Mike Atherton
Enter our Snapshots of Summer photography competition
The boos, whistles and catcalls from the crowd told the story, as did New Zealand’s refusal to engage in the traditional handshakes that usually signal the end of a red-blooded contest. The Laws of Cricket can be arcane and are often misunderstood, but 23,000 people knew that something not right had happened when Grant Elliott was run out, having collided with Ryan Sidebottom, with New Zealand 26 runs short of victory.
According to the Laws, the umpires made the right decision. There is no question that the collision was accidental and, given that there was no wilful obstruction, the umpires had no alternative but to send Elliott on his way, once Paul Collingwood had upheld his appeal.
But it did not seem right or just or fair or, to bring in that much-misused phrase, “in the spirit of the game”. It was clear that Elliott would have made his ground but for the collision.
More to the point, had Elliott not done the right thing by getting up and sprinting to the non-striker’s end, the umpires would have had no option but to have called dead ball immediately.
England lost the match, but, more important, a good deal of self-respect in that moment. Collingwood will have an uncomfortable couple of days, replaying in his mind the moment that he upheld the appeal until Lord’s on Saturday, when the reaction of the most conservative crowd in England will let him know whether he has been forgiven.
Collingwood was outstanding in his honesty and contrition at the end of the game. Although he was slightly disingenuous in that he had more than a split second to come to a saner judgment, he recognised that he had made a wrong call and that an apology was essential. Thankfully, it was accepted.
Imagine, though, if England had won. It is difficult to imagine how Collingwood could have apologised with a straight face; difficult, too, to envisage how the New Zealanders might have felt able to accept it. When Graeme Swann’s errant throw missed the stumps and evaded four England fielders, the cricketing gods rendered a judgment of their own.

Five occasions when it just wasn’t cricket
1882 In the Test at the Oval that led to the creation of the Ashes, W. G. Grace controversially ran out Sammy Jones when the Australia batsman stepped out of his crease to pat down the wicket. Jones was not attempting a run.
1933 The Adelaide Test of what became known as the Bodyline series was when England’s aggressive tactics came to the boil. Bert Oldfield was struck on the head and Bill Woodfull was hit over the heart, both by Harold Larwood. Woodfull, the Australia captain, claimed that England were “not playing cricket”.
1974 In a Test in Trinidad Bernard Julien, of West Indies, dabbed the last ball of the day into the off side. Tony Greig, fielding for England at silly point, hit the wicket at the non-striker’s end and appealed for a run-out against Alvin Kallicharran, who had headed for the pavilion. Kallicharran was given out but reinstated the next morning after some bitter exchanges.
1981 New Zealand needed six off the last ball to tie a one-day international against Australia in Melbourne and Greg Chappell, the Australia captain, told his brother, Trevor, to ensure the win by bowling underarm.
2006 Needing one run for his hundred in a Test against New Zealand in Christchurch, Kumar Sangakkara steered the ball to fine leg. When Muttiah Muralitharan, his team-mate, had completed his run, he stepped out of his crease to congratulate Sangakkara and was run out by Brendon McCullum.
By the book
Law 42 deals with unfair play It is unfair for any member of the fielding side, by word or action, wilfully to distract or to obstruct either batsman after the striker has received the ball. It is for either one of the umpires to decide if any distraction or obstruction is wilful or not.
Law 27 deals with appeals The captain of the fielding side may withdraw an appeal only with the consent of the umpire within whose jurisdiction the appeal falls and before the outgoing batsman has left the field of play.
(Patrick Kidd)
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Dear Michael
New Zealand (and every other international and probably state, county, district, franchise etc.) would have done exactly the same.
As for the 'Spirit of Cricket', just ask Rahul Dravid or Dwayne Bravo about it.
Regards.
Andrew Campbell, Slough, UK
I don't think that stupidity should be rewarded and inclusion of the Muralitharan should not be included here. The keeper collected the ball when the fieldsman threw it in, turned to the wicket and saw no one in the crease he rightly broke the wicket.
Vernie Ramkissoon, SAn Juan,
Playing cricket in 'the spirit of the game' is an essential part of the sport and an aspect lost to so many other sports. If however this was a turning point in, for example, an Ashes victory then I'd want the England Captain to do the right thing... uphold the appeal to try and win the game.
Phil, Lechlade,
I am afraid it would be unreasonable to accept that Collingwood made a decision in split second from the pictures it is clear that the umpire gave him plenty of time to think. His decision clearly shows that we need to think is he the right person to captain our team
satish parmar, Harpenden,
Dear Micheal,
I find it ironic that you are writing an article about the "spirit of cricket". I guess carrying dust in the pocket and rubbing it onto the ball does not come into that category!?
Assad Hasanain, Irvine, USA
whilst everyone is being sanctimonious and whiter than white and not one of our illlustrious t v experts have ever transgressed (BALL TAMPERING) etc. has anyone thought that Ryan Sidebottham had been obstructed and prevented from returning the ball to the non strikers end
B JENKINSON, WIGAN, ENGLAND
Dear Michael,
In the 50's or 60's Jackie McGlew, the South African captain, was given run-out after a collision with Fred Trueman. Colin Cowdrey appealed and the decision could not be reversed.
G Sanders
G S Sanders, Nottingham, England
Dear Michael,
What about Law 3.(b)(ii) which authorises an Umpire to call Dead Ball when a serious injury to a player occurs?
The collision was heavy, the batsman evidently stunned, so why didn't the Umpires intervene immediatly rather than wait for Collingwood to take a call?
Ajit S Datar, Mumbai, India