Martin Samuel, Chief Football Correspondent
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
The match may be 21 days away, but there is already one name on the Manchester
United teamsheet in Moscow. Paul
Scholes, scorer of the goal that edged United past Barcelona to confirm
their first Champions League final appearance since 1999, has been
guaranteed his place by Sir Alex Ferguson, the manager. In the
circumstances, it was the least he could do.
Scholes and Roy Keane were the pitiable absentees when United lifted the
trophy nine years ago, and while Keane will not get the chance to right that
wrong, it is fitting that, in the twilight of his career, Scholes will. As a
man on a mission in the Russian capital, however, he will not be alone.
This was the night when Manchester United the team
emerged from the shadow of Cristiano Ronaldo the one-man show. It has
been glibly claimed in some quarters that the sheer will of Ronaldo’s genius
has dragged this collection of players to the brink of glory this season and
without him they would be nothing. This was the case against that argument.
Ronaldo had a good game last night; good, but not great. Had it been down to
him, United would not necessarily have progressed. He worked hard and
manfully and stretched the Barcelona defence at every opportunity, but would
have fallen short without the collective efforts of his teammates, including
some of the unsung and simply overlooked heroes of the season.
In the absence of Wayne Rooney and Nemanja Vidic, United’s tower of strength
at the back, it was men such as Carlos Tévez, Michael Carrick and Park Ji
Sung who propelled United to the first all-English final in European Cup
history. And the defence, of course, always the defence. The rock on which
United’s season has been built, a statement that should encompass the
much-maligned Wes Brown and his stopgap replacement at right back in recent
matches, Owen Hargreaves.
Yet it is Scholes who will capture the headlines and the imagination.
Scholes, who many thought would be incapable of returning to a team aiming
for such a high level of performance after so long out injured. Scholes,
whom Fabio Capello wants back in the England squad, and no wonder. His
fourteenth-minute goal was not the half of his contribution here and by the
time he was withdrawn for the fresher, younger legs of Darren Fletcher in
the 76th minute, he had given everything, as he has in so much of this
campaign.
At times it is hard to believe a celestial influence on modern football, when
cheats often prosper and good guys finish last, but after all he has been
through in this competition, karma was surely at work in allowing Scholes to
score the goal that took United to their second Champions League final under
Ferguson, just as it is moving that they should be there in the year of the
50th anniversary of the Munich air crash.
And what a beauty Scholes’s goal was, too. Scrappy in the conception but
exquisite in the denouement as Ronaldo was dispossessed on the run only for
Gianluca Zambrotta, the Barcelona right back, to hit the next pass directly
to United’s greatest redhead, belying Capello’s suspicion that it is only
the English who cannot keep the ball. This was Scholes’s perfect range and
the supporters knew it. There was almost a collective whisper of
encouragement to shoot as he honed in on his target and struck, the ball
flying into the top right corner of the net, leaving VÍctor Valdés, the
goalkeeper, no chance.
And that was all it took. United had apparently prepared for this match on
the basis that Barcelona would score and they would have to outgun them on
the night, but in the end the most slender margin of victory was enough. For
all their poetry in motion, and what Ferguson evocatively described as the
passing carousel, Barcelona barely threatened the United goal in two
matches. They played nice football here and Lionel Messi is a delight to
behold, but the end product amounted to little more than pot-shots at Edwin
van der Sar’s goal, much as happened in the Nou Camp last week. The best
team won. The best team in Europe, quite probably. Now they must finish the
job.
It was tense until the end, of course, because Barcelona have too much talent
to allow opponents comfort when guarding a single-goal lead, and there were
shredded nerves when Florian Meyer, the fourth official, signalled three
minutes of stoppage time, but the best chances went to United, not the
visiting team.
Of these, the pick came in a 25-minute spell at the end of the first half and
were often the work of Nani, perhaps the most surprising of Ferguson’s
choices but justified for the threat he posed. It was Nani’s crosses
that caused Valdés most trouble; the goalkeeper spilt one in the seventeenth
minute and palmed another away in great panic soon after, and Nani should
have scored in the 40th minute when he met Park’s cross with a header that
travelled just wide.
