Edward Gorman, Motor Racing Correspondent
Pick up your copy of Joy Division: Closer at WHSmith today
Bernie Ecclestone rarely talks about retiring from running the sport he loves, but he joked yesterday that he would think about doing so if the FIA, motor sport’s governing body, contrived to take the World Championship away from Kimi Raikkonen and awarded it to Lewis Hamilton.
There is a more than theoretical possibility that the FIA’s Court of Appeal, which meets in London tomorrow, could reaward this year’s championship if it decides that the Williams and BMW Sauber cars should be retrospectively disqualified from the season-ending Brazilian Grand Prix for using illegal “cool” fuel.
If the court upholds an appeal by McLaren Mercedes against the decision of the stewards at Interlagos not to throw out the cars, the FIA could change the result of the drivers’ championship. Nick Heidfeld and Robert Kubica, of BMW, and Nico Rosberg, of Williams, could be disqualified from the race, which could hand the title to Hamilton.
Like Hamilton, Ecclestone is against any such thing. “I don’t think that the Formula One fans would like a championship to be won because the temperature of the fuel, which can’t be measured anyway, is possibly 5C out,” Ecclestone said. “If anybody thinks that’s the best thing for Formula One, then I’d have a very serious thought about me retiring.”
Ecclestone believes that the infringement by Williams and BMW is of the same order as McLaren’s rules infringement in Brazil, where Hamilton’s mechanics illegally used an extra set of tyres during practice. The punishment from the stewards was a small fine and the confiscation of the offending set of rubber.
“I don’t think anything’s going to happen if it goes through,” Ecclestone said. “In my opinion, they don’t have to change the results of the race – it’s an infringement of the regulations. On the same weekend, McLaren used an extra set of tyres, which they shouldn’t have used – that was an infringement - so maybe if anything does happen at this Court of Appeal, maybe they’ll treat it exactly the same as the tyres.”
BMW and Williams are expected to argue at the hearing that McLaren’s appeal is inadmissible and there are several ways under Formula One’s rules that an outcome of that nature can be arrived at. Ecclestone is hoping the lawyers will reach that conclusion. “That would be exactly right,” he said.
One other way out of this legal maze would be for McLaren to declare, at the eleventh hour, that they have decided to drop the appeal, something that Ecclestone hopes may happen. “I don’t think Ron [Dennis, the McLaren team principal] has really got the intention of continuing with it,” he said.
The Woking-based team have still not determined who will drive alongside Hamilton next season. But there is no doubt that Rosberg is their No 1 target, despite recent comments by Sir Frank Williams, the eponymous team principal, that the German is staying put at Williams. At McLaren, it is being noted that Rosberg, 22, has remained tight-lipped about his desires, amid speculation that he wants to leave.
In Barcelona, the first test of the “winter season” took place at the Circuit de Catalunya yesterday with 20 drivers at the wheels of an assortment of cars. Michael Schumacher was driving a 2007 Ferrari without traction control in his first proper return to the cockpit since retiring 12 months ago.
Schumacher was in the car to help the Scuderia to understand the technical issues arising from dropping traction control and the seven-times world champion appeared to have lost none of his spark. He was the quickest man on the track after completing 64 laps. Schumacher has made it clear that he has no plans to return to race driving.
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Find tickets for:
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2006
£14,337
2008
£39,937
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
Competitive package
Npower
Midlands
£
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
1 & 2 Bed apartments
From £249,995
Great Investment, River Views
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
low-cost ownership homes in London
Multi–Centre 9 Nights
From only £925pp
View thousands of properties online with your Vacation Rental People
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Mclaren have been punished .
So if other teams have broken the rules then award the appropriate penalty.If that means Hamilton wins the championship then so be it.
Bernie Ecclestone should be ensuring it is a fair hearing, rather than threatening to get out if the outcome is different to his views.Its always about him (small man syndrome)
David, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, England
When are you gonna take Alonso bad humor face out of this newspaper?. Alonso tookover Hamilton in Brazil. He was happy in the end, not Hamilton, we were happy as McClaren took what they diserved, not English people. Don´t change reality and try fairly to be winners not losers. I know English people are not the way Ron Dennis is like.
