Isn't it true that Mr Obama chairs the Senate's European Affairs Committee, but has cancelled every meeting for the last two years?

A nice smile and a sharp suit may be what America wants, but an ignorance and lack of interest in the rest of the world is deeply worrying for the rest of us.

David Norman, Cheshire, UK

Dear D Fisher of Mountain View, US/Ca

Your comments are interesting, but I hope they are not representative of your nation.

Like it or not, whoever is elected to the White House has an impact upon the rest of us. It's understandable, then, that we should have an interest - and I am impressed by the fact that comments are posted from across the world.

One of the great things about democracy (and the internet) is the freedom to discuss and express opinion with courtesy and intelligence. As a citizen of the world's leading democracy, D Fisher, perhaps you may appreciate this?

Ian Hunt, London, UK

Hi England

Thanks for your advice on who we Americans should vote for.

Please note your politics are a complete mess. Worse than Bush - you elect followers of failures. Really a pathetic mess. Gordon Brown? Huh?

Perhaps you should perform adequately in selecting leaders before you deign to advise others.

D Fisher, Mountain View, US/Ca

I do not believe that we can solve health care or high gas prices or the war in Iraq if we can't unify the country. Change is on the way.

Obama is agansit NAFTA. We need more jobs in US. Obama plan for college students is excellent. His health plan is perfect. He is not taking lobbyst money. Obama is for alternative energy resources. By all standard Obama will be the President by all measures. He is much better than Hilary and McCain.

Obama for President of United States of America.

hagos, Seattle, WA

It's interesting to me that both Billary and McCain continue to focus on Obama's inexperience as a grounds to diminish his ability to lead this country---this is the very trait that has endeared him to the American people. So many people are fed up with our "experienced" politicians, people who know how to (and use it well) shuck and jive, work the system, make the line between "corruption" and "negotiation" as grey as possible. His opponents are helping him win, a beautiful display of how out of touch these people really are with those they supposedly want to represent and lead. Another note----a word to the wise---those of you who think that socialized medicine is the answer need to leave the US and take a look around the world, and SEE how it works, not romanticize the idea. Do you think that, if our government is the funding entity for our healthcare delivery, they are going to enforce the standards that we are accustomed to (costly) or let people sue them for malpractice? Think...

John, Arizona,

I believe that the negative comments have gone against Sen. Clinton in her approach to win voters. Over the past several years American voters ahve grown increasingly annoyed by negative campaign strategies. The American people are more interested in where a candidate is looking to take us during their reign as commander and chief. The argument of experience does not weigh well either as neither candidate has never actually been president before. Being first lady does not necessarily give you presidential experience. It gives you insight into what the job entails, but not the experience of actually running it. Obama offers something that Sen. Clinton does not. He offers an attitude, not of superiority, but of reaching beyond normal barriers and passing partisan issues. This gives the American people the idea that it's not just another political aspiration but a candidate that is offering to actually look and listen to the American people. This is, after all, a democracy.

DNolan, Neenah, Wisconsin, USA

It is disappointing that, in the run up to an election that may see the inauguration of either the first American black president or the first woman president, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are busy attacking each other rather than offering unity of purpose and a new vision for the future both of the American people as a whole and of the western democracies.

Ian Hunt, London, UK

Pray tell me what choice does she have, she was dam if she didn't, dam if she does from day one, running against a young black, dancing, preaching, and not knowing nothing but yes we can, can what? When he first started, he said nothing, now he sounds like Hillary and Edwards, he sugar coats it, yes the news help, they back it up also,never guestion, anything about this guy, the young voters, the media is for the Rep's, to have Rove on makes me sick,another creep that so smart. Now, I bet HILLARY could say alot, but she will hurt the Dem's, I hope when she loses, she opens her mouth to you all, and OBAMA, OBAMA, you young people dance the tune, pay back time....

Judith, Inverness, FL.

Hillary Clinton still stands strong after all the negative "news" media assaults. I've not seen such shameful behavior displayed against a candidate since the swift boating incident. Stop trying to sway voters. Tell it like it is. Obama does not walk on water, McCain is a true patriot, and Hillary is still a viable candidate in this race. Shame on you and the American people that cannot think for themselves

Janie, Naples, Florida

Obama is popular because America is desperate for someone to mend the rifts caused by decades of mistreatment between the country and its citizens, as well as between the country and the world. Unlike Obama, Hillary who claims that she has solutions, what she is slowly recognizing is that while she may indeed have solutions, in the eyes of many Americans, Obama IS the Solution.

Con Fuerte, Hamilton, Bermuda

US and it's fascist ideology has put not only itself but eveyone the whole globe in extreme danger. unless this course is changed and changed by election of Obama the future will be very bleak. God help us all.

John, SF, US

To Chris from Worthing: You hit the nail on the head about Obama. Hs election would be the "bolt out of the blue" we need to send the U.S. in a new direction. To me, the best thing he has said so far is that he would actually talk to both our allies and our enemies. What a radical idea!

Bill Barker, Philadelphia, PA

I wish I could vote in these elections and if I could I would vote for Obama. It isn't just the US who needs a president we can all believe in.

Barack Obama is as white as he is black and from the little I've read about him, he speaks of his mother with as much love and pride and affection as he does his father.
To the very odd comment that Hillary is a woman and should be supported at all costs by women, so much for equality when we are asked to vote for a candidate simply because she is the same gender. Are women really so down-trodden? I think not. We in the UK have had a woman Prime Minister and with hindsight and experience it's irrelevant if you have the toilet seat up or down - what matters is the quality of the candidate. Go Obama!

Julia, Reigate, Surrey, England

I believe the meteor that was seen streaking across the Northwester sky of Washington State in the US on Tuesday was actually the faulty, defunct satellite breaking into our atmosphere before the Navy could shoot it down. I believe the Navy was afraid it would lose face and wanted the credit.

Robert Newton, Spokane, Washington

America, you have one chance to restore your reputation on the world stage, and that is Barack Obama. Without even lifting a finger, his election would send a ripple across the globe that something major has changed. Like it or not, rightly or wrongly, America is not popular. A country is actually only as popular as its last global act. People don't remember your billions in aid, your parts in both world wars, the fight against communism, they remember Abu Ghraib(?), Halliburton, Iraq (for all the wrong reasons), Israel, and every cowboy, tobaccy chewing, gun-toting nugget of drivel to emerge from Bush's mouth. McCain seems ok, but only Obama can start the healing process.

Chris, Worthing, England

What is the crying all about for an "Experienced Leader?" That term is nothing but a smoke screen for thief, liar, & manipulator - someone who has succumbed to the big banks/business way of running our Republic. Perhaps the problem in Washington is too much experience.

If the likes of McCain and Clinton is considered "Experienced," then I want a call for an "Honorable & Dignified Leader."

Debra, Colorado Springs, CO USA

Barack Obama is described as an African American, posibly the first black president, the great black hope. I may be wrong, but ... hasn't he got a white mother? And if he has, then how can he be black or African American. Surely he is of mixed race rather like that other great American 'black' success, Tiger Woods.
Bernard Lawson, London,

Mr Lawson, We are all desendents of black africans. So are we not all of mixed race.

Dr Izhar Khan, Aberdeen, UK

Yes, Martin of London, you are missing everything. First, he has spoken of his policies in every debate. We're talking 20 debates, now Martin. . . perhaps you have been looking at only the news reporting the REACTION to those debates. And then there is something else you're obviously not quite accustomed to, but it's gaining a good deal of popularity these days, and that's his WEBSITE!! Many have been to barackobama.com and he lists in detail what he plans to do across a wide variety of topics. There is hype over the election. But the reason for the hype is because the policies he stands for are so great. Here's a hint: Stop watching Headline News and all others on the television for that matter, and start reading and researching yourself. If you wait for someone to do it for you, you will only get their opinion and what they want you to hear. Obama will beat McCain. Nobody wants any more of the Bush policies than we have to have.

