Matt Dickinson, Chief Sports Correspondent
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
In the velodrome in Beijing during the Olympic Games this summer I turned to a respected cycling correspondent during the incomprehensible Madison race. “Am I right in thinking our Great Britain boys are falling behind?” I asked. The response: “To be honest, I'm not sure yet.”
Which brings us neatly to Formula One.
Sport is principally for the combatants, but at the professional level it is also a lot to do with the spectators. For their money, they like to know who is winning or losing, which seems less straightforward than ever in motor racing.
Yes, someone always crosses the line first, but the chequered flag all too often marks the start of the drama. The result is known only once the wheel nuts have been weighed, the winglets have been measured, the complaints sifted through, the tapes examined by the stewards and at least half a dozen conspiracy theories have been kicked around the media room.
At Interlagos in Brazil in October last year we sat until it was pitch black waiting to discover if the result of the World Championship was going to be overturned on a technicality. Something to do with fuel temperatures, apparently, although I am still not sure what it was about. Lewis Hamilton graciously declared afterwards that he wanted to win on the track and not in the courtroom. He knows where heroes are made. But eventsin Spa-Francorchamps on Sunday, when he was relegated from first to third after he had finished spraying the champagne, have fuelled the idea that the racing is just an excuse for a row.
If you want a laugh, go online and read the responses to Edward Gorman's report from Belgium. They remind me of the postbag that would typically follow a match report from a Liverpool-Manchester United epic. One letter postmarked Salford would accuse you of being a biased Scouser, another from Bootle would say the report must have been penned by a “soft Manc b*****d”. They were insistent in their views, but both could not be right.
Petrolheads are even more polarised in their opinions about Hamilton, Ferrari and the FIA, the sport's governing body, and so convinced of sinister plots that it is a wonder they have not turned their backs on Formula One. You can only conclude that they love it, that the chicanery off the track is as much fun as the overtaking. Last year's Spygate scandal was often described as a threat to the sport's credibility, but the fans could not get enough of the drama.
The love life of Max Mosley, the FIA president, was none of their business, but they loved to kick that around for weeks, too. The sex was just the part of it. Was it a plot? Who was behind it?
If they simply wanted to know who was the quickest driver, they would give everyone identical cars. But where is the controversy in that? More important, where is the money? In Formula One it is sometimes hard to tell where the commercial imperatives stop and the sport starts. These are big corporations at work and the fans love all the details of who is copying whose fuel pump.
They must have been slavering yesterday over the detail that, on the printouts in the pitlane, Hamilton had dropped to 6km/h (less than 4mph) slower than Kimi Raikkonen, of Ferrari, and had seemingly surrendered any advantage from taking his shortcut.
The wider question is whether the rest of us, the floating fans, are drawn to or put off the sport by the complexities. The Madison did not work for me in cycling, nor does Duckworth-Lewis as a means of settling rain-affected cricket matches. And I found it immensely frustrating that one of the few great races of the season, behind Monaco and the sodden chaos of Silverstone, is in the hands of lawyers and could take weeks to unravel.
Generally, sport is at its best when you are instantly able to comprehend the brilliance, or the woefulness, of what you have seen. You tend to go off sports in which you are not sure whether you can trust your eyes. Ask the Tour de France organisers.
Even the simplest of sports, football, can tie itself in bureaucratic knots. There is the banning of video replay evidence if the referee has seen an incident. So we can watch footage of a punch on the nose, but because, in the mêlée, the referee thought that he saw something different, his warped view of events stands. It is a strange justice, but at least it does not change the result.
In Formula One, who knows who won the Belgian Grand Prix? No one even seems sure if an appeal by McLaren Mercedes against a time penalty is permitted. Still, it gives fans the chance to debate the issue for weeks, along with Tyrrell being thrown out of the championship in 1984, the BAR car that was too light by 6kg (about 13lb) in 2005 and the rest of the scandals.
“I have often said the race is not over until the official results are published,” Stefano Domenicali, the Ferrari team principal, said on Sunday. Even then, everyone will row over the rights and wrongs.
“FIA = Ferrari International Assistance,” Brit, from Edinburgh, writes online. “The penalty was fair,” Richard, from London, says. “Thats the end of F1 for me,” Mike, from Berlin, says. Yeah, right.
Carragher's caveat narrows the field for future
Jamie Carragher once peed on my feet. We were sitting around a table in a bar in Malaysia on an England Under-20 tour and, as he explained at the time, he had had a few and it was a long way to the lav.
