Gerard Baker
Take a trip to New York and see the city from the air
Super Tuesday in America was also Fat Tuesday, but if anyone was expecting to gorge on the fruits of a decisive victory in the US presidential race they were out of luck.
For the Democrats, it looked more like a slightly delayed Groundhog Day – yet another day that failed to resolve the tussle between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, the tightest battle for the party’s nomination in several decades. As the night wore on it became clear that even though she secured a win in the biggest state, California, Mr Obama’s more numerous wins in smaller states across the country kept the two candidates locked in a tight race for delegates to the party’s nominating convention.
On the Republican side, the contest edged closer towards what has seemed nearly inevitable for the last couple of weeks – the steady, somewhat reluctant coronation of John McCain, the Arizona senator. That coronation was delayed, not, as the right wing of the party had hoped, by a Super Tuesday surge of support for Mitt Romney, the former governor of Massachusetts, who had another bad night, but by the unexpected re-emergence of Mike Huckabee. The former Arkansas governor won half a dozen states in his native South and kept the race going at least for another week or two.
On both sides the complexity of an already competitive and multi-sided contest across more than 20 states was further muddied by the fact that winning the nomination is not – as it is in the general election in November - a matter of winning a simple plurality of votes state-by-state. It is determined by gaining a majority of nominating delegates from all the states. And though in the Republican race some states allocate delegates on a winner-take-all basis, many do not. On the Democratic side, all the states award delegates proportionate to the votes cast for each candidate. That means that, while most of the headlines initially focused on the number of states won by each candidate, what really mattered was the breakdown of the delegates – and that was much more broadly distributed among the candidates.
As expected, the remaining Democratic candidates divided the spoils on Super Tuesday. Mrs Clinton’s win in California seemed likely to give her a majority of the delegates there. Both Mrs Clinton and Mr Obama won big majorities (and therefore a haul of delegates) in their home states – Mrs Clinton in New York and Mr Obama in Illinois. Mrs Clinton also secured important majorities in New Jersey and Massachusetts. The last was especially sweet for the Clinton campaign, because it came in a state where Mr Obama had won the endorsements of the state’s two greatest Democratic panjandrums – Senators Ted Kennedy and John Kerry.
Mr Obama performed well in the deep South – adding big majorities in Georgia and Alabama to his win last month in South Carolina. Most striking, according to the exit polls, he managed to win not only black voters in the South but also a sizeable minority of whites. He also bulked up his delegate count with a series of majorities in smaller states including Connecticut, Delaware, North Dakota, Colorado, Idaho and Utah.
And yet Mrs Clinton may still have a slight advantage – not just in overall delegates (she has more so-called Superdelegates – state and federal Democratic officeholders) but in the contours of her support within the Democratic party. Thanks to her continuing dominance among the party’s traditional base - the working class, older, poorer and less educated voters and especially women, she remains the narrow favourite to be the Democratic standard-bearer.
Among Republicans, the focus of the night had been expected to be the increasingly unpleasant battle between Mr McCain and Mr Romney. Instead Mr Huckabee, largely written off after his defeats in South Carolina and Florida, came back strongly across the South, winning his home state of Arkansas as well as Georgia, Tennessee and Alabama.
But it is likely to be a Potemkin victory for Mr Huckabee. He has not demonstrated that his populist, Baptist preacher’s message can play outside the South or the Bible-Belt-inclined parts of the Midwest.
Mr McCain notched up crucial wins in the handful of large states that allocate all their delegates to the winner of the popular vote, including New York and New Jersey. He also looked set to win California, the biggest state, though the distribution of delegates there was roughly proportional so his narrow lead mattered less than his wins in other states. Like Mrs Clinton, Mr McCain won states on Super Tuesday across the country – from California in the west to Missouri in the middle to most of the states on the Atlantic seaboard.
Mr Romney declined to admit defeat but his failure has been spectacular. He has spent more money than any other candidate in the race. In the last week he has been the sole repository of the hopes of the frustrated right wing of the Republican party, which has been used to seeing its favourites ascend to the nomination.
Yet last night, out of 16 primary contests he was able to win only three - his home state of Massachusetts and one, Utah, the home base of his Mormon church – as well as a few less important caucuses.
Mr Romney’s failure represents a stunning defeat not just for him but for the archpriests of the conservative movement. These figures – including religious leaders and talk-radio hosts and senior members of the party in Washington – despise Mr McCain, whose independent streak they regard as intolerable. Despite his fervent support for the Iraq war, many have said they will not vote for him if he is the party’s nominee in November. They deeply dislike Mr Huckabee’s economic populism too.
But Republican voters do not seem to share those views. And even if many do not like Mr McCain it is clear now that they certainly do not regard Mr Romney as the acceptable alternative.
When it was first planned a few years ago, Super Tuesday, the largest single primary day in American electoral history, was widely expected effectively to finish the primary campaigns in both parties, with decisive wins for a candidate in each.
It certainly hasn’t done that. But it probably has brought us a little closer to knowing who will be the Republican nominee.
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles with ease