Michael, Covington,

Oh yes just what we need another Clinton,besides Bill and Hillary.

B Allen, Williston, florida, 32696

I'm sorry but you are all CRAZY to believe all the media rhetoric going on; that either Clinton or Obama stand a chance is as ridiculous as this "hope and change" garbage...

"Go McCain!"

Renee, Woodbury, MN, USA

Huckabee believes that the Bible is more important than the Constitution. That's a fine point of view for a preacher or for someone to have in their personal life, but should render him disqualified as he intends to govern our country by this agenda.

I am afraid that once again, the Democrats will be sitting with jaws on the floor come November, wondering how we ended up with another four years of a Republican in the White House, when we had such a great opportunity.

The DNC must study closely how we fail our party. If there are to be Super Delegates, make sure people understand that they are NOT supposed to automatically vote with their districts, but from their supposed expertise, choosing the nominee best for the party, sometimes, in spite of the popular vote. Otherwise, there's no need for them at all.

Only registered Democrats should be allowed to vote in the primaries.

Lisa Hyman, Metuchen, NJ

Obama concerns me ...lack of experience.. you can't run the most powerful country in the world based on a few leadership campaign rousing speeches and soundbites for the media.

Can't say I have really understood what he stands for, as he doesn't seem to articulate exactly what polices he stands for. Surely if it comes to a McCain-Obama run-off, when the crunch comes the US voters would go for McCain as the safer pair of hands.

Matt, Wilsthire,

Are you kidding that you think Hilary would win here over McCain? Her own party dislikes her. In a recent pole, 50% of those who backed OBama said that they would just simply not vote if she got the nomination. A good portion of the others would vote for McCain. The Republicans fear Obama. He is charismatic and a tiough target 1) he is liked by the Republicans and 2) Are forced to tread carefully because he is black and the Republics have an issue with race in their party.

Donne V, Darien, IL

In todays highly volatile economic and political climate, americans are voting in an inexperienced candidate...a lot of the problems faced by the world today was when america voted in a comedian president called bush AND now they are being seduced by an african american into believing all will be well under his leadership. I say WAKE UP AMERICA the world needs exprienced leaders not one who can 'sing' his way through to the front! WAKE UP AMERICA! DO NOT BE FOOLED!

B Gillman, Singapore, Singapore

Bernard - Obama always mentions his mother and has credited her for bringing him up well despite being a single mum. Please get the facts rights.

P.S. I am a white/black child and we are not so hung up on racial descriptions.

Susan Levin, London,

People should know when they are beaten

Rob Lindsay, Wallasey,

I totally agree with Martin. Everyone seems to be fascinated with Obama and his rhetoric, but who knows what he stands for. He's a great mouth-piece, but what else is there to him?

SK, London,

Martin, don't forget that these are PRIMARY elections, in which each party is determining who will be their presidential candidate for the general election, always held in November. What the Democratic Party is learning is that, of the 2, the people dislike Hillary Clinton more than they distrust Obama's youth and limited experience. What is Hillary's experience: she has already run the country for 8 years while her husband cavorted with interns and signed away many jobs overseas? These winter and spring elections only determine who can RUN for president! All is not lost - yet!

Marcia, New London, PA/USA

From what I have seen so far, most Americans must have their heads in the sand. Clinton seems to be over ambitious, is clearly against what the majority of Americans want. Obama is inexperienced and will need a hord of advisors to get thru foriegn policy and Military issues and finding that many people to actually agree on any thing would be a miricle. McCain has a very bad temper that the media is covering up and I personally do not believe is stable enough to lead this country. So, take a closer look at Huckabee and what he stands for.

B. L., Lancaster, Texas, USA

They actually NEED a President who has no experience -- it would be refreshing.

Look what experience got us -- Bill Clinton and then Bush

Phil, Preston,

It is interesting that so many Americans need inspiration instead of better lives. Do you need inspiration from the new president after election?

Mike, Bloomington,

I find it mildly disturbing that Americans are being seduced by Obama who appears to be highly charismatic and sincere. What really worries me is that I still have no idea what policies he stands for. Perhaps I'm missing something in all the hype?

Martin, London, England

i would like to see obama for president. But, if it were to be a contest between Mcain and Obama then between the both, i feel McCain would win, simply because he would be the underdog and use war to cry foul whereas Mccain and Clinton, then i think clinton would win between the two. For as berween clinton and obama, psychologically obama being the underdog and great orator sets him infront. Of course i would prefer to see a democarte in office for world peace.

f Patel, Leeds, UK

I think Obama is the best candidate for the presidency. Because of his 'inexperience', he would not easily get into monkey business like the likes of Mc cain and Clinton once in power. His history and rich cultural background will do alot in uniting America and giving the 'audacity of hope' to all americans: white, black, latino etc. Lets give him a chance.

Edith, Nairobi, Kenya

Barack Obama is described as an African American, posibly the first black president, the great black hope. I may be wrong, but ... hasn't he got a white mother? And if he has, then how can he be black or African American. Surely he is of mixed race rather like that other great American 'black' success, Tiger Woods. Obama, as far as I know has never mentioned his white mother, the mother who brought him up, unlike his black father. Is he ashamed of that or, are women not recognized in the USA?

Bernard Lawson, London,

McCain and Clinton both seem to suggest that the American voter does not have the brains to make a sensible judgement - i.e. to choose one of them. A bit insulting I'd say.

Phil, Hong Kong,

I wonder what it is that the Clintons forgot in the White House that has turned them this desperate for another sojourn there.
They can be sure that whatever it is, George Bush, Jnr. has so dirtied it that in this still-brand new century, only an Obama can clean it up - for America and us in the rest of the world, who , like it or not, must catch a cold whenever Big Brother sneezes.
The Clinton campaign may opt for dirt, but they can be guaranteed to remain thick in it while Obama soars to victory. There is no stopping the CHANGE TRAIN- the only constant in life being CHANGE itself.
I have always been a keen supporter of the Democratic Party and I would have surely switched to the Republicans this year but for the emergence of Obama.
Mercifully, polls have already indicated a McCain victory in a McCain - Clinton race BUT an Obama victory in a race with McCain.
Obama is the hybrid reincarnation of Martin Luther King, Jnr. and John F. Kennedy. Any better dreamers?

MUAZU JAJI, Lokoja, Nigeria

Hillary had better start crying!

David Leslie, Perth, Scotland

"there was (sic) no congratulations..." Oh dear!

P J Hall, wallasey,

What is Obama???? Obama is no Clintons. That's all I need to know.

Tony Brady, Madison, WI,

Sounds like Obama is your man to turn things round and get the rest of the to liking and respecting you guys again, which is no bad thing.

Kris, London,

she should take the gloves off. this Obama guy is a rookie at best. he has such a glass chin that maybe if Hillary showed a little "fight" she just might show this guy a thing or two. enough of the health care broken record, most people dont want it anyway. tell us about his record compared to yours, itemized. show how much you have done compared to him. She should say "i did this, this and that before he was even out of college. contrast dont just try to glad hand the voters more than he can, because you will never glad hand better than Obama. I wanted Romney but hey this Obama is a fraud and Hillary should be "schooling" him.

Thicke Hawkins, van nuys,

Although I really like Hillary, I don't think she will win the Democratic nomination. Obama is just unstoppable right now, and his presence in Texas with an audience of 20000 people I've never seen this type of enthusiasm before from massive amounts of people in my life in any US presidential race. I honestly think it will be difficult for Mccain to get that same enthusiasm that will bring huge amounts of people to support him. I thought Mccain's speech after his win in Wisconsin was great, but hardly anyone really noticed it or cared(except for those at his rally) . As I read yesterday, this election will probably come down to Old Generation vs the New Generation, which I have to agree. And if you have this 'new' enthusiasm and excitement go all the way in November(which I'm sure will be a record turnout of new and young voters), Obama will be very hard to beat.

