Simon Barnes, Chief Sports Writer
2 for 1 tickets to Singin' In The Rain, this coming Monday. Book now
The England cricket team are in the position of a person who charges back into a burning house to rescue the baby and comes out with the cat. It’s a nice cat, and you are fond of it, but it’s not exactly what you went in for. Still, there’s not much you can do except stroke it.
No England cricketer will leave Australia with pride. But at least this fabulous run of two victories in as many matches gives them back the feeling that they are real sportsmen, the knowledge that good things can happen as well as bad.
By one of those amazing coincidences, the England rugby union team also won a match the other day. And of course, the great joy of the victory came from the fact that England had been having such a dreadful run of it, touching rock-bottom in the autumn.
And Lord, if the England football team can beat Spain in the friendly at Old Trafford tonight, then there will be no hiding from the nation’s sporting optimism. But it doesn’t seem more than a couple of weeks ago that television and radio stations were asking me to come on and explain why England is a nation of losers. That’s because it wasn’t more than a couple of weeks ago.
If the football boys win tonight, no doubt I’ll be fielding more calls: why is England a nation of winners? If so, I’ll tell them that the last question is no more sensible than the first.
England is a sporting nation, and it fights its sporting battles on many fronts. It stands to reason that England will lose a few matches, and also win a few matches. That’s the truth of it, but truth isn’t a very exciting way of looking at things. The cricket team lost the Ashes, the rugby union team lost eight matches out of nine, the football team are struggling to qualify for the 2008 European Championship and suffered a 2-0 defeat by Croatia in October. Why are we such a nation of losers?
Yeah, yeah, yeah, and I suppose England failed to produce Steve Redgrave, Matthew Pinsent, Kelly Holmes, Andrew Flintoff, Bobby Charlton and Jonny Wilkinson. Athletes who have 11 Olympic gold medals, an Ashes victory and two World Cups between them.
But this nation-of-losers stuff is extraordinarily attractive to the national psyche. We are not a nation of losers, but we love to think that we are. Perhaps it’s like believing you won’t get any presents for Christmas, because it’s always such a lovely surprise when you do.
The fact is that all nations are nations of losers: in every tournament, there are more losers than winners. Bad streaks are inevitable. Good streaks are inevitable, too, but not in a passive, fatalistic way, like waiting for the 49 bus. They come from strong, often insanely dedicated people — performers, coaches, selectors and administrators; and every now and then, everything comes together.
England had the most dismal record in Test match cricket for ten years, but even that turned around when Nasser Hussain and Duncan Fletcher took over, and it set England on the way to winning the Ashes. It didn’t happen because a turnaround was inevitable, it happened because, in the end, it was perhaps inevitable that exceptional people would come along.
The truly surprising thing, so far as the cricketers are concerned, is that it took so long for a team full of good players to start winning on this present tour to Australia. The run of failure shows not the team’s feebleness, but the depth of that extraordinary sporting disaster in Adelaide, in the second Test, when England lost from a position in which defeat was impossible. It is only now that the key players, those who were part of both Adelaide and the present one-day victories, have at last begun to recover.
One of the rum things about human life is that we treat any stage we happen to be going though as something permanent and unchangeable, as if spring will never come, as if happiness will never end, as if youth will last for ever. Then we turn to sport, one of the most volatile and changeable of all human activities, and still we assume that every period is permanent, that we are a nation of losers, or, on rarer occasions, that we are destined to be conquerors of the world for ever. Life is not like that, sport even less.
But perhaps this is one of the secrets of sport’s eternal fascination: that we get stuck in the rut of victory, and are taken down sharply, thrillingly, stimulatingly by defeat; or we get stuck in the rut of defeatism and victory comes — as it did at Twickenham on Saturday, as it did in Brisbane yesterday — as the most glorious and delightful surprise.

Simon Barnes is the multi-award-winning chief sportswriter at The Times. He also writes a Saturday column on wildlife. His 15 books include three novels and the best-selling How To Be A Bad Birdwatcher. His latest, The Meaning of Sport, was published last autumn. He lives in Suffolk with his family and five horses
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
Have you ever dreamed of owning your own racehorse or a beautiful painting?
Enjoy comfort, safety, space and great design. Plus enter our great competition
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
Do you have what it takes to be a Times photographer?
