Martin Samuel, Chief Football Correspondent
Subscribe to The Times and The Sunday Times

The director of technical development settled into his seat at shiny new Wembley to watch a vision of the future. The turf was divided into a grid of eight neat squares, five-a-side mini-pitches for the finals of a nationwide tournament. And as the whistle blew for kick-off, across half of these small spaces, Sir Trevor Brooking, the man charged with administering a climate in which the next generation of elite footballers can thrive, saw the same opening gambit: the ball launched in the air, from one end to the other.
“I thought: ‘Why are we allowing that?’ ” Brooking said. “Why let goalkeepers kick the length of the pitch? We know the teams that do it will often win because putting the ball in the opposition third at that age is always going to enjoy greater success than playing it out from the back, but skill development? None. And when the pitches get bigger and they can’t do that any more, what have those kids learnt? Nothing. I said to the mini-soccer review board that this must stop.”
And there, encapsulated in one frozen moment, is the crisis facing youth football in England. The emphasis on results above technical development, the win-at-all-costs mentality and the fact that the man at the top, bogged down in committees and red tape, now speaks more like an observer than a reformer.
Brooking recognises the problems and has the wit to address them, but increasingly he comments on the unfolding chaos rather than addresses it. When I wrote about an under-10 age group London district match, in which a 4ft 7in goalkeeper protected the same size goal as Petr Cech while undersized midfield players attempted to cover the same area as Frank Lampard, Brooking’s office was immediately on the telephone to arrange a meeting. Clearly, he wants allies and I even took Rob, the goalkeeper, to underline the argument. By the end, though, Rob’s eyes had glazed over at talk of reviews and reports. He wanted to know why he cannot play in a proportionate goal that gives him some chance of tipping a shot around a post. Instead, he learnt that the frustrations of youth football are only just beginning at age 10.
Brooking looked a beaten man at odd moments during our conversation. The scale of the job is wearing him down. “This should all be done by technical people, but it is not technical people making the decisions,” he said. “If they can just give us some money, leave us over here to make it work and judge us in ten years, this could be a defining moment. We can’t gloss over it, there is a core problem and the right people must be left alone to deal with it because as it stands, it is a foggy mess. All we hear is: ‘We’d like to do this, but . . .’ The FA should lead and be in total control of coaching and player development.
“We need to revamp, we know that. And I know to hear me say it doesn’t make sense. There is a lot I cannot defend. We should be the catalysts for change but at the moment we give too many choices over where and how you play, when we should be setting the rules. We have recommended pitch sizes for every age group, but some coaches and teachers are better organised than others at getting them and others will just take what they are given by the local council. It is the luck of the draw in terms of the environment you play in, right down to the atmosphere on the touchline. It is fragmented and that is not right. We are trying to help by having a national game strategy, which will come in next summer, but we know some county associations will be stronger at implementing it than others.
“I would ring-fence five million quid, train up a skill coach for the ages 5 to 11 and give him to every club. Except we can’t because while we have a national game strategy, for grass roots, we do not have a whole game strategy and this will only work if we get everybody involved from top to bottom. It is the Professional Game Board that decides that, but I don’t know what they are planning. We have a blank sheet of paper where we should have a plan.
“For example, when we tried to get something done about touchline behaviour towards officials, we were told we couldn’t go ahead without the support of the professional game, but they will be reluctant because they might have a player or manager with the same issues. Then the idea gets diluted. It is either integrated or it isn’t.We’re three quarters of the way, but there is more to do. And that last stage is the toughest. Getting rid of vested interest is the key.
“I don’t know how we will spend our money next summer. We should be telling Macclesfield and Mansfield what is going on at Manchester United, spreading news of good practice. I could impose certain things, but we would still have to carry the argument or some counties would make it difficult. We need to be more specific on pitch sizes, team numbers and behaviour. Yet I cannot pretend everyone thinks as I do. We have had two leagues write to us asking to start an 11-a-side competition for under-8 players. That is why we try to be flexible. We say you can play up to an hour; you can play two 30-minute halves, three 20 minutes, four 15 minutes. You can play five, six or seven-a-side. You’ve got to remember a lot of people disagreed with mini-soccer in the first place.”
Strength is what is needed. The strength to bypass obstacles such as the Professional Game Board or the absolutely useless FA Technical Control Board, which sits about as often as the Steve McClaren Appreciation Society at the England supporters club. The grassroots game needs a dictator, a pig-headed, dogmatic, troublemaker of a man who will contact the head of each county association and tell him the rules have changed starting next season and his clubs either buy in, or get out. Brooking is admirably focused on skill and has made some improvements in two years, but his reforms, like his manner, do not go far enough. He talks as if he is outside the problem, when he should be at the heart of it.