Arlene, LA, CA

I'm no fan of the Clintons, but calls for them to quit now are premature. Of the 10 biggest states (excluding FL and MI), Clinton has won 3 (CA, NY, and NJ) to Obama's 3 (IL, GA, and VA). But 4 of those ten biggest states--TX, OH, PA, and NC--have yet to vote; they should be allowed their voice.

As for the drumbeat against negative campaigning: sure, I think the Clintons went INCREDIBLY dirty when they subtly made this a race-vs.-gender campaign, but there is nothing wrong with challenging Obama on two counts. First, the guy was in a state legislature at the time of the last presidential election; as of Election Day 2008, he will have had less experience in a high position (governor, US Congress, vice president, a military general) than any president since Hoover. Second, many of his policies--bombing Pakistan, HUGE spending increases, no changes at all to Social Security--need more public scrutiny.

Sure, the Clintons are power hungry. But what is Obama?

Coby, Colonie, NY

The deluded masses flock to Obama like bugs to a nightlight and it is quite disturbing. Even more disturbing, is the mainstream media's gushing love affair with this candidate. He speaks of change with soaring rhetoric but his own proposed agenda is nothing more than the same re-hashed pipe dreams and promises from so many candidates in the past. He is running on the Bush promise of unity, yet his liberal agenda will not get republicans to cross the aisle. His agenda... what he can and cannot do... his lack of experience in national and international politics... these are sane reasons not to vote for him regardless of his mind numbing oratories. Inexperience - Deception - Promises Not Kept - Lack of Substance - Partisan Agenda - Good Guy to Have a Beer With... Remember, if it looks like a Bush and smells like a Bush, it is a Bush! Very little time to wake up to the truth America... May God continue to bless America even in its ignorance!

okie jeff, Tulsa, Ok

We just had 8 years of the most experienced administration in my lifetime. Experience doesn't seem to amount to a hill of beans. It's character and leadership. I'm a fiscally conservative, socially moderate man who backed Bush twice and never voted for Clinton. I'll follow where Obama leads and I can't say that for anyone else.

Fred, Kane County,

I agree that the opportunity to "vet" Obama should be taken. At the same time, it is becoming statistically impossible for Clinton to make a valid argument for receiving the nomination. This "vetting" needs to be balanced between harming the Democratic party and making the nominee as strong as possible. It would be productive for Clinton to force Obama to respond to well known criticisms. However, to attack his character as a fraud or as being empty is not helpful criticism and will only make Democrats nervous about his support.

I respect the criticisms levelled so far on this board. I think that credit should be given for the US realization that our performance after 9/11 was misguided. While competence is critical to redirect our energies, a figurehead is absolutely necessary who can explain this to foreign nations. In the end, I would support an inexperienced candidate who explains US foreign policy than a technocrat who may only worsen our reputation. Not to pigeon hole anyone.

Gordon, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Well The AMerican people deserve what they get. Hillary is the most fisaclly responsible of the bunch including Mccain. But hey if the voters want the potical version of Mille Vanille so be it. Who cares if the deficts soars and the country plundges deep into a recession. This is the most crutical time for America it isn't time to play games with a populist who is all FLUFF and no Stuff.....the dice is role and the future casted...get ready for the 4 more years of what we just had but worst ..Last Chance to make Hillary the Nominee....I have decide McCain is a better option than Obama

Harry, huston , texas

Hillary has no sense of humour.

She should fight this batttle as well as she can, tell voters, "Don't be taken for a ride by Obama, he's just a rookie senator with a lot of hype. If you do wanna have fun with him, you'll be happy to see me in 2012."

She should learn to laugh at herself, like Al Gore has done.

Don't panic: In a year most US voters will hate President Obama and his hype.

Ganpat Ram , London , UK

Innovation is not the product of logical thought, although the result is tied to logical structure.
- Albert Einstein.

What I mean to say is Innovation is difficult to expect from Old people as they get used to conventional thinking. So I think that Mrs. Clinton cannot do much to bring America out if its current troubles of financial downtime. Since existing people are already trying hard with conventional and known to work methods, which are failing to help.

So younger amoung the two has more chances to bring about a great change.

Also out of box solutions to handle problems mostly come from people inexperienced with current processes and solutions.

Racism and colour of skin are last centurys words, if they really are not then we havent grown a bit, from where the pervious generation left.

I support Obama.

Janardhan, Hyderabad, India

Lois from Swansea: So because Hillary is a woman is enough? What about all the minorities who think because obama is Black that should also be enough? What if Condi rice were to run as the Rep VP? A woman AND a balck...double enough?
Thats what has now kille dhte Democrat party. Deviding everyone into small Interest groups...Black, hispanic, poor, rich, GLTB, women, etc. It all worked fine as long as the candidate was a Rich White Man who would kowtow to the different groups and 'feel their pain.' But now you have 2 strong candidates each from 2 different interest groups. Who'se interest takes priority? Add to it the super-delegate BS and the DNC will be fractured regardless of who wins. That means with only 2 months from nomination to general election the Dem Candidate will have to waste time rebuilding the party Base while McCain sweeps in and takes the Indies and Conservative Democrats.
The DNC's Politics of devide and pander has now come home to roost.

KellJ, San Diego Ca, USA

if clinton cannot acheive her goals with the american people, how well do you think she can do when she becomes president and goes up against the bad guys?

peter s, edmonton, alberta

Hillary needs to bow out gracefully after losing Texas, which now looks very likely. If she doesn't, the Super Delegates might actually serve a useful function of quickly showing her the door.

From this point forward, she can only hurt her party by echoing McCain's mumbo jumbo.

Do the right thing Hillary. We will remember you either positively or negatively based on whether you put the defeat of the party that has so greatly damaged our nation and the world above personal ambition.

Sterling, Sonoma, California

I am so disengaged from the whole political scene because of the leading parties. What I want to know is, Why is it a bad thing that Obama has "no experience?" For once, I want somebody in office that has no real political history, career, etc. I have often said, lately in any case, that I would much rather have the janitor from the local college be the next president than any of the batch of candidates that was running. Those people who work to survive, love the united States more than anyone currently running for the most part.

I really wish I could take credit for the following quote, but I cannot. "Political power attracts the very people who should not have it. Then we act surprised when they do anything to keep it."

Terence Stamp, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic

I agree with your conclusion that the Clinton Machine will result to going negative to attempt to raise their campaign from the dead. The amazing part is that is exactly what Mr. Obama has pointed out consistently throughout the race, that is purely old politics. If you can't get people to vote for you, your beliefs, your wisdom and your leadership, throw mud at the front runner. It will be interesting when the general election campaign begins, to see just how far McCain distances himself from all of the failures of George W. If he does not, he will not win.

Patrick Sybilrud, Las Vegas, USA, NV

As much as I am enjoying watching the wheels come off for the Clintons I must say that Obama scares me. Policywise, there is very little difference between he and Hillary and he is actually rated as to her left polically. What has be done that wouild make anybody believe he is ready to be the president of the USA? He talks well, he gives a good speech. he says that, "We are the hope we have been waiting for". Since we have been here all of the time, why did it take until now for us to realize that we are the hope. Let's cut through the mustard and flowery speech and get down to this man's core values and beliefs. Where does he stand on the issues (and change and hope are not issues). What policies does he present? Is he any more that an empty, very expensive, suit?

Kevin, Virginia Beach, Virginia

The woman looks eerily like Mrs. McCain. The only one that should care about the lovefest portion of the allegation is McCain's wife. The part that I find disturbing is that the lobbyist wrote the telecom communications legislation, which was presented before a subcommittee that McCain chairs. Why are lobbyist writing federal legislation? Isn't that what congress is supposed to do? I agree with Sen. Obama "you can have a seat at the table but you can't have the whole table." I see two problems for McCain - his faulty ethical compass and the inability to heed the kind counsel of friends and foes alike.