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
Find out to make the most of your money with our wealth management guides
Need help with your property? We have an entire how to guide - buying, selling, letting, moving, to help you
We are seeking entries for the inaugural Sunday Times Best Green Companies Awards
Enjoy some wonderful inspiring wildlife moments
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Make sure you don’t miss a goal with our text alerts

Will your team win their match this weekend?

Direct from the farms
2007/07
£57,500
South East England
2007/07
£40,995
South East England
2006/06
£41,995
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
£40-55k+benefits+uncapped commission
Morgan Keating
South East
Up to £30,000
GLE
London
£
c£75,000 + executive benefits
Morgan Keating
London and South
Unpaid with travel expenses
Network Rail
Globrix, the property search engine
Visit Times Online Property for homes for sale or rent
Residential development site with planning permission
£1,500,000
Mortgages, bank accounts & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Dinarobin Hotel Golf & Spa 7 nights
From £1830 per person – saving £530.
Walking & multi-activity holidays in Cauterets. Stylish self-catering apartments.
From 350€ for 7 nights.
SAVE 25% on Sandals Luxury Resorts
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I admire Simon's cricket writing. I can still remember the first article of his that I read during the 2005 Ashes series. Wonderful stuff; Some of his atricles on Warney should be compulsory reading in primary school.
I enjoy the Anglo-Aust rivalry in cricket as much as I do the NZ-Aust rivalry in rugger. I suppose because you know you are playing a top side. Australia has been on top in cricket recently but, as someone whose most shameful memory as a child was watching the Aust cricket captain resign through a spokesperson because he couldn't stop blubbering - you never know when the worm will turn. And when it turns it can produce memorable scenes. Edgbaston 05 etc...
Long live sport and good-natured national rivalry
Michael, Bellbrook, via Kempsey NSW, Australia
I believe the article was about us being neither winners nor losers Mr Morgan, or rather both winners and losers, as are you. You are absolutely right of course, you can beat us at every sport you play. Then again, we can also beat you at every sport we play (even rugby league at times!). We did yesterday at cricket, so if we were the favourites we deserved to be. We got knocked down, we got up. You win some, you lose some. Is this not what Mr Barnes was saying?
We may not win often but we do win. That's good enough for me, mainly because I'm not arrogant enough to expect to win every time. (maybe I'm not really english?) Also when we do win big it seems to be at the expense of you aussies and that more than makes up for the losing.
Glyn Summerhayes, Telford, England
I'm delighted that the bulk of respondents are from Australians, and a New Zealander cousin, who've leapt onto the failure-accepting tone of the article with typical gusto. Yes there are hundreds of problems with administration and the government and inefficiency and club-focused mentalities, but I'd argue the main reason we struggle to succeed consistently is because we are not a nation defined by our sport. We lack the psyche whereby winning sport is the be-all-and-end-all, we have a sense of perspective which places sport alongside other things of interest, not at the centre.
John, Cambridge, England
I tihink I'd wait til the cricket tour is over before I'd write the epitaphs. But your first paragraph, Simon Barnes, just about sums up England's reaction to last night's drubbing of Australia.
And David Ross, although I agree with much of what you say about the english being soft as butter, you have to give it to the uncelebrated Paul Collingwood for showing a spirited grassroots performance. He's been playing in the shadow of media darlings Flintoff, KP and Vaughan, just getting on with it. If they had more with his attitude, the English might have come out of the fire with something more than the cat.
Caro, Sydney, Australia
I can't believe how deluded the English are. Wow you beat and under strength Australian team who is probably sick of playing and thrashing you anyway and then put one good performance together against the Kiwi's. All of a sudden they are the favourites to win the finals. A nation of 20 million people can beat you at almost every sport we play and still you think you are a nation of winners. Lets not even stop with Australia lets go to NZ cause they beat you just as badly with 4 million people. I am amazed at the stupidity and one eyed attitude of english people (and journalists) about their national teams.
Ross Morgan, Brisbane, Australia / Qld
Yeah, that's right.
Fans can be cruel but most of them remain sincere.
And in the beautiful words of the great coach Vince Lombardi
"It's not whether you get knocked down. It's whether you get up".
