Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes

Paul Collingwood and Matt Prior resumed England’s first innings on the second morning of the second Test today with a lot of work to do to justify Michael Vaughan’s brave decision to bat first. All in the visiting team’s dressing-room badly need to forget the controversy and their undoubted ill-fortune on the opening day.
Only 258 runs at a rate of little less than three an over, and a mere five wickets, may suggest a banal start to the match rather than the fascinating, strange and disputatious one it actually was. It included a brilliant innings by Vaughan, cruelly cut short by bad or good luck, according to your viewpoint; a sober and dedicated one by Alastair Cook; a strangely subdued one by Ian Bell; and the briefest of appearances by Kevin Pietersen before he was sent on his way after an instinctive piece of teamwork by Chamara Silva and Kumar Sangakkara. It added another to the list of bizzare Test wickets, not to mention technology-induced umpiring disputes.
By the end of the day, Vaughan was less concerned with his own malign fate than with Pietersen’s. “The decision should have been referred to the third umpire,” Vaughan said, risking official displeasure for commenting so forthrightly. “Common sense should have prevailed. We’ve got the technology, let’s use it. We’re talking about big decisions, big games of cricket.”
Pietersen’s dismissal was certainly freakish, but it was the result of a loose drive played to only his fifth ball, against Chaminda Vaas bowling well wide of his off stump from over the wicket. To that extent, Pietersen got his just desserts, but at the same time he, like his captain, might have been unlucky. The outside edge flew low to second slip where Silva got his left hand to the ball and scooped it up. He juggled with it as his body turned towards Sangakkara, moving right from first slip, and, like a scrum half making a flip pass from the base of the scrum, conveyed the ball into Sangakkara’s right hand.
That this was deft teamwork is not in doubt. Whether the two umpires, conferring, should have given Pietersen out without consulting the television umpire is. ICC guidelines encourage the men in the middle to make their own minds up. The replay from the vantage point of Daryl Harper, the umpire, suggested that Silva had grounded the ball in his first attempt to catch it, but history proves that replays can fib. The reverse angle suggested the initial catch was a close thing, but legitimate.
Two new-ball wickets for Lasith Malinga, the first the consequence of a second questionable decision by Harper made Sri Lanka’s close-of-play position far better than it might have been. That was not because they lost the toss — Mahela Jayawardena would have fielded anyway and for good reason — but because Vaughan, after an uncertain start, was in handsome command when he turned an off break from Muttiah Muralitharan from the middle of his bat into the midriff of Jehan Mubarak at short leg.
The ball slid down, stuck between Mubarak’s knees and Vaughan, unable to believe that, having returned to his most sublime form, his fun was over for the day and he had to go. After a few early plays-and-misses, he had hit the ball to the boundary 12 times, off either foot and on both sides of the wicket, all with perfect timing. Not until Collingwood and Prior got together late in the day did any batsman look even remotely as fluent.
Cook shared the first opening partnership of more than a hundred for England in 15 Tests, but his was a long and difficult labour as well as a noble and patient one. He hit some fine shots through mid-wicket and extra cover between long periods of careful defence, but needed almost 100 more balls (234 to Vaughan’s 139) to score six fewer runs.
Vaas and Malinga had had no luck with the new ball when it was swinging and bouncing in the first hour amid classic mosquito weather, muggy and humid. Soon everyone, Muralitharan not excluded, was feeling the weight and timing of Vaughan’s bat, but the off spinner’s accuracy and variations kept the batsmen chained to the crease once the England captain had gone in the eleventh over of the afternoon.
Cook’s cautious alliance with Bell, who was curiously diffident given how well he had played in Kandy, enabled Sri Lanka to seize back the initiative, helped by the steadiness of Vaas and fine ground fielding. Six overs after tea, Bell was caught superbly off bat and pad by Mubarak, diving to his right. But, with the Pietersen debate still raging, Cook was given out late in the day to a ball that barely pitched on leg stump, if at all, and would surely have swung past the wicket. That poor piece of umpiring cost England two wickets in effect, because Ravi Bopara’s first ball was a swinging yorker that hit middle and off.
The last four teams to bat first in a Test at the SSC have not got beyond 285. Presumably, England, having left out James Anderson to accommodate their two tallest fast bowlers, are hoping for uneven bounce later, but there was not a suspicion of it yesterday.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
" The replay from the vantage point of Daryl Harper, the umpire, suggested that Silva had grounded the ball in his first attempt to catch it, but history proves that replays can fib. The reverse angle suggested the initial catch was a close thing, but legitimate. "
What precisely is the issue here? If both angles show the catch is inconclusive, then I can understand the hullaballoo over the dismissal. When this is not the case as the above excerpt indicates, why is Vaughn and the match referee rushing to print?
From my point of view however, even had both angles shown the catch was inconclusive, no matter. The on field umpires were not in doubt and TV replays are never a fail-safe means for adjudicating close catches. They should be relied upon only where it is blindingly obvious the catch is not legitimate.
The only issues that should be adjudicated in this sorry episode is Pietersen's dissent, and Vaughn bringing the game into disrepute.
Johanne, Brisbane,
Where was Vaughan's sense of correctness when Inzi was given run out dodging a throw from Harmison at Faisalabad a couple of years ago. And with the two "best" umpires in the world - Simon Taufel and Darrel Hair - standing. Can you imagine the storm if Vaughan had been given out in similar circumstances.
The way the Poms play the game and cry when the rub of the green goes againts them leaves a bad tatse in everyones mouth. Baing theirs of course since the jelly beans (or bellies) hide the taste.
Dubby, Chennai, India
John of Kenilworth. Stop whingeing about Murali. That horse died a long time ao.
Poms have made an art form of questioning close catches. To the extent that Sunil Gavaskar when commentating has always raved at Indian batsmen who accept the fielder's word. The technology and positioning of cameras has always resulted in creating some doubt, which then goes to the batsmen. 95% of TV replays of close catches have been inconclusive which means the batsman gets to stay.
And what action is being taken against Pietersen for dissent (standing his ground and then returning to the crease after being given out). And what about Vaughan eing disclipined for bringing the game into disrepute by his comments. Or perhaps these rule only apply to some teams and not others.
Vaughan would get some sympathy if he had recalled batsmen wrongly given out - remember Tendulkar and Ganguly). But then the decisions were in his favour.
Dubby, Chennai, India
Give it up John you sourpuss.
JW, China,
As to poor umpiring, just when will Muralithalan's action be looked at properly?
John, Kenilworth,