Jeanie, Jasper, USA

Pretty smart move my McCain. He wants Hilary to win the Democratic leg because she doesn't have a prayer of defeating him in the Presidentials. Kind of like Survivor - where you try to keep the second best other guy on till the end...

Clare, Singapore,

I have always associated the Blairs and Clintons as almost identical in their personal goals, their ruthlessness, their smarmy smiles and general " dont do as I do do as I say" attitiude.
One could well imagine Cherie following Hilary down the Presidential route such is her opinion of herself and unbroken faith in the fact that she is royalty., and that it is her right to have anything she wants. With our experience of Mrs Blair and with respect to her identical twin Mrs Clinton I feel I can suggest to the Americans that anybody would be better than Mrs Clinton. But they probably know it already.

John Chambers, Melton Mowbray,

I'm an American Obama supporter, so I'm not unbiased. But Hillary is a great scrapper who believes she is best for America. But her problem now is that she can't hope for a win which is now a long shot, without increasingly negative attacks on Obama, which can only increase bitterness in Democratic ranks and damage the chances of the almost inevitable candidate, Obama, against McCain in November. In the interest of unity, leading former candidates, John Edwards and Bill Richardson and other party leaders should now unite around Obama and call on the Clintons to stop the internecine bloodletting. Go Obama! We will win! Yes we can!

David Irby, Dingle, Co. Kerry, Ireland

The preposterous allegation of plagiarism against Obama is just another indication of the lack of ammunition the Clinton campaign has to go "negative" against this guy.

Here's plagiarism: Obama delivers, word for word, the Gettysburg Address without attribution to Lincoln. He basks in the glory of those words, his silence implying they were his own.

The case(s) cited by Clinton, Inc. refer to a speech given by an ally of Barack's in which the only notable phrases quoted were those of others. The original speech by the MA Governor was being used as a defense and brilliant refutation of the latest Clinton advertising agency "speeches vs. solutions" ploy.

Language is as essential to human being as water is to fish being.

Barack should stand up before his next audience as say: "I have been accused of making speeches that are too inspiring, of using words in a manner that make people feel good about the future. The following words are not mine; they were written on train ride from Washington DC to Gettysburg PA by a man trying to save his country. [Then read the Gettysburg Address.]

Then, "Those words did not offer specific, detailed solutions; they were not written by an advertising copywriter...but they are words that inspired a nation in 1864(?) and still inspire nations today. I am not ashamed to speak of hope; to see brightness ahead for our country, And I also humbly acknowledge my inferior use of words to the man who wrote that short speech: Abraham Lincoln."

Nixon tried a variation of the "speeches versus solutions" tactic against JFK in 1960. It failed then, and Clinton's use of this inexplicable tactic today speaks more to her efficacy in using the "bully pulpit" than it does to Obama's vacuity of substance. If Super-Wonk Nixon couldn't derail Kennedy, Hillary's chances of success with this tactic are nearly zero.

By its very nature as an advertising slogan "speeches versus solutions" highlights the contrived, bordering on pathetic, nature of both Hillary, Bill and their campaign.

Fredrick Bernanke, San Siego, CA/USA

Two days ago Senator Clinton visited a manufacturing plant in Ohio. As shown in TV, she walked over to each of the workers to shake their hands.

Today, Senator Obama visited the same manufacturing plant.

The workers left their posts so that they could shake Senator Obama's hands.

That's the difference.

Javier, Silver Spring, MD

Go Hillary! I'm rooting for her.

She's the only one who can trump Mccain in the general election.

She's a great lady.

Niki, Berkeley, CA ,

Senator Clinton needs to concede the Democratic nomination to Barack Obama. It doesnt make sense for her to be in the running against the will of the people in 22 states. Her experience is not her own. She is an experienced First Lady in the Governor's mansion and the White House. She is not prepared to be President of the United States on day one on her own experience. If she chose as First Lady to be involved in her elected husband's responsibility that is between them not the voters. It is not about her making a comeback it is about being honest and getting out this election.

Beverly Buster, Bremerton, WA

The H campaign apparatus has adopted the "negative attack" strategy against B as they see timing running out on them. Two criticisms of B have emerged: 1. "Speeches versus Solutions" with the ancillary plagiarism and, 2. H is somehow more qualified to be Commander-in-Chief of the US military than is B.
Point 1 ignores the importance of words, per se, and inspirational words, in particular, in the functioning of the US Presidency. The sheer audacity to equate eloquence with lack of substance reveals H's analysis of our highest office as consisting largely of the drudgery of managing a plumbing supply manufacturer, for example.
On point 2, there is absolute no evidence to support the assertion of H as qualified to be CinC, just as there was none to indicate her husband was.
B should go to Iraq, find a suitable site, deliver the Lincoln Gettysburg Address to a mixture of US and Iraqi (soldiers) and his CinC issue, if there really is one outside the H camp, will vanish on the spot.

Fredrick Bernanke, San Siego, CA/USA

It does appear that Mrs. Clinton is finished. Obama has beaten expectations in virtually every contest of the last 10, usually beating the polls that were taken shortly before the election. While she holds apparent leads in Ohio & Texas, it's no guarantee she'll win either, let alone take signficantly more delegates from the races than Obama.

If she doesn't win with over 55% in both contests, she should halt her campaign and save the money that would be wasted pursuing gratification of her and her husband's immense egos. I say that thinking strategically about the race.

As an American and a Republican, I want her to take the fight to the convention and call in all her chits with each and every super-delegate to try to undo the popular will. It is important that Mr. Obama not become President. He's singularly unprepared for the obligations of the office.

Michael May, Chicago, USA

While the Media, John McCain and Hillary Clinton affront Barak Obama for his so called “rhetoric”...they are doing the same thing just less effectively. McCain and Clinton sound as if they are campaigning in the 90’s. It’s 2008!!! They’re just mad that Barak Obama took a grass roots campaign and mobilized America. There will be time for some action when the next President is elected and I hope that it is Obama. I will certainly cast my vote in his favor.

One would have to be loony to want the same old politics as usual or more to the point...the same old politicians as usual. Bush Clinton Bush Clinton or McCain ...that sounds like a cheap law firm. We don't need another Clinton in the white House. She moved to NY to become Senator and now she thinks that it is her Manifest Destiny to become President. Preposterous!

And with all due respect to John McCain...he may be too old to deliver the "fight" that he claims he will bring to the war on terror. STEP ASIDE AND LET MR. OBAMA SHOW AND PROVE!

LG, Washington, DC,

"John McCain. . . used his victory speech to pivot to a fierce attack on Mr Obama – suggesting his lack of experience and some of his comments on foreign policy meant he was ill prepared to be commander in chief of the US."

Golly, gee whiz ~~~~ how much experience did President Ronald Reagan have between his acting career & his election to Gov. of California, which led to his powerful reign as President of the USA?

If the "best" comments a candidate can make is to belittle their opponent ~ well, that kind of says it all, doesn't it! True self-confidence ~ or not!

Do have 2 questions, maybe someone can answer ~~~ If she is as great as she professes to be, why does Mrs. Clinton need to spend so much time trashing Mr. Obama and why doesn't Mr. McCain look straight ahead at the camera or his audience when he is speaking?

Thank you.

Anita, Dublin, USA / Ohio

A lead of 150+ pledged delegates at this point, in this race, is a wide margin that cannot be overcome. Do the math.

Hillary would have to win by 15% in every remaining contest (all 17) to catch up in pledged delegates. This is over. Hillary just hasn't admitted it yet because she's hoping to win the election via superdelegates.

