern," said Brooks.
Terry , Greenacres, FL
Whilst Obama's chances of getting the nomination now are unpredictable, I think he has a better chance on taking on the GOP's. Most people have had enough of the Clintons now.
Cindy, London,
Contrary to what many believe HRC has been able to work across the aisle and get things done. She won New York with 67% of the vote. This means a number of Republicans voted for her.
Pauline, West Palm Beach, FL
My sister, who hates America, says that American democrats have to decide between their hatred of women and their hatred of blacks.........and then the country must decide between whichever one the democrats chose and a white man with right wing views.
I like America, although I despise certain Americans, believe that America has a far wider choice than that: for example, Obama and Clinton might end up as President + VP ticket (not necessarily in that order!) and they might therefore be deciding between a man and a woman working together in harmony vs career women and misogynist men fighting to the death......
I think America WANTS the former......whether they are yet ready for it, time will tell. It requires the leadership to sense that and the courage of the voters to deliver that.
That doesn't mean that McCain or any other male elephant (member of the GOP for those outraged by my colloquialism!) can't hire a bunch of competent women either, does it?
Rhys Jaggar, Leeds, UK
I decided not to go with Hillary and to back Obama after I heard Hillary's disingenuous explanation for why she voted for the Iraq war. In the CNN debate, she said she voted for the war resolution because she thought Bush would send the inspectors back into Iraq. This is a patent rewrite of history. As Obama pointed out, everyone knew the resolution was a vote allowing Bush to go into Iraq with force. This is the same old Clintonitis we've seen before -- an attempt to redress reality for political convenience.
And how about her plan to fix interest rates for five
years? Tell that to the Federal Reserve! It's a great sound bite that would wreak havoc on our economy and financial system. It's patent nonsense.
Stephen A. Davies, Pelham, New York
"Inspirational vs Calculation". Poll driven policy of Hillary Clinton vs Inspirational Obama "courting angelic side of Americans". Who would be a better US Leader ?
JamesL, Adelaide, SA
I support Barack Obama - they clearly need to end this Bush-Clinton dynasty thing and have a fresh face for US politics.
What really made me laugh is that 'Clinton is better at concealing her emotions' - the woman that broke down into crying in the middle of her campaign?
Gary Horlock, Crawley,
My fear is that Barack Obama would turn out like John F Kennedy - great speeches but no delivery. Charisma and brilliance are not enough: the world is changed by people who have a clear purpose and the ability to make the deals which deliver.
Hillary Clinton has demonstrated these and he has not.
I hope that he will learn - but the presidency is not the place to do that kind of learning.
Not yet Mr Obama, but I hope soon.
Stan Collins, Staveley, Kendal, UK
I have been greatly impressed by Barack Obama. He has everything you could want. Intelligence, wisdom, decency.
You can just see just in the first few seconds of him what a breath of fresh air he is. HRC, I feel has had her time.
She has seen the White House, she has experienced the promixty to power. It's time for someone else.
Also note. America lectures some states on 'democracy'.
How is it then that if hrc gets in, that two famillies have been on the ticket since 1976!!! That is not what America represets.
Its something you see in some third world countrues.
God bless Barack Obama.
Orhan Catan, Istanbul, Turkey
Obama is the first and the last, and Obama is what the world needs, change is what the world needs we can not go on the old way for example here we have a situation where bills is out stripping what you earn which is what is causing the credit crunch. Wages is not keeping up with expenditure. I for example was put out of business due to a car accident, the fact that the person accepted libility I am stuck because I have no income now due to the accident. and my bank charges is going up, my mortgage still has to be paid. I still have to eat and I have no unemployment benefit because I am now unemployed due to a car accident not by any other reason. I am uabled to pay my business rates because I have no income. These are problems that could happen to any one, and people need a government who understand basic life situation, it is fantastic that these priveledged people can look smart and sound smart, but have no concept of basic life of the majority,rich people dont know poverty hunger.
Daphne Kenward, Cambridge, United Kingdom
The pools must e wrong .. like New Hampshire... Hillary will win the nomination hands-down.. Cannot wait for Tuesday.
Paul Michkiel, Tennessee, USA
Clinton has experience and a track record, Obama is just words and pie in the sky.
Linda, New York City, USA
Why does everyone want to fix all the problems such as immigration and not fix why it happens. The Mexican Goverment needs to be changed our or we need to incorporate Mexico as the 51st state. Then our border is managable. On the medical front we need to change insurance. The only way to change insurance or other big business is to get rid of the ability of pac money changing accounts.
Tim Rich, Tomball, TX
Al Gore's nod in Obama's direction maybe just the final 'kiss of death' too far.
Yet another Democrat candidate, whose, own attempt to win the Presidency, ended in failure, about to jump onto the bandwagon?
Whatever happened in those eight years he was Vice President to the formidable Bill Clinton?
Me thinks, he 'might' just have let envy cloud his judgement?
prudence eely bond mcguire, LONDON, ENGLAND UK.
Barrack Obama is one of the most magnetic, brilliant people I have ever encountered. As a student at Yale Divinity School I had the honor to have one Professor of Hebrew Scripture who had true charisma, Dr. Brevard Childs. When he entered a lecture hall hundreds would clamour to their feet in adoration. One of the toughest Prof.'s at Yale he managed to inspire conservative Christians and left wing liberals with his sheer passion and intellect. Obama has managed to do this with for a nation.
Hardly arrogant, he engaged my 12 year old son in a conversation about the downfalls of cold pizza when working round the clock. He can analyze complex issues and simplify them for a crowd of a thousand in a single mental bound. He is charming, handsome, intelligent and clearly a loving wife and father. What an America we will be with him in the white house.
hunter sloan smith, New Haven, CT
Obama - get the girls a greyhound - yeah!
JK, Wellington, New Zealand
Alas your article was written before today's polls. Clinton has extended her lead by 4.
Marcia, Dundee,
I disagree with Duffy Fitzpatrick. Obama was very nice and cordial to Hillary, he is by no means arrogant.
Ni, Portland , USA