I do not tell the tale to embarrass him but to record how far he has come from since his days as a hedonistic 19-year-old. The journey to upstanding professional, and all-round good guy, is colourfully chronicled in Carra, My Autobiography. In the book, Carragher discloses that he wants to go into management, which is no surprise, given how he loves to analyse the game. Some footballers are experts on the price of Bentleys. The Liverpool stopper knows the name of the Real Betis left back and, probably, whether he is any good on the overlap.
Trouble is, Carra no sooner raises hopes that one of our shrewder footballers will move into the dugout than he adds the rider that “if I couldn’t still live in Liverpool, forget it”. That does rather limit the horizons.
Andorrans on a slippery slope
As England players prepared to face Andorra on Saturday, panicking officials charged around the Olympic Stadium in Montjuic looking for corner flags. In the end, they had to make do with borrowing some yellow bibs, fixing them to the posts with sticky tape. It was another reason to ask whether England should be playing ski resorts in competitive matches.
Still, as last-minute preparations go, my favourite remains queueing up in the gents’ toilets shortly before an England match in Sofia to hear Gareth Southgate, in full kit and with boots clattering on the tiles, asking if he could jump ahead. “David Seaman’s in the only cubicle we’ve got,” Southgate said, “and he’s taking his time.” Perhaps that's why they called him "Safe Hands”.
Matt Dickinson studied at Cambridge University before joining the Daily Express from the Cambridge Evening News in 1991. He then joined The Times in September 1997 and became Chief Football Correspondent in April 2002. Five years later he took on the role of Chief Sports Correspondent. Dickinson won Young Sports Writer of the Year in 1993 and Sports Journalist of the Year in 2000. He is most famous for conducting the interview with Glenn Hoddle that led to his resignation as England manager
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Anyone who can't see LH gained a net advantage from the move needs to watch a different sport. Its irrelevant whether he would have won-the Stewards could not possibly judge that. Maybe McCheats/LH get more penalties coz they break the rules more? No-it must be Ferrari cheating -they're Italians!!!
Stuart, Johannesburg, South Africa
I do believe LH drove as a rookie. You have enough experience in F1 to understand that! You also know that rules are rules! He did get unfair advantage and had to be penalized...Nothing you can say will to change that.
Lucas, Manchester, UK
Had the infringement of the rules happened before the last 5 laps Lewis would probably have received a drive-through penalty, not a stop-go. Post race penalties don't reflect this difference, just add 25 seconds. Why?
Don't blame the stewards, blame their restricted options.
Rule change needed ASAP
David Keenan, Westgate-on-Sea, England
You are so wrong about loving the off track drama, it is poisenous. But we keep coming back because F.1. is a virus you just cant shift, once you have seen, heard & felt an F.1. go past at flat chat you can never get it out of your system! I have now had the desease 39 years!
Pete, St Albans, England
it makes you wonder who is filling some people's back pocket,
it makes you see RED!!!!!!
dean, ferrensac,
There is no denying that the race officals have brought the sport into disrepute and should be required to answer for their actions before the governing body. They missed Raikkonen crowding Hamilton in the chicane (L IV 2c), weaving into La Source and overtaking under waved yellows.
David Guest, Harlow, UK
I recall Jackie Stewart admitting on tv he waited for the legs of the man with the flag at the start to start bending and off he would go.
He never waited to see the flag coming down!
It was the arrogance of the Scot that astounded me.He seemed proud to admit it.
Nothing in F1 seems to have changed!
james allen, manchester, england
a) Raikkonen's driving clearly gave Hamilton no choice other than to cut the corner
b) Hamilton slowed to avoid any perception of advantage and allowed Raikkonen to 'overtake' him
c) Hamilton simply drove better and did not crash
Watch Fiat / Ferrari sales drop! What victory?
Len Stevens, Edenbridge, UK
Just a quick question. Why if, as some have said, the penalty was such a fair decision have a number of former F1 drivers (Jackie Stewart, Nicki Lauda etc) all said it was a disgraceful decision? Surely these respected members of the F1 community have greater insight than us mere mortal viewers?
Neil Parker, London, UK
The only true honest sporting events left in this world are cock fighting and dog fighting :)
Nick Tchalakian, Los Angeles, United States
As I watched the grand prix, I could easily tell Hamilton gained a small advantage by cutting the corner. If he'd gone through the corner as per every other lap, he would have been further behind Raikkonen. He still would have won, but at that moment, he gained a slight advantage.
David G, Coogee, Sydney, Australia
I believe the mistake lands squarely with wrong advice from Ron Dennis from the pit wall. Lewis should have been told to drop back behind Raikonnen, not alongside, before executing his stunning overtaking maneouvre.