Arsalan Khan, Karachi, Pakistan
This is hogwash.
England a sporting Nation?
Give is a break!
When did England in its own right - without the support of Scotland, Wales and Ireland - win an international tennis title, an international swimming title, a Winter Olympics gold medal, (even snow-deprived Australia can do that), a Formula 1 GP title, or a major cycling tour title..............?
England's cricket team has displayed sportsmanship and fortitude against the formidibale team of Australian cricketers and English cricket writers. If England is really a sporting nation, perhaps the journalists could be the first to demonstrate this by getting of their backs.
Brian, ADELAIDE, SOUTH AUSTRALIA
Behold the difference between Enlgish and Australian cricket.
2 matches in a row?
Sheesh.
Peter, Adelaide,
No English player will return with pride? We may have lost most games but theres the little matter of Monty Paneser who has barely put a foot wrong. Bowled well, has taken some catches and even had a go at nightwatchman. He has gone from a new arrival on the edge of the team to surely one of the first names on the team sheet for some time to come.
Chris, London,
Simon Barnes may not wish to believe England are a nation of losers, but the facts tend to suggest otherwise.
Yes, it is true that for any sport and for any nation, you win some and you lose some. The mighty will fall and the lowly will rise, eventually.
But seriously, look at the sporting history of England (or Britain and the rest, in the case of cricket ). The Ashes 2005, Rugby World Cup in 2003 and the Football World Cup in 1966 are highlights, but apart from that ... what?
There was a time when Ashes contests were mostly competitive affairs, with Britain and the rest winning almost their share, but since the late 80's, the cricket team have been a joke. While 2005 made it appeared things may be changing back, 2006/7 provided a much needed dose of reality for English cricket fans.
Other English national teams and representatives continually under achieve. The odd win here and there does not override a long term trend and extensive history of poor sporting performances!
Nathan, Adelaide, South Australia
Simon, lets not loose the run of ourselves, Peter's comments are a little bit over the top. Suffice to say you are not at all bad, but you are no Tom Humphries from the Irish Times.
Ciaran Mulgrew, Belfast,
Is it just me or does this article just sum up why the English are so poor at sport.
After all, performance in sport mirrors general national attitudes. The English have by far and away more financial resources, facilities and player numbers (population) to draw on in may sports - particularly cricket, rugby, rugby league and football. Especially when compared to the likes of Australia, Sth Africa, New Zealand and a whole host of European nations. England should not only be winning - they should be dominating.
Yet you are perennial underachievers.
You scrape by to win the Rugby World Cup against a very average and non-rated Australian side (who's teams have incidentally won the Cup twice and been in most finals & semi finals despite having a tiny rubgy population and it being the number 4 team sport in terms of players). Yes, the English were on form for 2 years but so they should have been. After the cup, everything fell apart and the Lions tour to NZ just typifies a shocking attitude. Why? Were not England boasting about their glorious depth of playing numbers during 03 season - where are they? Yes some players retired but every country experiences that. Aust, NZ and Sth Africa do lose games, but are never humiliated. England are consistantly.
Cricket - again a narrow margin of victory wins the ashes after a decade or more. MBEs all round and lets all be celebrities in a 'nothing celebrity' worshiping country. After that, lets lose as many tests as we can and perform disgracefully in Aust in 06/07.
Lets not talk about your religious football. You worship Beckham - but what has he ever won - zip. No European championships and No world Cups. Why can Greece / Italy win and not England with all that money and hype. Pathetic. Even Australia beat Eng in soccer last time they played ( and by the way, when Aust teams in any code are playing for their country, they dont entertain or understand the concept of " friendly") and by all accounts were a better team in the latest world cup.
Wont go near tennis - Timmy, god bless his posh socks.
At the end of the day England does produce talented sportsmen/women for individual and Olympic team sports ie Redgrave etc, but so do other countries with much smnaller populations. I am sure they are were not aided by their respective sports admin systems however.
At the end of the day, you have a poor climate, a govt that does not support school sport, and a poor diet on average for your children.
Many of your administrators are blazers with no idea and you seem incapable of learning and starting with a clean sheet and wrtiting at the top -this is what we need to win.
