Tom Dart
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
Liverpool have refused a request from Luton Town to donate their share of the gate money from tomorrow’s FA Cup third-round tie to their opponents, despite the Coca-Cola League One club being in such dire financial straits that they are in danger of folding and cannot afford to pay their players.
Luton are losing about £400,000 a month and went into administration in November. Their players have been paid only 2½ weeks’ wages in the past nine weeks. The club’s joint-administrator, Brendan Guilfoyle, asked the Barclays Premier League club if they were willing to forgo a share of the revenue from the tie, but was rebuffed.
“They probably said, ‘We have to pay players £100,000 a week. You must be joking, otherwise we will be like you,’ ” Kevin Blackwell, the Luton manager, said. “You just have to accept it. There are people in life who have got a Rolls-Royce while some people have a Mini. We are Mini drivers.”
The match will be televised live, earning each club £150,000, and Kenilworth Road will be full to its 10,000 capacity. Of the gate money, 45 per cent goes to each club and 10 per cent to a Football Association pool, so Luton and Liverpool stand to receive about £100,000 each from ticket sales. The winning club earns £40,000 in prize-money.
Blackwell is donating his wages to Luton’s trainees, who are paid £70 a week. “I’ve got players here on £175 a week, some on £400, so there are lads here who can’t even handle being in the situation because it came out of the blue,” he said. “We went into administration three days before pay-day in November. It wasn’t as if anyone was given any warning.”
While Luton’s mess - they also face a series of charges relating to alleged irregular payments to players - is hardly Liverpool’s problem, their decision not to make a gesture of support will reopen the debate about whether the nation’s leading clubs should do more to help their smaller cousins, given the vast amount of money flowing into top-flight football.
League One clubs receive about £375,000 a year from the Football League’s television deal. The Premier League’s various television contracts bring in about £900 million a year, of which they donate roughly 1.2 per cent to the Football League to be shared among its clubs. But even the club that finishes bottom of the Premier League this season can expect to be handed more than £30 million in TV revenue alone.
Going into administration provoked a ten-point deduction that leaves Luton in the relegation zone. With other clubs circling, they face a player exodus during the transfer window. The administrators have set a deadline of 5pm Monday for offers from prospective buyers and two parties are thought to be seriously interested.
An FA spokesman confirmed that there is no rule to prevent a club donating their share of the gate money to an opponent. Chelsea gave £25,000 to Scarborough for youth development when the clubs met in the FA Cup in 2004, though Roman Abramovich, the owner, can easily afford such largesse.
Liverpool’s American owners, Tom Hicks and George Gillett Jr, are not in Abramovich’s financial league. Their takeover of the club last year and plans to build a new stadium rely heavily on bank loans. Liverpool refused to comment on Luton’s request.
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Sean- Your figures about Liverpool's new stadium are also wrong. The North West Development Agency has put up £9 million to improve Stanley Park and the Anfield area in general There is not a penny of public money going into the stadium. Furthermore, Liverpool are giving the land that Anfield currently stands on back to the local community for free. Liverpool are also paying for new football pitches and tennis courts in Stanley Park and providing changing rooms in the stadium.
By the way, in 1985 Liverpool withdrew from European competition before anyone had the chance to ban them. The person who was responsible for all English clubs being banned was Thatcher. They also served an extra year than other clubs. Please try and get your facts right before posting.
One more thing, has anyone berating Liverpool for rejecting the request of a corrupt football club actually put their hand in their own pocket?
Thought not.
Paul, Liverpool, uk
To the plastic fan from London- Liverpool has never once helped Tranmere out financially- Everton and Manchester United did during our crisis in the 1980s but LFC never has.
As for Luton, well they did cheat, and it's a mess they need to sort out themselves.
Ace, Wirral, UK
Scouse Gaz,
Us football fans are not defending Luton Town FC. We are defending football â because LFC failed it.
My expressed opinion - which you mistook as expressing fact - is that LFC pretends to embody a pure love of football.
LFC had opportunity to prove its espoused credentials are bona fide. Instead, its true, modern cynicism was exposed and its sickening self-styled image as a club of football purists now lies in tatters, strewn naked across a filthy Mersey wasteland.
The act is up. Continuing to peddle it with that yarn about Wrexham only heaps more ridicule on troubled LFC!
You give Wrexham the gate money to pay the rent because LFC's reserves play at the Racecourse. That's hardly altruism in action. So, let's have an end of moustache-twitching Scouse pie-in-the-sky talk.
How many more times do we have to listen to embellished tall tales of LFC's fabled Boot Room being run by a bunch of Andy Capp characters?