It just won't work. Most superdelegates are elected officials and would be committing political suicide if they overturned the will of the electorate. Even Charlie Rangel (a Congressman and Hillary-supporting superdelegate) has admitted that it may be politically difficult for superdelegates to support Hillary when their districts supported Obama.

Kyle, Lawrence, KS

I haven't yet heard any clear, factual statement form Mr. Obama.

Ricardo, Madrid, Spain

A simple math on pledged delegates

Best scenario for Clinton on March 4:

Ohio　 Obama 70　　Clinton 90
Texas 110　　 120
Total　　　　 180　　 210

210－180＝30　

Present count:

Obama 1187－Clinton・1028＝159

159－30=129

Clinton is finished

onomar, North vancouver, Canada

The Dems have made the same mistake yet again.

They're down to only two serious nominees and both of them are far left of center. I guess they will never learn that only a moderate Dem is ever going to have a real shot at the presidency. The majority of the country is center to slightly right of center. The only way a liberal like these two gets in is if there's a major third party candidate to split the conservatives and independants ala Clinton via Perot in 92 and 96. They should've really tried to talk Gore into running again. I think he would've won quite handily as the people are tired of the Reps being at the helm.

Which ever sacrificial lamb they decide to serve up this year won't really matter. It looks like it'll be McCain for at least the next four years.

Mark, Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana

The bestand most qualified candidates are not running, more's the pity..: Nebraska (R) Sen Chuck Hagel, Pennsylvania (D) Gov Ed Rendell -- the best mayor Philadelphia ever had -- , (R)Dr Condi Rice and (Independent) New York Mayor Mike Bloomberg. Like Kerry in 04 and Gore in 00 Obama will not be able to beat the GOP. I wonder how much damage Michelle Obama's widely-broadcast comment on Tuesday ('this is the first time in my adult life that I have been proud of my country') will do?

Carol Gould, London, United Kingdom

I do not think it will harm the party that much if she goes negative. Romey tried this over McCain and they are now the best of pals. If HC attacks Obama and he gets the nod then I am sure they will become the best of pals overnight. Hilary will be forgotten and will be in Obama's court as much as the next Dem in Nov to keep McCain from winning. I think she should stay in and see what happens on March 4th, and if she does not win big then she should drop out. It was not Bush's lack of experience that got us into two wars etc but his morals, ethics and beliefs. And we must remember that 9/11 did not happen overnight it was a build up of years of US policy from Clinton (8 years), Bush the first (4 years), Regan (8 years), Carter (4 years) and further back. Experience does not in of itself matter, we need a leader who is able to think outside of the box, and is able to bring people to the table, to have new ideas and solutions to try something that has not been done before.

Tim Nicholls, Exeter,

The one who will win the convention, will loose the election...

Corriveau, Quebec, Canada

Hillary keeps telling us about her 35 years worth of achievements in public life. But what has she actually achieved? Not much. Not on her own anyway. Without Bill she would never even be in the Senate never mind running for President.

Her "public service" before being First Lady - Why's Laura Bush not running? - consist mainly of being a corporate lawyer on the Board of Wal-Mart. At least she would get to meet some non union labor.

From the mean streets of Park Ridge, IL to the mean streets of Chappaqua, NY via Embassy Row in Washington, Hillary's really done it the hard way.

Everything she's run's been a disaster. She couldn't get HillaryCare through a Democratic Congress and in fact helped the GOP take Congress for the first time in 40 odd years. Now she is running her campaign and it is a shambles. Is this really what we are looking for in a President?

What's Obama run? Not much, but he has run a stellar campaign. A campaign that has chewed up many others.

Bocephus, Surrey, England

I was an Edwards supporter. Seemed to me he was the only Democrat running who was talking to me and those like me, y'know, working folks. Still think he was the best candidate we had, but alas, that ship has sailed.
When that happened, I had to choose another candidate. I did the research, read voting records, campaign platforms, listened to speeches and debates and came to a conclusion. I don't really care for either Hillary or Obama!
Hillary is the "business-as-usual, inside the beltway, status quo insider" and I don't think that's what we need right now. Something has to change in coin-operated Washington, D.C. and that just ain't who she is.
Obama is, well, Obama! That's about it as far as I can tell. Yes, he has some legislative record, but it's mighty might thin. He tells me he has a 'vision' for American, but he isn't telling me exactly what it is. Shades of G. Bush!
But I have to choose and Obama does hold SOME promise of changing things, so...
GO BARAK!

Terry, Olympia, WA

For the life of me, I cannot figure where Hillary gets off touting her "experience". What, serving tea at White House lunches as Bill Clinton's wife?

Her husband was elected president, not her. She never held a cabinet post or any other official job in his or any other administration.

She has about as much "experience" as Laura Bush or Mamie Eisenhower. Perhaps that's why it's not working against Senator Obama: voters see through it.

Peter, McLean, VA

Hillary Clinton,is not a bad person. Before being first Lady of U.S> she was one of the best child advocates in the U.S> People in New York of which she represents like her. They too were skeptical at one point.
Ask the 911 widows how she faught for them.
Obama is not as sweet as you think he is. He too has some nasty things in his past. But is Obama wins,I will vote for him as anything is better than what we have now.

Wendy Hemingway, Sandy , Utah, U.S.A

Of course Michael from Ohio is right - we all know that politicians in America do exactly what they say while on the campaign trail. Whether it was "no new taxes" from Bush senior or "we shouldn't be telling other countries how to do things" of G. W....

Don't be such a sore loser. Just because your lady is getting served right now doesn't mean you should swallow every attack she dishes out.

Michael, Munich, Germany

Great Scott !7 years after Osama leads an attack on America, then America elects in possibly Obama Hussein!!! Incredible.

Scott Jones, Tokyo, Japan

If you back Obama you are signing your fate to the same things that we have seen in the current administration for the next 4 years.Wake up people he has not outlined one thing he stands for with details just broken speeches. Vote Clinton GO HiLLARY

michael king, niles, ohio

Mrs.Clinton should not forget the greater interest of the party.Obama is not a Republican.

Lyric Barnik, Dhaka, Bangladesh

Neither of them should even be considered. All she ever accomplished is to marry an ambitious politician....thats it. No one would have ever heard of her had she married say, a car repair man or plumber. Obama is still a pup, with only 2 yrs public service. Is this the best the Dems can come up with?

Tony, creston, usa/ne

I certainly hope this is not as clear cut as people seem to be suggesting, because one thing is for sure - if Obama wins the nomination, the next president of the United States will be John McCain.

Clinton could win - and probably would.

The thought that America will elect Barack HUSSEIN Osama, sorry Obama... that is a fairy tale.

Ian Lowe, Airdrie, North Lanarkshire, UK

What a choice!- Hillary the Socialist or B. Hussein Obama the Communist. Heaven help us. I'll vote for the Liberal (while holding my nose) McCain. The Founding Fathers must be spinning in their graves.

Bob in Ohio, Toledo, Ohio/U.S.A.

"Hillary is a woman. She should be supported at any cost."

It is this kind of political ignorance that makes me sad. Her gender has nothing to do with her competence. The above statement should really be read as, "Look, she has boobies! So do I! She'd be a great president!"

Stop staring at her chest and start listening to her polices and proposals. At that point the right choice for the nominee becomes clear.

Kerry Ann, Austin, Texas

It's interesting that Hillary would claim that Obama is hopelessly unprepared to take on the McCain machine in the fall campaign. Recent primary results show that he's been doing a great job of taking on the Clinton machine-- historically a well-oiled implement of political destruction -- and he's been winning, winning, winning winning, winning, winning, winning winning, winning, and winning.

P Bobbe, Celo, NC

"[Gotta] ... love the smell of napalm in the morning ...[eh]?" -- particularly when lobbed between two of the most tax-power-hungry, over-rated and under-experienced lefties in the US today!