Overseas contacts and local business information

A treasure trove of baubles, booty and stylish quests


£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£38k
Barclaycard
Various Locations
Live in One of London's Most Vibrant Areas
From £249,950
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
What the major media networks are intentionally not bringing to the attention of the American public is that Mike Huckabee's support is only partially derived from evangelical Christians, it's mostly derived from Mike's stated goal of ABOLISHING the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, repealing the Sixteenth Amendment, and instituting the FairTax. This resonates with middle America as demonstrated in yesterday's voting.
Many people I spoke with yesterday, who are NOT evangelical Christians by any stretch of the imagination, voted for Huckabee based ENTIRELY on his support of the FairTax, myself included. This is especially true across those states where the FairTax gets radio play on talk radio.
Get the facts: www.FairTax.org
Then see the NYT #1 Bestselling Book by Neal Boortz and US Senator John Linder.
WWW.FAIRTAX.ORG
Thomas, Atlanta, GA, USA
Perhaps it is Mr. Romney to whom the moniker Potemkin should apply, being that he is fake in many ways and has conveniently attempted to recast his image to conform with a bloc of voters he needs.
Christopher, Honolulu, USA
I think that the author of this article is mixing metaphors a little. A Potempkin village is something that appears to represent the big picture but is a mirage. A Pyrrhic victory, on the other hand, is a victory in battle that does not signify any greater victory in a campaign. I think the author of this article was confusing the two.
Nathan, Tampa, FL, USA
Potemkin refers to Potemkin village. As described in Wikipedia:
Potemkin villages were, purportedly, fake settlements erected at the direction of Russian minister Grigori Aleksandrovich Potemkin to fool Empress Catherine II during her visit to Crimea in 1787. According to this story, Potemkin, who led the Crimean military campaign, had hollow facades of villages constructed along the desolate banks of the Dnieper River in order to impress the monarch and her travel party with the value of her new conquests, thus enhancing his standing in the empress's eyes.
Peter, New York.
Peter, New York, USA
Potemkin refers to a battleship in the Russian civil war. It was seized by mutineers and eventually over-powered by the Russian navy. My guess is that it means even if Huckabee takes the republican nomination (the ship) he cant win the country.
also, 'Phyrric'
Gerard, Halifax, Canada, Nova Scotia
think that hilary and obama have spent so much time trying to get people that john macin might even be president
mary, waco, texas
Jo5ef:
You're kidding, right? While many think a joint ticket is inevitable, I think such an idea would be a disaster. Any ticket with Hillary at the top is a loser to John McCain. If the Democrats want to win, they will nominate Obama. Hillary is reviled by half of the US electorate and is the only unifying factor remaining with the Republicans.
Demosthenes, Glencoe, IL
What on earth is a "Potemkin victory"?
Potemkin was a reasonably successful general, which isn't the sense being conveyed, neither does it appear to be a version of a Phyrris victory so I have no idea what this phrase means. English please.
Benjamin , Gloucester,
Hillary Obama ticket will win election for democrats
Jo5ef, Adelaide, Australia