Chiri, Madrid, Spain
Kimi won more races and was faultless except unlucky failures in Spain and Germany. Everybody focusus on Hamilton to be the 1st. rookie Champion of.... and so we have a trial. Hamilton was not faultless in the last 2 races of the season. The mistake in China was the beginning of the end.
And that's all. If Bernie, Lewis and everybody else say that we do not have to argue...that Kimi is the right champion..than let's be proud of this season, concentrate on next season. New Round, New Prizes. Go!
Arthur, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Oh.. and by the way... Schumacher is NOT coming back.
He is not hungry anymore? He is afraid that it will damage his reputation? I do not think so.
If McLaren comes around I will eat my shoes if Schumi does not respond I just can't belief it. Such an ambitious guy. I hope on his comeback. Give Lewis some lessons. Fight with Kimi. Yeah.
Arthur, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
mclaren is not fair, firts they had denonced Alonso in Hungaroring because they wanted Hamilton to get the pole, second they copy Ferrari's car, third they want to win the championchip in bureaus and finally they accused Renault, Fernando's best option, is this fair play?
anita, Spain, Valladolid
If the FIA had taken Kimi's points away from Australia where he was driving an illegal car, we wouldn't be having this appeal...
Alastair, Guildford,
Yes, a rule is a ruleânice tautology!âand there are some other "rules" that simply do not exist, as that one used in Hungary to penalise FA. No to mention the rules about driving behind the safety car, ignored in Japan. Better don not talk about rules. Be serious.
Feli, Granada, Spain
reading some comments one would wonder if persons like Mike Burkinshaw or Colin Kendall are capable of any coherence.
I hear McLaren and Hamilton fans babbling about the federation helping Ferrari.
how ridicuolus can you get?
please... no other team in F1 history got away with what Hamilton and McLaren got away with the past championship: penalties not inflicted as they should have, Hamilton's car running out in Germany being put back on track by a crane, and on and on and on...
please, be honest and face it.
You just cant take the fact that, despite cheating, McLaren lost.
All sportsmen know that the spy story was ruled poorly, and obviously favoured McLaren drivers (which should have both been disqualified), and still I can read of brit fans babbling about Ferrari.
ridiculous !
Diego, Rome, Italy
yeee....yeeee.....
rules are rules for everyone, except against Lewis Hamilton......
Javier, Cordoba, Argentina
The problem is, if nothing is done about the illegal fuel temperatures in those cars then what is to stop all teams then adopting the same tactic to improve their cars?
I see the results being left as is, and then all the teams investing heavily to lower fuel temperature for the next season as they can then point back to this ruling.
Sadly, the officials at the race concerned SHOULD HAD ruled the cars were illegal, now we have a nightmare that will affect how teams behave in future.
Aubrey, London,
yes, a rule is a rule is a rule,
but FIA is not treating Mclaren any worse than others, in fact Mclaren got away with many things last year. Why Hamilton wasn't penalized in Brazil for the tyre issue? a rule is a rule is a rule (regardless you take advantage or not, isn't it?)
ps: where are the latest Jenson Button opinions regarding hamilton arrogant attitude? are you all too busy reading the 7 hamilton's boigraphies?
jordi, bournemouth,
I can smell a flavour of paranoid frustration amongst Hamilton's fanatics.
Oh dear, FIA is treating him so badly!! that's why Hamilton didn't get punish in Hungary and Alonso did. That's why he wasn't punished after the Safety Caw incident, that's why he wasn't punished for not giving evidence to FIA about the Spy scandal (he was legally obligated) and if you believe that he didn't know anything, then father xmas will not bring you any pressents this year.
The tyres in brazil, the crane and on and on and on...
jordi, bournemouth,
Russell Gill's comment is (as I see it) dead right. I have no axe to grind and no favourite teal in F1, but the obvious manipulation of the rules to disadvantage Mercedes-Maclaren is apalling. After 50+ years in and around motorsport of many varieties, I am now embarrassed and have given up attempting to explain how F1 is struictured to friends who are not fans of the sport.
A rule is a rule is a rule! If a rule can't be applied, it's either worded incorrectly or it should not be in the rule book.
Trackside officials cannot make ad hoc decisions about whether to apply a rule or not - that is definitely not their job.
Any problems with written rules need to be dealt with by an appeals panel or court, NOT by trackside ad hoccery!
