Geoffrey Dean
2 for 1 tickets to Singin' In The Rain, this coming Monday. Book now

Cricket Australia has called off its one-day tour of Zimbabwe, scheduled for September, after the Australian Government issued instructions that the team should not travel to the crisis-torn African country. John Howard, the Prime Minister, who played a key part in the decision, will be applauded by the majority of the cricketing community for refusing to allow the tyrannical regime of President Robert Mugabe the sort of propaganda victory that the tour would have provided.
Howard’s no-nonsense stand contrasts with the refusal of the British Government to order England not to play in Harare in the 2003 World Cup. After much procrastination, England eventually took the decision themselves not to visit Zimbabwe, claiming that their security could be endangered. They were fined heavily by the ICC, but as Australia have been instructed not to tour by their Government, they will not receive an expected fine of $2 million (about £1 million). Even if they had been fined, the Australian Government said they would have paid the sum.
Howard has long been a vocal critic of Mugabe, whose well-documented torture and physical beatings of political opponents caused the Australian Prime Minister to compare the octogenarian’s secret police to those in Nazi Germany.
“The Mugabe regime is behaving like the Gestapo towards its political opponents,” Howard said. “The living standards in the country are probably the lowest of any in the world and you have an absolutely unbelievable rate of inflation. I have no doubt that if this tour had gone ahead, it would have been an enormous boost to this grubby dictator.”
Malcolm Speed, the ICC chief executive, said that he was neither “pleased nor displeased” by the Australian Government’s order. “Mr Howard’s decision is not surprising,” Speed, also an Australian, said. “Talking to people in Australia over the last two weeks or so, it became clear the Australian Government has been heading for this decision.
“From an ICC perspective, we have an agreement between our member countries that they will tour unless there is acceptable noncompliance. One part of that is if a government or public authority imposes a restrictional prohibition and that’s what’s happened here.
“Last year, politicians in England were making a lot of statements about cricket in Zimbabwe and expressing very strong opinions that England should not tour.
“But they fell well short of giving a restrictional prohibition which is what we’ve been saying is required. In this case, a government has come out and said they’ve prohibited their team from going to Zimbabwe. That’s the clarity we’ve been seeking.”
Ricky Ponting, the Australia captain, backed the Government’s decision. “I’m comfortable the Australian Government has taken the responsibility for making international affairs decisions on behalf of the country,” he said. “I’ve never had a problem playing against international cricketers from Zimbabwe and as a playing group, the Australian squad understands its responsibility to spread the word of cricket throughout the world by playing against all member countries.”
Speed revealed that the planned one-day series between Zimbabwe and Australia may still be played in a neutral country, such as South Africa. “That will be for the two Boards to work out, but we would encourage them to look at all options,” he said. “From an ICC perspective, we will work with Zimbabwe Cricket and our members to try to ensure the game there gets the support it needs in order to continue at this difficult time. It is unfortunate for Zimbabwe’s cricketers – and supporters– all of whom need exposure to top-quality cricket in order to develop as players and to encourage future generations to take up the sport.”
Gordon Brown will be spared any similar moral dilemmas when he replaces Tony Blair as Prime Minister, at least in the short term. Although England are expected to host a two-Test series against Zimbabwe in 2009, they are not scheduled to tour there until early 2012.
ICC regulations
The Future Tours Program Agreement (FTPA) provides sanctions against Members that do not comply with their obligations under the FTPA. A Member that does not comply with its obligation to tour another Member is subject to a penalty of a minimum of $2 million or such greater amount that the host Member can prove to have lost as a result of the failure to tour.
This is not an ICC fine. It is a contractual obligation between the respective Members and if a Member fails to fulfil that obligation, then it would have to pay the Member against which it is defaulting.
In certain circumstances, a Member will be excused from its obligations to visit or host another member (acceptable noncompliance).
If there are circumstances likely to give rise to a serious risk of death or personal injury to the players . . . or if the government of one of the Members refuses “to grant a consent, exemption, approval or clearance or imposes any restriction or prohibition” for its team to tour another country.
In 2005, the New Zealand Government refused permission for the Zimbabwe cricket team to enter the country. No contractual sanctions were imposed.
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
Have you ever dreamed of owning your own racehorse or a beautiful painting?
Enjoy comfort, safety, space and great design. Plus enter our great competition
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Are you California dreaming? Explore the wonders of the Golden State. Also enter our fantastic competition
Do you have what it takes to be a Times photographer?
Your brain is capable of more than you might think...
Find out to make the most of your money with our wealth management guides
Need help with your property? We have an entire how to guide - buying, selling, letting, moving, to help you
We are seeking entries for the inaugural Sunday Times Best Green Companies Awards
Enjoy some wonderful inspiring wildlife moments
An interactive preview of the brand new For Your Eyes Only exhibition

