Oliver Kay
Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000
Liverpool were last night preparing to enter an uncertain period of coalition ownership after Dubai International Capital (DIC) agreed a deal to buy 49 per cent of the club, with Tom Hicks securing the additional 1 per cent that he needs to earn majority control.
George Gillett Jr, who bought Liverpool with Hicks just 13 months ago, has agreed to sell his 50 per cent share in the club, but, rather than sell the entire stake to DIC, he will sell 1 per cent of the company to Hicks. The deal allows Hicks to assume majority control, although DIC, the private-equity investment arm of the Dubai Government, remains confident that it will ultimately buy him out.
The compromise agreement, which will be finalised at a meeting in Dubai next week, was accepted by DIC last night after talks between Amanda Staveley, its representative in London, and lawyers for both Hicks and Gillett. In a statement last night Staveley said: “Subject to renegotiation of a partnership agreement and subject to the stringent minority shareholder protection rights we would be prepared to accept a 49 per cent shareholding in Liverpool FC. This arrangement provides the best possible solution to the situation and would be in the best interests of the club and their loyal fans.”
Liverpool’s supporters are likely to have mixed feelings about the partnership, which some Anfield officials had described as a “nightmare scenario”. In theory it means that Hicks will call the shots in the boardroom, but DIC is determined to exert its influence, having indicated that it will conduct a review of all aspects of the club. Staveley, a senior partner of the PCP private equity firm, and Sameer al-Ansari, the chief executive, are expected to be among those joining the board, with Gillett and his son, Foster, likely to depart.
Liverpool attempt to focus on on-field matters this afternoon against Newcastle United in the Barclays Premier League and, with Michael Owen returning to Anfield as captain of the visiting side, it is hard to say which he will find most unsettling: the admission from Rafael Benítez yesterday that he was on a list of potential signings last summer or the uncomfortable knowledge that the Liverpool manager was right to go with his instincts and opt for Fernando Torres instead.
“We know that Michael is a brilliant finisher, but we were looking for a player with the conditions of Torres, a player with pace and power,” Benítez said. “We had a list of ten strikers and he [Owen] was one of the names we had. Afterwards we decided that Torres was the No 1 priority. It is obvious we are happy with Torres.”
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip

Find tickets for:
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
New Year in the USA!
.
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Declan thinks that Hicks is "committed to taking Liverpool forward". He says that Hicks has made ammends with Rafa. I think I am starting to lose the will to live when I read comments like these.
jack , london, uk
It is only a matter of time before Hicks goes too. He does not have the cash to invest in building the team and so all future buys etc will have to be paid for by DIC. He will be forced to sell eventually. The sooner the better.
Richard, Jersey,
DIC will surely be far the better option to Gillet and Hicks who have not invested in developing the players. DIC has far greater resources, no debt to service and a long term interest in the club. The DIC managers are very astute business people.
David Humphries, London, London
At last a more balanced board. I think Hicks is here for the long-term but can the fans afford the increasing costs of all this exchange of owners?
steve tea, manchester, cheshire
Just a point of note: Hicks did not finance any signings, money from selling players like Cisse, Bellemy etc. We have yet to see Hicks dig deep, the man has short arms and deep pockects.
Graham, Worcester, UK
I think this situation is better than a complete DIC buy-out as it may be a case of 'better the devil you know.' Who really knows what DIC will do?
At least Hicks has made amends with Benitez and has come up with the money for top players. Although adding the debt on a loan to Liverpools books is a disgrace but would DIC do it any other way?
Hicks seems committed to Liverpool and taking us forward and hopefully lessons have been learned, such as, not treating a loved and respected manager like Rafa in such an appalling way.
Has Rafa learrned lessons - how not to throw a tantrum and create a divide between the himself and the bosses? How not to rotate the team so much?
Time will tell but I think DIC getting control straight away is dangerous. At least this way we can learn what they want to do.
Declan Reynolds, melbourne, Australia