Don't feel indignant because of their success. It's over now.
sean murphy, Dublin, Ireland
Re Dublin Sean :- As a Liverpool fan of some standing I can still remember Luton not turning up at Anfield in 1987 for an FA Cup game due to 'fog' despite their fans managing to make it. Also never forgiven them for their politics during that time and their plastic pitch.
Let's not let on the Luton are an unforunate club here. They are in administration because they have broken several rules and whilst I feel for the fans and staff at Luton Town, Liverpool FC have no obligation to them.
Also, Liverpool have made massive efforts to help Wrexham over the last 3 or 4 years by playing friendlys at the Racecourse every season and letting them keep the gate receipts. Get the facts right before you comment about 'selfish big clubs'
Gaz, Liverpool,
This just about says it all.
http://playinginthegutter.blogspot.com/2008/01/miseryside.html
pentangelli, Southport, Merseyside
Isn't it repulsive how Liverpool continues to portray itself as the community club with old moral values?
It's planning a new £200m stadium - after trying to get £23m of taxpayers' cash to help build the monolith - but has cold-heartedly rejected the desperate and grave appeals of an embattled club in administration and facing threatened extinction.
This isn't just about money.
Luton is a League 1 side fighting relegation that simply wants to survive.
So much for the romanticism of the Cup!
Let's hope this finally exposes the fallacy of Liverpool FC's 'honest Jim' image.
sean murphy, Dublin, Ireland
As a Luton Town supporter I am, in all honesty, fed up and quite frankly embarrassed at the whole scenario.
And this 'going cap-in-hand' business to Liverpool, revealed this morning, hardly helps, especially before the game itself.
Now instead of everybody getting behind the underdog tomorrow, perhaps even having a bit of sympathy for us given our situation, they'll probably be hoping we get taught a lesson.
If we do get beat (but without Gerrard, and if Torres doesn't feature: who knows?) maybe instead of giving us a footballing lesson any prospective Luton owners should be given a lesson in how to run a football club properly.
Years of mis-management have finally caught up with us. Have you ever asked a friend for some money when you are desperate for cash? I have, and it is an uncomfortable position. Now I feel just as bad watching a 'professional' football club - the club I love - to do the same.
S Ketelaarss, Mid Bedfordshire,
I take it the below views are from people who support cash rich clubs!
Unfortunately in the real world where fans suffer from bad owners who have taken money out of the club and left them with nothing but huge debts these things happen.
yes its not liverpools problem but when there players are on 100k a week (which is what the players need just to get paid) you would think that this would be s small gesture to help a crisis club which faces folding, lets face it its a drop in the ocean for a premiership club.
The FA only help rich clubs and kick the rest in the teeth so all you none suffering fans below , get real!
adrian, hanworth, middx
In the coming recession, lots of minor league clubs will disappear. The economics of football no longer makes any sense.
To call Liverpool well managed is a joke. All premier league clubs are poorly managed but they get away with it becasue of the easy money of the premier league. In the next five years expect to see the Premier league implode under the financial pressures of falling incomes and player wages.
sholto, Edinburgh, UK
It is not Liverpool's responsibility to help Luton Football club!! Those who think it is are living in cloud cuckoo land. It is a harsh and unfair world out there and im afraid its Lutons problem and nobody elses.
I suggest better management is needed by those who run the club and the local community should get off there backsides and attend the matches to produce extra revenue!!
Liverpool, Man Ure, Everton, Chelsea etc etc have no interest in clubs like Luton, it is an FA cup tie , another game to them ..sounds harsh in this pathetic fluffy pc world but its true.
Derren Coles, Christchurch, NZ
Liverpool FC has financially helped out small clubs in its vicinity such as Tranmere many times.
Luton already stands to earn extra money from TV rights from this game and now has the audacity to ask Liverpool its ticket share. £100,000 won't make a huge difference to a club that is in this position because of its own mismanagement and corruption so don't try to point the finger at Liverpool.
Leivan, London, UK
I am a die hard and proud luton fan. It is a sad state of affairs going into administration for the third time in 10 years, and even worse that a super club will not offer us what to them is one players weekly wage.
We have struggled to survive due to the short sightedness of the local council in supporting our plans for a new stadium, and betrayed by the FA.
Let's win tomorrow and stay alive!!
Marcus, Northampton
Marcus Bates, Northampton, UK
Why on earth should Liverpool help a club that is currently being investigated for football corruption?
Its a level playing field and should be kept that way and fair for other clubs in its league not recieving financial incentives.
Amer, London,
Nice to see the kind hearted Liverpuddlians digging deep for anyone other than one of their own isn't it. Remind me, which club was it that got us banned from European competition again? Oh yes...the same club who's fans are moaning about when Luton banned away fans. There's a distinct difference between banning away fans and banning an entire country isn't there.