The "coarse cackle" or the messianic "cloak of change" - some choice.

Jack, Ottawa, Canada

'I still believe in a place called hope' but populated by Obama, not the bitter and twisted Clintons

David Sindall, London,

For what it is worth Obama has shown himself to be the better leader during the campaign.

Hillary has not even managed to stamp out squabbling in her own team, and she's had - what - 10 years to plan this campaign? What a mess.

Of course, both of them (and McCain) have disastrous policies for the US economy. Get ready for continued high inflation! Only Ron Paul seems to have any grasp of economics and his is a very lonely voice.

Sheesh, London, UK

Many see Obama as simply another liberal Democrat with no experience who rides on his words alone. I see him as a man who finished near the top of his class at The Harvard Law School, who could have immediately sought the Golden Fleece at any of the numerous corporate defense law firms
as most of his class did. Instead he went to WORK in low-income areas in grassroots enterprises aimed at actually doing something to improve individuals' lives. Simply put, he is the only candidate who actually walked the walk before he talked the talk. That is substance.

M. Vincent Savage, Florence, South Carolina

I like Hillary but I'm very disappointed in her constant crying/complaining about this and that...Barack cut off our speech...wah...he's using a friends words in is speech...wah...stop the complaining because the whining is hurting my ears. She needs to think of something substantial to complain about because we just don't care about the one's she's using.

Vanessa, West Hollywood, CA

If any of you saw the SC debates I am sure you agree with me that Mr. Obama can handle his own when the attacks start flying. Remember this man comes from Chicago politics... some of the most rough and tumble in the nation. I am confident that he can go there if he needed to in order to defend himself.

JJ, Chicago, Illinois

Hey Hillary why is it you ran for the senate in New York and not where you came from. Could it be that you had hopes of being president and couldn't win unless you were a senator from New York. Could you please tell us I don't think you will because we already know the answer. You are all about the power and nothing else.

gabe collins, gautier, mississippi/usa

Since when is a spouse's experience counted as one's own? Would you accept surgery from a surgeon's spouse?

Dr Ray, Columbus, OH

Possibly, the reason Hillary won't pull out of nomination process now is to undrecut any chance Obama has of getting elected president. Likely Hillary already knows she can't win nomination, but will do anything she can to prevent Obama from winning presidency, setting herself up for another run in '12. She has done this before when she did not support Kerry in his run last time. The Clintons do not care about Democratic party, only themselves.

Larry, Fairfax, VA

Although she actually has less experience in elected office than Obama, I feel Hillary would be tougher in the White House in areas such as negotiations with foreign governments. However, there's just something about the Clintons (and their political machine) I despise. Arrogance? Bill wagging his finger at us? Her shrieking? Seems like most male Democrats feel the same way. And in the general election against McCain, she would probably do well to get 40% of male votes.

Mike, Plano, TX

The voters in the last ten states have collectively censured Hillary Clinton's insanely negative campaign. Her response? Pile on more attacks. If that is what constitutes leadership in this country, consider me an emigrant.

Linda, Akron, OH

To listen to Hillary Clinton you would think she had climbed Everest without oxygen. What exactly is her great record of achievement anyway (aside from persuading some people that she has a great record of achievment)? Can someone please enlighten me?

It's also interesting how the mainstream media, out of deference to the Clintons, refuse to write her off. Please abandon your British politeness Mr. Baker. It is painfully clear that she is finished.

Sinisa, Hamilton, Bermuda

Hillary should end it now. She has been a horrible Senator and terrible candidate. 20 years of the Bushes and Clintons is enough. Obama has captured the anti-Clinton vote and inspired many. Hopefully Hillary will also leave the Senate and return home. Where that may be.
Democrats have a simple choice elect Hillary and lose 48 States or elect Obama and be competitive. Texas will be the icing on the cake.

Benny, Saratoga, NY, USA

Obama (a) does have significant legislative achievements, mostly in Illinois, and (b) has no less direct experience of government than Hillary. This can't be conveyed in a 20-second soundbites, so many lazy pundits and bloggers ignore it.

Judge them by the way they've run their campaigns, to see the measure of the two as human beings, as leaders and as organizers.

I thought at least that HDC would make an effective President at the start of this campaign; I'm increasingly certain now that she wouldn't.

Simon Buckland, washington, DC

Clinton cannot bow out gracefully. There is nothing graceful about her or her husband. They are the Arkansas Billhillaries without a shred of dignity. They exist to wield power. I am confident they will go negative and show their true colours. They need to be discredited to the point where they lose all political influence.

As for those who claim they don't know where Obama stands on the issues, blame your media who are obsessed with soundbites. I know that he is for universal health care and against the war in Iraq which is why I pray for his victory.

Yes, there is a choice this year.

Sinisa, Hamilton, Bermuda

attacking Obama will simply produce adverse effect and desperate housewife will even lose kitchen support.

Sin, vancouver,

she has already gone negative against Mr. Obama. unfortunately negative campaign turned the voters off and had worked instead to the Clinton's detriment. If she lost Texas, and Ohio, I would suggest that she just ends her campaign and embraces Obama.
That would the right and the smart thing to do, if she care about the country. After all, I hope that the democrats have one goal and it is to defeat the republican and the bush administration. the country cannot afford a third term of the administration. we already see that Mccain will be a clone of Bush...

Richard Andre, Malden, MA, USA

Last night on Hannity and Colmes Sean Hannity remarked that Hillary Clinton "isn't likable." That, I think, is her biggest problem. Regardless of experience and proposed programs, it's hard to vote for someone a person dislikes.

Tina , Parker, Colorado

Hillary just can't accept defeat! It's just not a part of her and slick Willy's plan they made when they married. She should bow out gracefully, being a past president's wife doesn't make her any more experienced than Obama. Good luck to Obama.It's time for the Clinton's to say good-bye.

mary ann hannah, geneva, ohio

The inexperience argument won't work for Hillary, either. If you compare what the two democrats have accomplished during their adult work lives, Hillary has spent the bulk of her time as a corporate lawyer or a State or National First Lady (unelected positions of no real power). Her eight years of elected experience have lead to no real legislative accomplishments (she's basically named a bunch of buildings.) Obama spent most of his time either as a civil rights lawyer or as an elected official at either the state or national level. Although he's spent less time in the US Senate, during that time he's co-sponsored legislation to address campaign finance reform and poverty relief in contrast to Clinton's building-naming spree. It's not going to be hard to compare their two records. Obama is going to have a much harder time in the General Election against McCain, who has a long and very distinguished career in the US Senate.

Helen, Davanport, IA

Just because Gerald Baker wants Obama to win doesn't mean he will win, nor is saying the only option left to her is negative campaigning , means she will campaign negatively. Just where is the negative campaigninig from Hilary Clinton the commentators are insisting she has indulged in, a few remarks taken out of context is the best her detractors come up with.Obama is ahead by barely 150 delegates, his lead will be wiped out by the time results from Ohio and Texas are in. Hilary came back in New Hampshire and she'll come back again. There is an awful lot of wishful thinking about Obama, especialy from British commentators, who love the underdog.

Uche George, London, England

Okay everyone! Let's hear it! Unleash you tirade about Obama. We've heard them all before.
There are just problems with them:

One: These have been the same rants since Iowa, and despite an increasingly bright light being shown on Rezko, Larry Sinclair, and Wordsgate, the candidate KEEPS WINNING STATES BY IMPRESSIVE MARGINS.

Two: That Obama has now tapped into some of that voting block he will need to win an election.


Three: What is it in his vetting that detrators hope the press will find?And if there were a real dragon in Obama's past, shouldn't the Clinton campaign have found it by now?

Last: Isn't it just a little arrogant to assume that Obama supporters are this stupid little heard of sheep, and that opposing his candidacy (which ideologically isn't far different from any other Democrats) makes you somehow better than the majority of voters.