“I think there are certain rules we should get rid of now,” Brooking said. “Certain leagues that should be scrapped, too — because the way some parents behave is appalling and counterproductive, so we should set sanctions. Now, you and I might be sitting here agreeing, but a lot of people will not want that to happen. If we launch this, we have to be strong, we have to name and shame in regional newspapers, which cover grassroots football in greater depth, because that might embarrass people into changing their behaviour. Why do we even have leagues at such a young age? There are eight and nine-year-olds being told: ‘Come on, beat this lot today and we’ll be top.’ That isn’t the proper issue, particularly if they are going to get an ear-bashing if the result goes wrong. If you go to the academy at Manchester United, parents are not allowed to shout out. They are in one specific area, and if they say a word, they are not allowed to attend any more sessions.
“We look at a player like Cesc Fàbregas at Arsenal and think, why can’t we produce one like that? But what sets him apart is his brain. We have youngsters who cannot recognise a player in space, cannot see the pass, cannot make the right decision. Go to Manchester United, they will stop the play and ask the youngsters to say where the ball should go. They discuss it, they think for themselves. It is all about contact time. Manchester United have been arguing for ages that everything should be four versus four, because young players need more ball contact time. Our league youngsters get half the time with the ball than those on the Continent, our grassroots youngsters get even less. Unfortunately, unless they work in a structured club with proper training, nobody works on individual skills.
“In the early part of a youngster’s development, there should be no positions. My generation would have gone around the corner and picked up a match three versus three, four versus four and taken turns going in goal. Any skill I had I learnt with my mates. We’d come home from school, we’d meet up and play for two hours until it got dark, then wander home. You won’t let your kids do that these days. So the actual learning time has diminished. We have to find a way of replicating those games: small numbers, no pressure, nobody ranting or raving.
“I played 11 versus 11 at primary school, but I was technically better than a lot of the youngsters now. To have three extra players on the pitch all running towards you, unless you are confident enough to dribble around them, or to play a one-two with another player who is technically proficient, you are in trouble. That’s why we get so much long ball — because we can’t cope. Unless we have a ten-year campaign to change all this, we will be in trouble. If you think we haven’t qualified with this generation, if we carry on like this, wait and see what happens next.”
Brooking sounds worried. We should all be. The correct order is that outsiders issue dire warnings and the director of football development has the answers. Right now, Brooking is the Greek chorus to the doommongers, and that cannot be right. There should be an optimum number of players in each team for each age group and a standard pitch size based on indisputable scientific evidence. Beyond that, Rob and his team-mates do not require a review panel to know what should be done.
Bring the pitch boundaries in, make the goals smaller, take goal kicks from the edge of the penalty area, play in smaller teams, put greater emphasis on skill and less on power. Any child could tell you that. But are the committees steering the future at the FA as smart as a ten-year-old? Rob could answer that one, too, but he was brought up to be polite.
Blueprint for glory
1: Make pitches small enough to encourage skill and passing at all age groups
2: Decide on sensible goal sizes for all age groups
3: Take goal kicks from the edge of the penalty area
4: Play in smaller teams throughout age groups
5: Put greater emphasis on skill and less on power
6: Make sure coaches are trained to emphasise enjoyment not winning, especially at younger age groups
7: Where space allows, define an area away from the pitch for parents to watch from
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles

Get three teams for £6 £100K prize fund to be won

Find a course, arrange a game and save money


in The Sunday Times, Times and Times Online
2007
£47,995
2008
£42,945
06/2006
£40,850
Great car insurance deals online
£33,000
Macmillan Cancer Support
Central/South West
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£30k OTE
Meltwater News
Nationwide
circa £70k
Central Office of Information
London
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
Luxury Appts, beautiful gardens w/ Thames views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Great Investment, River Views
New York Christmas Shopping
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
The FA should use thier regional offices sending out FA coaches to every junior club in the land ensuring that the type of coaching and style of play that is needed is actually carried out. Everybody would win, players and parents the clubs and even better players would be identified and helped on.
Mark , Skipton, North Yorks, England
I would introduce a rule for matches involving under 16's banning players from kicking the ball over head height. A similar rule is often used in 5-a-side games & would prevent defenders from lumping the ball upfield. Obviously you could exempt corners, goal kicks and free kicks to encourage heading
Simon, Exeter, England
Er, Robert Jones, You're wrong Trevor Brooking was a fantastic player of the type that are missing from the premier league right now, and he did win something - The FA Cup against Arsenal in 1980.
Moving the FA from Soho Square to somewhere up north would achieve nothing. Its at grass roots level where the trouble is. Trevor Brooking is a figurehead, and whther it's him or anyone else they are never going to solve anything without the full backing of the FA from the top right down to the local level and unfortunately it doesen't look like that is going to happen.
Colin, Romford, Essex
Make all goalkeepers pass the ball out to defenders from a goal kick (in addition to getting the other team to back in their own half as Paul Cooper suggested).