Love Sudoku? Play our brand new interactive game: with added functionality and daily prizes

Are you irritable when you return from work? Drained of emotion? You could be suffering from boreout
Prepare for some shock and awe, petrol lovers. Despite the greens trying to wipe it out, the car is about to offer us the most exciting year ever
We've trawled the brochures and websites to find this summer’s best holidays for every taste and budget

Pre-order the new adidas kit now and get 15% off

Income, Life Insurance, Critical Illness Cover

Find a course, arrange a game and save money
2007/07
£57,500
South East England
2007/07
£40,995
South East England
2006/06
£41,995
South East England
Great car insurance deals online
£40-55k+benefits+uncapped commission
Morgan Keating
South East
Up to £30,000
GLE
London
£
c£75,000 + executive benefits
Morgan Keating
London and South
Unpaid with travel expenses
Network Rail
Globrix, the property search engine
Visit Times Online Property for homes for sale or rent
Residential development site with planning permission
£1,500,000
Mortgages, bank accounts & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Dinarobin Hotel Golf & Spa 7 nights
From £1830 per person – saving £530.
Walking & multi-activity holidays in Cauterets. Stylish self-catering apartments.
From 350€ for 7 nights.
SAVE 25% on Sandals Luxury Resorts
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property.
© Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Mr Speight in Manchester - that CIA factbook you have ought to be thrown out with the trash. Zimbabwe is very rich in mineral wealth. If huge reserves of platinum, coal, diamonds (yes, there are diamonds in Zim) and tobacco, to mention but a few, are not examples of natural resources, I don't know what is...
Anyway, back on topic, well done Mr. Howard. As a Zimbabwean myself, I applaud this decision. It will not matter one iota to Mugabe, but at least some sort of disapproval is visible.
Carys Mathews, Chester, UK
Some folks may be a little unjust here. If the Australian cricketers had taken the decision off their own bat (sorry, childish!) the financial consequences might well have bankrupted them, as was the prospect for England a few years ago in similar circumstances: far from being intrusive, Mr Howard appears to have rescued them from this dilemma.
Speaking for myself, I would sooner see our Aussie mates alive and kicking, desperately trying to hang on to the Ashes again next time round.
And the ICC should immediately draw up a code of conduct for participating nations, to prevent this recurring.
Mike Medina, St. Albans, England
John Dempster: Until the ICC does something, it is perfectly reasonable for an ICC member-state government to not allow their citizens to travel to a country.
How do you think the anti-apartheid movement began to gain ground? Through sport.
I think you made a typo: you claim ex-Zimbabwean, but perhaps you mean ex-Rhodesian?
Scott (from Australia), London, UK
Regards Vincent of Moscow's comments:
The Australian government is focused on the poverty of dispossessed Aborigines, but there's no magic bullet, just as there's no magic bullet for the poverty in London, Glasgow or Belfast.
Governments can walk and chew gum at the same time, or at least that's what we elect them to do.
Australia has taken in a number of black refugees from Zimbabwe - how many Aboriginals have fled to the 'greener pastures' of the Mugabe regime?
<blockquote>We first met the Mhlanga family earlier this year, on ABCs Australian Story.
Dumi was already working. His wife Kate and their three children had just arrived in Melbourne.
They came with only their suitcases and the equivalent of about $40 Australian dollars.
"It was a very difficult decision because we were thinking that we were going to a new place, a new environment and we didn't know how friendly Australians were, but we had to make that decision," Kate Mhlanga said.
"The situation in the farms was not very ideal and we would lose our jobs at any time and that would create a problem for the whole family if I was unemployed. If the country loses the agriculture base, which is the backbone of the country's economy, then it means everything would just collapse and that is what has happened now," Dumi Mhlanga said. <blockquote>
Australia has also taken in many Jewish and Moslem refugees from Russia.
Peter, Sydney,