Maybe he's winning simply because he's a better candidate the Clinton.

Food for thought, eh?

Thomas , Dallas, TX,

Clinton is no more qualified than Obama. All she ever accomplished is marry an accomplished politician, thats it. Period. Would anyone have ever heard of her had she married anyone else? She is all show and was media made throughout the 90's, based on sympathy for her due to her disgraceful impeached hubbie. It would be great to see her fade away after this campaign...the county can only hope and pray this happens.

Tony, creston, usa/ne

Chris Matthews' interview last night with Senator Kirk Watson
of Texas said it all: Chris asked the Senator, who supports
Obama, to name "just one" of Obama's legislative accomplishments, and the Senator literally had his mouth
open wide, nothing coming out of it, on TV. Chris Matthews
asked him the same question, 3 times, and finally the Senator
admitted "I can't".

Paul, Centerville, Ohio

It comes as no surprise that the people here in the USA in the case of making a difficult choice would prefer ANY man over a woman as President of the United States.
Way to Go !

WILLIAM, AVONDALE, USA, AZ

To conclude that the only available course of action to correct a faltering campaign is to go on a negative offensive belies a real lack of vision. Her campaign's initial dabblings with negative tactics have been badly received, which augurs badly for any plans to go back down that rocky road.

Surely a better strategy would be to redouble her efforts to a) win the battle of ideas with Obama, and - perhaps more importantly - b) enhance her communication of her ideas, and the way she connects with the electorate.

Too often she comes across as stiff and staid. While she'll never match Obama's oratorical flair, on occasion she does come across as relaxed, human and highly energised. At these times she's more convincing and persuasive than Obama. Not often though - she desperately needs to show this side of herself MUCH more.

That would boost her appeal and chances of success much more than what's currently being planned...

Dorje, Copenhagen, Denmark

Whoever wins the Democratic nomination - and perhaps becomes the next President - will be presented with a very thankless task in trying to undo the results of the Bush policies.

I should prefer to see McCain inherit Bushes mantle and have super Democratic majorities in both houses of Congress.

colin d, Tulsa, , Oklahoma, USA

My guess is that they won't go too negative, chiefly because they know how likely it is to backfire. Obama's appeal has an enormous amount to do with not being politics-as-usual. Negative campaigning is a clear example of that.

Andy Brown, New York, NY

Yeah I agree with some comment about Hillary's ego cloud her judgment. I could see her early speech in Texas where she sounded desparate; her tonality expression and words did not match up. She did not move me at all. Sorry for her for draining herself and people by not knowing she has lost.

Lisa, Chorley, UK

The democrats have lost the opportunity to make a really good president in Al Gore.
Obama is the second best.

Sidd, London,

TO Diplomad:
The Republican frontrunner is one of the Keating 5 and was censured by the US Senate for his involvement in the Liberty Savings and Loan scandal. Read up on your history. A man of integrity, war hero or not, doe not use the power of his office to influence the law in order to conceal or perpetuate a crime.
No, McCain is not a nanny-statesman. He is no statesman at all.
You should read more before posting vitriolic ignorance on the blogs.

Thanks, my friend.

Friend, Miwaukee,

During his eight years in the Illinois state legislature and his three years in the U.S. Senate, Senator Obama has authored or cosponsored hundreds of bills, many of which became law. Two notable accomplishments that come to mind are the Coburn Obama Act for government transparency and the Lugar Obama Act on nuclear nonproliferaiton. His voting record is easy to find if you care to look.

He also has a full blueprint detailing how he will bring about change in the U.S. You can find this, and other details, on his website.

Linda Jitmoud, Lexington, Kentucky

Mrs. Clinton should concede NOW to help the Party and the people she says she is fighting for. The focus should be on Obama vs. McCain. Voting for Clinton in March is, ultimately, voting for McCain in November. He is a decent human being and deserves well-earned respect.

Pedro, Bangkok, Thailand

The Clintons would be risking alot with a massive dose of last ditch negativity. They could divide the Democratic party. And they could also permanently damage the Clinton "brand" if they end up on the wrong side of history here. Bill has earned 20 million from speaking engagements since he left the White House - I wonder what his current market rate is?

Simon , London, UK

Belief in Obama is belief in yourself? What does that mean? No really, think about it. What does that mean? Go Obama - beat Hillary. And then the contrast with John McCain will be stark. Hopefully, if Obama does lose, you can still believe in yourself.

Good Grief, podunk, new york

Those who point out that Obama has limited experience do have a point. The question is whether and to what extent that matters.

Firstly, many observers have been convinced that he has a winning combination of intellectual capacity and openness to alternative and opposing ideas to his own. Much would depend on his judgement regarding the calibre of advisors he appoints.

Secondly, for all of Clinton's rhetoric on being ready to be commander in chief on day one etc, you have to ask where's the beef. I mean when has she really demonstrated this infallible experience? Her record as First Lady hardly meets those lofty claims (remember Hillarycare), nor does her Senatorial career.

Thirdly, voters will inevitably compare Obama to Bush, and many will conclude that Obama could do a better job than the incumbent.

Finally, there have been several important ‘inexperienced’ presidents who've entered office beating more experienced opponents (JFK, Reagan).

Dorje, Copenhagen, Denmark

As Obama continues to beat Clinton in Democratic primaries Hillary reacts with personal attacks, depression, and peevish anger. Do we want a President who becomes depressed and peevishly angry in the face of adversity? Hillary Clinton may have the experience but does she have the temperament needed to be a good President?
Cos Mognic, Beverly Hills Ca

Cosmo Mognic, Beverly Hills, USA/Ca

Oh, sure, believing in yourself triumphs over experience and skill anytime. Sit the current confident president, Dubya Bush, down in front of a piano, and you know what will happen? My guess is nothing. Courage and confidence work only if a person knows what he's doing. Obama simply isn't ready to be president, just like Bush wasn't ready to be president. Speaking skills, by themselves, do not a leader make.

Kelly, Revere, USA/MA

I am just so deeply devastated when I think about our country choosing yet again for a candidate whom they do not know well. Get Real made an insightful comment about not asking the hard questions. Anyone I've run into who is voting for Obama can't even tell me really why they like him. Could it be that he gives "super bowlish" type speeches? Is it that he was on the cover of GQ as the new "hip" president? I just feel like we don't need a frat guy. We need someone who can't be bowled over, who can think for themselves, who won't compromise their vision for the minions working for them in the White House. We need someone who is experienced, a real leader, someone who writes their own speeches for god's sake. I'm just disgusted with the lack of intellect from the American people. But then again, what did I expect? Hillary, I'm with you to the end -- Kelly, Eugene, OR

Kelly , Eugene, Oregon

What has the so called 'experienced' republicans given the average American....war & terror....environmental damage.....economic hardship.....loss of respect in the world.......a divided country. Hilary is no different.......it's time for a new and inteligent approach.......Go Obama Go.

Nick, New York, New York

Both Obama and Clinton are unqualified for the office of President. Neither has done anything positive or even of minor interest worth remarking upon. Both are beholden to an out-dated nanny-state ideology; both are bereft of any original thoughts; both are spoiled products of privilege; both are convinced of their entitlement to whatever they want at the moment; both are ignorant about the history and culture of the American people. They are empty suits who have relied upon a fawning left-of-center media for sustenance. Neither one will be President come next January.

Diplomad, New York, NY USA

Hillary's demise is not surprising. Americans--generally--have always frowned upon one family monopolizing political power. We see this with the Kennedy's. Although the US media still likes to refer to the Kennedy's as "Americans royal family" (no one else in America calls them that but the media), they have lost virtually all influence. Even in a liberal state like Maryland, Kennedy's cannot win (hence, Kathleen Kennedy Towshend's loss to a Republican in the Maryland governor race five years ago). Clinton is viewed as an exentsion of her husband. The Clinton clan is weak. No one likes a monarch, at least most in the US. Obama is the best Democratic choice for most Democats in the US (ironically, Obama's father comes from royal blood in Africa). But Obama sees himself less a King than Hillary does a Queen. Hillary truly believes America cannot survive without her. That kind of arrogance wears thin on American voters.