Your money is with the clubs (football and rugby) who dont give a damn about national endeavours. The players are pampered, overpaid and believe too much in their club based celebrity status. Always injured and always complaining. They do have the best hair styles - I'll give them that. Too many foreign imports stifle development - are there any Englishmenn playing for Chelsea? The foreign imports for premier rugby are all retired from sth hem rugby yet seem to dominate in your competition - most couldnt get a game back home. Too many foreign coaches aswell - how difficult can it be to develop your own coaches.
Enough ranting, at the end of the day nothing has changed. I can't see England ever dominating any major sporting code because they will never have it in them. The odd win yes, but dominate - no way. Leave it to countries with genuine spirit and the capability of being tactically superior and with skills to match fitness.
As a sarcastic and arrogant class divided nation, stick with your fluffy Big Brother celebrity worship and pomposity. Leave the celebrations to the real winners
David Ross, Christchurch, New Zealand
Well, Peter McGuinness sums it up very nicely. It is a wonderfully evocative piece of writing and thank you for that Simon. As a Scotsman, I was hoping that Scotland might triumph at Twickenham but sincerely wanted Jonny W to do well - as an MCC member I always support England cricket but the Scotsman in me welcomes the odd thrashing imposed by the likes of Sri Lanka, Pakistan and of course the Ozzies. Surely that is what we love about our sports - the shere exeburance one day followed by plumbing the depths of despair the next, riding the clouds.
one day and then feet firmly on the ground.
Thank you again to Simon for his writings and good luck to England ,supported by the country (and the Barmy Army!) over the best of three finals to come.
Graham Donald, Trimiklini, Cyprus
Peter,
You are indeed extraordinary.
I picture you sitting in a deserted Gold Coast hotel, leaning on a formica bar and sipping on a cold one, oblivious to the swarming blowflies.
Fascinating.
And all the while, your immense treasure trove of a mind ticking over, composing blogs of such sparkling wit and stunning erudition, effortlessly belying your ignominious ancestry of criminals and prostitutes.
Remarkable.
And all this under the harshest of Australian conditions (i.e. the kerching of the slot monkeys,the blaring noise of the mindless bilge of Australian advertorials that passes for television there). Peter, mon semblable, I salute you !
Scintillating.
Your fulsome praise of this journeyman hack will doubtless draw comparisons with Pound and Eliot, but it must be clear to all that you are indeed 'il miglior fabbro'.
Regards, Barnesy
(btw could you get me a job at the Courier Mail ?)
Maria, Praha,
This reminds me of the fable of the much loved king, who had conqured the world , he loved his people and they in turn thought the world of him.However for no apparent reason he became very depressed refusing public life and vowed to starve till death. The subjects consulted and begged the king to tell the the cause and hence the remedy could be provided.
The king initially reticent finally said I have been thinking of this life, and i want something that when i am said will make me laugh , and equally when i am happy will make me sad.The subjects at a loss as what this could be became resigned at the passing of the king...Then a sage from the proverbial mountain cave came and gave the king a ring,The king on seeing the ring became immediately happy..the ring was no magic ring, it had an inscription engraved on it which read " AND THIS TOO WILL PASS"
SALIL K GUPTA, LONDON, uk
Simon,
You are remarkable.
You are the sporting John Locke of your generation. Or possibly Bentham.
Either way, the prosaic subtlety of utilitarianism, and the 'principle of greatest happiness' colour many of your pieces. You give all who love sport pause to reflect upon the complexity of our expectations, and the upon the nature of combat in context with non-participants.
Are your men Elphinstones or Marlboroughs? Cornwallis' or Wesleys? Fascinating...
Maybe though, England simply won a couple of games of cricket and the boys got up in a Rugby game. And a nice football match to look forward to later on in the week.
You're enormously talented.
You are able to write thousands of words every week about the galactic and existential meanings behind the basic outcomes of sporting contests.
Have you ever considered marketing copy?
I reckon you could write the script for a 30 minute 'Ab-o-mizer 5000' info-mercial straight from the top of your head in seconds.
Anyway ongoing thanks for the entertainment.
I can't wait for next week's reference to Visigoths or the Theory of Infinity, ( or Pax Britainnia or something......). Especially, if England win everthing. Good luck on all fronts Simon....
Peter McGuinness, Gold Coast,