Matt Hughes
Your last chance to get tickets to Top Gear Live
For a hungry club intent on conquering the world – Buzz Lightyear’s “To infinity and beyond” could be the new Chelsea motto – it seems strange to report that stability is the new buzzword around Stamford Bridge.
As the club announced a record turnover of £190.5 million and slightly reduced losses of £74.8 million yesterday, the most striking aspect of the day was that everything appeared so serene. Chelsea’s hypothetical goal of breaking even by 2009-10 still seems to exist in a galaxy far, far away, although with sponsorship revenues up by 89 per cent because of a new deal with adidas, they are moving in the right direction, albeit slowly.
With transfer spending reduced from £126.7 million to £11.7 million over the past two years, Chelsea’s main problem is that salaries account for a staggering 71 per cent of their turnover, compared with 43.6 per cent at Manchester United – a wage structure only sustainable because of the largesse of Roman Abramovich, the owner. The Russian has spent £578 million on his personal plaything since buying the club five years ago, so it is just as well that, as Bruce Buck, the chairman, claimed, his interest remains as strong as ever.
“We know him pretty well, we talk to him and we see him a lot. His enthusiasm for football and for Chelsea over the last 4¾ years has not waned, it has only increased,” Buck said. “When a fellow puts more than £500 million of his own money into a football club, he doesn’t just walk away from it.
“Every year we tell him how the club is doing on the business side and we set goals with him, but it’s fair to say he’s more interested in the detail of the football side. That’s really why he invested in the club in the first place – because he loves football.”
Abramovich’s love affair with Chelsea appeared to be burning out because of a series of rows with José Mourinho this time last year, although it has been rekindled since Avram Grant replaced the Portuguese as first-team coach in September. Grant is a personal friend of Abramovich and speaks with him regularly. Peter Kenyon, the chief executive, insisted that such harmony vindicated the decision to part with Mourinho.
“There’s still a lot of noise around the club, but the noise is around football,” he said. “It’s less controversial and that’s a fact. That’s translated into letting the management get on with the job in hand. You would have to say there’s more stability under the new manager, yes.
“What we were very confident about was that the quality of squad we had was significant, the infrastructure around the club was significant and there was one variable, which was the new manager. We’d worked over the previous three or four months with Avram and I think the results today are not what 99 per cent in that room were expecting – and I think you’ve got to give full credit to Avram. Several months on, being in our first final [the Carling Cup] on Sunday, still in [contention to win] the Premier League, the Champions League and the FA Cup, I think you’ve all got to recognise that he’s done a good job.”
Grant will be given money to spend on transfers and that £11.7 million figure is likely to increase next year unless there are significant sales, although Kenyon ruled out a move for Ronaldinho, the Barcelona forward – a prospect that Abramovich has entertained in the past.
“I’m pretty sure we won’t be signing Ronaldinho,” he said. “We’re always looking to keep the age profile right. It’s fundamentally got to be somebody who will contribute to the team and have a long-term view.”
Kenyon remains committed to the notion of breaking even, although the target of being internationally recognised as a leading club by 2014 seems more realistic. “I don’t think it’s something we’re postponing,” he said. “It’s ambitious, it’s always been ambitious. It’s no less ambitious than saying that in ten years’ time we want to be recognised as a top international club, it’s no more ambitious than saying we want to win.”
Explore your passion for food with the delights of Thai, Indian & Chinese cooking
In our new series, Tony Hawks takes a dry, wry look at modern life - junk mail, interminable meetings and snooty sales assistants
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers

Find tickets for:
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
2007
£30,000
2006
£14,337
2008
£39,937
Great car insurance deals online
c.£75,000
GlosFirstmeansbusiness
Gloucestershire
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
£
£32,795 - £41,545
Universitry of Southampton
Southampton
Competitive Package
Npower
West Midlands
1 & 2 Bed apartments
From £249,995
Great Investment, River Views
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
low-cost ownership homes in London
Las Vegas SALE!
£POA
With Ramblers Worldwide Holidays!
£POA
List your property with two leading travel websites
£POA
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - search houses for sale and rooms and property to rent in the UK. Milkround Job Search - for graduate careers in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
well the difference between chelsea and other clubs is that their money comes, albeit grudgingly at times, from fans and supporters, whereas chelsea's comes from a sugar daddy - who, shall we say, 'acquired' his from the ex-soviet union
Steve, Canterbury, UK
paul esson. are you still asleep no top club in the history of football have been run like chelsea.give ambromavich his due its his money his toy, he would not run his own business like chelsea! would he they have lost millions in the last 4 years. the last 2 years 140, million alone. no other business since the world began, has been run like that. The product he has will grind out results, but is still not as entertaining as barcelona, arsenal, man utd, or even spurs.
paul, potters bar, uk
Paul, your feelings towards Chelsea were evident from your first word, Chelski? How very 2003, get a grip son.
kevin hennessy, Milton Keynes, England
Get ready for the usual array of Chelsea knockers. You know the line "We're stinking rich and thats OK (United, Arsenal et al)but Chelsea being stinking rich is not fair." Boo-hoo.
Peter, Wellington, NZ
Chelski and their Russian billions are bad for the league, bad for sport and, yes even, bad for society.
There players (with the exception of John Terry) have no loyalty to their or any other club, their effect on the relationship between wages and ability is having a negative impact on the national side, and they are allowed to win trophys whilst other 'profitable' clubs have to struggle to make ends meet.
When is the league going to impose penalties against this manipulation of the league.
Chelsea won a couple of cups before Roman came along but also were bust....and I saw the other day that, unlike Arsenal and Man Utd, they have no debt? what a joke
Paul Esson, Cape Town, South Africa