And why shouldn't Liverpool be expected to pay their own expenses to play against Luton. It isn't like they are strapped for cash is it...especially now that they are a US franchise club.
And the players certainly can't donate their wages as they'll need them for back up when they next get burgled.
Simon, Norwich, Norfolk
so who was it who got Luton,Everton and Wimbledon banned from Europe and were supposed to be banned for an extra three years themselves but were actually let straight back in at the same time as the rest?
Oh and when we thrashed Liverpool in the second replay at the Kenny didnt Ken make a compleat girls part of himself
John, Welwyn Garden,
well done liverpool, you should keep your money, after all, you are heading for another trophyless season and you need all the cash you can get. may be one day you can be called a BIG club who could afford a few pounds.
Gus, London,
As a liverpool fan I think it's a bit tight to reject luton's plea for financial assistance from the takings at kenilworth road and as a result I hope the luton players get really fired up and take liverpool apart. But being a realist, it's not going to happen is it!!!!
pete, landkey, UK
For more than 2 decades Luton Town have relied on development of the youth structure. A stream of players- products of the Luton Youth system- have made it to the big time over the years. It was always inevitable the best talent would be eventually sold- in fact it was expected to balance the books.
This combined with prudent spending allowed Luton at times to punch above their weight.
The assumption that Luton have lived beyond their means and now need to be punished is misguided. Look at the money that has come into the club through transfers in the past few years- Vine, Edwards, Davis... Where is this money? Where did it go?
Throughout this period the club has been in the hands of many different groups mainly interested in the property development opportunities of a new ground rather than the team.
Irrespective of what you think of the management of the club it will inevitably be the innocent fans who suffer.
S Brown, Sheffield, S. Yorks
Isn't it funny how Liverpool continues to portray itself as the community club with old moral values?
It's planning a new £200m stadium - after trying to get £23m of taxpayers' cash to help build the monolith - but has cold-heartedly rejected the desperate and grave appeals of an embattled club facing threatened extinction.
This isn't just about money.
Luton is a football club. And it wants to survive.
So much for the romanticism of the Cup!
Let's hope this finally exposes the fallacy of Liverpool FC's 'honest Jim' image.
sean murphy, Dublin, Ireland
John Mitchell and Richard Bagehot have agreed to step down from the Luton Town board after being charged with allegedly failing to report breaches of regulations regarding payments to agents.
And now the same club is going cap in hand to Liverpool asking them to give up money that is rightfully theirs? Tough.
Few clubs are as disliked as much as Luton, and few people outside of Bedfodshire will care if that horrible little club go to the wall. From the plastic pitch to the ban on away fans to Mitchell and Bagehot now. Good riddance.
Matt Pomroy, Dubai,
"As a Liverpool fan who had to blag my way into Kenilworth Road when they banned away fans, and had to endure their looney right wing chairman's diatribes, I have no sympathy for them. Their plastic pitch and failure to fulfil a cup game against Liverpool make them a pariah club. Relegation is too good for them.
S. wainwriht, Liverpool, "
Actually I'd say that a club whose fans riot at a European Cup Final, causing the deaths of opposition fans and getting the rest of the country's clubs banned from Europe is a tad more deserving of "pariah status" than one that had a plastic pitch.
Dan, London,
Luton Town a few years ago had a strong side, filled with some very good players. Curtis Davis now plays for Aston Villa, and Steve Howard for Derby County to name just two. Infact, in 2006 there was talk of Luton getting a new 20,000 seater stadium. What went wrong? As with Leeds United, in my opinion, Luton Town have been run into the ground by disastrous business decisions.
Selling your best players to bigger clubs for good money is how all smaller clubs have survived for years, but to sell your
entire first team as Luton Town did is just suicide. Liverpool are quite right in their decision. Its just business, and Luton
Town are not Liverpool's responsibility.
Nobody bailed Leeds United out in 2004 when they crashed out of topflight football and went bankrupt, and rightly so!
Stop trying to pass the buck Luton!
james steventon, lady lake, usa, florida
Luton were the club who bought a scoreboard before they put a roof on the away end and then banned visiting supporters (oh yes they installed a shelter that year didn't they?) and now they have the cheek to ask other clubs to bale them out. Quite right Liverpool for turning them down - it would be iniquitous to other clubs to do anything else.
