Gabby Logan
Star musicians and your favourite Times writers at the Albert Hall
Ninety minutes from a Champions League final in Moscow, the perfect location, the icing on the cake for the owner and still we cannot be sure that Avram Grant will be Chelsea first-team coach next season. Would you put a fiver on it?
Chelsea head into next week's second leg in their strongest position yet; it is the first time that they have an away goal from one of these semi-final encounters with Liverpool and it is the first time that they play them at Stamford Bridge in the second leg, but how secure are Grant's employment prospects?
The general consensus was that Tuesday's match was exciting when compared with the previous semi-finals, even if it took an own goal in the dying seconds to change the complexion of the evening for Grant. So it is Grant rather than José Mourinho at the helm of Chelsea when they finally get an away goal at Anfield, yet no one would be surprised to wake up on Thursday next week to headlines of “Grant out - Zola in to lead Chelsea in Moscow final”. Only Zola would stop that headline.
Sure, there is a Chelsea factor here, in that there is pretty much nothing that Roman Abramovich, the club's billionaire owner, could do to shock. He does not need to balance the books or speak publicly and he certainly does not need to please anyone other than himself.
As controversially and suddenly as Mourinho was jettisoned, so Grant can be airlifted back to an apartment in Tel Aviv. When Mourinho was showing signs of frustration at the club's owner, the fans rallied behind him, but Grant has nowhere to run. The supporters were ambivalent about his appointment, the media were no more enthusiastic, yet his win percentage is similar to that of his predecessor. Some people can do no wrong; Grant can do no right.
Why is this? Why has Grant felt the need to employ PR experts outside of the club? Why did he decide to offer strange monosyllabic answers after Chelsea's 1-0 win over Everton last week? Some have suggested that Grant's appearance is getting in the way of Chelsea fans falling in love with him; he is no George Clooney, but neither are Arsène Wenger and Sir Alex Ferguson and their fans love them.
But they did not inherit their jobs from the Special One. If Daniel Craig handed over the reins of James Bond to Pete Postlethwaite, it would be an uphill task in the PR department to convince women to fall in love with him and men to want to be him. Ask Gordon Brown what it is like inheriting a coveted job from someone who, for a period at least, was untouchable.
I am not suggesting that Chelsea fans are any more particular about the way their managers look than the rest of us, but they have a track record when it comes to sartorial elegance. Aside from Mourinho there have been Gianluca Vialli, Ruud Gullit and Glenn Hoddle, all dashing men. Linking Chelsea and fashion is nothing new and any psychology student will tell you that babies are attracted to better-looking people.
In recent times, though, it has not been all Armani models and waxed torsos. Claudio Ranieri resembled a language teacher on an exchange visit, but he had humour, a cracking smile and grace, so there is another route to fans' hearts.
Grant has courted a few journalists and bared his soul, which usually works as a method of eliciting sympathy, but a good gag at the beginning of a Friday morning press conference could carry him even farther. If he could take the mickey out of himself he would have people eating out of the palm of his hand. Deep down I think we want to feel for him, but he will not let us.
A straw poll of random strangers I met this week seemed to suggest that there is no way back for Grant and that even a victory in Moscow would be the end. Looks were not mentioned specifically, but the word “grumpy” was.
Well, sorry, but as much as I admire the man, grumpy has been Ferguson's mood du jour more than once in the past 22 years of ecstasy and agony as manager of Manchester United. Grumpy and moody work off the pitch only if there is beauty and joy on it, at least some of the time.
Perhaps we are barking up the wrong tree. Are we simply heading to a new world order - one manager a season? It is rare in the big Italian and Spanish clubs for someone to keep his job for any length of time: even Fabio Capello failed to stay at Real Madrid longer than 12 months despite winning the league during his second period at the club. The season before that, Real had employed three different coaches in a 12-month period.
Is nostalgia forcing us to hang on to the idea of long-serving managers in the face of a harsher 21st-century reality of easy come, easy go?
Whenever a manager is deemed to be sacked unfairly after a short period of time, we point to United and Arsenal and suggest that longevity is the key; stick with the man through the rough times and the good times will roll. That philosophy takes patience and while today's billionaire football club owners can buy anything they want, time is not for sale.
Follow our three athletes' progress in their preparations for the London Triathlon, and pick up training tips and more
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
We explore leisure activities that are safe and suitable for all of the family
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles

The Fantasy Season starts here. Sign up to win

Find a course, arrange a game and save money



in The Sunday Times, Times and Times Online
£129,500
Bentley Edinburgh
£79,850
Mercedes-Benz of Northampton
£26,995
Unit 1, Woodfield Business Unit, Kidderminster Road, Ombersley, Worcester.