Colin Kendall, London, England
The way things are going all the cars will be red Ferraris racing against each other because nobody has ever got away with as much as Ferrari or its drivers, so what´s the point of competing with a handicap.??
Mike Burkinshaw, Vilagarcia de Arousa, Galicia/Spain
FIA put Alonso in 5th place in Hungary when there was none written rule to penalize the FA action on the pit stop.
Now we are speaken about writen rules and of course the car companies should be penalized.
Just a question:
How many penalties has got Hamilton for breaking several written rules during the whole season?
Should not those cases be also reviewed?
Javier, Cordoba, Argentina
Comme on Bernie, dont be so cynical.You are so interested on claims like this being brought forward: it is the promotion you and your sport needs. I belive this sport should leave tha hands of: 1. a couple of individuals and 2. both british, to become a fair deal and not all this chitty-chatty-we-desperately-need-our-british-champion-lets-lets-make-people-hate-other-drivers rubbish!!!
James, segovia,
The FIA, Ecclestone, Mosley et al should forget all the politics- if Mclaren,Renault and others have infringed the rules then punished them - fine them large amounts of money, deduct some or all of their championship points including the drivers (Except Alonso, he turned FIA evidence against his employer McClaren) and AWARD THE CHAMPIONSHIP TO FERRARI .
TO ENSURE FARE PLAY NEXT SEASON,AT THE START IMPOSE A POINTS PENALTY AGAINST ALL CONSTRUCTORS AND DRIVERS EXCEPT FERRARI SAY 50 POINTS then the ruling bodies will have the result they desire because the current fiasco devalues F1 so much it looks as the transgression of rules is only punished for certain teams and not others.
Nigel Ashurst, Leicester, England
Bernie is getting old if he equates a non-timed practice issue with a potential championship-deciding race infringement.
The tyre issue with Mclaren had no impact on practice; qualifying; or the race result, whereas the performance advantage gained in loading and using cold fuel is measurable and benefitted Williams & BMW DRIVERS in the Brazilian GP.
The fuel issue is a fact, not an allegation yet-to-be-proven; that is why the fuel temperature regulations exist.
Bernie has been heard to say that if a team uses an engine of a larger capacity they should be punished - using power-boosting fuel or a turbo on the engine is the same!
Would he let Heidfeld or Kubica or Rosberg win the drivers championship if it was found that they had run the whole season with super-fuel? Would he simply 'dock' points for the team and tell the driver he had won regardless?
If it were Mclaren and the driver were Lewis Hamilton the answer would be a fat NO!
All 3 should be out of the race!
Russell Gill, TAUNTON, SOMERSET
I believe that Hamilton's season was done when McLaren was given the huge fine and had it's points taken away. The odd little glitch of Hamilton's car during the Brazilian GP was too much of a coincidence. I am certain that, had a BMW taken out a Williams or visa-versa, Hamilton would have had another glitch. How could the FIA or F1 come to any justifiable position otherwise? How could Hamilton be allowed to win under the prevailing circumstances? There is absolutely no way that the anybody will change the outcome as it stands. In effect Ecclestone has said "over my dead body!"
Nick, Quebec , Canada
Ron Dennis should concentrate on managing his team better & then maybe his team will get the results they are hoping for. In football, someone in his position would be replaced for losing the way he did, especially when his team had the championship there for the taking on 2 different occasions. PS Michael Schumacher is still kicking ass.
Joseph Suguturaga, Auckland, New Zealand
If the temperature of the fuel, which canât be measured anyway, is possibly 5C out,â Ecclestone said. â than why have this rule in the rule book, throw it out and while you are at it, why not throw the whole book out..............that will be the best thing Ecclestone and FIA can do for F1.
High Time the old guards of F1 got out and let a new and young team take it over.
A. Patel, Nairobi. Kenya
A Patel, Nairobi, Kenya
Thanks for reminding me that McLaren team were punished for the different set of tyres, even if the fines were collosal. So if the fuel temperature were tampered with, does that amount to fair play, Mr. Ecclestone. Even if it was less than 1C. Equity deals with the law. I rest my case.
HUHUHUGUY, Copenhagen, Denmark
One year into retirement, and 765 thousands of a second faster than third placed PDLR on day one, with more of the same yet to come. Cool.
L. A. Dietz, Palma de Mallorca, Spain