it's interesting that Joe plays the race card, in someways it is a race issue, if a white dictator was imposing the suffering that the current government is imposinf on the largly black population i am sure the rest of the African leaders would stop dithering and attempt to help the people of Zimbabwae, at long last a head of government has decided to speak out and practise what they preach. Well done Austrailia for showing some backbone, now lets pray that the African leaders follow suit.
Mark, South Wales,
John Dempster (ex Zimbabwean), London, Why did you leave your native country exactly?
We actually applaud the fact that our Prime Minister has the guts to stand up to your "infantile butcher" . Its evident that the ICC won't make the decision, someone has to take a stand. The ICC don't particularly care for your countrymen, they are a sporting body not the UN. It should be a political decision not one regulated by a sporting body.
PM, Sydney, Australia
Once again, Howard should focus on the poverty of the dispossed Aborigines in his own country (their plight is far, far worse than those of the poor Zimbabweans) rather than worrying about povety in Zimbabwe.
He should ban Austrialia cricketers from touring next-door Pakistan, where a military dictator does not even allow the level of democracy that exists in Zimbabwe (of course, Pakistan is a darling of the West).
Mr. Howard will also do well to ban Austrialians from visiting the United States until all the CIA secret prisons are closed, Guatanamo Bay is closed, and those responsible for the torture at Abu Ghraib are brought to justice.
If Howard still has no business of his own to mind, he should do something about the illegal war in Iraq that has killed 600,000 and created 2.5 million refugees...
Vincent, Moscow, Russia
This is good and bad news. Good IF Mugabe gets the message! Bad in the sense that it sets a precedent in a supposedly democratic country for governments controlling who may travel and to where they may go.
Peter Hargreaves, Stockport, Cheshire, U.K.
I oppose almost everything Howard stands for but this decision is correct. It has nothing to do with black vs white. It is a shame that Western nations who are quite prepared to sacrifice their own citizens and locals in interventions in places like Iraq and Afghanistan do not have the resolve to remove this manifestly evil man.
John McLoughlin, Melbourne, Australia
I am glad the Australian government has taken the decision not to allow its national cricket team to tour Zimbabwe. This may persuade governments of other cricketing nations not to dither and hide behind the oft-claimed principle that "sports and politics do not mix". If the Zimbabwe regime has such scant regard for its population's welfare it should be isolated, and that includes isolation from the international sporting arena.
Teo Hue, Birmingham, England
I don't believe Government's should interfere in sport. I know the players' have to earn a living from their sport but it is the players who should be making a stand and refusing to play in Zimbabwe or against the Zimbabwe team anywhere in the world. This odious dictator needs to realise that the world will not stand for his regime on any level.
Tracey, Manchester,
While not for a moment questioning the need to bring the Government of Zimbabwe to its senses would we really want our Prime Minister arbitrarily telling us which countries we can and cannot visit because he doesn't happen to like their policies, and confiscating our passports so we can't travel anywhere? Australia is not at war with Zimbabwe, nor is there any suggestion that their cricketers might be in any danger.
Peter Martin, Welwyn,, Herts
it seems its a race thing , how come there is only a problem when it comes white cricket playiong nations , that tour would be good to spread cricket among the black people, expalins why most white zimababweans are aganist the tour
Joe, Hatfield, England
A government with some balls. Nice to see.
Si, Reading,
A victory for common sense, and something which our own government ought to have done in 2003.
I remain astonished that NATO and the West continue their indifference to Mr Mugabe's tyrannical regime. It is only from checking out the CIA Factbook that I discovered that Zimbabwe has no real natural resources (diamonds, gold, oil etc) worth "protecting", unlike certain other countries that we've taken more of an "interest" in, which is probably the true reason for the international apathy.
Mr Speight, Manchester,
Going to Zimbabwe was the second worst thing that could have happened, the worst being government interference in sport. Shows how infantile Australian society is, that they would welcome intervention by nanny. Let the ICC make the decision, dammit, kick the odious Zimbabwe cricketing system out.
John Dempster (ex Zimbabwean), London ,