Dez, Georgetown, Malaysia
My son joined a local club and all he learned after 18 months there was that he was no good ( He was no worse than 50% of the others there) Subsequently he has quit the team and the game that he did previously enjoy - even if he was not particulary good at it. From the bottom to the top, British sport seems only to recoginise individuals that shine. Kids soon 'Jack' when other team members are screaming at them for a poor performance. Sports need the average performers to be able to have the good or great. Surely enhance the numbers and quality of the average and the good and great will have to get better. Enjoyment is key - without it thousands of kids will simply go away from the game completely.
stuart whyte, morecambe,
get the f.a. out of that ivory tower in soho square,it to much of this lunch with you old boy syndrome,sack sir trev,he a nice guy but he was an ordinary player,never won anything,never played in any major tournaments why he got knighted god knows who ever put him up for this should be sacked. spend some of murdochs money on a massive complex at burton move the head office up there build accomadation blocks and a hotel for visitors.that will do away with all the free loaders that work in soho square.
robert jones, eastliegh, hampshire
Please support Brooking!
Neil Graham, Mula, Murcia, Spain
How about the ideas for Burton which was dismantled for the great white elephant that is the Wembley stadium.
When we have an FA who put a fancy new national stadium (which we don't need) before an excellence centre (which we are crying out for) how do we hope to improve?
Simon Wright, chesterfield, derbyshire
I agree with most most of the things raised in this article. What perpelxes me is Brooking. I never heard him talk about the game in this way when he was involved/taking part in the coaching set up with Mr Cheney, AKA Charles Hughes. We have been going over the English coaching philosophy for decades, even when there was no Premier league and the FA was in charge and we're still going over it. And when it's all said and done, the same (or type) of people are still around, whether it's the professional coaches and the stiff necks at the FA. I could go on and on, but we'll finish with remember John Cartwright?
Gezz, London, Uk
Well here is my two cents
maybe school children can join up with their favorite teams in the neighbourhood and learn together with the clubs academies on a weekly basis lets say if i study near the chelsea training academy i would love to play some football with the youngstars learn some skills
All those ex players who enjoy outhing of as sports presenters should go down and train these kids in their neighbourhoods instead of moaning about the state of young English talent
Its no use talking and blaming everybody else when you can not lift a finger to play your part
Kat, London,
The development of children revolves around repitition and practice just like any other sport. If the kids are introduced to the correct practice and repitition then it is just down to the commitment of the individual and their desire to improve. The flip side is that kids are not introduced to the proper skills and techniques that can be prcticed on an individual basis and therefore we find ourselves in our current position.
I have played professionally for 15 years and had a brief spell in the premiership and now currently coach within the development centres on a part time basis. I have completed my A licence and love coaching and helping the young players. I happen to think that there is ability out there but clubs parsist in realeasing kids at every oppertunity and no development takes place. It just becomes a trading post like first teams. Kids could well have played for 4 pro clubs before they are 13 - thats just garbage. Start sacking the coaches not the kids.
al, preston,
Interesting point about the big kick upfield when the game starts.
But trust me, that is not all about the coaches. Watch any park kick about and the keeper regularly punts the ball downfield towards the opposite goal.
They may be kids, but they understand the object of the game is to score goals and hence they will kick it near their opponents' goal.
Having said that ,when they get to play in a club, you'd hope the coach wants to encourage them to play out from the back and have all players comfortable enough on the ball and so would ask the keeper to roll it out to the back most players.......
Frank the coach, Brighton,
I agree with the above and would add
The children referee themselves. In the games we have had at 'Give Us Back Our Game', this has changed the game completely. The game flows much more as the kids just want to 'play' and get on with it. They then have to take responsibility for 'their game' and fair play.
This also helps with their social development.
The parents and coaches have no one to blame and shut up
For the younger age groups at a goal kick, have the oppostion retreat to the half way line to encourage building from the back. The problem at present is the only option is to boot it long as their is a semi circle of players waiting to pounce if the keeper plays it short
Mix the teams so they are equal, like we used to do down the park.
The games are then more competitive, better football and players have to quickly communicate with their new team mates.
There is change in the air and everybody is starting to pull in the same direction. We must continue the debate
Paul Cooper, Cirencester, UK
I recently saw an Academy game at Chelsea's Cobham training ground against Fulham. Chelsea had a big, strapping, young lad playing in an advanced wide role on the left.
His first two touches were so bad, the ball flew away from him. He did score later with a deflection though Fulham won 2-1.
I later learned Chelsea had paid £1.5million for this lad, at 16, to Leeds in June and he is already on six figure salary, according to a Fulham source.
Big, strong and fast beats ball control at 16 - and therein lies the problem.
ian, walton-on-thames, walton-on-thames, surrey, england