Great car insurance deals online
90k + Bonus + Options
Confidential
London
£23,716 +
Highways Agency
National
£
£43,405 - £48,228 pa
Notting Hill Housing
London
£30,000 base, £100,000 OTE
Riches Consulting
London/South
with annexe accommodation and 5.25 acres
£1,100,000
Beautiful Gardens w/ stunning Thames Views
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Mortgages, bank acc & money transfers to help you buy abroad
Explore mystical Jordan
From £1030 for 7nts 4*
to USA's Most Cosmopolitan City; San Francisco!
£POA
Book Now for Winter 08/09 and Get 10% off!
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Search globrix.com to buy or rent UK property. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Barry, Kansas City is the only one that has pinpointed the reason that Avram Grant will not be accepted by the Chelsea supporters. The treatment of Jose and the unfilled position of the director of football post.
"Looks", "Grumpiness" simply amazing insights???
A.Hyde, Bangkok, Thailand
A manager can only do the best with the players he has and Avram Grant, with a team that is massively inferior in individual ability to that coached by Sir Alex, has taken them as far in every competition. Every team has the odd blip, even utd, chelsea have been consistent! Back your manager!
David, London,
give the man a break. hes working with the same players jose brought to the club , judge him next season !!
paul chelsea
paul lynch, fulham, england
Oh man...when I look at the rate at which managers are losing their posts I get alittle peeved at the greed and lack of faith in todays game. Let the man have a go..!
Avram's gonna win the title for Chelsea, Fergies weak team was a big mistake. Lets hope that'll stop the hammering of managers?
Jono, Ahrlehnsbrucke, Germany
Leave the man alone for God sake and let him get on with
his job!
R.Roe, Brighton, England
Any new manager should be given a grace period to become acclimated to the position. A President/Prime Minister is granted by the press '100 days of grace'. Yes - Grant made some mistakes, but this is to be expected in the first season. Give him time and start judging him by his results - not looks
Josh, Tel-Aviv, Israel
David from Jerusalem and Muhammed from Manchester both suggest being Jewish is Avram's biggest difficulty......
.....But back to the secular football arena which transcends religion and race, Avam's just not proven to be a big enough personality to carry the enormous burden of expectation.
Richard, London, England
Under Jose, we would never have lost to Spurs or Barnsley. Nor would we have dropped the points we have to Villa, Spurs or Wigan and would be celebrating a 3rd title in 4 years...THAT is the difference between JM and AG.
Role on the summer, role of Hiddink.
Sav, London,
There's an objective truth and a subjective one.
Objectively Grant's already done enough to keep his job. His results haven't been average, they've been good. Subjectively, he just ain't as sexy as JM.
So, on balance he has to stay. I can see this clearly because I'm not a Chelsea fan.
Joe, Leeds,
Grant's unlucky, his personality just cant fill the vacuum that Mourinho left. However its not a manager's personality that wins you trophies.... as Gabby says: just look at Ferguson!
Also, Muhammad, what has Grant being Jewish got to do with anything? Keep your views to yourself mate.
Mike, London,
Dan Cater has it spot on.
It's team spirit that has got Chelsea where they are, and had a functional manager or JM stayed they would have been champs again this year.
This team needs a competent manager and a soul again...
D.Dent, Ipswich,
If longevity is the key, as the article cncludes, why look at Wenger? When was the last time he ever won anything?
The lesson of Wenger is that everyone has their sell-by date.
Harry, London,
o beutiful and mastertrful english players of chealsy from Ivory cost, France and Kongo the aristocrats of genuine and guards of the best, lucky funs and poor you, be saved from forigner Avram.
david, jerusalm, israel
Avrams interviews I have read show an inteligent, witty person - maybe it is the press who are more anti-Grant following the fun and free lines they had from Jose? As a chelsea fan, he does not inspire me but I respect his results to date (bar the final and Barnsley!)
Alan LUCAS, Hemel Hempstead, UK
Whilst Grant has done well, I cannot help but feel that a lot of Chelsea's recent success has been down to the players and the ethic created by Mourinho before he arrived rather than Grant himself. He should be given the option of stepping down because team ethic can only carry you so far.