Tévez, for all his graft, was quiet in front of goal, except for a
second-half shot kept out by Valdés, and it was left to Park to come closest
with the ball on the ground, a side-foot shot, set up by Ronaldo, that went
close after 21 minutes.
Park is typical of the sort of player who will travel to Moscow with a score
to settle. He should have been a Champions League finalist in 2005, when PSV
Eindhoven were desperately unlucky to fall to AC Milan at the semi-final
stage, having outplayed the Italians over two legs. Carrick, too, will feel
that he has a point to prove as the most underrated English footballer in
the Barclays Premier League, if his recent omission from Capello’s England
squad and his performances in recent weeks are anything to go by.
Then there is Ferguson. He knows that he should have been a European finalist
more times than this. He knows that his team have underachieved in Europe.
Now he can do something about it. For United, and for all sorts of reasons,
this is the time to make things right.
Manchester United (4-4-2): E van der Sar - O Hargreaves, R Ferdinand, W
Brown, P Evra (sub: M Silvestre, 90min) - Nani (sub: R Giggs, 76), P Scholes
(sub: D Fletcher, 76), M Carrick, Park Ji Sung - C Ronaldo, C Tévez.
Substitutes not used: T Kuszczak, Anderson, J O’Shea, D Wellbeck.
Booked: Carrick, Ronaldo.
Barcelona (4-3-3): V Valdés - G Zambrotta, C Puyol, G Milito, É Abidal - Xavi Hernández, Y Touré (sub: E Gudjohnsen, 89), Deco - L Messi, S Eto’o (sub: Bojan Krkic, 72), A Iniesta (sub: T Henry, 61).
Substitutes not used: Pinto, Edmilson, Sylvinho, L Thuram.
Booked: Zambrotta, Deco, Touré.
Referee: H Fandel (Germany).
Talking tactics
— Manchester United had only 38 per cent of the possession last night but their excellent defending prevented Barcelona from having many chances to test Edwin van der Sar, the goalkeeper. The six players with the highest number of successful passes were all in Barcelona shirts yet both teams had seven efforts on goal
— United displayed far greater fluidity last night than they did last week in Spain, notable on the wings, and thus carried more of an attacking threat. The change was typified by Park Ji Sung, who was stuck on the left flank almost throughout the first leg yet drifted around the pitch at Old Trafford
Possession
First leg
Barcelona 61%
Manchester United 39%
Last night
Barcelona 62%
Manchester United 38%
Words: Bill Edgar
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I know for many people Messi is such a great player. His flair is undeniable. However, Id pick Tevez over Messi any time. In clutch time, when it matters most, Tevez will always do what needs to be done. From my view, Messi is so far quite like Ronaldo. Hes classy but does not deliver when he has to
Federico, Buenos Aires, Argentina
On a playing field skewed by fears of conceding an away goal, and twisted even more by scoring early, United were always going to be awkward: yearning for attack while desperately maintaining defence. Barcelona's attack is awesome, but they are awful at the back. That's why they lost.
Chris, Worthing, England
Imagine EPL fodder winning 1-0 after Utd had 60%+ of a game. They would have been accused of "hanging in there" and "nicking it'...Well, that's what Utd did.
They had no choice but to chase, as Barca's technical and tactical skill is superior. It showed. A lot. Utd defended well, as they had to!
D.Dent, Ipswich,
United's 'keeper performed excellently in the goal area,but his distribution of the ball left a great deal to be desired. To repeatedly boot the ball out directly to a member of the opposing team,albeit well into the opponents' half,is surely courting disaster against players of high calibre.
C Greenslade, Selby,
By the definition of the object of the game, then barring cheating, the best team always wins.
Polly Parish, tenby, wales
Tell you what, you all need to give your head a wobble. Perhaps barca did have a larger share of possesion but did they really look like scoring at all in either game? More to the point, did they score in 180 mins of football? Don't talk about deserve or should haves , they didn't and Utd DID
ben Jones, manly,
barca lacked conviction in the final third. messi took players on in positions that were not dangerous.
utd had less possession time because they use the ball quickly and productively, not passing across the midfield when 1-0 down.
utd's away tactics were horrible, but ref missed 2 pens .
jem, london, uk
United were awesome last night and reflected the finest aspects of the EPL i.e. quick, incisive and dynamic play with true grit and determination.