Dave Ablett, Llanllwni, Wales
Given the F1 fiasco of deducting 25 seconds off Hamilton's winning time, what would happen if say Arsenal won the FA Cup against Man U only to have that result overturned by some faceless official 2 hours after Wembley had emptied?
barry wadley-smith, Southend-on-sea, Essex
Conspiracy or not, Ed Gorman's article in today's paper makes a shrewd point - "The way the sport is administered may be, at times, incompetent or inconsistent...." In other words - it is unfair on some & favours others. Thus we have seen Hamilton suffer (apparently) more than say Massa.
Phil , Wolverhampton,
Since Hamilton came to the Formula One, apart from some hilarious mistakes for the eternity, all we have are scandals, rows and dangerous, unsportmanlike driving.
He should be out of F1.
Tato Dulanci, Vitoria, Spain
One of the main reasons for this farce is that the new 'bus stop' chicane is so ridiculously tight that to get two cars through side by side requires complete cooperation from both drivers.Something that is unlikely to happen during a race. Frankly it's an insult to a racing driver
Graham Scarborough, Hertford, England
All this hysteria about the FIA being anti McClaren. In fact McClaren benefitted the most from the FIA in not being expelled for having Ferari's most sensitive technical files in their hands. How could Ferrari race against someone who had fheir entire technical data? That is some leniency.
Frank, Halifax, UK
We care, the F1 supporters! In Spain there were TWO infringements from Ferrari, no action taken! Except the fuel guy getting broken bones!
There was no infringement from Lewis Hamilton, when you have ex-world champions saying the same, isn't it about time the FIA were held accountable!
Cass, Canterbury, UK
Lewis did give Kimi the pole pos back and over took him again, and a short while after this Kimi had the Lead again and SPUN IT! Lewis DID-NOT GAIN A POS by going off the track and was punished to the MAX! no 10,000 euro fine cuz its Mclaren & Lewis!
carl hall, burton on trent, england
Hamilton did not cut the chicane - he was pushed off . Defending a line is one thing but Raikkonen went further than that. He is the one who should be penalised. I tried the same thing in my karting days and was severely reprimanded. Hamilton then ceded his place - advantge over - end of story.
Ron Pringle, Eastbourne, England
A fair decision and one which has been used before. Remember Alonso at Suzuka? Almost identical to the event on sunday, and guess what? Alnoso was treated the same way Hamilton was.
Funny how when the person being persecuted is of national interest we turn to the highest level of arrogance.
James, Hertfordshire,
If there was any question - and having watched the race I cannot see how there was - it should only have been was the race outcome materially altered? Given what happened to Raikkonen subsequently the answer can only be no. The first past the chequered flag was the clear and correct winner.
David Burgess, Lymington, UK
Just to clarify, it is not an offence to cut the corner and gain an advantage. The offence is to cut the corner,gain and keep the advantage. Lewis surrendered the advantage and therfore has not commited a crime. The race was back on immediately Riakkonnen overtook. A Farce indeed!!!!!!!!!!!!
Charles, Wakefield, UK
Lewis is the only reason i watch even qualifiers and the race proper. If this injustice continues, i will turn my back on F1 for good.
Brian, Brussels,
I may be wrong but in terms of points advantage over the 2nd place driver in the F1 standings, wouldn't Lewis Hamilton have been best advised to let Kimi win and Massa come in 3rd. This would also have had the advantage of a Ferrari team split over who to back in the last 5 races.
Simon Leonard, Shrewsbury, UK
I only cast the occasional jaundiced eye over an F1 race these days. I used to be an avid fan, but I prefer to watch real sport, rather than the contrived and corrupt form of 'entertainment' that F1 has been for many years. It has about as much cred as WWF wrestling. Why do sponsors bother with it?
Rich Leonard, Southampton, UK
We don't want the off-track stuff at all - we want races like we had on Sunday, with a proper result earned on the track.
The current scenario is beyond farce.
Castro, Stroud, Glos
I have been an avid follower of Formula One since 1950 (Farina), have personally met at least 7 or 8 World Champions and have never seen anything as disgusting as the events following the Belgian GP last weekend! Hamilton avoided a collision, took the lead, gave it back then took it back and won!
Tim Holt, Brisbane., Australia
Once again controversary Hamilton was fighting Raikonnen for the lead whatever happened he beat Massa and Heidfeld fair and square, the stewards should be accountable for their descision and explain in detail how they arrived at it using the rules. Earlier in the race other cars also cut the corner.
Ken Price, Birmingham, United Kingdom