Dan Cater, Richmond, England
OK OK......if by some miracle Chelsea do win the CL & PL ..... then I won't mind if Avram stays on for a while. But only if we win BOTH
Davie P, London,
"Looks were not mentioned specifically, but the word grumpy was. "
Grumpy? Or maybe 'Jewish'?
Muhammad Abra Abas, Manchester, England
Stuart,
How does Grant being put in place make him a fraud?
While he's a mate of Abramovich's, the decision to hire and fire Mourinho was not his to make. Neither was the decision to put Grant in charge. That's all on Abramovich's head.
While Grant is certainly fortunate, fraud is a bit strong.
Pip, New York, via Dundee
If Chelsea does defeat Liverpool and earn a place in Moscow, it will almost certainly be as a result of a burst of individual brilliance, rather than any Grand Plan by the Manager. On many important occasions this year, he has shown himself to be tactically clueless. Even at home, they're no shoe-in
Andrew Metcalfe, New York, United States
Grant is detested by the vast majority of Chelsea fans and for good reason.
He was put in place by the owner to allow him to dispense with Mourinho when he chose.
I am sure people will have noted that no replacement for the Director of Football role has been forthcoming.
The man is a fraud.
stuart, KM, IOM
Chelsea are the posh London club whos almost zero title record before the Russian money era was of no importance as long as they had fashion. With money and Jose they had both titles and fashion.Grant took fashion from Chelsea and will never be forgiven. Who cares if he wins the league or Europe.
Leslie Udwin, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe.
Chris (Chicago) is spot on. Chelsea have performed unevenly this season (esp defeats v Spurs and Barnsley) and may still end up with nothing, but deserve credit for their resilience. This is why they - rather than Arsenal - are still pursuing United, 3 matches from the end of the Premiership season
Roy Pinney, Weston Super Mare,
As a lifelong Chelsea fan I fully agree with Gabbie's article.
Avram Grant is not the face of Chelsea Football club, Kings Road, the posh part of London, or however you might wish to look at it. He has no experience as we have seen time and time again. Wake Up Chelsea!
Karen M, London,
Lots of comment here from Chelsea fans about the team winning games but Grant losing them - not entirely balanced is it? Oh, and yes we would all be astonished if Grant were to be sacked by the bloke who appointed him if we reach the CL Final - something Jose didn't achieve.
Peter Bench, LONDON,
space-filling celebrity twaddle - "a straw poll of random strangers", says it all really
Jimbo, London,
In terms of sartorial elegance and style - when has anybody ever seen a Russian with these qualities. They do love a shell suit though.
We want style on the pitch and off. So the message from the top is all wrong.....and while were at it get a shave Roman you scruffy mutt.
Dan, London, Uk
What complete nonsense. Just shows how celebrity obsessed so-called sports writers are these days. A waste of a good read talking looks of a person. Avram Grant has a family you know, how rude to character assess him in such a way.
It should be his results that matter not the way he looks!
Ginny, Croydon,
It's amateur analysis to broadly stroke Grant's record as equal to Jose's . Look at his critical blunders this season against Tottenham, Barnsley, Wigan. Take a closer look at that home record this season and the number of draws as well as leads lost. Plus, his numerous tactical errors.
Chris Provenzano, Chicago, USA
I love this piece. Thank you. I am a lifelong Chelsea supporter currently living in the US, but there was always a certain flair associated with Chelsea from the time I started supporting them in 1962: Jimmy Greaves had left for AC Milan: Then Docherty changed the kit and we were OFF: History.
Sinclair-Wood, Minneapolis, US
is kenny logan ok?
he doesnt seem to be in this column
adamw, sagae, japan
Please. Grant's unpopularity has nothing to do with his lack of dashing looks or charisma. Fans would embrace the Elephant Man if he showed tactical awareness and decisiveness under pressure. Grant has hitherto made only obvious or erroneous substitutions. Sheer player talent is winning them games
paul dowling, adelaide, australia
once grant was hired over mourhino's protest and then became manager after just two months, the supporters are naturally going to think that grant stabbed jose in the back. regardless of what happens in moscow, they will not forget how grant got the job.
barry, kansas city,
Ah, but the entire conversation here is dictated by Jose's attractiveness.
Focus on the real story. Jose won games that were in the balance with great control from the bench and great subtitutions, motivation, and he made supporters believe in Chelsea.
Good looks is not the real story.
Jason, London, UK
The difference is that while Chelsea players under Jose could lose an odd game here or there that Mourinho would have won, it is the opposite under Grant. Chelsea players can win the Champions League, but Grant can lose it for us.
J. Davis, Coventry,