Barcelona epitomises La Liga, fancy work in possesion but lacking the killer instinct and incision of the EPL.
al, Ealing , UK
I've said it before and I'll say it again - once upon a time Paul Scholes was Zinedine Zidane's favourite footballer.
Mat, Brighton,
As usual, equate a bit of slick passing withcontrolling a match. Half of Barcelona's possession was in their own half and they rarely threatened Utd's goal when they went forward. United have gone out of Europe too many times with a gung-ho attitude. Last night they were the better team. Simple as.
Cian Cunningham, London,
Complete lack of tactical understanding displayed by alot of the negative comments here. ManU played deep in both matchs to stop the threat of the counter attack. These 2 games were a great example of how to win in Europe. The most gun-ho team doesn't win in the CL, its the most astute and clever.
Rob, Leamington Spa,
Actually, one "hones" one's skills, and "homes in" on a target.
Small point, but might as well get it right. Right?
Bob, Portland,
I have rread many comments on the Times Blog about how Scholes was not performing this year. All I will say is "class" is permanent and all those that criticised Scholes should be ashamed.
Bring on whoever! This is already a fitting tribute to the Busby babes cruelly struck down at Munich.
imj, Reading, UK
Usual myopic manc comments.
Barcelona played the game it is made to be played, and Utd have no choice but to watch. Yes, you do have to make possesion count, but one team controlled the other here, even more so on their home park.
The best side over two legs wasn't Utd, and that's obvious.
D.Dent, Ipswich,
The best team does not always win, this is a case in point. Good luck to the teams in the final, but football has not been best served.
John Claro, Cleggan, Ireland
Tactically speaking I can see the points United detractors say about Barca's ball retention and passing. They however lacked vital incisiveness they never got in behind, choosing to play in front of the back four. List United goal opportunities in comparison to Barca's and my point is clear.
Jonathan Jones, London, England
Tevez's awesome dogged attack on the players kept Barca kicking up balls to ManU all night long. Every time Barca got the short pass triangle going Carlos either stole it or forced them to kick it away to ManU. Best team won the game and Carlos Tevez is worth his wieght in gold. Vamos Carlito!
Richard, Davis, California
D. Dent & S. Manick, you must be out of your minds! Just because you control more of the possession doesn't make you a better team- in the end 'possession %' is only a statistic. Man Utd are more incisive in attack and that results in goals. Enough said. Oh, not quite. Utd also have a better defense
Brian, Melbourne,
United was well organized and executed a fantastic defensive display! It shows that stalwart team defense trumps the best offenses. United were content to let Barcelona carry the ball. They dropped back, conserved their energy, and waited for the complexity of Barca's play to break down itself.
M. Johnson, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
To the neutral fan, this competition's result is too disappointing
kimi , chongqing, china
If they give the mid-field away like that in the final they will lose. Not a great performance although for once Ronaldo played for the tam instead of himself. To be fair only the paucity of Barcelona's forwards got MU through., Losing Vidic and Rooney is no excuse for another average performance.
Ronny, Bradford,
Stephen + D.Dent - what?? Not sure about your Scholes point, who are you arguining with? I would not say the Catalans are much further ahead than Arsenal in terms of possession and movement and the rest of 'La Liga' were dumped out of the comp weeks ago. All EPL final-what an overrated league!!
James, Sydney,
Utd were second best in both games. No question. Barcelona controlled both games and showed Utd how to play the game. Their possesion and movement are still a league above Utd, showing again the EPL os over rated. The best team over two legs is not advancing and that's a shame for all neutral fans.
D.Dent, Ipswich,
Total nonsense. Scholes was always good shooting from outside the box, he has the technique and took his chance. In the context of the game Barcelona's possession really offered a more definitive chasm between the sides. Ronaldo had the opportunity to show his self proclaimed class but could not.
Stephen Manick, Port of Spain, Trinidad