Andrew Cottrell, Richmond,
Nigel Wroem i find it whole-heartedly offensive that you can compare the helping-hand in remembrance that so many clubs held out after Hilsbrough with a mis-managed club self-combusting because of poor money-management and lack of spending discipline. Liverpool are at the top because they are well managed, play good football, and are generally well looked after. It is not their responsibility to help out a club that is falling apart. You don't have a lowly relationship with your rich neighbour, but when your mortgage gets out of hand, go and ask them for money, or do you? And what are your comments about "It is Liverpool after all" supposed to mean? Knowing lots of scousers as I do, and as I'm sure many other people will know, scousers are the kindest, most giving helpful people you could hope to meet (if you're unintelligent, this is the bit where you make comments about hubcaps).
When it comes down to it, this is not their problem, and therefore not their responsibility. End of.
samuel gosney, reading, berkshire
To call Liverpool stingy is unfair. After all for the past few years Liverpool have held friendlies at Wrexham, and given them all the funds from the day and th reserve team played at Wrexhams ground too.
If Luton are losing 400k a day, Liverpool giving them 200k will not save them, it must be down to the bad management of the club?
John Harvey, DURHAM, England
If Liverpool help out Luton then they would have to help everyone else out in League 1 otherwise it wouldn't be fair on Luton's competitors in League 1. The teams that have been prudent and well managed in the past should benefit and the profligate should go to the wall, otherwise what is to stop all lower league teams rushing out to sign players they can't afford and then pleading poverty when it all goes wrong?
Ian, Thornbury, Glos
Any football club that goes into administration is guilty of financial mis-management and the only people who are responsible (and should be held accountable) are the people running the club at the time. It is not the Big Four or any other Premiership club for that matter. Was it Livepools fault that Leeds went bust? No, it was the idiots who ran the club. The same rules apply to all clubs, big and small. If you spend more than you earn you will go skint. Simple.
Marc Robert Sinfield, Hoddesdon,
I think Luton have a cheek asking in the first place.
James, London, UK
Has nobody been following the news? Liverpool have no money for new players or a new stadium. How is it selfish of them to want to be paid for playing? If Luton want more money, it's simple. Win the game!
jim, brussels, belgium
One day Liverpool might choose to remember how the rest of football supported them in their multiple tragedies. Until that day arrives, if ever, expect them to be mean minded and indifferent to the plight of fellow football clubs.
Such gestures as by Chelsea and manchester United, are usually inspired by the attitudes of their manager's. Benitez is no Ferguson or Mourinho, that's for sure.
Phil Thompson gave £10K to help Rotherham, maybe Liverpool's multi-millionaire players will donate their match fee instead? Nah, never in a million years, this is Liverpool we are talking about after all.
Nigel Wroe, Doncaster, Yorkshire
as a qpr fan i feel sympathy for Luto especially because they have our legend Paul Furlong in ther team. However, football is no charity so you have to earn your income by playing decend football. QPR had some rough years but the fans kept on coming and finally we see light at the end of the tunnel because some rich guys see a business opportunity. the 10 points deduction is a joke but don't humiliate yourselves by begging for money.
jim, London,
Hello, this is the FA Cup and not the Charity Shield. Luton might as well setup 20 booths outside each EPL club and ask/beg for donation to stay up.
If you cannot keep up, you lose out. Just look at Leeds. At least they had the dignity to go down themselves and not ask for petty donations against EPL club.
Look this is football, every penny counts. The USA in Liverpool are paying 26 mil a year just on interest and being charitable in not in their sould. Besides 100k can pay for the hotels, petrol and food.
King Kong, PJ,
This is such a selfish act by Liverpool.
However it is not surprising because the big(I think that should be bully)clubs aren't interested in anyone else.They would be quite happy for all the other clubs to go bust.
At lest we know the money will go to their foreign mercenaries and not help save a part of English football.
Shame on Liverpool.
Trevor, Bushey,
I'm not a Liverpool fan, I support Everton. Read into that what you will. It could be argued that by meeting clubs like Luton in the FA Cup, LFC are already doing their bit to help smaller clubs. Let's face it, if they weren't in the FA Cup 3rd round they'd be plying a MUCH more lucrative Premiership or Champions league fixture somewhere else.
I too have been to Kenilworth Rd., in the 80s. What a shambles of a place. As my brother said at the time, it looked like four different 'architects' had had a plan at various stages and each, successively, given it up as a bad job. I remember paying £5 to stand on an open terrace and £1 for a programme - this in the days when it cost me £4 to stand under cover at Goodison Park!
I hope Luton survive, and I hope the players (and everyone else) get their wages, but to expect Liverpool to travel there to play entirely at their own expense is unreasonable.
Chris Jones, Wakefield,
As a Liverpool fan who had to blag my way into Kenilworth Road when they banned away fans, and had to endure their looney right wing chairman's diatribes, I have no sympathy for them. Their plastic pitch and failure to fulfil a cup game against Liverpool make them a pariah club. Relegation is too good for them.
S. wainwriht, Liverpool,