Jason Kumstockowski, New Jordan, OH

The issue now is will Hillary's self-serving interest cause the party nominee to suffer? The likelihood of Mrs. Clinton being the nominee is slim to none. Barrack Obama is locking the nomination up and if Hillary can not win fairly, she should not apply for the nominations at all.

The fact that I've read stories how Mrs. Clinton and her staff wish to attempt to steal Obama's pledge delegates, strong arm the nomination through super delegates overriding the will of the people, and/or fracturing the party through arguing to change the rules in relation to Florida and Michigan is bad enough. Now, I read how Hillary wants to go nuclear on Obama.

At this point, even if Hillary wins the nomination, she will lose the general election and the Democrats will lose Congress for putting her forward. Now the only question is should Hillary be ethical and decent and potentially salvage her political career or does she want to burn out through these tactics.

Bill, Pittsburgh,

Just another opportunity for Obama to prove he’s a better choice. By staying above the muck he has engendered the confidence of millions, and this is how he will handle the Republican mud-machine as well. Intelligent, moderate, thoughtful and inspiring – what more are you looking for in a head of state?

Alex L., Toronto,

Belief in Obama is belief in yourself. I believe that I have the courage, the talent, the desire, the resoluteness, and the tenacity to overcome and thrive in the face of inexperience, and I believe Obama does too. Its a choice of belief in yourself or cynical surrender to politics as usual.

D.J. H, Iowa City, Iowa

Double, double, toil and trouble...

Bob Redman, Jacksonville, FL

Spot on Gerard. The collapse of hubristic dynasties is both painful and toxic. Change is frictional to the status quo and the precipitate is more vitrioloic cant.

Lionel, Windhoek, Namibia

David, I am suprised that you would fall for such a childish ploy as what are his progarm talking points. Obama has details of his program ideas on his website. Being from South Yorkshire I thought you would read to find out information, instead of waiting for someone to tell you what someone's program is. But going negative by the Clintons will backfire, as it has through out these primaries.

James, FT Lauderdale , Florida

The largest organization Hillary has managed in her life is her presidential campaign. It has been a complete disaster.

Matt Wright, Willmington, DE,

It is a sad day in the election process when a candidate is pigeon hold by voters who have blinded themselves to the real truths about their candidate. Lets just tell it like it is-- Obama is an inexperienced legislature with no real accomplishments who has been able to use a campaign process stolen from the Governor of Massachusetts to get a disillusioned, fustrated and demoralized electrate to drink the cool aid and be hearded like sheep into a decision that will lead our country into another four years of wondering in the wilderness. Change is good but it has to be the right kind of change! Mr. Obama has not been vetted and this country will pay dearly for not asking the hard questions just as the right questions were not asked before going to war in Iraq. It is very difficult to imagine how anyone could put the future of this country into the hands of someone three years removed from a state legislature, and a community activist into the world stage without an ounce of experience

get real, Plano, Tx

Sometime after Hillary loses the Democratic Nomination she will take a very constructive step toward running again: Divorce Bill. Just watch

Gabrielle, Glendale, usa

If Hillary Clinton cannot even run an election campaign how can she aspire to lead America? Go now before you damage your party further.

Phil, Hong Kong,

You people are so silly. If Obama were not black he would not even have been taken seriously as a candidate. Sen. Clinton is by far the more capable and competent of the two. Why the devil she doesn't attack more aggressively I don't know. For the same reason Sen. Obama gets such favorable treatment from the press, I suppose. After all, we're all terrified of being called racists just because we support someone other than the latest American Idol. Substance means nothing these days. 10-second sound bites and pearly whites decide the nomination. Obama's campaign is fueled not by idealism, but by rank cynicism. The cynicism that devalues competence and experience in politics and loves to see frontrunners (and Britney Spears) brought down and humiliated. Such is the state of democracy in the USA

Norbert Malvaux, Atlanta, USA / Georgia

I agree that Clinton is the only one not to recognize she has lost. What concerns me is that she will continue to fight, helped by the notion that the Clintons are scrappers and never lose, and split the Democratic party. I am concerned that she will not withdraw before the convention and struggle and connive whilst there to deprive Obama of his rightful nomination. To echo another comment: is this the type of behavior we want in our leaders and wish our children to emulate? I don't think so.

Anthony, Shanghai, China

Hillary is a woman. She should be supported at any cost.

Lois Rees, Swansea, UK

For those of us who've watched and wretched at the cynical arrogance of the Clintons for the last 16 years, the collapse of Her Inevitableness' coronation is sweet indeed.

Anthony (Los Angeles), Los Angeles, CA

Don't get your knickers in a twist -- negative campaigning is a redundant expression in our American politics. It began with the first elections, and is highly entertaining, as well as revealing about the target. Obama has yet to be vetted, and the Republican attack machine, which turned war hero John Kerry into a war coward, will turn the Holy One into so much grist for a Big Mac -- with special sauce, yet. The more negative the Clinton gang goes, the better for all concerned.

Rodger Lodger, New York, New York USA

Actually I think they may give up without a fight. The true test in this - if H. Clinton really really cares as much as she says she does about the poor, working class, health care,etc. why cause divisions in the Dem. party if it is almost a lost cause?

Isn't it better to cut the losses, move on? Yes, but it won't be easy - and this is where true character comes into it - how she bows out will be remembered as as much as how she got in. She is best served to rally the party around the leader.

Point in case: will she want to really work for almost universal health insurance under Obama's plan that insures 32 million people(47 million - the 15 million she claims he leaves out). A true test indeed.

Kent, Toronto, Canada

If the only option now is for the Clintons to go toxic, it is time for the Party apparatus to encourage her to suspend her quest for the nomination. Were the situation reversed, ... Clinton had the momentum and a clear sign of being headed for the nomination, ... the cry for Obama to concede would be deafening. Let's hear those voices now. It's time for the good of the Party and nation for the Clintons to graciously step aside before irreparable harm is done.

jeff, st thomas, vi

There's another unmentioned issue with thermonuclear attacks that ought be investigated.

Senator Reid hasn't endorsed and has a Senate majority to protect.
Speaker Pelosi hasn't endorsed and has a House majority to protect.
Vice-President Gore hasn't endorsed.
John Edwards hasn't endorsed. Nor have Sens Dodd or Biden, nor Governor Richardson.

Thermonuclear attacks have a tendency to prompt cooler heads to reach for the nearest microphone to put a stop to it. The worse her campaign behaves, the more likely she starts a floodgate of potentially vocal and powerful endorsements to her opponent.

Seth W, Ann Arbor , MI, USA

More I see Hillary Clinton trying to hold on to the race, more I cringe at the very sight of that frumpy lady.

Barry, Dublin, ireland

Very well said Fred Keeling. To which I'll add:
They will be childish
They will be negative
They will be arrogant
They will be insulting
They will be overbearing
They will not concede defeat
They will continue to be divisive
They will not be graceful in defeat
They will harp on and on about no contests
They will try to steal the pledged delegates
They will ignore the will of the Democratic Party
They will attempt to change the rules after subscribing to them
They will say anything and do anything until they are pronounced the winners
But at what cost?
Is this the kind of leader and leadership we want?
Is this the person to unify the Democratic Party after the Convention?
Is this what we want our children to aspire to?
Speak Up America!
Let your voices be heard!
Wherever you are, whoever you are
Stand Up and be counted!
The time to stand up for Change has come!

Fired Up! A