John Stern
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
Graham Taylor has been blamed for many things over the years but all of them relating to the fortunes of the England football team. Yet it was Taylor — or rather the area where he was sitting — that might have contributed to the downfall of Jacques Kallis yesterday and a bizarre row about the visibility for batsmen at Edgbaston’s Pavilion End.
Described recently by Bob Willis, the former England and Warwickshire fast bowler, as the best spot to watch cricket in the world, the committee room balcony affords a perfect wicket-to-wicket view of the action. Which is great for the people lucky enough to be sitting there but not, it seems, for batsmen trying to see the bowler’s hand as he delivers the ball at more than 80mph.
It was Andrew Flintoff’s spell on the second evening to Kallis that sparked concerns in the South African camp about how well their batsmen could see the ball when it was bowled from the Pavilion End. Flintoff worked Kallis over with a superb over, eventually bowling him with a yorker that the batsman palpably did not pick up. The problem is that, from the batsman’s point of view, Flintoff’s hand, as he delivers the ball, appears to come out of the dark seats above the sightscreen rather than the white sightscreen itself.
Mark Boucher was also struggling to pick the ball up on the second evening so asked the umpires to do something about it. But since the game was already under way, the only way the sightscreen could be adjusted was if both captains agreed. Clearly there was no way that Michael Vaughan was likely to accede to that. Vaughan could legitimately claim that it is the same for both sides and Morne Morkel, the South African fast bowler who is taller than Flintoff, had also bowled from the Pavilion End yet no England batsman complained.
It was the dismissal of Kallis yesterday that really sparked the row and prompted Mickey Arthur, the South African coach, to complain to Ranjan Madugalle, the match referee. Kallis ducked into a short ball from Flintoff which he obviously did not pick up, was hit on his thigh and given out lbw. The batsman did not want to leave the crease and shaped to smash down the stumps before trudging off. In the dressing room, Arthur was doing a passable impression of Sir Alex Ferguson in full hairdryer mode.
So it seems that it was only Flintoff’s bowling that caused the problem and predominantly only Kallis who struggled to see the ball. Why? Even Sir Ian Botham, in the Sky commentary box, was stumped. He commented that it was only the right-handed batsmen, such as Kallis, who struggled. Botham speculated that Flintoff’s flick of the wrist as he delivers the ball might cause trouble and that it was often his slower ball, which has a higher and deceptive trajectory, which Kallis struggled with.
Whatever the merits of Arthur’s complaints about the sightscreen it was apparent that Kallis had allowed his concerns about it to play fatally on his mind. For a man of his vast experience who is usually so unflappable, it was an uncharacteristic lack of professionalism.
John Stern is editor of The Wisden Cricketer
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
John Stern, all I can say is look at the scoreboard. The only lack of professionalism is your writing. To say that Kallis would make something like that up because he can't handle Flintoff is almost as laughable as the English cricket team.
Andy, Ipswich,
It was the same for both sides and has been exactly the same for many years at Edgbaston.
Unfair? How many club sides have not made judicious use of the sun to bowl out of, on those grounds where it sets behind the bowlers arm at one end?
sandy, ayrshire,
As usual, the whinging Poms can do no wrong as long as their players aren't the ones being affected. Imagine the hue and cry if it was Pietersen or Collingwood instead of Kallis or McKenzie.
Jake
Cape Town
jerome, cape town, south africa
Could NOT agree with you more, Pule from Jhb! As for Graeme Smith...YOU BEAUTY. You make me proud to be a South African right now.
Jana, Cape Town, South Africa
Flintoff didn't do good to himself.For his caliber, you gotta be a better sportsman.It was clearly a must win situation and England showed that they just want to win no matter what. If it was some other visiting team doing the same to them, you would have seen more of it in the news.
Fawad, Sydney, Australia
Steyn and Morkel must be excited with the fact that beamers are now allowed in cricket again.
Expect Flintoff to get a great welcome next time he pads up ....
Reg Ramsay, Cape Town, South Africa
why would a south african side that is clearly
superior complain about the sightscreen if there was not a problem.
surely the matter should have been investigated
and if necessary attended to.
art fallows, haarlem, the netherlands
Through any day the light might change and the background might look different for the batsman. Not a single cricket playing nation or ground in the world (except the English) will not immediately do something about the batsman's complaint.
Dewald, Pretoria,
Dave,
Does the word sarcasm mean anything to you? Anyone who has even a faint understanding of cricket should be able to detect my earlier comments as pure sarcasm and an indictment to what I think was disgraceful behaviour by M. Vaughn (denying a more than reasonable request by SA).
Radu, Bucharest, Romania
England good sports? My foot.
And the commentators went on and on about the bad decisions just because they went against the English. Alim Daar is a great umpire.
Trying to win at any cost!! Flintoff aimed well but in the end the Saffres prevailed because they played the game in the right spirit.
Peter Casie Chetty, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Ruda, do you even know wht your saying!!! its got nothing to do wih how skilled you are, how are you going to see a dark ball moving at 80miles + wih a dark back round and not being able to se it. This would never have happened at a ground in OZ, India, Sa or any other test playing nation
Dave, London,
Mckenzie and Boucher also had the same problems. Vaughan and the umpires decision was a ridiculuos response to a reasonable request. Clearly flintoff was the only bowler finding this blindspot and it was highly improbable that Kallis, Boucher and Mckenzie were bamboozled by Flintoffs Brilliance
Tichatonga Pfupajena, London, England
Bad sportsmanship by England in the eyes of us Saffers even the beamers to AB de Villiers. But anyway, job done, series won... well done boys!
Chris, JHB, South Africa
Did anyone notice the bad sportsmanship displayed by Ambrose in trying to sneak a stumping . How cute can you get?.
Would Vaughn have called Mackenzie back . somehow given the History in this regard I doubt it!
Han, Cape Town, SA
Hey, I have an idea! Why do we not do away with sightscreens? Really skilled batsman should still be able to pick up the ball, at least some of the time. Now this would be a real test of skill and courage. I may also make for good entertaiment.
Radu, Bucharest, Romania
Playing on his mind? He didn't have to do anything of the sort, he had to pitch the ball full and then Kallis couldn't see it. Normally the ball that got Kallis in the second innings would be considered a bad ball. It was not good bowling that beat Kallis it was bad sightscreen and bad sportsmanship
Mike, Auckalnd,
It would have been sporting og the England captain to allow the sightscreen to be covered, but it just shows the level of desperation in that team.
The problem with England is that for them everything is about the Ashes, forgeting what an average team they are!
Pule T, Johannesburg, South Africa
Pure brilliance from Freddie, playing on Kallis's mind. Almost passed out laughing when Old Jacques threw a wobbly. Frastrated at being out done and made to look a little daft.
Same for both sides, and they won!!
Ollie, Dubai,
It is a sign of how desperate the English were that they had to revert to bowling full tosses out of dark windows. It's almost like appealing for run outs after the batsman has been obstructed by the bowler :)
By the way, the ball that got Kallis was not a short ball, but a full bunger.
Tobie, London,
Its A shame he did not deliver more balls like it ? England may have won!
Bill Williams, Bagnoles, France
Oh, don't worry ... he did pick up his toys ... alongside the trophy.
Rich E, Durban, SA
Mickey Arthur needs to pick up the toys that he has thrown out of his pram.
John Traynor, Birmignham,